Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.1%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.0%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 70 10.4%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    672
I'd be way more interested in hearing from Drex's "dom"'s mother than hearing whatever regurgitated shit the chick herself would say. If she was groomed (not saying she was), she's obviously not worked that our herself, so she'd justBBC-guard/say what he wants her to say.

Nick's chat is trying to get him to sponsor his event in Vegas with Balldo. Nick says he might auction his extra...

View attachment 4432584

Gag! People might pay more for the used one from this chat...
Sally would buy the used one and post pictures of herself sucking on it in Locals.
 
I'm more offended by this than I thought I would be. Let's ignore the fact that the Balldo is a ridiculous, degenerate representation of Nick's downfall and pretend it's something innocuous and related to the show. Really, Nick? You're going to auction something you have no use for because of your pathological need to grab money from your fans? They're already paying $50 for a ticket to your glorified podcast and paying their own way to get there in the first place. Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to raffle it to the audience based on the fact that they already paid for a ticket? They can't cost more than $100 to begin with. The greed of auctioning this thing off is honestly insulting even to his paypigs.
Rekieta has always been a shameless grifter-whore. We're more open to seeing it, but I'm pretty sure he's always been this way when it comes to getting money.
 
Drex likes to bring up that he didn't hook up with the kid until she was 20, 22, 24, or whatever age he thinks provides the best defense at the time. (I would like to point out for the sake of KF accuracy that I don't believe we have evidence of him ever saying 18 but if someone has a clip it would be quite damning)

Something I'd like to point out that we might be forgetting though. In one of his Discord cope sessions he pointed out that he met her at a fair and she had a boyfriend. He did not approve of this boyfriend, this boyfriend was a "simp" and he, of course, was a "non-simp" and we know Drex can't abide that. Shortly after Drex met the boyfriend they happen to break up. Not only does this hurt his "I waited" defense, because it wasn't really him waiting it was more him not having an opening, but it also heavily implies that he himself created the opening by sabotaging the relationship. I understand some people's urge to give him the benefit of the doubt based on his most recent excuses and accounting of events but at this point his story and excuses have changed so much that he really doesn't deserve the credibility. He is obviously going to paint himself in the best light possible so we can and should assume that we can take the worst-looking retellings of the various parts of the story and then realize that the truth is likely some degree worse.

View attachment 4430157
Man Drexel is such a phony chad, jury is still out on the BF but it's clear that Drexel either smelled bitch or the BF didn't want to waste time on Drexel and have the girl be caught between them beefing. Either way they broke up and Drexel got the chance to put her into bondage. All of this just proves more and more that Drexel is a lying scumbag with an inflated ego. All of this makes me wonder who else he has done this to.
 
People on the internet use the term "grooming" a lot to mean god only knows what, but knowing some 13 year old girl and slowly parlaying that into a sexual relationship when she's finally of age is the actual historical definition of it.

He claims that wasn't true, but look at this guy. With his attitudes I don't believe for a second that he could handle himself around some fatherless teenage girl without his eyes immediately lighting up green and churning through all the ways he could manipulate her tough situation into him getting his dick wet.

I'd imagine the reality is just that he's a skeevy fuck who has no concept of what appropriate boundaries are, so he didn't see his blatantly inappropriate behavior as being such.


I don't know, this all seems like very stereotypically black behavior. It's only in the fantasies of a subset of very disturbed, very broken internet individuals that white women everywhere love screwing black guys.
No one prefers niggers, they just lie to themselves loudly, hoping to gaslight naive women. It’s such a grotesque anomaly that porn of it only exists as a circus sideshow.
21FEB2F8-6D6E-4725-A4CF-739463911DC9.jpeg
I'd be way more interested in hearing from Drex's "dom"'s mother than hearing whatever regurgitated shit the chick herself would say. If she was groomed (not saying she was), she's obviously not worked that our herself, so she'd justBBC-guard/say what he wants her to say.
Who wouldn’t trust the word of submissive sex slave groomed since childhood?
 
Last edited:
Rekieta has always been a shameless grifter-whore. We're more open to seeing it, but I'm pretty sure he's always been this way when it comes to getting money.
He has always been upfront about him being a grifter, he just had more goodwill and was less of a sped that he is now.
That's because Ralph didn't provide evidence for shit, and he still hasn't. Only anecdotes with little or no evidence. What has Ralph really contributed to this discussion? It's okay to speculate as to the veracity of what Ralph and CRP claim went down at Knoxville, but I'm still not not gonna take anything Ralph or CRP say at face value. Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. There's enough other things with actual hard evidence to discuss. Things that Ralph had nothing to do with (ie. Hedonism II).

