Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Almost a year into this war I still don't know what "neo Nazi" means in this context. When asked, Ukrainians start sucking Bandera's cock and crying about the Holodomor, and Russians start shrieking like Jews about how evil the Nazis were. Is there any kind of coherent political ideology behind these guys getting swastika tattoos?
Extreme right wing groups like Sloboda/Right Sector were always present but around 9 years ago a bunch of soccer hooligan rowdies were gathered into paramilitiaries, largely financed by Kolomosky, a shady Jewish Ukrainian oligarch who also groomed Zelensky, a comedian, to be President. The militias are idiots who think Hitler and Nazis are super cool so they get tats and do roman salutes to post on Tik Tok and TG. When the government told Russian ethnics in the East they couldn't speak or learn Russian they declared their intent to secede, so Ukraine sent in these goons, some tanks and the rest is history.

This all happened after the government rejected an IMF loan and the prospect of EU membership in favor of a multi-million interest free loan from Russia so the US State Department went in and arranged a color revolution that ousted the pro-Russian president and installed an anti-Russian president. He immediately began making plans to join NATO, which happens to be Russia's red line in the sand. Russia immediately went in and secured Crimea, where their only warm water port is, without firing a shot or killing anyone.
 
Almost a year into this war I still don't know what "neo Nazi" means in this context. When asked, Ukrainians start sucking Bandera's cock and crying about the Holodomor, and Russians start shrieking like Jews about how evil the Nazis were. Is there any kind of coherent political ideology behind these guys getting swastika tattoos?
Much simply, Stalin pretty much forced citizens in the Ukraine SSR to learn to adapt agriculturalism while not getting any food so that they can want Communism, and ended up killing millions of people in a famine which resulted in the Holodomor. The Ukrainians obviously did not like this and when the Germans came and occupied Ukraine, revered them as saviors and became fervent auxiliaries, who went after Russians, Jews, and other ethnic minorities (even more violently than the Germans supposedly) in their hatred against Communism. This is why Ukrainians still see the Nazis in high regard compared to the Russians because the Holodomor was that bad and the Germans liberated them from this oppression under the Soviet state, and hence their legacy spawned a lot of far-right groups in modern Ukraine understandingly. Russia still holds in high regard their victory over Nazi Germany as the legal successor of the Soviet Union so any appraisal of Nazism from the Ukrainians is seen as an offense to Russia.

The Holodomor is what solidified the existence of the Ukrainian identity (though as @Useful_Mistake stated, Ukraine was created as a puppet state of Imperial Germany and then they were annexed by the USSR), because before, all the lands east of Poland was all Russian. Now it's a Russian against a Russian whose family was starved to death during the Holodomor, so the war between Russia and Ukraine is thanks to Germany and then massively to the fuck-ups of Stalin and the USSR.
 
Last edited:
It's basically Volkstrum at this point and no match for their opponent
And Bakhmut still didn't fall. Strange.

The Holodomor is what solidified the existence of the Ukrainian identity (though as @Useful_Mistake stated, Ukraine was created as a puppet state of Imperial Germany and then they were annexed by the USSR)
Jesus Christ, here we go again.

No, ukrainians as a nation existed long before Great War. First political ambitions surfaced during Spring of Nations (circa 1848) in the form of Supreme Ruthenian Council (in that time more concerned around also Rusyns and Ruthenians at general, not only Ukrainians - and really, I don't want to sperg about how different eastern nations emerged and why Rusyns, Ukrainians, Ruthenians and ruzzkie are different thing). When Great War started Ukrainians was present on stage (accordingto previous austrian censuses) .

