Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

[My Name is Mud]

Hi man whose name looks like an inverted ککک, I have something I want to say: you were indeed right this whole time and I feel like even more of a jackass for being hostile toward you in the previous page. @Need4Sneed's assistance helped clarify that once and for all. He, much to my surprise, managed to discern Alyss's ZIP (78702); bless on you fucking autistic bastard.

Special thanks also to @KingFrampt's post about the email being linked to DOB 16 March 1992.

Operating under the assumption that she does live in Austin under ZIP 78702 and that her date of birth is 1992-March-16, public-facing voter data returns the following

This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

This is all well and good, but how can we verify the validity of the email @KingFrampt provided earlier (anakhimel.br@gmail.com)? I think I'll let search engine results do the talking from here.

View attachment 4456472
View attachment 4456464
View attachment 4456483

Anakhimel on Twitter explicitly links back to PreciselyAlyss, proud new “bees-ness” partner of Honeycomb.io.

Sorry if these were posted before, but I just run the email through Epieos and got this:

 

[ubunr9kpkk69c4ex]

Charity has started directly responding to negative reviews on Glassdoor. Not able to archive it at the moment.

Charity, our Co-founder and CTO wrote a message to specifically address your comments. In addition to Charity, I am also available if you ever wanted to talk as this is certainly not the experience I'd want employees of Honeycomb to have. It’s been a month since I’ve joined and while my experience has been positive, I’d want to know where and how we could do better for Honeycombers. -Jenny Cristobal

“Wow. It sounds like you had a really bad experience here. I am so sorry. Reading this site isn't exactly fun or pleasant, but your feedback here demonstrates why we must. It is a hard reminder that even if many people do love working here, experience is never universal, and the worst experiences are often the least visible to us. By every signal available to me — employee satisfaction surveys, in-depth interviews by an external DEI consultant, employee turnover rates, our record of hiring, retaining and promoting people from underrepresented backgrounds — I can attest that these statements do not represent most people’s experience working at Honeycomb. But that doesn’t, and shouldn’t, make me feel any better about the fact that your experience left you feeling this way about the company. It’s hard to know how to respond without knowing more details. Was this written by a bitter ex-employee who is lashing out, trying to hurt us by swiping hard at the values they know we hold dearest? Is it from someone who was harmed or mismanaged on our watch? I don’t know. I will absolutely own that we are not perfect. We finally have a VP of people, but it took us years (too long, honestly) to fill the role. Our People team has been overextended for a long time. We have gone through a period of rapid growth, and we have work to do in developing our managers, scaling up our comms, and trusted outlets for people to ask for support when they are unhappy at work or see something (or someone) who needs to change. I am sure you aren't the only one to have left feeling angry and betrayed, but I fervently hope you will be the last. I am sorry your time at Honeycomb has left such a bitter taste in your mouth. I hope you have found a new job where you feel valued and at home. It’s a long shot, but if you should ever want to reach out and discuss your experience in more detail, I would love to hear you out in complete confidence. We may be lacking in many ways, but the desire to fix our problems and avoid hurting people is not one of them.” -Charity Majors, CTO

 

[Ethics Gradient]

...Null he's found a target just as independent and implacable as himself.

I'd love it if, one day in the future, Josh finds himself at some tech convention and runs into Elliot. Babyface Moon vs the Moonfaced Brick.

Been a little while since in checked in on Elliot. That Mother Jones article shows some next-level cognitive dissonance. It feels like Elliot is running out of steam. He's burned through all the favours he can leverage in the sector with former colleagues / contacts and is resorting of venting on fringe sites that posit no scrutiny of his - IMO - indefensible actions. Although, having said that, neither did soybeard Collins or Jowels-for-days-Lorenz...

All this considered i feel like the points Josh made in that Zero Hedge op-ed a while back are more pertinent than ever. Especially with freaks like Elliot actively pushing for dominion over the Internet.

And I remember this is a man who spends so much time seething at the continued existence of this site, his body has decided his eyes are the enemy and his immune system is literally eating his eyes before he reads something that gives him an apoplectic siezure.

Disagree. His eyes are most likely calling it a day because they have to process the image of his reflection in the mirror.

