Disaster Catholic student opposed to biological males in women’s washrooms arrested for attending school - Grade 11 student Josh Alexander has been arrested for attending St. Joseph’s Catholic High School in Renfrew, Ontario.

1675787494908.png

Grade 11 student Josh Alexander has been arrested for attending St. Joseph’s Catholic High School in Renfrew, Ontario.

“I have just been arrested and charged at my Catholic highschool [sic] for attending class after being excluded for indicating my intent to adhere to my religious beliefs,” Alexander said in a tweet viewed over 30,000 times.

Alexander was suspended for 20 days in late 2022 because he expressed his Christian beliefs during class debates and on social media, that there are only two genders, that students cannot switch between genders, and that male students should not be permitted into the girls’ bathroom.

Liberty Coalition Canada is assisting Alexander. In a press release, LCC said, “The timing of this suspension also suggests retaliation for Josh organizing a student walk-out regarding the refusal of St. Joseph’s principal, Derek Lennox, to address the concerns of a female student regarding male students accessing the girls’ washrooms.”

Alexander was told by the principal he could only return to school if he agreed to not use the “dead name” of any transgender student and agreed to exclude himself from his two afternoon classes because those classes are attended by two transgender students who disapprove of Josh’s religious beliefs.

On January 6, 2023, LCC Chief Litigator James S.M. Kitchen, who is representing Alexander, wrote to the principal explaining how compelling Josh to utter falsehoods regarding gender contrary to his beliefs and segregating him from classes are repugnant manifestations of religious discrimination.

The principal responded by excluding Josh from attending St. Joseph’s altogether, claiming that “his presence in the school or classroom would be detrimental to the physical or mental well-being of the pupils”.

Alexander attended school on January 9 regardless. In response, the Renfrew County Catholic District School Board, of which St. Joseph’s is a part, issued a Trespass Notice against Josh, effective until the end of the first semester, and a second suspension.

The school board hired lawyers, who wrote to Kitchen on January 9 objecting to the publication of the details of how Josh was being treated by the School Board. Mr. Kitchen responded, noting that the “issuing of a further suspension and a trespass notice [is] an unnecessary escalation and extreme response to him simply attending classes”.

The school board then took the position that Josh could not appeal his suspensions based on a technicality. Josh’s desire is to appeal his suspensions on his own and through Kitchen as his lawyer. Despite demonstrating to the school board he has standing to appeal the Board’s disciplinary decisions against him, the board has refused to hear his appeals, Kitchen said in a press release.

Alexander had hoped to return to school at the start of the second semester Monday. However, upon informing the school board he would continue to adhere to his religious beliefs regarding Biblical sexuality and gender, the School Board responded by excluding Josh from attending St. Joseph’s for the rest of the school year.

In a press release, Kitchen wrote, “Under the guise of ‘safety’, as that term has been revised by woke gender activists now pervasive in public institutions, Josh has been penalized for expressing his Christian beliefs regarding gender and modesty, beliefs which also happen to align with both objective truth and actual safety. Josh not only has a right to express himself during class discussions and through public forums, he also has a right not to be discriminated against by his school for his sincere religious beliefs. Being suspended and excluded from attending classes is the height of discrimination.

“Josh will continue to courageously stand for his beliefs, for truth, and for girls whose voices of concern over their actual safety are being drowned out by the outraged nonsense of the woke mob, even if that means sacrificing his ability to attend St. Joseph’s.”

https://www.westernstandard.news/ne...cle_de574da2-a65d-11ed-a558-8ff6fda6fc64.html (Archive)
 
To admit my bias, I come from a long line of non-denominational folks who are devout and hate churches, viewing them as places where folks go for a public display of false piety and to shove their spiritual obligation to read for themselves in lieu of being sold on whatever the leader of said local chapter of x denomination is selling that week. Also as a way for people to separate themselves from God mentally, compartmentalizing Him to Sunday gatherings while sinning the rest of the week.
So, why aren't their beliefs capable of being public displays of false piety, where they get to claim like they're better than those "religious" folk? That kind of arrogance isn't uncommon among the Baptists "non-denominational Christians", nor is there any reason for it to be.

Maybe it's the people that are at fault, rather than the institutional frameworks they inhabit.
 