Also not only one state existed durign Great War - separete from Kievian and Soviet Ukraine it was also West Ukrainian People's Republic (and now all of us knows from what period ruzzkie stolen to idea of "peoples republic" in east ukraine), centered around Lviv (which was never a part of ruzzia, only after 1945 Soviet Union controlled it for not even half of centaury). WUPR wasn't widely recognized, but
 
View attachment 4443460



If holhols are cannibalizing museum pieces then either Russia blew up everything we gave them (doubt), the hardware went elsewhere (possible) or its just smoke and mirrors to camouflage more money laundering (highly likely). Also doesn't look very mobile so makes a good target. RIP Great Patriotic War artillery museum piece.
M-240s aren't that old, they were used in Afghanistan and the Chechen Wars, and they captured the ammunition from a Russian artillery unit since the Russian army still uses 240mm mortars
 
Dumb commie who censors dissenters. He’s also friends with a guy who lied to a GunTuber for access to his weapons and who got mad when Jeremy Clarkson used his channel title as a catchphrase, even planning to release merchandise with his face on it out of spite.
Doesn't quite sound like a good fit to me, but if you feel like it's worth it, make a thread about him and I'll look it over.
 
Kinda old video but I’ve been delving a lot into these guys stuff and they seem like straight up communist sympathizers lmao


This entire video is full is weird misleading statements and out of context clips, it’s even weirder because literally all of the top comments are talking about sponsorships, in a 20 minute political video. Almost like he’s artificially inflating what comments are at the top of the comment section somehow.

He also has a few videos that are essentially DPRK propaganda, so I’m kind of wondering if I should put these guys in the Breeding Grounds.
Okay this is tripping me out a bit. Their name plates and US Army patches are on the wrong sides along with the flag which is somehow still properly facing the correct direction (stars forward). A couple of them have 173rd deployment patches, but none of them have unit patches. There's also an E7 formed up with what looks like an E4 next to him. I know it's a newish photo since they're all rocking multicams, but there's no way shit changed that much since I was in. Dafuq is going on nigger? lol

image_2023-02-06_045146223.png
Edit:
lol never mind, it is a weird camera trick. For some reason I was thinking the beret was over the left eye. Still really strange to see a E7 without a deployment patch though. Especially in the 173rd
 
Edit:
lol never mind, it is a weird camera trick. For some reason I was thinking the beret was over the left eye. Still really strange to see a E7 without a deployment patch though. Especially in the 173rd
It's been 10 years since they last deployed, so not actually far fetched. Especially if he joined right after their last deployment. E7 is ~7-10 years (6 is extremely rare), so definitely possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatniggo1488
Much simply, Stalin pretty much forced citizens in the Ukraine SSR to learn to adapt agriculturalism while not getting any food so that they can want Communism, and ended up killing millions of people in a famine which resulted in the Holodomor. The Ukrainians obviously did not like this and when the Germans came and occupied Ukraine, revered them as saviors and became fervent auxiliaries, who went after Russians, Jews, and other ethnic minorities (even more violently than the Germans supposedly) in their hatred against Communism. This is why Ukrainians still see the Nazis in high regard compared to the Russians because the Holodomor was that bad and the Germans liberated them from this oppression under the Soviet state, and hence their legacy spawned a lot of far-right groups in modern Ukraine understandingly.

That's putting it in a weird, roundabout way. History is always seen through contemporary lenses. As much as the Russians love to larp as Soviets, the Union wasn't only Russian, and one has to consider that it has become very politically useful to let the Russian eat the Soviet legacy (that they can't even uphold because they're Russian) and to larp as victims because victim-hood gives instant justification for everything (modern historiography is infested by victim-hood narratives). No, the German/Nazi supporters in Ukraine weren't a majority in WW2 and the German attempts were haphazard and chaotic - the hiwis theoretically should not even have existed. More than three million Ukrops got killed by the Nazis and two and half millions got deported to starve into German factories, and more than a million and half died/got taken prisoner under the banner of the RKKA, while Banderites and assorted collaborators number like, a few tens of thousands? And we should not even consider the role of Ukrainians in Soviet industrial and military leadership.

The idea that the majority of the Soviet Ukrainians were waiting with open hearts for the German saviours is .... untenable, after the first few weeks of occupation. Maybe in an alternate reality where the Nazis had a basic framework to properly "divide and conquer" the Union, but they were after all Nazis and merely followed their ideas, with obvious results.

