Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

[White-Kettle Shufflepunk]

What am I saying, Tony is cool with women who shoot testosterone. They’re the only ones he can really stomach. He doesn’t give a shit if some teenage girls are hurt in the process of pushing more hormones on minors. Here he is praising a woman with a pube beard shooting up T in front of the Florida board of medicine as a historical moment:

That has to be one of the worst Tony faces I’ve seen. He looks like the barber from Courage the Cowardly Dog.:

””Naughty”

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

From the article you shared:

"a 15-year-old trans guy in a southern state named Ash"
and
"Hippolyta, a 22-year-old transgender woman"

There has to be some underlying psychological reason for the names troons choose. It's such a reliable phenomenon. In fact, I'd say their names are downright clockable.

Also, whenever I read or listen to Tony's "work", I'm struck by how obvious it is that he thinks of himself as some erudite thinker who deigns to interact with the unwashed masses to guide them toward enlightenment, a troon sage who chooses to interact with the drooling plebs out of the goodness of his heart.

I honestly think that he considers himself a great writer and speaker, but even if everything he believes weren't utter bullshit, he's neither. His writing is ponderous and needlessly abstruse, the telltale indicator of someone who thinks himself much smarter than everyone he meets. The interview transcript you posted earlier is a great example of how condescending and meandering his speaking is. He always sounds so patronizing, and while he says a lot of words, none of them really mean anything. He often misunderstands the legislation he claims to be analyzing, and apparently has no eye for relevant precedent. He can't express his position succinctly, because he's uneducated, incurious, and not intelligent. He's just talking in endless circles: this law will codify a systematic trans genocide, trans genocide bad, I am very smart and will explain, for real just trust me bro, this law will codify a systematic trans genocide, trans genocide bad...

He's a troonouboros.

Spot on!

This is why I am super skeptical of Tony's claim that he has a Master's Degree in Sociology with a 4.0 GPA

Linkdin for Erin Reed Public Speaker // Content Creator // DEI Consultant // Transgender Rights Activist

Tony is barely literate with zero critical thinking skills.

 

[Raven Rainbow]

"a 15-year-old trans guy in a southern state named Ash"
and

There has to be some underlying psychological reason for the names troons choose. It's such a reliable phenomenon. In fact, I'd say their names are downright clockable.

Gotta clock 'em all! Gotta clock 'em all!

 

[AMHOLIO]

When the site was down last night I made another grid, this time 4K of just Tony's face:

I wish we could make this the site banner. It's beautiful, horrific.

The efforts failed-

Do you think Tony now blames said trans man for failing? I don't think so since his hatred of Florida wronging him is greater, but it would be hilarious.

"a 15-year-old trans guy in a southern state named Ash"
and
"Hippolyta, a 22-year-old transgender woman"

There has to be some underlying psychological reason for the names troons choose. It's such a reliable phenomenon. In fact, I'd say their names are downright clockable

So, do you want to be a cute young man named Ash or do you want to be an awkward socially anxious girl stuck in puberty hell with her emotions magnified 200% and her body changing uncomfortably and for the worse in her eyes? Do you want to be an innocent boy or nonbinary fairy who has an air of mystery about them who sounds like a cool badass like Ash Williams or a cute guy you read about in fanfic, or do you want to be Olivia the girl who's just the same as the 2 other Olivias in her class but more autistic leaning and prone to melting down more because of underlying mental issues that are hard to confront and get her bullied anyway?


Alright, now do you want to be a guy in your 20s who plays MtG and gets no pussy and still has to go through the trials of college (or just NEET life), or do you want to be Hippolyta, a literal mythical figure of beauty who's queen of the badass warrior women who are also bi/lesbians? Add in the Wonder Woman reference for superhero fans too of course.

I'm trying to say the choice of names is about starting over but rerolling the dice to get a better default character build. It doesn't work but it is a name they want to live by, their first impression to other people when read or talked about, their IRL username, their all encompassing essence of them. Some troons bounce on names due to not having a stable identity, others bounce when their chosen name is soiled by something or someone, like a bad person sharing their name or having that name at a bad point of coming out. The idea is shedding one identity and becoming anew, choosing names you wish you were or would name your baby after.

Think about what you'd change your name to if given the chance. Would you just call yourself a fit in name and keep your original name in your heart or would you embrace it and go with an exotic or melodic name? Or would you just call yourself Blaze Motorhead because it sounds cool? Names are a big part of our identity whether we realize it or not, and a name change or nickname means something different (most people call you Taylor, your friends call you Tay, your family calls you Taybae, your spouse calls you darling, all different but shows your relationship with them). So being able to reset your name usually means choosing someone new to roleplay as for trans people. Imagine if you could force people to stop calling you "Kevin" or "Gaylord" by pulling the trans card.

