Karl Kasarda / InRangeTV / 2gACM / Karl-InRangeTV - satanist cuckold guntuber with cringe haircut and a Kubelwagen hates yt

[AN/ALR56]

Minor point but it stuck with me ever since I heard it: in a fairly early Q&A when he and Ian were talking about their ancestries, Karl mentions he still has family in Norway but he has no contact with them since his own branch of the family left during WWII. One of the things he offhandedly mentions is that "they might have been Quislings, I don't know". I have a feeling he might actually know.

So, his side of the family had the luxury to flee, but the family who stuck for 5 years during occupation, either bombed by allies or living with the SS and auxiliary local police running around are "guilty" and "evil" if they had to "collaborate" (probably didn't shoot a German on sight to avoid their family being hanged).
Reminds me of a quote by De Gaulle after the liberation of Paris, how everyone appeared out of nowhere claiming they were french resistance, despite the vast majority of the french army and Population actually willingly collaborated with the Germans.

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

Karl has always struck me as one of those guys who got into guns in the first place because he was tired of getting his ass beat everytime he ran his mouth IRL like he does online.

 

[Irate Feline]

I wouldn't put too much weight on Brownells messing with WWSD lower orders beyond the "TRIGGERED" discount since from personal experience I can say they cancel lower orders all the time, give you a full refund only to re-place the order for you a few days later, without warning. Usually after you bought a lower locally (but too many lowers kicking around is a good problem to have). I think it's something to do with how the website updates when things are in stock and it being run by boomers. Keep an eye on the folks implying Brownells is fucking them over.

I really wanted to like Karl when the mud tests were in full swing a few years ago, and it seemed he did a pretty decent job keeping his politics out of the main channel content (no small feat as to a lot of folks firearms are an inherently political concept) but with the whole leaning into the limp-dick "edgy satanist but cucked and inoffensive so as not to hurt feelings" shit it all just bubbled up and every past statement he made that was well-informed and educated now seemed smarmy and intentionally inflammatory regardless of what it was. I was completely indifferent to masks during Covid but any motherfucker lecturing you about it, be it for or against masks, is not someone worth listening to.

His rant about how folks who don't comply with dogshit tyrannical NFA brace laws should dox themselves to prove a point (as if he's someone worth proving anything to) just cements him as an embarrassing manchild who uses guns to cope with how unlikable, irritating and charmless he really is. He might run some killer 2-gun matches, but once the event is over I can't see how anyone would want to stay in the same room as him beyond sucking up to someone who owns a Volkswagen Thing. IDC if it's a cringemobile. I want one.

 

[Swole McPole]

TheYankeeMarshal.

I haven't watched this loser since he got cucked wandering around Seattles CHOP/CHAZ zone. Goddam, if being allowed to concealed carry means you still have to bend over and spread your cheeks for every retarded anarchist who fancies a taste of your asshole, perhaps we're not missing much by not having guns in the UK after all.

 

[Fools Idol]

I'd still rather have an SLR. That gun is lighter than the SA80 and it shoots every time you pull the trigger.

I'm pretty sure the L85's are lighter than any FAL clone. In a attempt to move the discussion form the rifle here's the history.

The British army wanted a new rifle because it's the full power rifles are kind of stupid for light/mechanized infantry. They had some experience with bullpups in the past and they were still in fashion in the 80's so they decided to develop a bullpup. What the MoD got was basically a AR18 in bullpup form, I don't know if there was any relation with the Sterling made AR180's but that's what they got. So the L85 was adopted.

Problems started almost immediately, the design was sound but the craftsmanship and material choices were not, as a result the rifle had huge issues with reliability and parts breakages. The UK government both perpetually broke and under some scandal decided that fixing the rifle would cost too much money and be too embarrassing so they just didn't. In an effort copy the Russians in a burry your head in the sand contest the UK would go as far as to redefine what "reliability" meant. Different branches of the UK military wouldn't touch the thing so anyone with their own procurement system got different guns. That's why the Royal Marines got M16s from Canada for example.

In the end things got too much and the MoD had to admit there was a problem. I'm a but fuzzy on the details but they started to work on fixes for the rifles in the 90's, even getting in Jim Sullivan (of Armalite fame) as a consultant. At some point the project was passed to H&K (owned by BAE at the time, bongs don't like that piece of trivia left out) and the L85A2 was born.

The L85A2 is a much better rifle, it's still a bullpup so if you don't like them you won't like this. It's one of the first gen militarily bullpups too so it's about as bland in terms of features as you can make it. You don't get any of the fancy side changing, front ejecting bull shit you get with modern bullpups but it does the job. The Brits seem like they want to keep the rifle going forward, they've adopted an A3 variant which has some nice rails and a new grenade launcher.

