Pre-K teacher attacks idea of 'childhood innocence,' claims toddlers not too young for 'sexuality' discussion - William 'Willy' Villalpando called the idea of 'childhood innocence' a 'mythology'

(Article, archive)
A pre-kindergarten teacher and early childhood professor repeatedly attacked the idea of "childhood innocence" and claimed that early childhood teachers should introduce children to gender ideology at the youngest ages, Fox News Digital found.

William "Willy" Villalpando works at Santa Ana College in California where he teaches early child development. He also indicated on his Instagram that he is a pre-kindergarten educator.

Fox News found documentation that Villalpando worked in the Rialto Unified School District pre-k division from 2016 through at least June 2021, the latest date California updated teacher's records. It was unclear whether Villalpando continued to work at the district for the 2022-23 academic year, and they refused to respond. When Fox News reached out to Villalpando's Rialto district email address it was not returned to sender.

In 2020, Villalpando called the idea of "childhood innocence" an example of "mythology."

Childhood-innocence-.jpg


"There is a common mythology that children live in this world of pure innocence, and that by introducing or exposing them to the real-world adults are somehow shattering this illusion for them. Therefore, there is a banning of topics and issues that children should not be exposed to, as if they are not experiencing them already."

On another occasion, he said, "I'm tired of the ‘Childhood Innocence’ argument… Stop blaming a phenomenon that doesn't exist."

He went on to attack the idea that children shouldn't be exposed to "sexuality," claiming that "such a view is a very white, Christian, upper-class, cis-gendered, and hetero-centric."
Willy-V.jpg

"Not talking about Queerness in the Classroom, is NOT Letting Children be Children. It's Telling Those people They Do Not Deserve to Exist," he said in September 2021. "Kids are never too young."

"Let's work to deconstruct some of our own biases. (Adults incorrectly link discussions on sexuality and gender as equating to discussions about sex.)," the early childhood educator said.

The district Santa Ana College where the teacher works told Fox News that they do "not condone any form of attack on 'childhood innocence.'

"Our RSCCD community college courses in Child Development and Education Studies do not address nor teach gender studies," the district said.

He said in a November 2022 podcast of "Rainbow Parenting" that "we have so many people who tell us that this is inappropriate stuff we can talk about. And so I'm like, hey, no, we can't talk about this."

The teacher went on to say that if parents didn't have the conversations with kids, it was up to teachers to foster classroom environments that "may make others uncomfortable."

"Children who are exposed to environments with more fluid understandings of gender, are more likely to understand that gender is fluid."

He added that educators should talk to little kids about queerness even if parents have avoided the topic.
Willy-V-prof.jpg
"Parents haven't already had conversations about these things with their kids, that kids don't know, that they might be intersex, that they might be agender... non-binary. And really, children have a right to see themselves in our classrooms. It's not okay to just forget about them or push them out just because it might make us uncomfortable or may make others uncomfortable."
queerness-in-classroom.jpg
According to Villalpando, "talking to children about gender" includes telling them that it is a "social construct."

"This goes alongside teaching children to ask others for their pronouns. Trust me when I say children get this so much faster than adults give them credit for. Let kids practice with you," he said.

Villalpando's social media accounts went dark after Fox News Digital reached out for comment.

"[C]hildren are exploring and understanding gendered association before they say their first words," he said.

"Around 3 to 4 months old, infants [sic] show a sex and gender preference in who they look at."

"At 3 years old, a child can label their perceived gender identity," he said. "By 4 years old, children have a stable sense of their gender identity and have assumptions and beliefs of what they can and cannot do based on their gender (i.e. dolls are for girls, cars are for boys)."

Other teachers in California have raised the topic of gender ideology in their classrooms.

A California teacher named Olivia Garrison bragged about helping students hide their social transitions from parents. Fox News Digital found that Garrison, a 9th grade history teacher, worked at Del Oro High School located in the Kern High School District.

TikTok-teacher-NYT.jpg
Social transitioning is a first step for transgender children. It entails adopting new names, pronouns, changing their clothing and getting haircuts to match a preferred gender expression.

The New York Times reported, "Olivia Garrison, a history teacher in Bakersfield, Calif., who is nonbinary… has helped students socially transition at school without their parents' knowledge."

