Executive Order 2023.02 (henceforth "NIGHTMARE WORLD WHERE FACT AND FICTION COEXIST")

This is it, sexy indian gentlemen now have access to the thermonuclear bomb of imposter scamming.
Imagine, if you will, Rajeesh cloning some zoomer's voice from a video they uploaded to Instagram or TikTok. In mere minutes said Zoomer could be calling Grandma and begging her to wire him bail money because he got into trouble and is afraid of telling his parents.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Sneed S. McSneedensen, GhastlyGhost and 57 others
Sarn’t said:
How do we know that nulls post wasn’t AI generated? I believe a sharpie in pooper is needed in order to verify.
Click to expand...
It is not uncommon for people to question the authenticity of online content, especially when it comes to posts made by AI-powered language models like OpenAI's GPT. However, in this particular case, I would like to offer some evidence to suggest that Null's post is not AI generated.

First and foremost, it is important to note that AI language models like GPT have been trained on a massive dataset of text from the internet and other sources, but they are not capable of independent thought or creativity. They can only generate text based on the patterns and relationships they have learned from the data. This means that the text generated by AI language models can often be repetitive, formulaic, and lacking in nuance.

On the other hand, Null's post appears to be well-written and exhibits a distinct voice and perspective. The post is thoughtfully constructed, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. The writing style is engaging and demonstrates a strong command of the language, including the use of figurative language and other literary devices. These qualities are not consistent with text generated by AI language models.

Another aspect to consider is the content of Null's post. AI language models are often trained on a wide range of topics, but the depth of their knowledge on any given subject is limited by the data they have seen. The post by Null, however, shows a deep understanding and familiarity with the subject matter, suggesting that the author has firsthand experience and expertise in the area.

In conclusion, while it is certainly possible for text generated by AI language models to be mistaken for human-generated content, the post by Null appears to be the work of a human writer. The writing style, content, and tone of the post all suggest that the author is a knowledgeable and creative individual, rather than an AI-powered language model.
 
  • Winner
  • Horrifying
  • Autistic
Reactions: MrJokerRager, GhastlyGhost, Instant_Pot_User and 24 others
Welcome to the world where truth is obsolete.
Horrifying.png
ML:

So, when is this shit getting legislated?
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Sneed S. McSneedensen, Corn Pop Nationalism and 32 others
It's really fun to play around with these machine learning-based AI programs but about 5 seconds after I'm done doing it I also start wishing I was late middle-aged, and consequently more likely to be dead in the ground by the time this tech starts really turbofucking society.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Turd Burglar, Essay2414778 and 31 others
DeutschfagAufAbwegen said:
Kinda still waiting for the first international incident to happen due to a Ai/ML audio or video clip. Gonna happen one day
Click to expand...
With Canada's parliament moving to a hybrid/remote model one could envision a synthetic parliamentarian inserted maliciously in place of the real thing

Conversely, with the GPT code model one may never have to actually "work" from home as a shit tier codecel
 
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Foreverial, Essay2414778 and 3 others
Thankfully if you never listened to or put stock in anything on the internet to begin with you're way ahead of the curve.

Objective truth already hasn't existed online for a long time, people believe what they want to and anyone who thinks otherwise is being naive. The internet isn't real, it never was.

In a way I find this development a little bit funny because it'll make the FACTS and LOGIC people who refuse to acknowledge the almost pure demagogic nature of the internet look even more clownish.
 
  • Feels
  • Dumb
  • Agree
Reactions: MrJokerRager, felted, big cum and 2 others
roombutt said:
Someone in telegram already made audio clips of him declaring his love to Anime and Brittani Venti. I would share them but I'm fearing the ooperator's wrath. He is scary as fuck.
Click to expand...
The one where he signs the site over to Keffals doesn't really sound like Null does. The intonation is all wrong and it sounds like a gun is being pointed at his head while he reads off a script.

Some of the ones I did with Justin Roiland as Rick sound super-stilted and unnatural.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MrJokerRager and AmateurComedicTaxidermist
Xarpho's Return said:
The one where he signs the site over to Keffals doesn't really sound like Null does. The intonation is all wrong and it sounds like a gun is being pointed at his head while he reads off a script.

Some of the ones I did with Justin Roiland as Rick sound super-stilted and unnatural.
Click to expand...
Maybe it's his voice? Not the average Joe voice. Could it be harder for the AI because of that?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Wright and SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Gender: Xenomorph said:
It is not uncommon for people to question the authenticity of online content, especially when it comes to posts made by AI-powered language models like OpenAI's GPT. However, in this particular case, I would like to offer some evidence to suggest that Null's post is not AI generated.

First and foremost, it is important to note that AI language models like GPT have been trained on a massive dataset of text from the internet and other sources, but they are not capable of independent thought or creativity. They can only generate text based on the patterns and relationships they have learned from the data. This means that the text generated by AI language models can often be repetitive, formulaic, and lacking in nuance.

On the other hand, Null's post appears to be well-written and exhibits a distinct voice and perspective. The post is thoughtfully constructed, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. The writing style is engaging and demonstrates a strong command of the language, including the use of figurative language and other literary devices. These qualities are not consistent with text generated by AI language models.

Another aspect to consider is the content of Null's post. AI language models are often trained on a wide range of topics, but the depth of their knowledge on any given subject is limited by the data they have seen. The post by Null, however, shows a deep understanding and familiarity with the subject matter, suggesting that the author has firsthand experience and expertise in the area.

In conclusion, while it is certainly possible for text generated by AI language models to be mistaken for human-generated content, the post by Null appears to be the work of a human writer. The writing style, content, and tone of the post all suggest that the author is a knowledgeable and creative individual, rather than an AI-powered language model.
Click to expand...
This post was AI generated, wasn't it? Fess up.
The tell for me were being an almost note-for-note 5 paragraph essay like they teach in schools, the ironic sense of repetition (that made me pull a Princess Bride Battle of Wits in my head- was that intentional, as a decoy to make it SEEM AI-written, or unintended, because it IS AI-written?), and mostly the bizzaro use of transitions, way too formal for most forms. (Null is also never referred to by "he", as if the AI didn't know what sex he is.)

I think my own post can be called human because of the goddamn typos and less-than-ideal syntax and grammar, use of formatting specific to the forum, and uncommon informal words.

I read a book a few years ago about "The most human human." This was before the recent AI boon. In some Turing test competition, people would try to guess if it was a human or chatbot. Of course, it was mostly to see what chatbot people thought was human the most often- but for the humans trying to be seen as humans, not robots, how do you do that?

One of the things they pointed out that the chatbots were not replicating at ALL was how humans type. When the chatbots were entering their replies, they did it at a totally uniform speed, typing start to end, perfectly knowing their response before they started typing, the same time between each character, etc.... humans obviously don't do that. I wonder if it would be easy for an AI to replicate the nuances enough that most people couldn't notice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Essay2414778, Konstantin Romanov and 4 others
IsaacShraeder said:
This is it, sexy indian gentlemen now have access to the thermonuclear bomb of imposter scamming.
Imagine, if you will, Rajeesh cloning some zoomer's voice from a video they uploaded to Instagram or TikTok. In mere minutes said Zoomer could be calling Grandma and begging her to wire him bail money because he got into trouble and is afraid of telling his parents.
Click to expand...
Grandma might start wondering why Zoomer is clarifying that the money must be in "American dollars"
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: MrJokerRager, Instant_Pot_User, felted and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back