So what do the bongs have? Well they have a completely unremarkable rifle, it meets any standard of reliability, durably, accuracy, bla, bla, bla. It does have some positives, you get a long barrel for a given length which for 5.56mm is pretty nice. It's heavy but also fairly comfortable to shoot. It's known for being fairly accurate.

tldr: L85(A1) was a piece of shit and spent most of the 80's/90's as piece of shit. They fixed the problems with the L85A2 variant which is basically a rework of the rifle in the late 90's. Just in time too considering the UK would follow the Yanks into the sand box for the next 20 years.

FAQ:
Q: Why didn't they scrap the guns back in the 80's
A: They didn't want to spent the money on adopting new guns. When you adopt equipment you do it as a system, that means new racking systems, spare parts, training, etc. That all gets expensive. Plus it's embarrassing to send your boys out with guns that don't work.

Q: How did they fuck up an AR18 in the first place.
A: They're bongs.

Q: Why bother with an A3 now?
A: The A3 is just an upgrade for the A2. Rifles aren't that important in the grand scheme, the M16, G36, SCAR, etc might be better but they don't offer enough to replace the A2's in service. The A2 does have some positives mostly around it being a bullpup.

Q: Aren't bullpups shit?
A: No. They offer advantages that you just can't get in other types of gun. It's all about compromise, the M16 for example is a very nice gun to shoot and some of comes from the inline recoil spring that goes into stock. But that means you don't get a folding stock. People say that doesn't matter but for some militaries it does.

Q: Will there be an A4?
A: Who knows. I'd imagine that the A3 is about as far as you could take the system without a redesign. If you're going to do that then you might as well adopt a new cartridge while you're at it. I don't know if the UK would adopt the US army's new M5 or whatever it's called.

 

[Battlefield2142EU]

I haven't watched this loser since he got cucked wandering around Seattles CHOP/CHAZ zone. Goddam, if being allowed to concealed carry means you still have to bend over and spread your cheeks for every retarded anarchist who fancies a taste of your asshole, perhaps we're not missing much by not having guns in the UK after all.

You say that like he wouldn’t enjoy bending over and spreading his cheeks for communists. This monkey pox spreading fag allowed to adopt kids.

 

[WelperHelper99]

I'm pretty sure the L85's are lighter than any FAL clone. In a attempt to move the discussion form the rifle here's the history.

The British army wanted a new rifle because it's the full power rifles are kind of stupid for light/mechanized infantry. They had some experience with bullpups in the past and they were still in fashion in the 80's so they decided to develop a bullpup. What the MoD got was basically a AR18 in bullpup form, I don't know if there was any relation with the Sterling made AR180's but that's what they got. So the L85 was adopted.

Problems started almost immediately, the design was sound but the craftsmanship and material choices were not, as a result the rifle had huge issues with reliability and parts breakages. The UK government both perpetually broke and under some scandal decided that fixing the rifle would cost too much money and be too embarrassing so they just didn't. In an effort copy the Russians in a burry your head in the sand contest the UK would go as far as to redefine what "reliability" meant. Different branches of the UK military wouldn't touch the thing so anyone with their own procurement system got different guns. That's why the Royal Marines got M16s from Canada for example.

In the end things got too much and the MoD had to admit there was a problem. I'm a but fuzzy on the details but they started to work on fixes for the rifles in the 90's, even getting in Jim Sullivan (of Armalite fame) as a consultant. At some point the project was passed to H&K (owned by BAE at the time, bongs don't like that piece of trivia left out) and the L85A2 was born.

The L85A2 is a much better rifle, it's still a bullpup so if you don't like them you won't like this. It's one of the first gen militarily bullpups too so it's about as bland in terms of features as you can make it. You don't get any of the fancy side changing, front ejecting bull shit you get with modern bullpups but it does the job. The Brits seem like they want to keep the rifle going forward, they've adopted an A3 variant which has some nice rails and a new grenade launcher.

So what do the bongs have? Well they have a completely unremarkable rifle, it meets any standard of reliability, durably, accuracy, bla, bla, bla. It does have some positives, you get a long barrel for a given length which for 5.56mm is pretty nice. It's heavy but also fairly comfortable to shoot. It's known for being fairly accurate.

tldr: L85(A1) was a piece of shit and spent most of the 80's/90's as piece of shit. They fixed the problems with the L85A2 variant which is basically a rework of the rifle in the late 90's. Just in time too considering the UK would follow the Yanks into the sand box for the next 20 years.

FAQ:
Q: Why didn't they scrap the guns back in the 80's
A: They didn't want to spent the money on adopting new guns. When you adopt equipment you do it as a system, that means new racking systems, spare parts, training, etc. That all gets expensive. Plus it's embarrassing to send your boys out with guns that don't work.

Q: How did they fuck up an AR18 in the first place.
A: They're bongs.

