US Minnesota governor signs broad abortion rights bill into law - Third trimester abortions a-ok. Can I sacrifice babies to Baal now?

1675250425857.png
ST. PAUL, Minn. -- Gov. Tim Walz enshrined the right to abortion and other reproductive health care into Minnesota statutes Tuesday, signing a bill meant to ensure that the state's existing protections remain in place no matter who sits on future courts.

Democratic leaders took advantage of their new control of both houses of the Legislature to rush the bill through in the first month of the 2023 legislative session. They credit the backlash against the U.S. Supreme Court decision last summer to reverse Roe v. Wade for their takeover of the state Senate and for keeping their House majority in a year when Republicans expected to make gains.

“After last year's landmark election across this country, we're the first state to take legislative action to put these protections in place,” Walz said at a signing ceremony flanked by over 100 lawmakers, providers and other advocates who worked to pass the bill.

Abortion rights were already protected under a 1995 Minnesota Supreme Court decision known as Doe v. Gomez, which held that the state Constitution protects abortion rights. And a district court judge last summer declared unconstitutional several restrictions that previous Legislatures had put in place, including a 24-hour waiting period and a parental notification requirement for minors.

Opponents decried the bill as “extreme,” saying that it and other fast-tracked legislation will leave Minnesota with essentially no restrictions on abortion at any stage of pregnancy.

The leaders of the Senate and House GOP minorities, Sen. Mark Johnson, of East Grand Forks, and Rep. Lisa Demuth, of Cold Spring, urged Walz in a letter Monday to veto the bill, saying the Democratic majorities rejected dozens of amendments that Republican lawmakers proposed as guardrails, including prohibitions on third-trimester abortions except to save the patient's life.

But the White House welcomed Walz's signature on the bill, noting that Minnesota is the first state Legislature to codify protections into law this year. Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre noted that voters also turned out for ballot initiatives to defend access to abortion in California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, and Vermont.

“While Congressional Republicans continue their support for extreme policies including a national abortion ban, the President and Vice President are calling on Congress to restore the protections of Roe in federal law," Jean-Pierre said in a statement. "Until then, the Biden-Harris Administration will continue its work to protect access to abortion and support state leaders in defending women’s reproductive rights.”

While the new law will have little immediate further impact on access to abortion in Minnesota, the governor, legislative leaders and sponsors of the bill said it provides a critical new layer of protection in case the composition of the state courts someday changes, as it did on the U.S. Supreme Court before it struck down Roe v. Wade.

“To Minnesotans, know that your access to reproductive health, and your right to make your own health care decisions, are preserved and protected,” Walz said. “And because of this law, that won't change with the political winds and the makeup of the Supreme Court.”

The House passed the bill 69-65 less than two weeks ago, and party discipline held firm during a 15-hour debate in the Senate that ended in a 34-33 vote early Saturday.

“Fundamentally this legislation is about who decides,” said House Speaker Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park. “Who should be legally entitled to make reproductive health care decisions for an individual. ... It can't be decided by politicians. It can't be decided by judges.”

Abortion is currently considered illegal at all stages of pregnancy, with various exceptions, in 13 states, including neighboring Wisconsin and South Dakota. Bans in several states, including neighboring North Dakota, remain on hold for the moment pending court challenges. Because of restrictions elsewhere, Minnesota has seen a surge of pregnant patients coming to the state for abortions.

Minnesota's new law is named the “PRO Act,” short for “Protect Reproductive Actions.” It establishes that “every individual has a fundamental right to make autonomous decisions about the individual’s own reproductive health” including abortion and contraception.

There are other bills to protect abortion rights in the Legislature's pipeline as well, including one to delete the statutory restrictions that the district court declared unconstitutional last summer. It's meant to safeguard against those limits being reinstated if that ruling is overturned on appeal. Hortman said she expected House floor votes to approve them as early as next week.

(+)
 
I'm not talking about third trimester but abortion and pregnancy in general.

Stop with the bullshit of willing to donate a kidney to a match when there are entire charities and databases out there matching donors to those who need kidney transplants.

And if you claim that being pregnant equals to being on your period then I already know you're not a woman but a deluded troon.
Nobody has to donate kidneys to keep baby killing illegal and punishable. Maybe get comfy with the idea of starting a family instead of killing people to avoid responsibility.
 
Nobody has to donate kidneys to keep baby killing illegal and punishable. Maybe get comfy with the idea of starting a family instead of killing people to avoid responsibility.

Hey, I already had an abortion and it was easier and quicker than visit to the dentist. I'm actually planning to start a family sometime soon but should something go wrong or unexpected I won't have a problem with terminating again. Maybe get comfy with the idea of women having a choice. 🤷‍♀️
 
Hey, I already had an abortion and it was easier and quicker than visit to the dentist. I'm actually planning to start a family sometime soon but should something go wrong or unexpected I won't have a problem with terminating again. Maybe get comfy with the idea of women having a choice. 🤷‍♀️
Well, this explains why you are so bent out of shape about people being appalled by abortion at a late stage. You subconsciously recognize what you did is shameful and fear the judgement extending to however many weeks along you were. You can't truly remove the guilt, but you can push it away and if the world keeps giving you asspats to tell you what you did was justified and beautiful, don't worry about it, Cookie, then it makes it easier to tell yourself you're a good person. You doth protest too much.