"She's politically motivated, she's not a doctor, and she only started talking about this at the peak of anti-trans bills!" says a man who is politically motivated, not a doctor, and only started talking about trans rights at the peak of anti-trans bills.

Glass houses, mate.

It's different: HE is trans, therefore an instant expert and his coochie says so!

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

I wish we could make this the site banner. It's beautiful, horrific.


Do you think Tony now blames said trans man for failing? I don't think so since his hatred of Florida wronging him is greater, but it would be hilarious.



So, do you want to be a cute young man named Ash or do you want to be an awkward socially anxious girl stuck in puberty hell with her emotions magnified 200% and her body changing uncomfortably and for the worse in her eyes? Do you want to be an innocent boy or nonbinary fairy who has an air of mystery about them who sounds like a cool badass like Ash Williams or a cute guy you read about in fanfic, or do you want to be Olivia the girl who's just the same as the 2 other Olivias in her class but more autistic leaning and prone to melting down more because of underlying mental issues that are hard to confront and get her bullied anyway?


Alright, now do you want to be a guy in your 20s who plays MtG and gets no pussy and still has to go through the trials of college (or just NEET life), or do you want to be Hippolyta, a literal mythical figure of beauty who's queen of the badass warrior women who are also bi/lesbians? Add in the Wonder Woman reference for superhero fans too of course.

I'm trying to say the choice of names is about starting over but rerolling the dice to get a better default character build. It doesn't work but it is a name they want to live by, their first impression to other people when read or talked about, their IRL username, their all encompassing essence of them. Some troons bounce on names due to not having a stable identity, others bounce when their chosen name is soiled by something or someone, like a bad person sharing their name or having that name at a bad point of coming out. The idea is shedding one identity and becoming anew, choosing names you wish you were or would name your baby after.

Think about what you'd change your name to if given the chance. Would you just call yourself a fit in name and keep your original name in your heart or would you embrace it and go with an exotic or melodic name? Or would you just call yourself Blaze Motorhead because it sounds cool? Names are a big part of our identity whether we realize it or not, and a name change or nickname means something different (most people call you Taylor, your friends call you Tay, your family calls you Taybae, your spouse calls you darling, all different but shows your relationship with them). So being able to reset your name usually means choosing someone new to roleplay as for trans people. Imagine if you could force people to stop calling you "Kevin" or "Gaylord" by pulling the trans card.


It's different: HE is trans, therefore an instant expert and his coochie says so!

There seems to be an epidemic of self appointed expert status on the troon circuit whether is is Tony and Zac, Eli Erlick, Keffals, Weird Al, or John Walker Flynt. All of them are all too eager to pontificate from their dunning kruger afflicted podium and punch down on those they wrongfully view as their intellectual and moral inferiors.

 

[Geranium]

Do you think Tony now blames said trans man for failing?

Nah, personally I think Tony making a big deal of King Pube Beard is partly him trying to restore his reputation amid the ongoing “trans community discourse”.

These tweets are next to each other on his timeline:


Edit: It’s cut off in this screenshot, but yes of course the “black transfem” mentions his “$8 OF” [OnlyFans] in his Twitter name.

Meanwhile, if you search for "Erin" and "Keffals" there’s a lot like this:

 

[White-Kettle Shufflepunk]

I fucking hate "transfemmes and transmascs." It sounds less like you're talking about people and more like IDW Transformers at they're most pozzed.

 

[Geranium]

Checked in on Kat. He gave up the chance to live and study abroad so he could get his balls chopped off sooner:

(twitter.com, archive.ph)

 

[White-Kettle Shufflepunk]

That is genuinely tragic. There are going to be so many sad documentaries in a few decades, with some very odd looking old men.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

And because he uses that dumb left-handedness graph, here’s the full version:
View attachment 4496405
(voidifremoved.substack.com, archive.ph)

Tony should not trust anything this openly right-wing fascist says, in another piece he denies the well known fact that everything posted on the internet is serious and exactly what the person means and it reveals their inner most beliefs:

Also, whenever I read or listen to Tony's "work", I'm struck by how obvious it is that he thinks of himself as some erudite thinker who deigns to interact with the unwashed masses to guide them toward enlightenment, a troon sage who chooses to interact with the drooling plebs out of the goodness of his heart.

