Are you saying that his rants are official NJP speeches?
It doesn't need to be an IRL podcast appearance in a barn to represent the NJP in an official capacity. A premeditated rant with 6 NJP logos present on their radio platform represents them, clearly.
As a supporter myself, and I don't link his rants to NJP policy, do you agree with my view?
The NJP is an LLC and activist organization. The sum total of its policy is talking about stuff. Beyond that, the NJP has a policy of allowing Sven and Alex McNabb to represent them in an official capacity. I don't know why anyone would allow this for themselves, much less an org that wants to represent an entire racial demographic. Beyond that, personnel is policy, and b/c of personnel overlap I don't draw a distinguishing line between NJP and TRS. I think the only NJP board guys without podcasts on TRS now are Tony and Balogh Sr. If NJP has personnel issues, that directly reflects poorly on any policy views or decisions. Beyond this, I'll return to my first point, policy is what you do, not what your plans say. The republican party nominally supports equality under the law, religious freedom, etc, but fails to act on these things because of its personnel (those personnel being craven, evil, or some combination of both). If such critiques are valid for the pre-eminent right wing organization on the north american continent, then to not allow them de facto for the self proclaimed pre-eminent White nationalist organization on the north american continent does not logically follow.
Clearly there is a need to explain things, and take action, but you wanted him to talk more about his ex wife? Would you be keen also for him to discuss their sex life?
If he was to say objectionable stuff about her, do you think he risked her suing him later for defamation? Or was whatever he said about her risk free?
The window to be transparent on those issues closed when the divorce was allegedly sealed in New York. Whatever he theoretically could've talked about or given explanation for isn't happening. Its water under the bridge and mike will have to continue to bear the jew allegations because of TRS' inability to just make a clear and concise public statement about anything. No one really outside the innermost circles of the early TRS facebook circlejerk really knows any details about this, so anything that's relevant isn't coming out now.
To give another example, I've heard at least 5 different explanations as to why they let Jayoh go, from him being a fed to him simply cheating on his wife. The guy was in charge of vetting IRL nationally, there is a reasonable expectation that people know whether he had access to any details they gave or not if TRS believes he was a fed. If they don't, then its a reasonable expectation that you don't let rumors circulate that one of your former associates was a federal informant because at the very least it reflects poorly on you.
His black pill, collapseitarian view , obviously goes against the show's remit. He knows that so started going "ok.. you want to talk American politics? Here..." then posted various gop clips of the usual nonsense.
If platforming the paranormies reflects on the political goals of the NJP/TRS, then so does platforming alex mcnabb. We have a term for this, revealed preference.