"My job, which is a public service, is to protect kids… Sometimes, they need protection from their own parents," Garrison told The Times. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Another teacher in the Sacramento City Unified District, Danita McCray recommended using a "gender unicorn" with toddlers to introduce gender theory.
Danita-McCray-Featured-Image.jpg

"Now, early childhood is 0 to 8 years old, so that's kind of like from preschool to third grade… And the focus… of this workshop is to provide you with positive strategies to support transgender and gender non-conforming children," McCray said in a video exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital.

"I've done research. I have got my doctorate degree. Children are not too young at five years old. Children understand gender as early as three years old," she said.

Skye Tooley, a teacher at Saturn Street Elementary, located in the Los Angeles Unified School District, discussed on TikTok using a "gender-fluid" stuffed animal to teach children on pronouns and being non-binary. Gender fluidity refers to change over time in a person's gender expression or gender identity, or both.

Stuffed-animals-teacher.jpg

"This is a llama unicorn... I thought it was so cute to let my kids name the llama unicorn. It was a mistake. So this little llama is gender-fluid; we will be practicing pronouns with this little llama," Tooley said.

"[Children] are very much ready for these topics, and are way more accepting than adults when it comes to... gender, gender assumptions, pronouns, all the things. And it is child-development appropriate and age appropriate," the teacher said.

Tooley provided another example of a stuffed animal that had they/them pronouns.

"I started talking [to students] about Norbert the Narwhal … who uses they/them pronouns, and we practice making mistakes with their pronouns as well as correcting them."
 
one should first check they local soccer team coach, local pastor or teachers, as these are often the professionals they opt for that get them close to their targets.
True, they should not be above suspicion.

But they aren't the ones demanding that they have unfettered access to other people's kids as some kind of civil right. They aren't looking to make this lunacy not only acceptable, but celebrated.

The LGBT crowd wants everyone to forget that they were in league with NAMBLA back in the day. Walter Breen, Marion Zimmer Bradley, Harvey Milk, Allen Ginsberg, et al were all in favor of kidfucking, and even committed it.

I will consider them complicit in institutional noncery until they condemn this and fight against it in a way I find satisfactory.
 
Last edited:
I have children.

I keep an exceptional eye on the news for all the cases within the city in which I live. I also know the Federal prosecutor in my city who is responsible for prosecuting these monsters. They are the sneakiest fucks to have ever walked the Earth and if you are a father or mother and you think your Pedo problem is waiting for you down the road at the local Tranny or gay nightclub, you're a fool.

They hide in plain sight and will most likely be in positions of great trust and be considered beyond reproach - because that's the cover they need to have in life in order to avoid detection.
Alright, I see your point. But here's the thing you ain't getting:

They aren't hiding. And you're too busy still going after the cliche priest and soccer coach to notice what's in front of you.
 
He went on to attack the idea that children shouldn't be exposed to "sexuality," claiming that "such a view is a very white, Christian, upper-class, cis-gendered, and hetero-centric."
"Not raping children is white, christian, and straight"

Wow dude I'm pretty spergpilled but even I don't lay it out this plainly

Have some tact, god damn
 
He went on to attack the idea that children shouldn't be exposed to "sexuality," claiming that "such a view is a very white, Christian, upper-class, cis-gendered, and hetero-centric."
Lol send this fat shitskin faggot over to UAE and let him find out what Brown, lower class, men and women do to child perverts.

Look at him; he's a disgusting looking ugly piece of shit. The idea of perverting white innocence not only turns him on but is his best way of getting even with his ugliness.

The teacher went on to say that if parents didn't have the conversations with kids, it was up to teachers to foster classroom environments that "may make others uncomfortable."
So it's ok to talk about the Jewish question again?
 
True, they should not be above suspicion. But they aren't the ones demanding that they have unfettered access to other people's kids as some kind of civil right. They aren't looking to make this luncy not only acceptable, but celebrated.

The LGBT crowd wants everyone to forget that they were in league with NAMBLA back in the day. Walter Breen, Marion Zimmer Bradley, Harvey Milk, Allen Ginsberg, et al were all in favor of kidfucking, and even committed it.
You've entirely maligned an entire section of the populace based on a trait (pedo) that has nothing to do with sexual orientation.

