Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still one of my favourite actors.
"We don't want to risk pissing off the Chinese" is not something an American should EVER say, especially not our fucking government, when China may be openly violating our national sovereignty.Am I a little paranoid here if I think this is less about spying and more about testing if they can penetrate U.S airspace without reprisal?
Well if you want a hypothesis for why it would be a balloon of all things I have an idea. Communist China is very known for its "West bad" rhetoric and may of launched it to accomplish one of two things in case it is either allowed to be shot down or stay up. If the balloon is the shot down Xi Jinping can go on his shtick of the USA is bad and imperialist or whatever and start some new propaganda campaign. If the balloon isn't shot down it makes the USA look weak and could be a sign the country current's leadership will tolerate probing by more surveillance Chinese aircraft.I never said anything about not shooting it down. That's not an issue for me. I just find it to be the most obnoxious way for them to spy on us. Consider all the other ways they could do that without alerting us. They could have just as easily used American made drones (not the military ones mind you) or even a private aircraft to surveil us, but instead they chose to use something that they can't really control. Why?
If the USA blows up a Chinese spy device flying over its territory, then doesn't China equally have the right to do so with the many USA spy devices that fly over its? Presuming this is a spy device, then the only difference between this and numerous US satellites is altitude."The Chinese have spy satellites so who cares?" is a pretty bad argument in my mind. It's like saying that because the Chinese government has really good hacking capabilities that we shouldn't care that the CCP implants loyalists into Western industries and universities. If it is a Chinese spy balloon and it has no value to the Chinese, then it wouldn't be floating over the United States right now. The DoD has been super cucked over the last few years and the cracks are really starting to show. The only thing that would make it more predictable is that we can't shoot it down because we gave all of those type of missiles to Ukraine.
If that balloon had been Russian, we'd be at DEFCON 2 by now."We don't want to risk pissing off the Chinese" is not something an American should EVER say, especially not our fucking government, when China may be openly violating our national sovereignty.
Realistically if China reacted in a way like that, that would practically guarantee the CCP faces a soft power crackdown in the United States and the destruction of all of their own surveillance devices. Not to say they couldn't possibly do that, it would just be a short-sighted goal, jeopardize the operation of existing intelligence networks and solidify that feeling of a Second Cold War between China and the USA which would have all sorts of ramifications.If the USA blows up a Chinese spy device flying over its territory, then doesn't China equally have the right to do so with the many USA spy devices that fly over its? Presuming this is a spy device, then the only difference between this and numerous US satellites is altitude.
but chink cock tastes so good"We don't want to risk pissing off the Chinese" is not something an American should EVER say, especially not our fucking government, when China may be openly violating our national sovereignty.
I agree with all of the above. I personally would shoot it down - it's unmanned, no loss of life - unless the Chinese admitted ownership and provided me some pretty solid assurances of what it was that I could trust (good luck with that). I would be polite about it though and say: "Sorry, had to. Hope you understand."Realistically if China reacted in a way like that, that would practically guarantee the CCP faces a soft power crackdown in the United States and the destruction of all of their own surveillance devices. Not to say they couldn't possibly do that, it would just be a short-sighted goal, jeopardize the operation of existing intelligence networks and solidify that feeling of a Second Cold War between China and the USA which would have all sorts of ramifications.
Keep in mind, these are the same people who constantly bring up the slavery days of the US and the Holocaust but are silent about China enslaving and genociding the Uyghurs."The Chinese have spy satellites so who cares?" is a pretty bad argument in my mind. It's like saying that because the Chinese government has really good hacking capabilities that we shouldn't care that the CCP implants loyalists into Western industries and universities. If it is a Chinese spy balloon and it has no value to the Chinese, then it wouldn't be floating over the United States right now. The DoD has been super cucked over the last few years and the cracks are really starting to show. The only thing that would make it more predictable is that we can't shoot it down because we gave all of those type of missiles to Ukraine.
So we're just trading spy intel with China now? We are going to have to rename it to the 5 and a half eyes.If the USA blows up a Chinese spy device flying over its territory, then doesn't China equally have the right to do so with the many USA spy devices that fly over its? Presuming this is a spy device, then the only difference between this and numerous US satellites is altitude.
EDIT: On re-reading, the above might sound like I'm arguing that the USA mustn't shoot it down for fear of reprisals. If I were in charge I'd shoot it down. No balloons without my consent.
That's the fun part, they've already accused him of saying or doing everything their retarded minds could think of and none of it sticks. They don't call him Teflon Don for nothing.Anyone want to take any bets that if Trump wins, we're going to see the media "leak" all kinds of audio clips from Trump that were actually manufactured?
On another note, call me dumb and naive, but this "weather balloon" thing doesn't scare me at all. I don't even understand the point of it. It's pretty much the most inefficient way for the Chinese to spy on us considering how many spies and corrupted officials they already have in this country. Then again, maybe the point of it isn't to actually spy on us. It's just there as an eff you to Biden.
That would take one hell of a Cessna. Definitely not stock.Some mad lad with a Cessna needs to do an aerial drive by on that balloon.
Sure, but why would we fly spy planes or even drones perhaps over China though when our spy satellites should be able to do the job?If the USA blows up a Chinese spy device flying over its territory, then doesn't China equally have the right to do so with the many USA spy devices that fly over its? Presuming this is a spy device, then the only difference between this and numerous US satellites is altitude.
EDIT: On re-reading, the above might sound like I'm arguing that the USA mustn't shoot it down for fear of reprisals. If I were in charge I'd shoot it down. No balloons without my consent.
If the Chinese wanted something to spy on us that could hover for awhile and be able to resist the vagaries of the wind, they would have used a civilian American made drone. It's patently stupid for them to rely on a balloon to spy on us.I will point out that a balloons surveillance advantages are in loiter time - One of the hard parts of satellite observation is they're only over the target for a few seconds every few hours, so your doing a lot of guessing and stitching together to track activity. A balloon can go eyes on with a target for however long the winds carry it over, which will be significantly longer than a satellite by any conventional measure. This makes dealing with shadows, lighting conditions, natural movement and such far easier.
This is kind of funny to me.Sure, but why would we fly spy planes or even drones perhaps over China though when our spy satellites should be able to do the job?
If any kind of confrontation were to occur in the skies over reconnaissance aircraft, I would wager it would be over the water.