Q: Why bother with an A3 now?
A: The A3 is just an upgrade for the A2. Rifles aren't that important in the grand scheme, the M16, G36, SCAR, etc might be better but they don't offer enough to replace the A2's in service. The A2 does have some positives mostly around it being a bullpup.

Q: Aren't bullpups shit?
A: No. They offer advantages that you just can't get in other types of gun. It's all about compromise, the M16 for example is a very nice gun to shoot and some of comes from the inline recoil spring that goes into stock. But that means you don't get a folding stock. People say that doesn't matter but for some militaries it does.

Q: Will there be an A4?
A: Who knows. I'd imagine that the A3 is about as far as you could take the system without a redesign. If you're going to do that then you might as well adopt a new cartridge while you're at it. I don't know if the UK would adopt the US army's new M5 or whatever it's called.

It very much has that M16 reputation. To be fair, Ian did say good things about the A2 and A3 in a update video, but the reputation has still stuck. I've always found it kinda cool, and that really got hammered home in that Black Ops 1 mission where they slapped thermals on it as you were going full CBRN through this facility.

 

[Fools Idol]

It very much has that M16 reputation. To be fair, Ian did say good things about the A2 and A3 in a update video, but the reputation has still stuck. I've always found it kinda cool, and that really got hammered home in that Black Ops 1 mission where they slapped thermals on it as you were going full CBRN through this facility.

Yeah it's fine. I don't really want to make this thread one about guns out side of maybe the WWSD project. I can see people getting bogged down in irrelevant gun bullshit that doesn't really have anything to do with Karl or Ian or whoever.

 

[Bogliacci]

Karl has always struck me as one of those guys who got into guns in the first place because he was tired of getting his ass beat everytime he ran his mouth IRL like he does online.

I've said it before in the guntuber thread, he fantasizes about putting christians and conservatives up against a wall and blasting them. He's just better at hiding it than your average libtard. Well, WAS better at hiding it.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Yeah it's fine. I don't really want to make this thread one about guns out side of maybe the WWSD project. I can see people getting bogged down in irrelevant gun bullshit that doesn't really have anything to do with Karl or Ian or whoever.

I can agree on that but it is gonna come up sometimes, since Karl has had many a bad take.

 

[aZnchinK]

I'm also curious how KE's contract with Brownells was worded.

It might not matter if its true Brownells is dropping Inrange

 

[ChampFantana]

Most Satanists are just fedora tippers making fun of Christians. Theistic Satanism is pretty rare.

I'm not even slightly impressed by eunuchs who are so brave and edgy that they join a religion specifically to make fun of Christians. You wanna impress me? Make a church of Mohammed Was A Goat-Fucker.

 

[Battlefield2142EU]

The communist atheist left like Karl are some of the biggest defenders of Islam in the world. Especially with church of Satan supporters. Even Penn Jillette let's shoot bibles in the name of free speech, ended up doing anti-islamophobia PSAs.

 

[ulsterscotsman]

I haven't watched this loser since he got cucked wandering around Seattles CHOP/CHAZ zone. Goddam, if being allowed to concealed carry means you still have to bend over and spread your cheeks for every retarded anarchist who fancies a taste of your asshole, perhaps we're not missing much by not having guns in the UK after all.

Remember he went to CHAZ to show how safe it was and that people where overreacting, he fairly changed his tune after that altercation lol.

 

[Consider Lizärds]

View attachment 4476355

Fatty ate his sign.

 

[Trig.Point]

I'm pretty sure the L85's are lighter than any FAL clone. In a attempt to move the discussion form the rifle here's the history.

The British army wanted a new rifle because it's the full power rifles are kind of stupid for light/mechanized infantry. They had some experience with bullpups in the past and they were still in fashion in the 80's so they decided to develop a bullpup. What the MoD got was basically a AR18 in bullpup form, I don't know if there was any relation with the Sterling made AR180's but that's what they got. So the L85 was adopted.

Problems started almost immediately, the design was sound but the craftsmanship and material choices were not, as a result the rifle had huge issues with reliability and parts breakages. The UK government both perpetually broke and under some scandal decided that fixing the rifle would cost too much money and be too embarrassing so they just didn't. In an effort copy the Russians in a burry your head in the sand contest the UK would go as far as to redefine what "reliability" meant. Different branches of the UK military wouldn't touch the thing so anyone with their own procurement system got different guns. That's why the Royal Marines got M16s from Canada for example.

In the end things got too much and the MoD had to admit there was a problem. I'm a but fuzzy on the details but they started to work on fixes for the rifles in the 90's, even getting in Jim Sullivan (of Armalite fame) as a consultant. At some point the project was passed to H&K (owned by BAE at the time, bongs don't like that piece of trivia left out) and the L85A2 was born.

