UK Devout born-again Christian mother sues her four-year-old son's school in first case of its kind in UK for 'making him take part in LGBT parade' - Headteacher of Heavers Farm Primary told Izzy Montague her son must attend

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-year-old-sons-school-saying-LGBT-parade.html
Archive: https://archive.is/U97lC#selection-903.0-903.74


Devout born-again Christian mother sues her four-year-old son's school in first case of its kind in UK for 'making him take part in LGBT parade'​

By Matt Powell For Mailonline

Published: 19:06 GMT, 1 February 2023 | Updated: 21:12 GMT, 1 February 2023

A devout Christian who claims her four-year-old son was compelled to take part in an LGBT pride parade is suing the school - in the first case of its kind in the UK.

Izzy Montagu, 38, said she was told by the headteacher of Heavers Farm Primary School in South Norwood, southeast London, that her son could not opt out of the event in June 2018.

The school sent a letter to parents on 19 June inviting them to partake in a Pride march and 'celebrate the differences that make them and their family special.'
A week later Mrs Montague contacted the school 'and asked for her son to be excused attendance on 29 June as they were concerned of him being involved of a public display of adherence to views which she did not accept.'

Mrs Montague's request was refused by the headteacher Ms Susan Papas so the parent replied with a lengthy email on 13 July, Central London County Court heard.

1675286880104.png

Central London County Court heard that Heavers Farm Primary School headteacher Ms Susan Papas told Mrs Montague that her son had to attend the lesson
At the start of the eight-day case Judge Christopher Lethem described Mrs Montague and her husband as 'devout born-again Christians, and they bear a belief that sexual relations should be abstained from or take place within a life-long marriage between a man and a woman and any activity outside those confines is sinful.

'They also say pride is considered to be the most serious of the deadly sins.'

Mrs Montague attended a meeting with Ms Papas on 19 September in which the headteacher's daughter wore a t-shirt with the slogan: 'Why be racist, sexist, homophobic, or transphobic when you could just be quiet?', the court heard.

Giving evidence Mrs Montague told the court, prior to the incident, she had expressed concerns to her son's teacher about the types of books they were reading in class.

Ian Clarke, representing the school, asked: 'What books where they?'

Mrs Montague said: 'There was one reference to a same sex family book.'

'I believe it's called The Family Book,' said Mr Clarke.

'I can't remember the exact name, just that was included in the lessons,' she answered.

'So you get this letter on 19 June and you see that it is about celebrating 'the things that make our family special.'

Mrs Montague replied: 'It felt like it was lecturing me about something to do with British values and somehow we weren't adhering to British values.'

1675286895455.png

Izzy Montague previously appeared on ITV and argued that teaching LGBT is wrong and that it should be her choice and that she should be the one to teach her children about LGBT

'You also say in your witness statement that the letter made a disparaging comment about the attitudes of parents... where does it say that?' asked Mr Clarke.

Mrs Montague replied: 'I just feel this letter was really trying to hammer into parents and drive into them something that's not happened before.'

Mr Clarke said: 'You say the letter is forcing you into the indoctrination of an LGBT lifestyle, where does it say that?'

Mrs Montague told the court: 'I don't know I just felt a topic had come up.

'I clearly was not in the know about it, but this was the way, in my opinion, to try to indoctrinate it onto us by passing it off that it was part of law or part of British values, or it was part of the national curriculum, it was trying to sell something no one wanted to buy.'

Reading from a blog published by the school on 18 June 2018. Mr Clarke said: 'This June, the celebration of pride is about learning about the diversity of our whole school community and tackling bullying.'

He asked the parent: 'As I understand you don't have a problem of celebrating the diversity of the whole school community and tackling bullying?'

Ms Montague replied: 'Me personally, it's not something I would celebrate...... It's not something I would choose to celebrate.

'I think it's good the wider community comes together, and we learn and live together.

'I don't know if you mean celebrate as have a party, it's not something I would attend.'

Mr Clarke asked: 'Isn't the school simply using the month of June to celebrate wider issues of diversity and tolerance?'

Ms Montague replied: 'I believe it's using pride month and other issues around that time to sell pride month.

'I think you can easily celebrate diversity without even having anything do with pride month.'

'So, if they did it on 29 May would we all be sat here?' asked Mr Clarke

'If they did any form of celebration of any sexual lifestyles we will still be sat here,' said Ms Montague

Mr Clarke asked: 'So, the fact it is pride month is neither here nor there?'

'A month that celebrates sexual lifestyles Is a problem in any month,' said Ms Montague

Mrs Montague, supported by the Christian Legal Centre, is suing the school on the grounds of direct and indirect discrimination, victimisation and breach of statutory duty under the Education Act 1996 and the Human Rights Act 1998.

It is the first time that a UK court will scrutinise the legality of imposing LGBT ideology on primary schools.

The hearing continues.
 
