reddit General

Sadly, we don't have access to the source code in their brain to remove the virus.
Eh, it probably wouldn't help anyway. Their brains are set to read-only once they leave the factory.

Why are you Christ fags still whining about fedora atheists? Its been like seven pages of this shit. I just want to laugh at redditors not have a theological debate. Look I found dumb tranny shit so we can change the subject.
Shaddup 'ya crazy Protestant. :story:
 
Redditards have these insane childishly ideas about stuff. I believe the whole "hunter-gather society is better than capitalism" stems from the snippets of documentary they saw when they were pre-teens.
It has nothing to do with documentaries, it's been a longstanding part of Leftist philosophy. Marx believed that man initially lived in tribal communism in which all were equal and there was no oppression, which ended with the adoption of agriculture and slavery. Going slightly further back, Rosseau believed that man in his natural state was perfect, and that all the evils of the world were due to society.
 
>redditoids unironically believe stone age tribal societies were "egalitarian"
They were egalitarian in the sense nobody cared who your daddy was so long as you brought home the meat. If you were a successful hunter you were a hero to the tribe. And if you weren't, they'd just plain kill you. Guess which category redditors would fall into?
 
This is Rebecca from circa 2013:

View attachment 4407576
My god (heh) ... this is why men shouldn't be anything but curt and distantly polite to ugly women. This creature has no business acting offended that any man might be (even unintentionally) expressing interest in her or extending her a basic courtesy.
 
Can someone explain to me why Reddit is upset at the movie Blonde? One thing I got from them was that the movie portrayed a abortion scene in a negative light. What are the other reasons. I find it hilarious and now I what the movie to win the Oscar just to piss them off.
But I would like some more details since I haven't seen the movie
 
Can someone explain to me why Reddit is upset at the movie Blonde? One thing I got from them was that the movie portrayed a abortion scene in a negative light. What are the other reasons. I find it hilarious and now I what the movie to win the Oscar just to piss them off.
But I would like some more details since I haven't seen the movie
From what I've seen it's solely because it portrays bad things happening to Marilyn Monroe. In their minds portrayal equals endorsement, and buy showing the fucked up things that happened to her, she's being exploited. There was a user on Twitter who went kind of viral for saying that Joyce Carol Oates, who wrote the novel Blonde was based on, was not attractive to write about Marilyn Monroe and was just another case of a "literary non-hottie" exploiting beautiful women for money.
 
From what I've seen it's solely because it portrays bad things happening to Marilyn Monroe. In their minds portrayal equals endorsement, and buy showing the fucked up things that happened to her, she's being exploited. There was a user on Twitter who went kind of viral for saying that Joyce Carol Oates, who wrote the novel Blonde was based on, was not attractive to write about Marilyn Monroe and was just another case of a "literary non-hottie" exploiting beautiful women for money.
That's pretty hypocritical!! Lefties do that all the time and Reddit doesn't seem to care. As in Non- attractive woman writing stories about hot women.

I do find it funny that they complain about abuse of women and than complain about it when they actually see it portray on screen in a negative light. And they wonder why people call them snowflakes!!
 
Reddit has a meltdown over Trump speaking against transgenders.

We're back to the comparing Trump to Hitler bullshit again lol.

Comments reading "I've met transgenders and they were all super cool and chill" okay, well you're either lying or you're a tranny as well. I've met plenty of trannies and all of them were sex addicted freaks I wouldn't want anywhere near a school zone, or even worse.

Worst one I ever met was on some Steam game when I was 16 (like 7 years ago) - we just chatted casually. At one point they told me they were a sex camsteamer and they sent me a link to their stream trying to get me to watch their sex acts. They knew I was underage and they were like 27. I told them to kill themselves and blocked them. Don't trust a troon, not even once.

Discuss.
 
D67EFA95-F50B-4F99-B909-53A0F80A0B77.jpeg5E35D364-2448-4BF7-BCA9-7BA55E103F33.jpeg

And then suddenly, out of nowhere, Hitler was voted into power
 
Worse still is that redditards have some ideas that in those times people were just, there was no violence and everyone was happy.
In addition, the most successful (aka the ones that survived) were also all patriarchies. This is a very inconvenient truth for Resdditards who wish they would live in the oh-so-peaceful hunter gathering tribes.
and war against rival tribes on the other side. and from what we can tell, tribal war is basically total war, where the losing tribe ceases to exist because the victors literally kill or enslave every single one of them.
I dont remember the book now, but awhile back I read one about the evolution of human societies. In modern western society your chances of dying from a violent act are something like 1/100,000 (I don’t remember the exact number), whereas 1/10 hunter gatherers were killed in violence. Back to the cave, everyone!
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage
As late as the previous century the Ugric tribesmen living in Russia killed women who dared to go on the sacred island. So much for hunter-gatherer tolerance!

View attachment 4417064View attachment 4417068

All pagan societies were patriarchal, even Wikipedia admits it.

View attachment 4417088
View attachment 4417096
I've genuinely never met a woman, even a liberal feminist woman, who wanted to lead people. Sure, some of them had positions of power such as manager positions. They were okay with soft leadership like that. But I have never met a woman who actually wants to be a leader in her marriage or in a political sense. It's anecdotal evidence, but it really convinces me that women who are pastors or politicians (aside from small time stuff like a schoolboard council head) are, at best, weird exceptional people (in the same vein as men who would prefer to let their wives make all the decisions and head the house) and, at worst, sociopaths. And the latter is probably way more common than the former given how common mental illness is in the West now.
 
I've genuinely never met a woman, even a liberal feminist woman, who wanted to lead people. Sure, some of them had positions of power such as manager positions. They were okay with soft leadership like that. But I have never met a woman who actually wants to be a leader in her marriage or in a political sense. It's anecdotal evidence, but it really convinces me that women who are pastors or politicians (aside from small time stuff like a schoolboard council head) are, at best, weird exceptional people (in the same vein as men who would prefer to let their wives make all the decisions and head the house) and, at worst, sociopaths. And the latter is probably way more common than the former given how common mental illness is in the West now.
They don't want to lead they just want to be in control, to soothe their raging insecurities. Most women in leadership positions are just subservient to larger power structures, not independent leaders under their own command.
 
I've genuinely never met a woman, even a liberal feminist woman, who wanted to lead people. Sure, some of them had positions of power such as manager positions. They were okay with soft leadership like that. But I have never met a woman who actually wants to be a leader in her marriage or in a political sense. It's anecdotal evidence, but it really convinces me that women who are pastors or politicians (aside from small time stuff like a schoolboard council head) are, at best, weird exceptional people (in the same vein as men who would prefer to let their wives make all the decisions and head the house) and, at worst, sociopaths. And the latter is probably way more common than the former given how common mental illness is in the West now.
I'm pretty sure that fact is exactly why they want women to be in leadership positions to begin with, because they're perpetual infants and think that women are more likely to coddle them and give them their way. Just the usual motive over on Reddit.

I remember that Viziepop chick who made that hazbin hotel animation, and how the Tumblr types threw a fit and tried to cancel her basically just because she expected the people she paid to actually do work on time. But no, women have to treat us like babies and always be nice, not like those scary dumb meanie men.

Then of course if a woman who is successful dares to not toe the line, they get JK Rowling'd. These people only care about minorities or women because they think they're easier to keep a collar on, and there's nothing they despise more than ones who refuse to play along.

I'm really starting to believe that r/actualpublicfreakouts is one of the most based subs on Reddit.

Archive Link

View attachment 4419220
It's probably only based for the same reason gun crime statistics are based. Because it deals with actual reality.
 
Back