Couldn't the same thing be said about most of the churches and especially catholic churches today. I remember even material from 30-40 years ago was talking about lies being spread within bible colleges overseeing the priests and formation of churches we see today ad still being spread within said colleges and developments right now.
Oh, absolutely. There was a really interesting book I read a couple years ago called Goodbye, Good Men which detailed how many strange, heretical and immoral practices were going on in the seminaries. It has cleaned up a lot due to the efforts of John Paul II and his successors but there are still problems to this day.

However, the important difference is there is still a defined, unalterable dogma and mechanisms for disciplining priests and religious who do these things. It would have been impossible to reform the seminaries without the authority of the Church. Of course more than a few of these types just end up splitting off and starting their own church...

The people who have taken over are hipsters and frauds that were warned about as false prophets and yet most in pews don't read their bibles which allowed them to take power. A church I live near actually threw out their pastor who was being a misleading weasel a few years ago after their older brimstone enthusiast retired, but many churches just go right along with the new leaders because most went for fun not for actual religious reasons but for community reasons not literal religious learning
This is due to the complete and utter lack of catechesis in pretty much all denominations. The first and most important people for this role are parents teaching their children about the faith, with the church providing the community, guidance and faith environment to develop into well-formed Christians. Luther's Small Catechism was specifically written for this purpose.

In fact it's so bad now if you were to survey Christians about the nature of Christ and his relationship to the Father you'd find out the Arians won after all.
 
Why are trannies allowed in a catholic school?
I hope the Moslems and Poos erradicate the Christcucks if this is the kind of Christianity they practice.
Trudeau-Castro is actually a sort of cuck francis catholic, that is, not a Catholic. P.O.P.E (protector of pederasts everywhere) Francis actually has met troons (weird mtf things) and uses their pronouns. Heretics all like those CoE ('God is non binary') cucks. His hatred of reverence, his foul language (journos are coprophiliacs, f words) and hatred of the ancient Mass says everything. This student is a hero.
 
Why are trannies allowed in a catholic school?
I hope the Moslems and Poos erradicate the Christcucks if this is the kind of Christianity they practice.
Trudeau-Castro is actually a sort of cuck francis catholic, that is, not a Catholic. P.O.P.E (protector of pederasts everywhere) Francis actually has met troons (weird mtf things) and used their pronouns. Heretics all like those CoE ('God is non binary') cucks. His hatred of reverence, his foul language (journos are coprophiliacs, f*** words) and hatred of the ancient Mass says everything. This student is a hero.
 
So, why aren't their beliefs capable of being public displays of false piety, where they get to claim like they're better than those "religious" folk? That kind of arrogance isn't uncommon among the Baptists "non-denominational Christians", nor is there any reason for it to be.
Not a baptist (I would say so if I was) and never said it was from a position of superiority. I've certainly met more people who think it's a mark of superiority to go to church than I ever have people who feel the same way I do thinking it somehow makes you better than anybody. I could go on but as I said in my previous post, I'm not going to turn this into a point-by-point explanation of my personal opinions and how those compare and contrast to that of my folks'.
Maybe it's the people that are at fault, rather than the institutional frameworks they inhabit.
Brother, it's always the people at fault, and institutions are works of the people whom inhabit them. From my own opinion it serves as a weakpoint for capture/twisting of the faith, and that point of view seems to be being proven more accurate by the day.

I'm just glad that there does seem to be a large segment of these people who do consider themselves whatever denomination, either searching out churches that aren't progressive or just doing their own thing. I have no contempt for people who attend churches and I certainly wasn't raised that way. My contempt lies solely with the structure and what it does/has done to people, and what problems it represents as well as the bad actors who work to use such structures for malicious ends. I'm not enough of an autistic about it to declare the church, and the concept itself, has had a solely negative impact either - that would be retarded and I'm not a black and white thinker. I mean for fuck's sake it's not like the Catholic church sprang out of nowhere, I know where it came from.

For people who need church for a sense of community or whatever, I wish there was more of an effort for communal organization without oversight from some institution with a monetary incentive. That would be a comfortable middle-ground imo.
 
Last edited:
Feel like this is about selling merch and promoting their influencer image more than anything (Josh Alexander even labels himself a Social Media Influencer). Alexander is associated with the group Save Canada that was involved with the Freedom Convoy a bit, getting promoted by guys like those at Rebel Media, then this past fall enrolls in this Catholic school and does this 'walkout' where they end up meeting with the adults that were sorta carryovers from the Freedom Convoy.



