- Joined
- Apr 3, 2019
Executive Order 2023.02 (henceforth "NIGHTMARE WORLD WHERE FACT AND FICTION COEXIST")
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
I WANT TO GO BACK!!!
For a short clip or excerpt it could be very convincing, but listening to a lengthy sample for Tucker and (especially) Biden were extremely jarring. Not entirely sure if it's an issue with the technology or the way it's currently being utilized, but they speak so fluidly and uniformly without any stammering, digression, or tonal shift that it's a bit uncanny. It's almost there, but there is still just a short gap between the AI sample and what I would expect from Generic Human X in reality in terms of how people actually speak. Maybe the technology as it currently is can factor that in with the right inputs, or maybe in a future update or alternative version? Scary, either way.
It's like listening to a clip of Joe Biden speaking from the 80s and hearing him be able to get out a sentence coherently and fluidly without tripping over his words and getting extremely confused and being extremely taken aback, but taken up to 12.
For a short clip or excerpt it could be very convincing, but listening to a lengthy sample for Tucker and (especially) Biden were extremely jarring. Not entirely sure if it's an issue with the technology or the way it's currently being utilized, but they speak so fluidly and uniformly without any stammering, digression, or tonal shift that it's a bit uncanny. It's almost there, but there is still just a short gap between the AI sample and what I would expect from Generic Human X in reality in terms of how people actually speak. Maybe the technology as it currently is can factor that in with the right inputs, or maybe in a future update or alternative version? Scary, either way.
It's like listening to a clip of Joe Biden speaking from the 80s and hearing him be able to get out a sentence coherently and fluidly without tripping over his words and getting extremely confused and being extremely taken aback, but taken up to 12.
Last edited:
biscuitscilia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
I don't know if this is the printing press of our times but I feel like Pandora's Box has been open and now if I wanted to, I can now make a perfect repulication of someone's voice to say whatever I want him to say. That will absolutely be used for malicious intent and we might see court cases soon where someone innocent is wrongly declared guilty through AI generated evidence.
What's worse is this is a wild west situation where there are no explicit laws that address this that aren't interpretable from previous libel or false evidence laws. We've now crossed the rubicon for AI to generate audio and visual indistingushable from actual speak and that's genuinely fucking horrifying.
EDIT:
What's worse is this is a wild west situation where there are no explicit laws that address this that aren't interpretable from previous libel or false evidence laws. We've now crossed the rubicon for AI to generate audio and visual indistingushable from actual speak and that's genuinely fucking horrifying.
EDIT:
There could be very easy work around for this, like you can splice two generated audio files with more nature speak to create something seemless or use background noise or other audio tricks to hide the imperfections like distortion. But the AI can even generate imperfection in speech like stutters and even accents. Or even replicate the unique ways that we speak, like lisps or whistling sounds.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Potentially unpopular opinion: I hope all this gun, bullet, and second amendment stuff gets outlawed completely.
While it seems fun to mess around with, I see no applicable use of this technology that isn’t outright malicious.
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2022
Putting less trust everything they see on the internet is unironically the best thing that could happen to 90% of people. Deepfakes becoming a fad might just snap a few people out of their social media stupor as they realize that, hey, it actually is super easy for anyone to lie on the internet, even though we were told that only the white supremacist alt-right nazis do that!
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2019
You can’t put the genie back in the bottle even if it were made illegal. A disclaimer is the best thing anyone could hope for with all this deepfake stuff
biscuitscilia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
I don't think they should be outlawed, but maybe heavily regulated. The potential for harm is great with AI and ML technology and it can effect anyone at anytime. All they need is a minute long clip of your voice and the FBI could knock on your door with an anonymous tip from a concerned friend with an ""audio recording"" of you. This technology will only get better with time so even the small imperfections in it now will be patched up and human error in judgement is infinite.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
The people who say 'nigger' have always been the pioneers. We journey to the tops of mountains just to say nigger. We say nigger from the darkest regions of the moon. We go to deep sea thermal vents and say nigger to octopusses. So when new tech comes out, what do you expect? The AI will come out of the gate uttering nigger in every direction. Eventually it will be tamed, but until then, nigger.
niggers snigger
niggers snigger
niggers snigger
Vect
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2020
So the company that makes this has realised that allowing people to create convincing fakes of almost anybody saying anything might just have fucked the world over. Their solution is a paywall and a verification tool, because that will solve everything.
Like, what the fuck did they expect???
Like, what the fuck did they expect???
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
I like how the Tucker one in the OP lists all of this hyper-violent, heinous stuff and then halfway through drops "Report niggers to the IRS."
biscuitscilia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
This quote has never been more relevant like it is now
They better keep the source code under lock and key because if this ever becomes open sourced, we're all fucked.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2019
I don't know about you guys, but I've spent the last 30 years or so living in a world where the truth was always questionable.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2022
That one would unironically be pretty devastating to a good few of them.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2019
Oh god we really are at a crossroads here aren't we. That fun part at the beginning of every new era where people panic because the new tech is gonna cause the end of the world only to end up commonplace and normal.
I'll admit, I'm a bit worried the trend of everything working out ok could break this time. Still. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.
I'll admit, I'm a bit worried the trend of everything working out ok could break this time. Still. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2021
The way I see it, it'll just be common knowledge that audio can be easily fabricated, and so it won't be taken seriously as evidence. People are able to make convincing Photoshops now that weren't possible decades ago, and that tricks people every now and then, but it doesn't have massive repercussions because people are aware that the tool exists.
I also wouldn't be surprised if there are people developing tools to detect AI-generated audio at a similar pace to the people developing tools to create it. But my guess is that arms race will end in favor of AI stuff becoming more and more believable.
The problem will be that genuine audio and video evidence can no longer be trusted, rather than that deepfakes will doom people.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2019
The gay ops are gonna be so fucking gay that i's gonna be now pozzed ops.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Am I the only one that wonders why one would bother reporting a nigger to the IRS? For what? Crack sales are not taxable income.
GoPro
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
The only way I can think of to do is to keep AIs closed source on centralized servers and every generated request recorded in a publicly available ledger. That way there will be some trail to check if a video, text, image, or sound were generated using AI. Still, it does not stop open source projects from popping up or people and entities powerful enough to bypass that system. Even if there will be some sort of government mandated regulation and auditing, there will still be a deepfake black market.
First step to curb the flood will be a paywalls and bans on generating materials that use public figures. Kind of like image and text generating AI projects are starting to do.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
hey @IAmNotAlpharius
This "deepfake" thing and possible "post truth era" could be of Tzeentch.
(in other words possibly HERESY)
This "deepfake" thing and possible "post truth era" could be of Tzeentch.
(in other words possibly HERESY)
ScatmansWorld
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
I'm going to be stubbornly optimistic in this doompost filled thread and point out that video fakery has existed since the creation of videos, and likewise, voice impersonation has existed since people could impersonate voices. The only thing that's changed is the gap in effort for the layman, and trying to regulate that out of existence will only serve the rich and powerful that already rule over you. That's not even accounting for all the non-malicious and unexplored uses for machine learning that could be crippled from forceful intervention. The best you could do for this kind of thing is have people be transparent about their fakery.
Here's a tip, there's many cases where clear video footage of you commuting a crime still isn't sufficient evidence to be fully convicted. Actually investigating the alleged crime would more than likely put holes in the prosecutors case.
Here's a tip, there's many cases where clear video footage of you commuting a crime still isn't sufficient evidence to be fully convicted. Actually investigating the alleged crime would more than likely put holes in the prosecutors case.