Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 153 40.4%

  • Total voters
    379
Heard Drexel’s Woman-Free Society idea.
The spectacle of a nigger talking about culling an undesirable section of the population that is responsible for civilizational collapse is pretty good. 10/10.

I noticed it was a stream with Raging Golden Eagle. So it does make me laugh every single time how these allegedly redpilled guys clearly obsess with women. Because if they really hated entitlement, dysfunction, ignorance, and decay they’d hate black people so much more but never do.
 
Last edited:
Heard Drexel’s Woman-Free Society idea.
The spectacular of a nigger talking about culling an undesirable section of the population responsible for civilizational collapse is pretty good. 10/10.

I noticed it was a stream with Raging Golden Eagle. So it does make me laugh every single time how these allegedly redpilled guys clearly obsess with women. Because if they really hated entitlement, dysfunction, ignorance, and decay they’d hate black people so much more but never do.
8BCD8272-F47D-4444-A4E4-099BC8E3D7C8.jpeg
 
I legitimately *can not stand* Camelot. He white trashes *the shit* out of any show he's on. He talks and acts like some random loser working next to you at a temp job none of you will be at in a week.
He worked at a Gamestop, what do you expect? No wonder he acts this way about sex, he spent years and years around fat neckbearded permavirgins.
Tattoos in general are a very trashy thing. For every one that looks cool there are a thousand that look retarded. And even with the cool ones the whole idea of permanently carving a drawing into your skin to "express yourself" seems like a basic bitch substitute for having a personality.
Nick and our wife are just trying to fit in with the kids these days, and that means getting lots of tats since for some reason everyone under 30 has them.

Any new pics of Nick's faggy MCR emo tattoo? That shit was hilarious.
 
Or simply castrated the slaves.
Thats actually what happened to the ones sent east for the Arab slave trade.
The Civilizations of the Near East had long experience with slavery (and with niggers) and knew it was a mistake to let them breed and increase their populations unrestricted.
In that way the ones the were sold to the Atlantic Slave Trade were the lucky ones, despite the deaths caused by the fucked up conditions they were transported in, they were at least left uncastrated and able to have families once they arrived wherever they were bound for.
The slaves sold to the Arab Slave Trade were immediately castrated, treated far more brutally, and also often killed when they couldn't work.
 
Yes, but unless it was a first marriage, long term serious relationship, or a baby daddy, it’s kind of unusual to consider your exes once you’re married.
I suppose? But I see no reason why the ex couldn't have been any of those things you mentioned. If he cried only "when babies were born," as she stated, then maybe they had a child together. Who knows.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Thats actually what happened to the ones sent east for the Arab slave trade.
The Civilizations of the Near East had long experience with slavery (and with niggers) and knew it was a mistake to let them breed and increase their populations unrestricted.
In that way the ones the were sold to the Atlantic Slave Trade were the lucky ones, despite the deaths caused by the fucked up conditions they were transported in, they were at least left uncastrated and able to have families once they arrived wherever they were bound for.
The slaves sold to the Arab Slave Trade were immediately castrated, treated far more brutally, and also often killed when they couldn't work.
American slavery was not that bad in general, but the propaganda is strong. They generally weren't beaten that often, they were allowed to have families, they had weekends off, they usually got sick days, they often got educated, and they basically only got killed or mutilated if they did something seriously bad. They had lifespans similar to free-born farmers, too.

The only comparison for how well those slaves were treated is Greek/Roman city slaves, who had cushier jobs, but slaves headed for the fields and the mines in that era had lifespans measured in months. Slavery in the East (Arab countries and China) was brutal by comparison.

People forget how shitty life was in the 1800s, and they use the juxtaposition of slaves (who would otherwise be lower-class peons) and plantation owners (rich landowners) to pretend that American slavery was so brutal. Free farm workers didn't generally have better lives than slaves, but it was just an economic calculation about whether it was better to own the workers or employ them. By the 1860's, there was no contest: it was much cheaper to employ them.
 
American slavery was not that bad in general, but the propaganda is strong. They generally weren't beaten that often, they were allowed to have families, they had weekends off, they usually got sick days, they often got educated, and they basically only got killed or mutilated if they did something seriously bad. They had lifespans similar to free-born farmers, too.

The only comparison for how well those slaves were treated is Greek/Roman city slaves, who had cushier jobs, but slaves headed for the fields and the mines in that era had lifespans measured in months. Slavery in the East (Arab countries and China) was brutal by comparison.