FiGmNgbXoAAnIT7.png

Still it seems like the school screwed up by saying the only way he could come back to school was if he agreed to not say the boys' names and to abandon a couple classes.

The school board then took the position that Josh could not appeal his suspensions based on a technicality.
I think this stems from the school contacting Alexander's parents while he's saying he's withdrawn from parental control (Canadian for emancipated minor?).

Or he's saying he's withdrawn from Parental Control just for the suspension?

Anyhow the school ended up treating a lawyer saying there'd be a conflict if they can't come to some arrangement as being a 'threat'.
As you know, the temporary exclusion notice was issued only after Josh continued to challenge the expectations set for Josh on his return and only after you issued the following threat: “Absent some sort of arrangement…there will likely be an unfortunate and unnecessary conflict tomorrow, as Mr. Alexander's position as communicated in my letter to you of January 6 also remains unchanged”. The Education Act provides that it is the duty of a principal to maintain proper order and discipline in the School and “to refuse to admit to the school or classroom a person whose presence in the school or classroom would in the principal’s judgment be detrimental to the physical or mental well-being of the pupils”. The Principal determined that Josh’s presence in the School met this standard. It is not acceptable for Josh to flaunt the Principal’s directions.

In the circumstances, and in face of Josh’s continued defiance of the Principal’s authority in the School, the Board will be issuing a Trespass Notice. In addition, based on Josh’s conduct at St. Joseph’s today, the Principal will be issuing a further disciplinary suspension on the grounds of Josh’s “persistent opposition to authority”. These grounds will be detailed in the notice of suspension.


We will be communicating with you and Josh’s parents shortly on next steps. In the interim, we would ask that Josh cooperate with the Principal’s direction not to attend school while we are working through these issues.


Finally, we understand that Board correspondence to Josh has been published on the Liberty Coalition Canada website, along with other statements regarding the current situation. Please be advised that you do not have permission to publish this communication. Further, this letter is subject to copyright protections.

We note that the statements posted regarding the current situation are false, misleading and potentially defamatory. Contrary to what is suggested, Board staff have acted in good faith, performed their duties diligently and conducted themselves with the highest degree of competence. More specifically, School administrators have acted within the scope of the Education Act, as well as relevant Board policies.
This reads as them treating any challenge to the suspension as reason to do the suspension which I don't get how that'd seem reasonable to anyone. They even go on to suggest Alexander's comments about this whole situation are defamatory while their emails backup much of his version of events.



This site has relevant links to some of their communications:
 
I don't like Catholics, but this poor kid man. We must nuke Canada.
I'm trying to figure out how this happened exactly, Canada aside. It appears the parish this school was in is very conservative and looks like it still offers TLM. I can't find any charism associated with the school, so there is the first red flag. Seems like it must have been mostly secularly staffed and a problem for awhile then. Bishop is responsible for it ultimately though and who is the Bishop?

Edit: Got the diocese wrong, it is Pembroke. The Bishop, I can't find a lot on him of interest besides Francis appointed him which...yeah...

On Jan 16, 2023, at 8:13 PM,
Vicar General / Vicaire général <vg@pembrokediocese.com> wrote:

Dear Ms. Williams,

Thank you very much for your email, to which Bishop Desrochers has asked me to reply on his behalf.

The Renfrew County District Catholic School Board is a separate corporation from the Diocese of Pembroke, and it is under the direction of a Board of Trustees. The diocese does not have jurisdiction over the internal life of the Board, nor does the Bishop have the authority to intervene in internal matters. He can, however, exercise moral suasion, and he is in regular contact with the Board’s leadership.

I thank you again for writing.

Sincerely yours in Christ,

Fr. Michael Smith

Vicar General

**************

Link Archive

:thinking:
 
Last edited:
Or, hear me out, we send all the freaks to Canada while the few normal people left there are allowed to move to the USA or Europe or wherever they want. A great replacement basically but with troons vs normal people.
You Americans then build a great wall at the border and the rest of the world chips in for some ships with big guns to make sure noone leaves protect their coasts.
We could set up a few thousand cameras and satelites and boom real life Jurasdic Park tv with troons and other fantasy-gender-specials.
Think about the money for the tv rights and all the merch we could sell. We could get rich like Elon Musk!
What if we did that, but annex canada and put the troons and commies in mexico behind an even bigger wall?
 