 

[Trianon]

Charity has started directly responding to negative reviews on Glassdoor. Not able to archive it at the moment.

Lol, that statement is manipulative garbage. "I am just so grateful that I am the type of person who cares what you, a bitter ex-employee, have to say, and even though you are the only person who has ever had a problem with me, I believe we can resolve our differences if you'll do exactly what I say."

 

[Mia Zapata's Ghost]

Lol, that statement is manipulative garbage. "I am just so grateful that I am the type of person who cares what you, a bitter ex-employee, have to say, and even though you are the only person who has ever had a problem with me, I believe we can resolve our differences if you'll do exactly what I say."

Not only is it manipulative but it's also extremely counterproductive. A potential employee might see the negative reviews on Glassdoor and have second thoughts about working there, but they will DEFINITELY retract their applications if they can see before even getting hired that this is how management operates.

 

[TheNazgulKing]

Hi man whose name looks like an inverted ککک, I have something I want to say: you were indeed right this whole time and I feel like even more of a jackass for being hostile toward you in the previous page. @Need4Sneed's assistance helped clarify that once and for all. He, much to my surprise, managed to discern Alyss's ZIP (78702); bless on you fucking autistic bastard.

Special thanks also to @KingFrampt's post about the email being linked to DOB 16 March 1992.

This is a great example of the difference between a normal person and a lolcow. When it becomes clear we dun goofed, most of us acknowledge our error, apologize, and move on. The lolcow, Kiwilaughatacus moronicus, doubles down. They create statistics, question your motives, insist that dozens of lurkers are supporting them in private messages but afraid of being bullied and harassed if they offer public support, etc.

Think Patrick Tomlinson's "No, child, I do not owe Quasi legal fees" or Elaine Miller's "Those nudes that Kiwi Farms said I posted are deepfakes they made to embarrass me." And for added fun, you'll frequently see lolcows supporting the delusions of other lolcows. RubinRemus is fast gathering an entire herd of anti-KF lolcows, including more nonces than you'd find in Jeffrey Epstein's address book.

 

[Jarry Seinfelt]

Lol, that statement is manipulative garbage. "I am just so grateful that I am the type of person who cares what you, a bitter ex-employee, have to say, and even though you are the only person who has ever had a problem with me, I believe we can resolve our differences if you'll do exactly what I say."

Employer responses to Glassdoor reviews just look bad in general. Aside when a megacorp like Walmart has a HR/social media drone copypasting "We're so sorry to hear this, email us if you want to discuss this complaint in greater depth" on negative reviews. Can't really explain why, it just feels Streisand Effect-y.

 

[Wy4M]

Looking at a photo of him is bad enough, but you really need to see video of him to understand just what a fucked up freak he really is.

The Easter Island head and massive jaw. The obviously male features and gait. The utterly laughable Kermit voice that you can tell is a pretence that he struggles to maintain. But on top of that are these insane mannerisms that give you a serial killer vibe. It really is weird as fuck.

I know I'm saying nothing new here, but if you've only experienced this troon via photos, you have to check out his YouTube channel, cos it's something else.

View attachment 4433400

Can it be that he's using cheekbone fillers?

 

[AnOminous]

Only a troon could be so narcissistic and nihilistic as to not give a fuck about their family while expecting something from the very family they turned their hunched back to.

This is why people hate troons. They contribute nothing of value, while demanding everything. They should be gassed.

 

[乙乙乙]

Hi man whose name looks like an inverted ککک, I have something I want to say: you were indeed right this whole time and I feel like even more of a jackass for being hostile toward you in the previous page. @Need4Sneed's assistance helped clarify that once and for all. He, much to my surprise, managed to discern Alyss's ZIP (78702); bless on you fucking autistic bastard.

Special thanks also to @KingFrampt's post about the email being linked to DOB 16 March 1992.

Operating under the assumption that she does live in Austin under ZIP 78702 and that her date of birth is 1992-March-16, public-facing voter data returns the following

This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.

This is all well and good, but how can we verify the validity of the email @KingFrampt provided earlier (anakhimel.br@gmail.com)? I think I'll let search engine results do the talking from here.