People weren't generally speaking against abortion here, but you had to take it personally because you are so insecure. For it to be such a physically easy procedure (you are completely emotionally unhinged here, so you reveal it had more harms that you admit), you were likely on the early end of it. You can't even acknowledge how the experience would be different near birth. You're extraordinarily poorly informed to imply your first trimester abortion is exactly the same on every level as one at 36 weeks, or at least, you don't care because again, you made this about yourself and justifying your choices to the world like an insecure wretch.

Also, you are completely unable to cope with someone else of your same biological sex disagreeing with you. I guess the sting of even a woman not agreeing with you is even more bitter. So you kept calling everyone a male, even those with a uterus, just because they don't agree with you. I guess this does prove you're female, because you are so whiny and unable to cope with social stimga.

There is another uterus owner on here who is judging you as a bad person, and the stain will never be something you can actually wash away, so keep squirming. I've never needed an abortion because I'm not a cum dumpster, for starters. When I was a teenager I would have been so self-centered to expect others to pay for my mistakes, but I left behind that attitude. If I got unexpectedly pregnant, I couldn't expect the child to bear the cost of my error. Honestly at this stage, not even if from rape, though it's not something I'm particularly concerned about. Taking care of matters before the fertilized egg implants is the least terrible option if you must, but waiting up until it's a term baby that doesn't need to be in your body to live is unforgivably ghoulish and people should rightly judge you for infanticide at that point. There's no case that can be made for the mother's health at that point that wouldn't just be solved by attempted live delivery.

Even if they are unable to truly face the world, it doesn't take too long for a fertilized egg to develop into a functional separate being. It's obvious from marsupials who force their fetuses to march up to their nipples and incubate outside of the female. Any mammalian fetus of a similar development would react to stimulation the same way, though would have no where else to go, but independent reaction to stimuli is an inconvenient acknowledgement of life and existing as an individual.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I already had an abortion and it was easier and quicker than visit to the dentist. I'm actually planning to start a family sometime soon but should something go wrong or unexpected I won't have a problem with terminating again. Maybe get comfy with the idea of women having a choice. 🤷‍♀️
Everybody has lots of choices. You chose to get nutted in and chose to kill the baby. I choose to see you as inhuman slime. Funny how that works.
 
Hey, I already had an abortion and it was easier and quicker than visit to the dentist. I'm actually planning to start a family sometime soon but should something go wrong or unexpected I won't have a problem with terminating again. Maybe get comfy with the idea of women having a choice. 🤷‍♀️
Keeping your legs closed is indeed a choice.
 
Hey, I already had an abortion and it was easier and quicker than visit to the dentist. I'm actually planning to start a family sometime soon but should something go wrong or unexpected I won't have a problem with terminating again. Maybe get comfy with the idea of women having a choice. 🤷‍♀️
Please keep getting those abortions.
We really need a break from welfare leech,
genetically defective, single mothers pushing more future criminals and degenerates into the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu
Giving women this much power while teaching them no amount of responsibility...that can only end so well.

Why conquer and genocide a people when you can just convince them to do it for you? Its slower, sure but by the time they realise what is going on, its far too late.

Just give people what they want, let them drown in it.

Just know, ladies, when you are boiling on the pits of Hell for this, you will still refuse to accept any responsibility Im very sure.
Calm your tits down. Third trimester abortions are extremely rare and when they do happen it's because mother's health or life is in danger . Even in countries that have no restrictions on abortion there is normally only a handful of doctors that can perform them, because at this stage its a complex procedure, and I guarantee you women who want to terminate their pregnancy do it as soon as they find out they are pregnant, they don't wait until third trimester to put themselves through a literal nightmare.

Man, that is true. Idk why people here are freaking out so much.

Anyway, speaking on the subject, here is bridge that I want to sell you

1675439852498.png
 
Please keep getting those abortions.
We really need a break from welfare leech,
genetically defective, single mothers pushing more future criminals and degenerates into the world.
I think we should just give them a lump sum to spay themselves before they can think better of it. They get to buy themselves a nice handbag and their ability to further human suffering is greatly diminished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No. 7 cat
Only that I'm not on welfare and I'm married. Retarded of you to even assume that I'm in the US
Well given that you said you would abort despite those things, I suppose they aren't relevant. What is that how do you square a circle in that one child was not worthy of life but somehow this other one is? I killed your brother or sister because it was inconvenient, but I'd never do that to you...
 
This is why I am grateful to live in Uganda. Baby killings are still looked down upon here in real Africa. Unlike Americans who celebrate baby killing as a woman right.
View attachment 4394220
View attachment 4394228
I just want to say, every Ugandan person I have ever met has been awesome. And you continue the tradition.

Whenever the latest debacle with African American politics or behaviour hits the news, based dudes from actual Africa I've encountered are the counter-balance. Not joking.
 
I haven't seen a pro-choicer get beaten down this hard since Android Raptor. Bravo, A&N.
It's more that this one is so rabidly 'kill anything that inconveniences me' that's so disgusting. There are states that would no shit easily push for 27th trimester abortions.
 
Calm your tits down. Third trimester abortions are extremely rare and when they do happen it's because mother's health or life is in danger . Even in countries that have no restrictions on abortion there is normally only a handful of doctors that can perform them, because at this stage its a complex procedure, and I guarantee you women who want to terminate their pregnancy do it as soon as they find out they are pregnant, they don't wait until third trimester to put themselves through a literal nightmare.
Keep your legs closed alright Hon?
 
Back