Explain this Catholic school arresting a student.

This is a dumb argument to make, you can't point to Martin Luther and call him corrupt for things which occurred long after he's been dead when the institution you're defending is equally corrupt.

The Catholic church has always been little more than a political party, they caved into the belief of witchcraft when it became popular enough and then rejected heliocentrism because it was unpopular, everything about the Catholic church revolves around their power and their coffers.
You could make a very convincing argument that Luther and the other Reformers saved the Catholic Church through the Counter-Reformation. It was very corrupt and very immoral in the years leading up to the Reformation, from the Pope on down.
 
Aaaaaand...its Canada, of fucking course.

Fuck you, you weak maple syrup chugging Castro's son led medical suiciding tranny worshipping soy drinking commie Godless bastards. You guys are California but somehow even worse.

I legit hope the history books paint you all as the failed nation you all deserved to be remembered as

Rate me MATI, I dont give a shit.
 
James Kitchen who is representing Alexander also was involved with the Baptist church pastor Tim Stephens who got in trouble in Canada for doing services when they were doing lockdowns.


So they do seem like people out to make a buck with this.

Still you have the retards with the school that seemed to assume they could just dictate to the kid what he had to do and tell him he has to deal with it.

It also sounds like in Canada if you're 16 or 17 you can decide fuck it you're emancipated and don't need your parent's permission for stuff.

If that's accurate, then the school is ignoring the law to say that because the parents didn't appeal the suspension, only the teenager, that the teenager's appeals don't count. Problem is you also had Josh and his parents showing up to the school December 20, suggesting the withdrawal thing wasn't planned out beforehand. The law may be on the teenager's side, but you could still have the school assuming they can say none of it counts because the parents were involved leading to this all being drawn out.
 
Still you have the retards with the school that seemed to assume they could just dictate to the kid what he had to do and tell him he has to deal with it.
Makes a lot more sense once you realize they weren't really a Catholic school but in name only and there was no oversight by the Catholic Church over them because it was fundamentally secular. So we can argue about whether The Church should allow this shit, but regardless, this is ultimately a secular matter under the grift mask of a religious school. Now the grifters might get outgrifted, lol.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
You could make a very convincing argument that Luther and the other Reformers saved the Catholic Church through the Counter-Reformation. It was very corrupt and very immoral in the years leading up to the Reformation, from the Pope on down.
People had been pointing out the absolute horseshit that the Catholic church had been up to for literally centuries before Luther. The Church more or less went to war against the Czechs over it. They engaged in what some consider a genocide in southern France to wipe out the Cathars. Luther was just in kinda the right place at just the right time to break the camels back.

That's not the point for these people though. The big no no was going outside the church. Nothing is worse than that. Traaaaaaads, esp the Catholic and Orthodox kind, hate the reformers. Nothing makes them cope and seethe more. The One Troo Church is their identity, and some dude cucking their identity 500 years ago cannot be allowed to pass without slandering the shit out of them. They are "Apostolic", after all. You can come up with all kinds of whackadoodle theological bullshit, but as long as you close ranks and keep it within the church, you're ok.
 
You could make a very convincing argument that Luther and the other Reformers saved the Catholic Church through the Counter-Reformation. It was very corrupt and very immoral in the years leading up to the Reformation, from the Pope on down.
It was never Luther's intention to break off from the Church, just clean house. He was disappointed in the results at the end and was always devoted to Mary.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Agamemnon Busmalis
It was never Luther's intention to break off from the Church, just clean house. He was disappointed in the results at the end and was always devoted to Mary.
The whole story is a tragedy....the Church drove Luther away through how they treated him. What was going on in the Church at the time was obscene and desperately needed reform but they refused to listen due to arrogance, corruption and greed.
 
The whole story is a tragedy....the Church drove Luther away through how they treated him. What was going on in the Church at the time was obscene and desperately needed reform but they refused to listen due to arrogance, corruption and greed.
Yep, Catholics themselves fully acknowledge it and don't begrudge Luther for it. But the law of unintended consequences and whatnot.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Safir
Back