A person straight, gay, trans or anything else isn't "more likely" to be a Pedo. A Pedo is a Pedo regardless of sexual orientation, and given that the vast majority of the population are straight, by concentrating on the Pedo's that are gay or trans, you are avoiding in plain sight the greatest source of the probability of an encounter with a Pedo:

A straight male.

So by distancing from Gay's or Trans which you'd probably avoid anyways by par of the course, you are blinding yourself to the likely source of a sexual assault on you child which will more than likely be from:

A straight male.

Almost all sexual assaults on children are from people the child and parents knew. And the culprit is usually a male. And they are usually straight. And they are usually trusted - like a family member of member of the public in a position of trust.

You will certainly find Pedo's in the gay and trans community, no doubt, but by percentages they will be near equal to straight pedo's, but by statistical volume in a community will be minor, i.e. if 2% of the male population are trans or gay, and 0.1% of all persons are Pedo's, you'd have to run into 1 gay male in 1000 to chance upon a Pedo. In other words, A gay Pedo might be one in 1000, as with a straight male, so in a population of 100,000 males there is hypothetically 2000 gays, and 98,000 straights. If 1 in a thousand is a Pedo, it means in a population of 100,000 males it means 2 Gay Pedo's exist, but 98 straight make Pedo's exist.

This is why, if you look at the convictions of Pedo's you will certainly find Gays and trans in there, but those prosecutions are dwarfed by the number one culprit:

A straight male.

Of course a great exception to this rule is within Religion where Gay Pedo Pastors run rife and have been protected for decades. And still are.
 
That's a nice argument, why don't you back it up with a source beyond "reee catholic priests"?
(Yes, that is a loaded response even though you're also putting schools on the list too.)
Ask a liberal about the grooming problem in the LGBT community WITHOUT them going “MuH peDo PRieStS” Challenge (IMPOSSIBLE).

Seriously, they use this retarded whataboutism every time without fail.
 
Of course a great exception to this rule is within Religion where Gay Pedo Pastors run rife and have been protected for decades. And still are.

According to the stats school teachers arrests due to grooming are near double that of the Church. And they have the entire protection of the media and the Teachers Union, plus they are pushing what in the article says.

Meanwhile the Church is a front page scandal.

So where do you think the power truly lies?
 
I don't know when I was last in UAE (although over 20 years ago) it was alot more forgiving. Not that a trip to some middle east society shouldn't be in the cards, but perhaps a stricter one should be used.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BBJ_4_Ever
But these conversations are going to need to be had with our younger counterparts because it isn't something that can left until they are 18 years old.
This is another dumb argument progressives like to parrot, this idea that conservatives are dumb hicks who don’t educate their children about sex until they are 18. You know what the best time to educate your kids about sex is? HOW ABOUT WHEN THEY START GOING THROUGH PUBERTY AND HAVE SEXUAL URGES FOR THE FIRST TIME! Seriously it’s not rocket science, any one who says kids should be taught about sex earlier than like 12 (or whenever puberty starts on said child) is either dumb as pig shit (usually the case if the person is a woman) or a pedo (usually the case if the person is a man).
 
There are always a few of these clowns around. They don't represent the vast majority so giving them oxygen is pointless.

Within any profession or group you can always find the exceptions, but they aren't the rule, remember that.

The subject of gender must of course be taken up with children and some guidelines will need to be established with children to ascertain when this is best accomplished, to which there will be much debate. The term "children" has a wide age range so we are going to have to have a much defined range for the conversation in our schools.
How compelling please lie face down in the ditch, now.
 
Alright, I see your point. But here's the thing you ain't getting:

They aren't hiding. And you're too busy still going after the cliche priest and soccer coach to notice what's in front of you.
Gonna echo this and add: you can find pedos in positions close to children but you can also find them dressing as woman too. Sometimes there's considerable overlap between the two.

The biggest red flag is someone who is one of those loud ally types who thinks children should be introduced to sexual concepts like the original article stated. There is no doubt in my mind that all those teachers are sickos in addition to frequenting gay bars or dressing in drag.
 
Back