I honestly think that he considers himself a great writer and speaker, but even if everything he believes weren't utter bullshit, he's neither. His writing is ponderous and needlessly abstruse, the telltale indicator of someone who thinks himself much smarter than everyone he meets. The interview transcript you posted earlier is a great example of how condescending and meandering his speaking is. He always sounds so patronizing, and while he says a lot of words, none of them really mean anything. He often misunderstands the legislation he claims to be analyzing, and apparently has no eye for relevant precedent. He can't express his position succinctly, because he's uneducated, incurious, and not intelligent. He's just talking in endless circles: this law will codify a systematic trans genocide, trans genocide bad, I am very smart and will explain, for real just trust me bro, this law will codify a systematic trans genocide, trans genocide bad...

He's a troonouboros.

This is what was great about his old Daily Kos posts being found. He's been this way since he was 14 or whatever. He literally went on the Daily Kos after getting interested in the first Presidential Election he really paid attention to and started lecturing them all as if he uniquely had a vision of the Promised Land and would lead them to it. And this is when Daily Kos was not a sad joke but a serious influence in the Democratic Party.

I think he's actually worse at writing now. His Substack posts are really hard to read for the content to point out the wrongness because it's so badly written. I don't think he could respond to the criticism in this thread on his Substack not just because it's usually airtight but because he really probably can't understand most of it. Epistemic closure isn't really a tactic by these kinds of people, it's more required by their inability to actually "debunk" or critique things in any way except deployment of the genetic fallacy as an all purpose salve.

 

[behindyourightnow]

Tony's bizarre rage fueled Twitter meltdown over the shark attack between his legs.

View attachment 4477387

View attachment 4477391

Tony, the axe wound betwen your legs is NOT a vagina.

I am just catching up on the horror, but I wanted to add: it is funny how Tony tried to sound sciencey by using the word "histological," but then immediately referred to a "membrane" instead of "mucous membrane" because "mucous" would sound too gross when he's talking about his magic Barbie pouch.

 

[AMHOLIO]

Edit: It’s cut off in this screenshot, but yes of course the “black transfem” mentions his “$8 OF” [OnlyFans] in his Twitter name.

From the thumbnail he looks like black Dr. Franken Furter. I kinda like that bizarro idea.

Meanwhile, if you search for "Erin" and "Keffals" there’s a lot like this:

ERIN REED HATES BLACK PEOPLE PASS IT ON



As I stated in another post, I think he's afraid of anyone who doesn't look exactly like him or people who aren't as "pretty/passing" as he is. Like he's just an anxious narcissist who is worried that people will realize how hollow he is and wants to find people he can control easier.

That is genuinely tragic. There are going to be so many sad documentaries in a few decades, with some very odd looking old men.

I pray they make it. Life post trooning sucks, I think they can turn it around with the proper support and strength, but it's a hard challenge.

Tony should not trust anything this openly right-wing fascist says, in another piece he denies the well known fact that everything posted on the internet is serious and exactly what the person means and it reveals their inner most beliefs:

We do a little trolling...

I understand if people get super hurt by a troll's words: we all have insecurities and some things hurt more and we can't be easy going 100% of the time. Erin REEd however seems like he's upset these people never get punishment, that when you feel something has gone too far you can't slight them back or play power games to punish them. He's bad at humor and it's ok to stay off the internet if he's that butthurt.

I think he's actually worse at writing now. His Substack posts are really hard to read for the content to point out the wrongness because it's so badly written.

Do you think the drugs have anything to do with it? I wouldn't be surprised if they damaged his brain. My other guess is that he picks up writing habits of those he reads, and thanks to his current... "intellectual" circle he's gotten even dumber since part of him copies others. Seems to happen to trans people in general if they fall too hard down the trans cult mentality.

I don't think he could respond to the criticism in this thread on his Substack not just because it's usually airtight but because he really probably can't understand most of it. Epistemic closure isn't really a tactic by these kinds of people, it's more required by their inability to actually "debunk" or critique things in any way except deployment of the genetic fallacy as an all purpose salve.

I think him being too blinded by rage would also be a part of it. I couldn't think properly if I went on a narc rampage where I saw red, so in addition to wanting quick cheap wins and being too stupid, he just would devolve into a frothing insult rage.

I'd like to invite Ms. Erin Reed to show us a proper response to us anonymous haters. This is an open invitation. You can start ny "I have had various transphobic critics talk about my work, and I will respond to them in kind" or some other variation so you don't even have to mention your thread. I know Ms. Reed's day is full of trouble, but this could also squash haters from twitter if done properly. Your call, your move, creep.