In fact, I have to say having anything to do with Ralph was one of Nick's dumber decisions. Particularly since Ralph is himself a sick fuck and a lot of the "behind the scenes" shit you are talking about had to do with Ralph's sick fuckery, and not Nick's. Not to toot my own horn here, but I told both Nick and KF years ago that I didn't believe for a second that he was largely ignorant about Ralph revenge porn case and other chicanery. That's when I started to back away from being so invested in Weebwars. I didn't have any hard evidence for anything, but I had my suspicions.

I feel like my suspicions were ultimately vindicated because after the ragepig raged over Nick's reaction to the "shart heard 'round the world," it came out that Nick was giving Ralph legal advice behind the scenes on how to handle his revenge porn charges. So much so that he afforded Ralph attorney-client privilege (something they have both stated as fact). Which is why he looked like such a guntguard. I can't fault Nick for following his ethical obligations to confidentiality, but I would fault him for voluntarily taking on such responsibility in the first place. That was a position Nick voluntarily put himself in. Everyone is entitled to the assistance of a lawyer, but Nick isn't a public defender. He is a private practice attorney. He can pick his battles. That was a dumb one to pick, and you'd be hard pressed to convince me otherwise.

The ONLY reason why Nick and Ralph aren't friends anymore is because Nick had the audacity to laugh at Ralph sharting himself on air, and Ralph's skin is like tissue paper. That's it. It's not because Ralph had some grand epiphany that Nick is a bad person all of sudden. Ralph might be enjoying Nick's fall from grace, but he did absolutely nothing to cause it. They'd probably still be friends but for Ralph's very well documented anger-management issues.

TL;DR: This isn't a zero-sum game. They're both deplorable people.

Or to paraphrase @AnOminous when he was talking about Keemstar vs. H3H3, this is two bullshit artists flinging bullshit at each other. Just sit back and enjoy the fireworks.
I think that Nick to a degree is a bit too loyal of a person and he was willing to gunt guard because of that. The fact that he stuck his neck out for Ralph and he spat in his face would have been sad if not for Nick not breaking off the friendship sooner. Everyone with a brain knew that by the time it was Harvest time that Ralph became a disloyal, volatile cunt. One of the big warning signs regarding Nick was his Gunt and Dick guarding when he could have consolidated his position and help better shape Lawtube and create new circle that he could loose be affiliated with. Nick should have really listened to Metukor and realised that there are no internet friends and loyalty online will only get someone that axe in the end.
 
No one prefers niggers, they just lie to themselves loudly, hoping to gaslight naive women. It’s such a grotesque anomaly that porn of it only exists as circus sideshow.
View attachment 4433076

Who wouldn’t trust the word of submissive sex slave groomed since childhood?
Maybe the weebs have a chance with their Asian waifu based off this chart....
 
The way Drex has told it, his father was incredibly strict & didn’t put up with any nonsense from his kids or he’d be harsh on them. He’s also said that growing up, his family took in foster kids, usually of the pre-teen / teen ages & boys only bc girls were too much hassle, of course. He said the boys they took in were often delinquent, wayward types but under the stern guidance of his father they got sorted out right. Can’t especially recall of any time the mother was mentioned but oddly enough, Drex somehow made acquaintance with Vic’s mother & has remained close enough to her to keep in regular contact with phone calls & texts.
 
Been catching up. Seeing much Drexel discussion. A few notes relevant to today's conversation RE Drexel:

Grooming can/does happen to adults. It is used by sex cults and human traffickers among other groups/industries. Trust is built to gain consent, which is the most valuable currency of the day for sexual conduct. I imagine the rigorous conversation around the anti-grooming bill in Florida made people associate it more with pedophilia, though the two are not mutually exclusive.

There is evidence that T is white. The "softer things" Drexel references are linked by knowing her at such a young age. I have reviewed his philosophy on ideal conditions for male and female relations. They are inherently predatory and demand a large age gap. Nick appears to endorse or at least appreciate the benefits of this.

Drexel documents every sexual encounter due to his persistent fear of #MeToo on his phone. In addition, part of Drexel's dating strategy is showing porn of himself to women. Taking both of these factors into consideration, if T saw porn related to Drexel on anyone's phone, it's most likely his.

The story with T's one-time boyfriend has funny blind spots regarding Drexel's behavior. I would ask those who have seen it to note that this story comes right after Drexel and the other panelists describe how physical Drex is with women he's around (picking them up and such) and how much they love it. I doubt that Drexel conducted himself in a way that was respectful to the relationship as Drexel was likely asserting himself by staking his claim to T through physical contact. Drexel's touching may have been normalized to T, but someone unaccustomed to seeing it (like T's boyfriend) might be taken aback.

@Not Who You Think, I guess we won't be getting stream/interview content to add to your mega-post.

This is a relief. I do not wish to see T's face or hear her voice. After considering things further, I have rescinded my interest in hearing from the mother. She is still a part of her daughter's life, likely out of love. As such she will be tempted to say what she deems necessary to protect her daughter.

