US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Well sure, but you can't bullshit your way out of a depression any more than a person/group/organization can bullshit their way out of a natural disaster. It doesn't matter if %85 of americans believe it, the shoe will still drop eventually.
The plan is to deny deny deny until a controlled uniparty GOP member takes power, then they suddenly caused the depression.
 
27A57D63-694D-403C-B0C4-ACA2095B5BAC.jpeg
Article

“Members of Congress, Democratic strategists and other major party figures all said she had not made herself into a formidable leader," The New York Times wrote of Harris on Monday.”

“According to The Times, two Democrats it spoke with recalled private conversations they had with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who reportedly told them she felt Harris lacked "the political instincts to clear a primary field."

“…according to The Times, the spokesperson for Clinton did not deny the assertations that in private she has expressed doubts about Harris.”
______________________________________________

Anon sources and all, but anyone who’s heard Kween Kamala speak in public could understand why they’re worried (I’ve long maintained that facing Harris would be Trump’s most optimistic scenario). After all, she was the first fatality of the 2020 primaries (without a single delegate, mind you) for a reason. Question is, what is Hillary’s strategy for deliberately putting this out there?

Is she privy to some news known only in Joe’s immediate circle? That he’s reached the terminal cliff and a Harris presidency is imminent? Or that he’s going to be removed from office in some other fashion? Therefore, she’s trying to play sage by gently reminding them to get another placeholder lined up for the primaries because Harris definitely hasn’t got what it takes?

Is she planning on running again, and is dementedly trying to position herself as a better option, while taking some shots at a likely competitor?
 
Is she planning on running again, and is dementedly trying to position herself as a better option, while taking some shots at a likely competitor?
Who the hell would vote for her?

Serious question. She's done NOTHING as a VP, and everytime they DO trot her out, she makes things worse as soon as she opens her mouth. She's not even entertaining as a lolcow, her thread's been in a comatose state because the bitch is boring.
 
View attachment 4456948
Article

“Members of Congress, Democratic strategists and other major party figures all said she had not made herself into a formidable leader," The New York Times wrote of Harris on Monday.”

“According to The Times, two Democrats it spoke with recalled private conversations they had with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who reportedly told them she felt Harris lacked "the political instincts to clear a primary field."

“…according to The Times, the spokesperson for Clinton did not deny the assertations that in private she has expressed doubts about Harris.”
______________________________________________

Anon sources and all, but anyone who’s heard Kween Kamala speak in public could understand why they’re worried (I’ve long maintained that facing Harris would be Trump’s most optimistic scenario). After all, she was the first fatality of the 2020 primaries (without a single delegate, mind you) for a reason. Question is, what is Hillary’s strategy for deliberately putting this out there?

Is she privy to some news known only in Joe’s immediate circle? That he’s reached the terminal cliff and a Harris presidency is imminent? Or that he’s going to be removed from office in some other fashion? Therefore, she’s trying to play sage by gently reminding them to get another placeholder lined up for the primaries because Harris definitely hasn’t got what it takes?

Is she planning on running again, and is dementedly trying to position herself as a better option, while taking some shots at a likely competitor?
Reminder that Hillary had to buy out the DNC so that she could win her nomination.
 
View attachment 4456948
Article

“Members of Congress, Democratic strategists and other major party figures all said she had not made herself into a formidable leader," The New York Times wrote of Harris on Monday.”

“According to The Times, two Democrats it spoke with recalled private conversations they had with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who reportedly told them she felt Harris lacked "the political instincts to clear a primary field."

“…according to The Times, the spokesperson for Clinton did not deny the assertations that in private she has expressed doubts about Harris.”
______________________________________________

Anon sources and all, but anyone who’s heard Kween Kamala speak in public could understand why they’re worried (I’ve long maintained that facing Harris would be Trump’s most optimistic scenario). After all, she was the first fatality of the 2020 primaries (without a single delegate, mind you) for a reason. Question is, what is Hillary’s strategy for deliberately putting this out there?

Is she privy to some news known only in Joe’s immediate circle? That he’s reached the terminal cliff and a Harris presidency is imminent? Or that he’s going to be removed from office in some other fashion? Therefore, she’s trying to play sage by gently reminding them to get another placeholder lined up for the primaries because Harris definitely hasn’t got what it takes?

Is she planning on running again, and is dementedly trying to position herself as a better option, while taking some shots at a likely competitor?
Hillary's 'politely' telling them that the spot for First Female President belongs to her and her alone, and that the cocksucker better know her place if she wants to get back to her cozy seat in California.
Yes which is a plan I can only describe as "fractal retardation".
I never said their plan was a good one.
 
biden_state_of_the_union2-768x597.jpg

YOUR GUIDE TO ‘JOE SPEAK’ SOTU 2023​

Cartoon published 02/06/2023

If there’s one thing we can expect from Biden’s upcoming State of The Union Address, it is this: He will lie.