View attachment 4456472
View attachment 4456464
View attachment 4456483

Anakhimel on Twitter explicitly links back to PreciselyAlyss, proud new “bees-ness” partner of Honeycomb.io.

speak no more of it friend. i didn't even read it as hostile. your posts have been very informative

 

[ForTheHoard]

Can it be that he's using cheekbone fillers?
View attachment 4460972

View attachment 4460984

View attachment 4461809View attachment 4460993

View attachment 4460973View attachment 4460976

Maybe, but face filler tends to make the injection site look fatter and plump. Elliot's face is too skeletal and ghoulish. All the contours of his face look hard and boney. I also think facial feminization surgery never happened because how could you do any work on that face and not grind that jaw and chin back? He's already a super low effort tranny so I think he was just unfortunately born with a head shaped like a mailbox.

 

[Onni Kalsarikännit]

 

[Solid Hyrax]

Charity has started directly responding to negative reviews on Glassdoor. Not able to archive it at the moment.

Here's an image with the review plus the response for context

 

[Kees H]

Here's an image with the review plus the response for context
View attachment 4464651

Funny that she's only responding to that one negative review and not the other ones. The other ones are way more detailed and damning to Honeycomb. Fail attempt at damage control imho.

Tbh, if I was working in such a pozloaded place, I wouldn't be too overly negative in the internal review processes as well. If I read the negative reviews, I'd expect that to be used against me, and I would not have any trust for the review processes to be anonymous. It's hilarious they are only trusting on those reviews. Not to powerlevel too much, but I've worked at toxic companies as well, where we got shit on when we told that in those "anonymous" review processes.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Employer responses to Glassdoor reviews just look bad in general. Aside when a megacorp like Walmart has a HR/social media drone copypasting "We're so sorry to hear this, email us if you want to discuss this complaint in greater depth" on negative reviews. Can't really explain why, it just feels Streisand Effect-y.

Here's an image with the review plus the response for context
View attachment 4464651

Here's why, notice that she writes all that shit but never does anything but say "nuh uh, please contact me so we can improve this thing I didn't know was happening and don't think happened at all" and this is often the case when the companies reply to these or other bad reviews most anywhere. They can't actually defend themselves because that would reveal too much but they really want to defend themselves rather than drop the note like you see from the bigger companies. Charity obviously lost her shit at this because why else would not just the person whose job it is but also her write all this? They want to defend the company but know they can't post what they really want to "THIS PERSON WAS A BITCH AND IS A LIAR AND WE ARE THE LEADER IN CONSENT ACCIDENTS!!!"

A lot of lolcows simply don't understand that deliberately being dishonest and assuming everyone will believe whatever you say may reveal your actual motives more than just staying silent or succinct will. Simply flooding the zone and dominating a conversation works in person because of the limitations of the medium, the internet doesn't have these limitations.

 

[Trianon]

A lot of lolcows simply don't understand that deliberately being dishonest and assuming everyone will believe whatever you say may reveal your actual motives more than just staying silent or succinct will. Simply flooding the zone and dominating a conversation works in person because of the limitations of the medium, the internet doesn't have these limitations.

Dominating the convo is a good way of describing it. The sarcastic "wow" at the beginning really sets the tone. Of course current employees will also think twice about giving any negative feedback too.

 

[AnOminous]

How does anyone even look at a repulsive freak like this and not instantly vomit?

Look at how vile this thing is.

 

[0 0]

View attachment 4466753
How does anyone even look at a repulsive freak like this and not instantly vomit?

Look at how vile this thing is.

Whenever I see a still image of his face, I can only ever interpret it being constructed out of solid stone. If I imagine him speaking, I just see his face cracking into place like a puppet made out of concrete.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

Not sure about him being a Software Engineer:
View attachment 4449096

Liz Fong-Jones (方禮真) on Twitter: "My biological family, in five gener…

archived 6 Feb 2023 09:38:28 UTC

archive.md

"Mai biorogical famiry, in flive genelations: Rairroad raborer, Fierd wolker, Ladio tlechnircian, Rawryer, Sloftrare renginreer"

 

[InteracialBowelSyndrome]

Shrilly Elliot's great-great grandfather is probably in the Chinese afterlife like "I died on a railroad so my future heir could chop his dick off and pretend to be a woman? Ay yah, maybe we should of let the Khans keep China."