Deciding wether to call him Womb Raider or Toob Raider in my post but i'll just skip to the point where i'll just say, Olly, you don't have MASSIVE TITS.
He should be less bothered about insane acing ambitions ('acting' still being an ambition he hasn't even nailed), and more concerned with why he's not getting the shout to replace the odious India Willoughby as go-to panel Troon- the media are certainly crying out for someone less unpersonable and obnoxious to give the Troon side, but clearly aren't asking him .
he's even got the Scottish connection, from university...which again, curiously, he seems to take no interest in, despite living there for a few years...I guess he didn't really get involved, like Newcastle?
He's curiously placeless, isnt he? Maybe its a deliberate affectation for whatever devious ends, maybe it's just because he is too self involved to notice or care about his surroundings.
Then again, there's a chance he wouldn't take the risk involved in this kind of bun fight..he wouldnt like getting ragged on by all and sundry, though he disguises it as his 'no platform to /phobic views' stance....which really makes no sense at all-if you take his 'caring about trans rights' schtick as truth- that he only preaches to the converted..when they've got a chance of reply, anyway.
Pre-recorded BBC interviews are fine !
So, is he lying about having to constantly decline media appearances from entities guilty of hosting wrong-thinkers? Maybe. He is fame hungry but has demonstrated a lack of appetite for being unable to have total control of the narrative or garunteed adoring audience.
Or is it vast exaggeration of one or two instances?
Are they even asking him in the first place? The are crying out for such people, but Tube has likely burnt a good few media bridges already just by virtue of being himself.
So, what's more likely; his intellectual cowardice, or his delusional grandiosity?
Is it 'i dont care I wasnt invited, I woudlnt have gone anyway'?
-or, the natural result of being unpopular, both professionally and on a wider 'literaly who' scale?
BBC QT regularly has relative nobody panelists, and I do think i would be tough for Tubes ego to turn down the opportunity...
Many embarrassing potential realities jostle for probability.
Just like Tube, India inflicts fatal damage on the common Troon with every appearance, you've got to feel sorry for the normie ones, having that fucking pillock representing them, effectively going up against he horror show that is the Scottish rapist situation.
Tube would have done no better, but was too coward to even put himself n the line for 'his people', when in such a desperate need of positive representation.
When he gives his cringe, self martyring Braveheart speeches at safe, no stakes, student land trans marches, choking fake tears on his videos, hey should remember that he is nowhere for them when the going actually has a faint chance of looking rough.
(Of course, the only way to save any sort of face with the public for troons here would be to effectively admit that:
-trans women are not
better than exactly the same as women,
-that women's rights should be protected,
-& sex offenders should blanket banned from women's provisions.
This should be a simple thing to do, but does require having one iota of respect for women.)