He will brag about the bogus unemployment rate. He will claim he has made progress on inflation and the climate change claptrap. He will urge more money be sunk into a losing cause known as Ukraine. He will blame Trump and his ‘extreme MAGA’ supporters for all the ills of the country. He won’t mention his own disasters such as wide open borders, the Covid debacle, and his failure to act when a Chinese spy balloon floated over our country. He certainly won’t mention his son’s financial ties to communist China from which he also benefits.


It’s becoming more difficult to watch Biden as he repeats obvious lies that have been proven to be lies. It’s almost as if he has lying disease and can’t help himself. Clearly he could have never reached his position of power without a stolen election.

Joe is doddering fool of a man and a moral, physical, intellectual, and spiritual disgrace. Time for Joe to step down and enjoy the rest of his days licking ice cream. What should follow his State of the Union speech is his resignation speech.

— Ben Garrison
 
I present to you the next level of journo cringe


Biden should go Dark Brandon in State of the Union speech: 'America is SUPER WOKE, tbh'​

'That’s right, in the past year, we have made great progress on our mission to transform America into a genderless, vegan nation grounded in socialism and a firm belief that there is no god.'​

View attachment 1675742445442.webpRex Huppke
USA TODAY
Published 5:00 a.m. ET Feb. 6, 2023Updated 8:40 a.m. ET Feb. 6, 2023
View Comments



'We're turning it around': Biden says Democrats must pay attention to working class voters
President Joe Biden talked about the middle class that's been diminishing for years and called for Democrats to pay attention to working class voters. Anastasiia Riddle, USA TODAY
During the State of the Union address Tuesday night, President Joe Biden could announce U.S. scientists have found a cure for cancer and, within hours, Fox News pundits would be saying: “Great. Now patriotic cancer doctors will lose their careers to Biden’s relentless political ambitions.”
Biden and America are both far from perfect, but the president has ample accomplishments to crow about: The unemployment rate fell to 3.4% in January, the lowest it has been since 1969; inflation, while still high, has been easing; and his party performed historically well in the midterm elections.
But in the right-wing media “Land of You-Will-Believe, Because We’ll Say It Over and Over and Over Again,” Biden is, in no particular order: an illegitimate president; the most radical president America has ever had; dementia-addled and incapable of completing a sentence; a criminal mastermind who has duped the American people and every level of U.S. law enforcement; effectively dead, but controlled, “Weekend at Bernie’s”-style, by Vice President Kamala Harris; weak; tyrannical; inept; and devious.

Nothing Biden says in State of the Union address will matter to those who hate him​

He could stand before Congress and announce a plan to cut corporate taxes, mandate prayer in schools and name every airport in America after Ronald Reagan and it would do nothing to shake conservative’s conspiratorial construct that every move he makes is a demonic blend of evil and nefariousness.
Dark Brandon vs. The Pronoun Patrol:Illustrated Origin Story of a JoeBiden Meme
So my question is: Why bother? Why not go "Dark Brandon" and just trot up to the podium – or better yet, have someone push him up there in a wheelchair – for the big speech and give the Fox News/Newsmax/OANN/PatriotBlatherBlog (I might’ve made that last one up) people what they want?

It would make their lives easier, and the rest of us would probably enjoy it more than the usual State of the Union Pablum.
Here's a draft speech I worked up, free of charge:

A State of the Union address to the Fox News crowd​

Mister Speaker, Madam Vice President, and our First Lady and Second Gentleman, members of Congress and the Cabinet, justices of the Supreme Court, ghosts of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin and members of the cannibalistic global cabal that I lead: Good evening. You all look delicious.
President Joe Biden arrives in Hagerstown, Md., on Feb. 4, 2023.


President Joe Biden arrives in Hagerstown, Md., on Feb. 4, 2023. Patrick Semansky/AP

On this night, I’ve come to report to you that the State of the Union is … WOKE AS (EXPLETIVE)!
That’s right, in the past year, we have made great progress on our mission to transform America into a genderless, vegan nation grounded in socialism and a firm belief that there is no god.
In just the past six months, for example, our elite social justice warriors have surreptitiously inserted critical race theory into more than 95% of the nation’s Bibles while also transmitting subliminal lessons on gender identity to the iPads and iPhones used by 67% of U.S. children under the age of 10.
Biden wants to save us from our gas stoves:What will the nanny state think of next?
Are 'stovetroopers' coming for my gas stove?:I don't know, but I AM ANGRY!
At the direction of my supervisors, Barack Obama and George Soros, my administration has taken steps to mandate that every sporting event halftime show feature drag queens – sorry about the Super Bowl gig, Rihanna – and meat will be outlawed by no later than March of this year, along with gas stoves and guns.
As you can see, I’m reading tonight’s speech from a laptop computer. This one belongs to my son, Hunter Biden, and it does, in fact, contain a large file labeled “Biden Crime Family Dirty Dealings.” I’m sure you’d love to get your hands on it, but you can’t, because it’s where I keep my plan to ban Christmas and make religion illegal.
Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, boards Air Force One with the president on Feb. 4, 2023,  in Syracuse, N.Y.


Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, boards Air Force One with the president on Feb. 4, 2023, in Syracuse, N.Y. Patrick Semansky/AP

(Pause for a full two minutes, staring blankly into space.)
Where am I? Are my pancakes here yet?
Whoops. Sorry, sometimes I go a little blank for a spell. It’s just the ol’ dementia acting up. Nothing the blood of a few young conservatives who were victims of “cancel culture” can’t fix.
(Take sip from glass of red liquid.)

Anyhoo, next month I’ll be dissolving the military because I hate America. Oh, and that Chinese spy balloon that was floating across the country over the weekend? That actually belonged to Bill Gates. He was using it to activate the chips he implanted in everyone via the COVID-19 vaccine.
Don’t worry, you won’t feel a thing as you’re being enslaved and forced to work the soy fields.
Hail Satan!
BIDEN OUT!

Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Twitter @RexHuppke and Facebook facebook.com/RexIsAJerk, or contact him at rhuppke@usatoday.com
 
So you are suggesting most of, if not all of the administrative state is captured by the Russians? Even though all the evidence we have, points to China currently doing the capture?
Are you under the impression that the corrupt fucks like Biden are members of the China corruption rewards loyalty system and are just saving up their points for the all expenses paid trip to pedophile Island? Because taking money from the chinks doesn't preclude them from taking money from the Russians.
 
Are you under the impression that the corrupt fucks like Biden are members of the China corruption rewards loyalty system and are just saving up their points for the all expenses paid trip to pedophile Island? Because taking money from the chinks doesn't preclude them from taking money from the Russians.

If, at the top level, they were taking money from the Russians, there would've been no intervention by the CIA and State Dept during the Maidan Coup. There would be no sanctions against Russia. And there would've certainly been no directions to shell the Russian loyalists in the Donbass region near Russias border.

I don't even understand your line of reasoning.
 
If, at the top level, they were taking money from the Russians, there would've been no intervention by the CIA and State Dept during the Maidan Coup. There would be no sanctions against Russia. And there would've certainly been no directions to shell the Russian loyalists in the Donbass region near Russias border.

I don't even understand your line of reasoning.
The CIA doesn't listen to the president, I thought that became clear when they blew JFKs head off and staged Watergate. I think you're under the false assumption that Biden or Putin give a fuck about anything but cash and power.

As far as why Biden is sending weapons to Ukraine my two words would be weapon laundering, something Biden is no stranger to. Biden and Obama both gave weapons to the Mexican drug cartels, Biden basically gave an armies worth of weapons to the Taliban. It wouldn't surprise me if alot of the military aid to Ukraine that has been "captured" by the Russians was less captured and more laundered. Foreign states pay big bucks for military equipment to study and reverse engineer.
 
The CIA doesn't listen to the president, I thought that became clear when they blew JFKs head off and staged Watergate. I think you're under the false assumption that Biden or Putin give a fuck about anything but cash and power.

As far as why Biden is sending weapons to Ukraine my two words would be weapon laundering, something Biden is no stranger to. Biden and Obama both gave weapons to the Mexican drug cartels, Biden basically gave an armies worth of weapons to the Taliban. It wouldn't surprise me if alot of the military aid to Ukraine that has been "captured" by the Russians was less captured and more laundered. Foreign states pay big bucks for military equipment to study and reverse engineer.

Yes I know all that, but you aren't addressing my points. If Russia is paying at the top level. Why is Russia directing the US to attack Russia? I mean China must be paying good since the spy balloon went through the entire US.

And we know why Biden gave an armys worth of weapons to the Taliban. Soon before the Afghanistan pullout, the Taliban promised to protect the gas pipeline built during the US occupation. (Probably requested by the corporate donors). The weapons allowed the Taliban to stablize the country and protect the pipeline.

afgha.jpg
 
Last edited:
And we know why Biden gave an armys worth of weapons to the Taliban. Soon before the Afghanistan pullout, the Taliban promised to protect the gas pipeline built during the US occupation. (Probably requested by the corporate donors). The weapons allowed the Taliban to stablize the country and protect the pipeline.
Taliban, doing something that could benefit the US? Not working to screw Biden over? Am I in the twilight zone?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back