I'm amused by all the frankly deranged use of history in this mess: a failure of a Mafia State (the Russians) larp as both Soviet and Orthodox while the Ukies larp as Westerners. Funny if this wasn't a colossal waste of life and money.
 

Ammunition running out but 'no new money' for defence despite war in Ukraine, sources say​

The comments came after Sky News last week revealed that a senior US general had told Defence Secretary Ben Wallace that the British Army is no longer regarded as a top level, or "tier one", fighting force following decades of cuts to its size and strength.

Now, defence sources are warning that Britain will be unable "credibly" to offer as many troops as NATO allies would expect to a major new force structure that is being drawn up by the alliance to bolster its defences in response to the war in Ukraine.

As things stand, the army would already run out of ammunition within a few days if called upon to fight and would take up to 10 years to field a modern warfighting division of some 25,000 to 30,000 troops.


 
The comments came after Sky News last week revealed that a senior US general had told Defence Secretary Ben Wallace that the British Army is no longer regarded as a top level, or "tier one", fighting force following decades of cuts to its size and strength.

I just listened Ritter offering something very similar regarding not only britain, but the entire NATO not having the military capability to attack Russia.
Also there was this: "Russia not only demilitarizing Ukraine, they're demilitarize the entire NATO" by grinding up the fancy gadgets NATO send to Ukraine in meatgrinders like Bakhmut.

 
The Dog of War continues the clown fiesta.

Tonight, Yevgeny Prigozhin flew a combat mission as a Su-24 navigator to bombard Ukrainian positions in Bakhmut. After returning to the base, the head of the Wagner PMCS recorded a message to President Zelensky and offered to solve everything in the sky:
"We landed, bombed out. I'm boarding a Mig-29 tomorrow. If you have a desire, we will meet in the sky. If you win, take Artemovsk. If not, we go to the Dnieper."
https://t.me/readovkanews/52103
 
Crima before Great War also wasn't inhabited by ruzzkies - most population was Tartars.
Sevastopol was. And it's inhabited by Russians now.

Not that it matters. NATO's not hurling wealth and weapons into Ukraine because its leadership holds the idea of an ethno-state to be sacred. This is about money and power, same as it always was.
 
Sevastopol was. And it's inhabited by Russians now.

Not that it matters. NATO's not hurling wealth and weapons into Ukraine because its leadership holds the idea of an ethno-state to be sacred. This is about money and power, same as it always was.
While that is true, it just happens that what NATO does coincides with the interests of an Ukrainian ethno-state, so they'll take it.
As usual, send moar gibs.
Tax the vatnik-enabler MAGApedes higher for it.
Null point The Poles were part of the Russian Empire, so they were, by your standards, "a rebellious minority that should move or assimilate."

So either your principles are retarded or you don't believe in them yourself.
But I already told you a trillion times that I HATE and DESPISE multicultural mutt empires like Russia and Amurica and want them to die. Russia is closest and more aggressive towards East EU so I want it to die as soon as possible.
I like ethnic states as much as reasonably possible.
Minorities in empires should rebel, take arms and mangle the imperial scum up.
It's actually a very consistent ideology, you just don't like it cause it goes against your preferred muttpire expanding lmao
 
"BOMBSHELL VIDEO: Former Israeli Prime Minister says The West blocked Russia Ukraine peace deal so they could continue to crush Putin."

But how is this ZOG then if the Jew in Chief was submissively showing his pozzhole to the Western leaders and accepting all their proposals?
I am so confused.
How come this former J in C suddenly came out after Net-in-yahoo won again and is now saying all sorts of shit that tends to smear the allies of the current J in C?
Yesterday he was implying Zelensky was cowardly hiding until brave Israeli PM talked to Putin and convinced him not to rocket Z to the moon.
Wow so influent in Russia!
Does this mean that the vatniks are now allies with this Jew dude and embracing their ZOGslop good goy legacy?
lmao
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back