Unrelated, but thanks for teaching me a new word. The farms surprisingly has a lot of people who are eloquent with large vocabularies in addition to just going "lol niggos".

 

[AirdropShitposts]

I think "debunking common TERF and other transphobe myths/lies/etc." would be a really popular article genre, but it seems to be pretty sparse considering how many of these troons probably wrote entire collections worth of books debunking Christianity a few years ago.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

use code AMHOLE20 at checkout for 20% off your first purchase

Why did I read this in Ben Shapiro's voice?

 

[Tryphine]

I think "debunking common TERF and other transphobe myths/lies/etc." would be a really popular article genre, but it seems to be pretty sparse considering how many of these troons probably wrote entire collections worth of books debunking Christianity a few years ago.

It's fascinating. Every time trans rights activists try to debunk transphobic "myths", they go down one of three routes:
1. They say "well, MY vagina hasn't perforated during sex".
2. They link to a study in which 9 teenagers self reported that their vagina hadn't perforated during sex, published by the Institute of Prescribing Testosterone to Children.
3. They outright lie about what the other person said.

They talk constantly about deradicalizing the evil TERFs, but they never actually address any of the issues people have with trans people. Look at the article Tony tried to debunk: she was a caseworker in a hospital which worked with around a thousand trans teenagers, and she was concerned with how quickly + easily the teenagers were prescribed medication, as well as with the side effects of that medication.

Tony's response to that:
The caseworker only references half a dozen anecdotes out of the thousand patients she's seen, she isn't talking about the patients who were happy with their treatment, just because she said the patients only saw a therapist once doesn't mean that's true, and every medication has some kind of side effect. He doesn't seem willing to actually respond to any of the issues that she raised. He talks around it every time.

I'm really curious who he's thinks he's writing these articles for. Does he think he's winning over transphobes, or does he understand he's writing them as a circlejerk for other trans people?

 

[White-Kettle Shufflepunk]

I'm really curious who he's thinks he's writing these articles for. Does he think he's winning over transphobes, or does he understand he's writing them as a circlejerk for other trans people?

Actually trying to convince the other side of your beliefs is now for chuds. It's a useful stance to have when your side controls the entire narrative and the normies aren't super-engaged, less so when the tide starts turning.

 

[garbage cake]

Big Tony tweet discussed on r/detrans

link | archive

 

[Thomas Eugene Paris]

Big Tony tweet discussed on r/detrans
View attachment 4508350
link | archive

View attachment 4508545
View attachment 4508537
View attachment 4508530
View attachment 4508553
View attachment 4508557
View attachment 4508561

These "detrans" people seem just as toxic and mentally ill as the troons. Just crabs in a different bucket.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Right! T

It's fascinating. Every time trans rights activists try to debunk transphobic "myths", they go down one of three routes:
1. They say "well, MY vagina hasn't perforated during sex".
2. They link to a study in which 9 teenagers self reported that their vagina hadn't perforated during sex, published by the Institute of Prescribing Testosterone to Children.
3. They outright lie about what the other person said.

They talk constantly about deradicalizing the evil TERFs, but they never actually address any of the issues people have with trans people. Look at the article Tony tried to debunk: she was a caseworker in a hospital which worked with around a thousand trans teenagers, and she was concerned with how quickly + easily the teenagers were prescribed medication, as well as with the side effects of that medication.

Tony's response to that:
The caseworker only references half a dozen anecdotes out of the thousand patients she's seen, she isn't talking about the patients who were happy with their treatment, just because she said the patients only saw a therapist once doesn't mean that's true, and every medication has some kind of side effect. He doesn't seem willing to actually respond to any of the issues that she raised. He talks around it every time.

I'm really curious who he's thinks he's writing these articles for. Does he think he's winning over transphobes, or does he understand he's writing them as a circlejerk for other trans people?

Right! Tony's alleged "debunking" of the St Louis Gender Clinic story can be summarized in its entirety as:

1. She "misgendered" someone [which is not a real thing] by using the wrong pronouns.

2. She mentions some of the same things that Matt Walsh complains about.

3. She is not a doctor [which is irrelevant because she is merely reciting observations and not making medical claims].

DEBUNKED!

The rest of the troon cult is no better.

Rep Zooey Zephyr at any given troon bill hearing

 

[chiobu]

I wonder which one is Tony's hackernews account




https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34753240 (Archive)