For non-bong kiwis expect this to happen more. A side effect of the mass importing of africans is that a large number are very conservative christians. Not the cuckservative kind either real hard line burn the gays kind. Of course this puts those pushing this shit in a conundrum.
 
For non-bong kiwis expect this to happen more. A side effect of the mass importing of africans is that a large number are very conservative christians. Not the cuckservative kind either real hard line burn the gays kind. Of course this puts those pushing this shit in a conundrum.
I thought they did what the Catholics did and fused it with their local religions? Are there many Africans who are purely Christian?
 
I thought they did what the Catholics did and fused it with their local religions?
The Catholics (and any Christian institution, for that matter) didn't do that, not least of all because that's impossible to do with Christianity. At most, they may have done what Paul kind of did at the Areopagus, using some chief god as a stepping stone to elucidate the locals about how they've been mistaken about the nature of God.

Are there many Africans who are purely Christian?
Plenty. There's also Africans all over that try to simultaneously maintain their indigenous spiritual customs because they think it affords them more "power". There's still no space for them in Catholic (or any other Christian) doctrine.
 
Last edited:
The Catholics (and any Christian institution, for that matter) didn't do that, not least of all because that's impossible to do with Christianity.
Yes it is, Saints are just stand-ins for the Greek god pantheon, and they elevated Mary to "Queen of Heaven" status, which was an epithet first given to a Babylonian fertility goddess.
 
Yes it is, Saints are just stand-ins for the Greek god pantheon,
There are easily hundreds or thousands more venerated saints than Greco-Roman gods-- many known through the Scriptures, many with hagiographies and preserved writings of their own, and even many whose names are lost to time. That alone is inconsistent with your claim, along with any process of canonization. Even more, Christians were being thrown in prison or worse for not offering incense to the gods, and they didn't offer incense to the gods because they regarded that offering as worship (because the core of worship is tangible sacrifice). Saints have never been offered to, and they're constantly acknowledged in both writing and liturgy as creatures rather than any kind of divinity. It's not at all unheard of for them to be talked about as the part of the "Church triumphant" we definitely know of (as opposed to the "Church militant" comprised of the physically living).

and they elevated Mary to "Queen of Heaven" status, which was an epithet first given to a Babylonian fertility goddess.
Mary wasn't "elevated" to "queen of Heaven" status. If Jesus is the "king of Heaven" and He's of the Davidic lineage, then it's appropriate to call His mother "queen mother (of heaven)"-- in the same exact way that Solomon's mother was regarded as such (the specific Hebrew term for "queen mother" is "gebirah"). It's an epithet meant to encapsulate at least two truths about Christ, through Mary.

You can't simultaneously claim that Christians replaced the Greco-Roman pantheon with thousands of saints more than there were idols in the Greco-Roman pantheon, and then say that they co-opted a very specific thing from a dead religion they wouldn't have ever been in contact with even if it wasn't dead by that point-- it's schizophrenic and aggressively retarded.
 
Last edited:
For non-bong kiwis expect this to happen more. A side effect of the mass importing of africans is that a large number are very conservative christians. Not the cuckservative kind either real hard line burn the gays kind. Of course this puts those pushing this shit in a conundrum.
I expect this to happen largely with Muslims and they'll almost certainly bend the knee to them. Given Muslims are the type to actually scare the people they're protesting.
So they don't believe in other things like Voodoo or anything?
The vast majority of Africans immigrating to Europe are either Christian or Muslim. Both religions dominate in the major population centers in the country. 9/10 if you know any native Africans that live in the West today they're one of the two.

They also tend to take an extremely literal interpretation of scripture like they practice exorcisms and shit.
 
I expect this to happen largely with Muslims and they'll almost certainly bend the knee to them. Given Muslims are the type to actually scare the people they're protesting.

The vast majority of Africans immigrating to Europe are either Christian or Muslim. Both religions dominate in the major population centers in the country. 9/10 if you know any native Africans that live in the West today they're one of the two.

They also tend to take an extremely literal interpretation of scripture like they practice exorcisms and shit.
Do these Christian and Muslim Africans ever fight?
 
Mr Clarke asked: 'Isn't the school simply using the month of June to celebrate wider issues of diversity and tolerance?'

Ms Montague replied: 'I believe it's using pride month and other issues around that time to sell pride month.

'I think you can easily celebrate diversity without even having anything do with pride month.'

'So, if they did it on 29 May would we all be sat here?' asked Mr Clarke

'If they did any form of celebration of any sexual lifestyles we will still be sat here,' said Ms Montague

Mr Clarke asked: 'So, the fact it is pride month is neither here nor there?'

'A month that celebrates sexual lifestyles Is a problem in any month,' said Ms Montague
Had my doubts about how well spoken she'd be, but she finished strong in spite of the Mr Clarke's attempts to twist her words. I mean you can see how he was trying so hard to redefine pride as instead being about "celebrating diversity and tolerance" but she didn't take the bait. Maybe having clearly defined values (pride is a sin) helps with that.
 
Back