People forget how shitty life was in the 1800s, and they use the juxtaposition of slaves (who would otherwise be lower-class peons) and plantation owners (rich landowners) to pretend that American slavery was so brutal. Free farm workers didn't generally have better lives than slaves, but it was just an economic calculation about whether it was better to own the workers or employ them. By the 1860's, there was no contest: it was much cheaper to employ them.
Try and explain to a nigger that his ancestors were kept in luxury compared to White slaves the Roman Republic (and later Empire) siezed from Gaul or Germania (who often ended up as Galley Slaves, or in mines forces to work in chains) and they hit the roof though.
In general Chinese Coolies were treated far worse than niggers on Plantations over here, they were particularly sought for mine work as they could be forced to work on their knees so required smaller drifts.
For truly brutal conditions though, the Ancient Near and Far East are hard to beat.
Compared to how the Ancient Egyptians or Assyrians treated their slaves there is no comparison to anything endured by slaves in the Antebellum US.
 
Last edited:
Tech Update: Got my mini-PC up and working. Now that I do not have to worry about taking Panoptes V 1.1 offline, I will try to get the 1.2 features all de-bugged.

Looks like Nose is running his chat from Thursday all the way through the weekend, so this next archive drop should be massive.


Yes, Middle-Eastern and African slave trade is both older and more savage than the Atlantic Trade. The Arabs did a lot of scientific work and study, but for some reason we gloss over the horrible slave practices... Curious... The free infidels were taxed to hell and back, got almost no protection of the law, and were basically third-class citizens. As for the slaves and galley-workers... well... just do some of your own research...
 
The Arabs did a lot of scientific work and study,

Alot of scientific work and study was done in Arabic at one time, but generally not done by ethnic arabs. The science was largely the legacy of the pre-Islamic cultures in were conquered by arabic islam: Persian, Greek, Mesopotamian and so on. The more "Islamic" these societies became and the more education was directed by the Madrasas over time, the dumber these societies became. Science lasted for a few hundred years after the Islamic conquests but once Islam was firmly established, it just faded away.
 
American slavery was not that bad in general, but the propaganda is strong. They generally weren't beaten that often, they were allowed to have families, they had weekends off, they usually got sick days, they often got educated, and they basically only got killed or mutilated if they did something seriously bad. They had lifespans similar to free-born farmers, too.
LMAO slaves weren't allowed to have families since if the owner felt like it, he could just sell the kids to another plantation. Happened all the time. I heard a story too once from a slave owner descendant my family knew. They said their ancestor beat a slave to death for looking at his daughter funny. They're conservative BTW so weren't just making atrocity propaganda. That was perfectly legal and accepted.
The only comparison for how well those slaves were treated is Greek/Roman city slaves, who had cushier jobs, but slaves headed for the fields and the mines in that era had lifespans measured in months. Slavery in the East (Arab countries and China) was brutal by comparison.

People forget how shitty life was in the 1800s, and they use the juxtaposition of slaves (who would otherwise be lower-class peons) and plantation owners (rich landowners) to pretend that American slavery was so brutal. Free farm workers didn't generally have better lives than slaves, but it was just an economic calculation about whether it was better to own the workers or employ them. By the 1860's, there was no contest: it was much cheaper to employ them.
Not true, that's why the Southern elite were hellbent on expanding slavery and even were using slaves in ironworks and factories. And let's get real, Johnny Whiteboy isn't getting his kids sold across the state like Rastus the Negro. He lives in a slightly nicer hovel too than the slave quarters. Compare old reconstructed pioneer settlements in the South (these houses were those of the poor too in the 19th century) to slave quarters on the plantations, slave quarters were more cramped.
 
It puts Drexel into context. He's the house nigger (too soft for the fields) who fucks the master's daughter and complains when he gets whipped for ruining her.
Rekieta is a crypto-jew. He's a jazz age decadent weakling not a Southern slave owner. Racemixing comes fitted standard with all genestealers due to how they spread their infection.
 
Rekieta is a crypto-jew. He's a jazz age decadent weakling not a Southern slave owner. Racemixing comes fitted standard with all genestealers due to how they spread their infection.
A high percentage of southern slave owners were jews. Memoryholed, they’re conveniently white when they need to be.
 
So now we are debating slavery? You 'tists are something else.
It's been a quiet day lol.
We'll be back on track as soon as Nick or his Leather Factory do something amusing, or someone in the hugbox points out to Big Alpha what we've been saying and he goes on another "End anonymity/Consequences will never be the same" rant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boopims
Back