Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

How many people will show up to Aella's birthday gangbang?


  • Total voters
    168
  • Poll closed .
The difference is that credentialed scientists will acknowledge and work to reduce potential sampling errors in their peer reviewed research
That's what they say. The reality is more complicated - the peer reviewed studies are subject to publication bias, so that nice-sounding findings are published, and null (or politically incorrect) results are shelved. So when you see "p=0.049" it's not the real p, because already a similar study has been done 20 times, but only this one, confirming the hypothesis, was published.

In fact, what irks mi most, is Aella's uncritical use of the Political Compass, which is rather obviously a propagandistic tool designed to convince a reasonable person that they should vote democrat through clever choice of questions.
 
In fact, what irks mi most, is Aella's uncritical use of the Political Compass, which is rather obviously a propagandistic tool designed to convince a reasonable person that they should vote democrat through clever choice of questions.

when I was in undergrad — so, 19 years old then and a fan of political compass, not knowing how bimbo I was — I suggested the political compass to a poli sci professor. this was in 2008, long before it was a meme. she told me in the most polite language allowable by a private university that I was being a moron for not noticing how biased it was in favor of a certain left-libertarian outcome

in retrospect, so glad she did that. and I could tell she was biting her tongue.
 
1676306220542.png


(twitter, archive.md)

Not being familiar with existing research, and not familiarizing your audience with existing research, is a good thing, actually, according to this whore! What a joke.
 
fucking called it. How brave of her to buck the cultural narrative on child molestation

View attachment 4320810

Talk about a lack of self-awareness... it's really kind of sad. She gets abused at 8, runs away from home at 17, and within a year goes into sex work... and she thinks being abused had little to no long-term effects on her?

It's no surprise she "only" found the abuse confusing and uncomfortable at the time. That's because an 8-year-old doesn't know about sex and doesn't understand what's happening. It's often only later when victims are old enough to understand what happened that then they have to process that traumatic experience. And a very common way of doing so is by becoming hypersexual, promiscuous, etc.

I mean, these are textbook reactions to childhood abuse and Aella considers herself some sex researcher but can't even see what's right in front of her face?
 
1676329951688.png


(twitter, archive.md)

1. She is so fucking incapable of doing anything herself. Always needs her army of simps to do the most basic shit for her.
2. I don't understand why she is even bothering. She has already demonstrated that she does not care about integrity. If she finds that any study "replicates her data," she will use that as proof that her data is just as good as someone who has actual research experience. She will dismiss any research that contradicts her data, because she believes that her data is better than existing research.

And she is only doing this because she got pushback for stupidly claiming that lit reviews are unnecessary... but still can't be arsed to do the work herself.
 
View attachment 4518866

(twitter, archive.md)

Not being familiar with existing research, and not familiarizing your audience with existing research, is a good thing, actually, according to this whore! What a joke.
But you're not unprimed, you already have assumptions and you're supposed to already have a fucking hypothesis. You summarize previous research so you can say why yours isn't a waste of time. (Even if it is.) If you're doing research while ignoring everything that's come before you're going to sound like a complete moron not unbiased.
 
violentporn.png
source (a)

This is literally just textbook narcissism. No, Rachael, you are not so fucking important that this person not citing your shoddy research is meaningful or significant. They'll find different, better sources to cite instead.

Also from Siskind's latest blogpost: There's a prediction market for which person Rachael's going to date and apparently the leading candidate is DesTiny.
predictionmarket.png
source (a)
 
Something doesn't really add up to me: in her infamous shower tweet, she mentions she had sex 63 times last year. Not going to powerlevel or TMI, and people have different drives of course, but that seems very low for the "promiscuous poly woman" persona she puts out online.
Most of the married couples in my friend-sphere (conservative, religious, have several kids, work full-time, etc.) consider 3x a week to be a healthy number to hit,
which is putting them at triple the action this self-proclaimed "whorelord" is enjoying.
 
Last edited:
Something doesn't really add up to me: in her infamous shower tweet, she mentions she had sex 63 times last year. Not going to powerlevel or TMI, and people have different drives of course, but that seems very low for the "promiscuous poly woman" persona she puts out online.
Most of the married couples in my friend-sphere (conservative, religious, etc.) consider 3x a week to be a good number to hit,
which is putting them at triple the action this self-proclaimed "whorelord" is enjoying.

Yeah! She doesn't have sex that much and masturbates even less. She is a coomer like Kevin Gibes trying to hide that she has completely mangled her sex drive.

I have already masturbated more in 2023 than she did in all of 2022. It is only Valentine's Day.
 
Happy 3-year anniversary to Aella's journey to find a husband!
7.png


A nice little subplot of Aella's is her wanting to basically settle down, get married, and have kids. She's even developed these dating spreadsheet things where people apply to date her (I think one of her current BFs she met this way) and she analyzes it with some score and dates them. It's mystifying to her she hasn't found a guy who fits her simple request after 3 years.

It's been 6 months and still no luck! What's the secret to finding a guy and being happily married? Married people, help me!
5.png

As you'd expect, each time she receives advice that ditching onlyfans and escorting might help her hubby search. Her response is always a variant of:
6.png

Keep in mind, this is the same OnlyFans that she admits she is too lazy to even try at because she gets bored.

Fast forward to 2022. She's still looking for a husband, though now calling it a life partner, and mentioning she also wants kids. (There are plenty of tweets where she admits having baby fever--didn't screenshot them all.)
4.png

1 (3).png

Her poly life is now amazing, guys!
2 (1).png

Is it really, though? Maybe I'm just a dude, but crying 59 days out of the year seems like a lot?
1676415183438.png



I'm almost certain there is a more on-the-nose tweet she deleted complaining about not being able to find a husband who simply wanted to settle down and have kids. What's interesting is that though her having no shame seems to have no bounds, she *does* occasionally delete tweets when ratioed extremely hard. If anyone knows the tweet I'm talking about, feel free to post. I'm pretty sure it was within the last year but tried searching at work and came up empty-handed.
 
Last edited:
"When ppl imagine dating me I think they are probably imagining me leaving them at home while I go off and get railed. But realistically it also includes"

I don't think you're supposed to admit it will involve the first part even if it's true. At least with the porn or prostitution they can be like "it's work" ya know.
 
"When ppl imagine dating me I think they are probably imagining me leaving them at home while I go off and get railed. But realistically it also includes"

I don't think you're supposed to admit it will involve the first part even if it's true. At least with the porn or prostitution they can be like "it's work" ya know.
The sex will be better if she has experience, duh. A rationalist would understand that.
 
Blatantly admits to wanting a followerbase of simps:
simping.png
source (a)

Also her bio updated and says "my research is more than just twitter polls":
morethanpolls.png
I have literally never seen an ounce of research from this chick that isn't just asking questions to random people on the Internet. Her "sex survey" is not a twitter poll but it's still very similar.
 
Back