The L85A2 is a much better rifle, it's still a bullpup so if you don't like them you won't like this. It's one of the first gen militarily bullpups too so it's about as bland in terms of features as you can make it. You don't get any of the fancy side changing, front ejecting bull shit you get with modern bullpups but it does the job. The Brits seem like they want to keep the rifle going forward, they've adopted an A3 variant which has some nice rails and a new grenade launcher.

So what do the bongs have? Well they have a completely unremarkable rifle, it meets any standard of reliability, durably, accuracy, bla, bla, bla. It does have some positives, you get a long barrel for a given length which for 5.56mm is pretty nice. It's heavy but also fairly comfortable to shoot. It's known for being fairly accurate.

tldr: L85(A1) was a piece of shit and spent most of the 80's/90's as piece of shit. They fixed the problems with the L85A2 variant which is basically a rework of the rifle in the late 90's. Just in time too considering the UK would follow the Yanks into the sand box for the next 20 years.

FAQ:
Q: Why didn't they scrap the guns back in the 80's
A: They didn't want to spent the money on adopting new guns. When you adopt equipment you do it as a system, that means new racking systems, spare parts, training, etc. That all gets expensive. Plus it's embarrassing to send your boys out with guns that don't work.

Q: How did they fuck up an AR18 in the first place.
A: They're bongs.

Q: Why bother with an A3 now?
A: The A3 is just an upgrade for the A2. Rifles aren't that important in the grand scheme, the M16, G36, SCAR, etc might be better but they don't offer enough to replace the A2's in service. The A2 does have some positives mostly around it being a bullpup.

Q: Aren't bullpups shit?
A: No. They offer advantages that you just can't get in other types of gun. It's all about compromise, the M16 for example is a very nice gun to shoot and some of comes from the inline recoil spring that goes into stock. But that means you don't get a folding stock. People say that doesn't matter but for some militaries it does.

Q: Will there be an A4?
A: Who knows. I'd imagine that the A3 is about as far as you could take the system without a redesign. If you're going to do that then you might as well adopt a new cartridge while you're at it. I don't know if the UK would adopt the US army's new M5 or whatever it's called.

The problems with the SA80 were really serious but if you have an impression that they were jamming regularly on a range then you're wrong.

The A1's were used in training for non infantry right up until the late 2000's and they were fine. Most stoppages were due to problems with the Magazines (I know this is shocking but after all the money the army spend upgrading the rifles, they still couldn't get themselves to bin the cheap ones from the 80's)

It's impossible to miss with an SA80, it is easy to run a range because you can see the state a weapon is in, while standing over a firer. It's also easier for a non expert shooter to apply all the marksmanship principles using one.

The problems they had in conditions such as dirt/sand. My theory is that the SA80 would break a part where another rifle would just have a stoppage.

Another problem is that the Army has ridiculous standards of cleanliness for rifles, which usually involves scrubbing rifles with wire wool. I've watched people methodically scrub the bluing from A2 rifles. The Paras and Marines had more reasonable standards and in general did a better job of making them work.

I'm not defending it, it should never have been built. They should have bought M16's but they wanted a bullpup as well as a separate safety and change lever. They should have bought Steyers but the progressive trigger was anathema to them, and the FAMAS got too dirty.

 

[Swole McPole]

The communist atheist left like Karl are some of the biggest defenders of Islam in the world. Especially with church of Satan supporters. Even Penn Jillette let's shoot bibles in the name of free speech, ended up doing anti-islamophobia PSAs.

Penn went full retard when one of his kids turned troon. I don't think he even identifies as a libertarian any more. His troon offspring probably has him sporting the Hammer and Sickle.

Remember he went to CHAZ to show how safe it was and that people where overreacting, he fairly changed his tune after that altercation lol.

I remember him bleating to the anarchists when they slapped his phone out of his hand. "Why are you being so mean to someone who just wants to be a BLM ally?" All that tough cowboy talk posturing he went in for on his channel suddenly disappeared when he found himself all alone, deep in the homeless encampment from hell.

 

[Trig.Point]

I remember him bleating to the anarchists when they slapped his phone out of his hand. "Why are you being so mean to someone who just wants to be a BLM ally?" All that tough cowboy talk posturing he went in for on his channel suddenly disappeared when he found himself all alone, deep in the homeless encampment from hell.

In fairness he did square off to them, what was he meant to do escalate the situation. I still think the video gave an interesting insight into Chaz.

 

[Fools Idol]

I can't believe that Karl is shit talking his friend over fucking troon shit. Fucking snake.

 

[White Devil]

I can't believe that Karl is shit talking his friend over fucking troon shit. Fucking snake.

I don't think they're friends anymore. Or apparently haven't been for awhile judging about Karl's whining over Ian not wanting to put InRange branding on events.