I will post what I have soon now that Drexel has decided to not involve T directly. It won't be an account of what happened, so much as a documentation of various accounts Drexel has given (with a few additional sections for curious minds). I'll try not to screw it up.

Just noticed something while watching Ralph react that I didn’t catch when seeing the video originally. Nick first says two lesbians tried to pick them up. Does it make sense for two lesbians to want to pick up a male / female couple? Maybe Ralph has a point that the “lesbians” were hookers. Then Nick says that two gay guys tried to have sex with him. Not them as a couple, just Nick. And he doesn’t say they tried to pick him up, as he said about the lesbians, he says they specifically tried to have sex with him. Did he almost get sodomized on the dance floor or how did things escalate so much from the “lesbian” couple’s pick up attempt of Nick & Kayla to Nick alone having some fags trying to balldo him in the butt?
If you're thinking of the underwear party, Nick said one was lesbian and one was bi. Nick didn't know this for sure, but claimed it was obvious.

 
Last edited:
The way Drex has told it, his father was incredibly strict & didn’t put up with any nonsense from his kids or he’d be harsh on them. He’s also said that growing up, his family took in foster kids, usually of the pre-teen / teen ages & boys only bc girls were too much hassle, of course. He said the boys they took in were often delinquent, wayward types but under the stern guidance of his father they got sorted out right. Can’t especially recall of any time the mother was mentioned but oddly enough, Drex somehow made acquaintance with Vic’s mother & has remained close enough to her to keep in regular contact with phone calls & texts.

Drex told a story before, about a time where his mother stumbled across some of the porn of himself that he had. Said she's never really been the same around him ever since. (I'm paraphrasing from memory here, but it's not far off.)
 
If you're thinking of the underwear party, Nick said one was lesbian and one was bi. Nick didn't know this for sure, but claimed it was obvious.

View attachment 4434172
Way to make baseless assumptions about someones personal life Nick, they could've been a wholesome traditional conservative family-oriented couple out having a little fun. geez 🙄
 
Last edited:
Really, Nick? You're going to auction something you have no use for because of your pathological need to grab money from your fans?
There's probably some degenerate out there who would buy the Balldo and insist Nick doesn't clean his ball sweat off it first.
 
I mean, the kid has her mother's genes, and her mother was doing God knows what with Drexel, so. Probably wasn't exactly being raised in a stable household either, and last but not least, young women do stupid things in general. It ain't that far-fetched. The reason Drexel is the scumbag here is because he should've known better rather than taking advantage.

But to give Drexel the bare minimum of credit, he does have that MGTOW attitude that women are just stupid things for men to fuck, so. At least he never pretended to be some kind of conservative Christian. It doesn't make it okay, but he's less of a hypocrite than Nick, I guess.
I really wonder when Drex swithed to what he is now. Correct me if I'm wrong but this whole sub episide happened a few years ago? Even if it happened 7/8 years ago its definitely after he himself has a daughter. I still wouldn't call him a groomer, but his self professed degeneracy is iredeemable.
I don't think bringing "T" into the trashfire in any capacity would be a good idea for Drexel. It doesn't really matter if she comes on stream and gushes about how much she loved getting pissed on or whatever, it's still a story of a much older man being super skeezy. Her personal testimony can't change that. What he should have done when people started to put a spot light on this was just say "uhhh actually that never happened i made that up and lied cause i wanted to sound like a badass hehehehe ain't i's a dumb nig nog." Might be a bit embarrassing but would've been way better optically.
I'm just calling out how he made a 180 turn regarding anonymity.
 
Well. In my search for the Drexel mom finding his porn story, I found something far more hysterical.

I present to you: Rackets admitting that he's a homosexual and goes to gay bars because he's looking for other men to take home with him. Because, "that's specifically why you would go to a gay bar."



 
Why can’t he have a normal coomer fantasy and just want a harem of genetically engineered cat girls instead. I for one support the freeze and breed theory I’ve always wanted a cunt popsicle
Then you'd love my ex wife.
How about genetically engineered Cat Girl cunt popsicles?
The best of both worlds...
Not calling them "Cuntsicles". Never gonna make it
 
This is a relief. I do not wish to see T's face or hear her voice. After considering things further, I have rescinded my interest in hearing from the mother. She is still a part of her daughter's life, likely out of love. As such she will be tempted to say what she deems necessary to protect her daughter.
From the way Drex has talked about the situation, I don't think the mother gives a shit about protecting him even if it was out of love for her daughter. That said, I doubt she'd speak to anyone Internet related about it - that tends to be more of a Spergy Dad thing to do (see: Vickers and Morris). I have no doubt, however, that she turns the air absolutely blue when speaking about him to people she's close to.

The main thing I'd be interested in is whether or not she believes it was grooming, or is she just that upset because it was still betraying her trust to run through her kid behind her back. Either way, he's a fucking creepshow.
 
Back