Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
So their solution to lonely people is for people who are getting laid to have more sex?
lmfao

TBH I will agree with one thing and that is Modern Society is more connected but increasingly lonely, a lot of relationships people have today are and I hate to use this term "parasocial" they don't have any emotional weight or investment to them and can be dropped and picked back up on a whim, and people try to fill that missing void with more relationships that are disposable.

When I was a kid in the 90's I was always told that a lot of really old people 70+ most important non family contact on the daily was The Milkman, The Postman and the Shop Assistant, and how that was really sad an you should do more for the older people in your community and I have seen people in there mid 20's saying that the most human contact they have with someone regularly is with a Starbucks Barrista or someone at McDonalds etc.

Do you have any idea how soul crushing it is to not have a genuine friend that you know in person, the sort of guy or gal who you can knock on there door after a really shit day have a cup of tea with and feel better or who you can call in the dead of night and they will answer? Not just like your facebook, twatter, reddit thread etc?

Before I reconnected with my now Fiancee I had lots of "Friends" but no real real "Friend" and before we started dating she was that Friend for me, for a long time, and still is - there is more to a friend than someone who you can laugh with, or talk too a real friend will listen and feedback and pick up on your mood just from subtle clues will pull you to one side and say "hey dude are you really alright" and you feel better for them just listening an caring, Today people have less of that, I read a statistic recently that said a lot of people in the 20 - 40 age group say they have less than 10 friends they know there real name and have only met in person 3 or 4 of them and only 1 or 2 where made offline.

The world today is a big empty superficial place and it will suck you in if you let it, the only answer is to disconnect to reconnect to reality.
 
I like this pic and the Tweet:
1676397002235.png
On point for a "drift" party as those nips have drifted wonkily apart. Almost Keffals-tier cleavage.
 
This guy gets it. IMO, society in general is reeling from hyper-promiscuity, coupled with birth control. Sex without the ultimate gratification of raising a family just becomes hollow after a while.

Lots of people ITT are saying that the issue is women just aren't putting out enough, but I disagree. Casual sex was never as enjoyable to women as it was to men. They have a biological imperative to find a man who is able to take care of them and their progeny. The real issue is economic in nature. Most men in this country can barely afford to take care of themselves, let alone a wife. We really shouldn't be expecting women to give us sex for free and do nothing in return to support them.
So it's our fault for their rampant degeneracy because we don't make enough money? Seriously? How the hell is that supposed to work? Men aren't the majority making the decision to end marriages.
 
So it's our fault for their rampant degeneracy because we don't make enough money? Seriously? How the hell is that supposed to work? Men aren't the majority making the decision to end marriages.
Well to be clear, I'm blaming society, not men. In the 1950s, it was possible for a man to support an entire household on a single income. Inflation and stagnate wages have ensured that two income streams are generally the minimum for a household to stay afloat nowadays. Realistically, it's something like 4 or 5 income streams to maintain a household in bughives, which is why they're starting to live in pods and live as perpetual adult children.

This is the real reason we're seeing reproduction plummet and a return to generational living. People don't have families anymore because partners can barely afford to take care of themselves, let alone children. Combine that with the constant barrage of propaganda designed to discourage childbirth, it shouldn't be a surprise that most people are opting out of having children. I don't blame men because our 10,000 year history shows us that most would take care of a wife, if they could.
 
It’s bizarre that a culture hyper fixated on sex, gender, consent etc is barely having any.

We really aren’t meant to live like this.
It's worse than have no sex: the sex they are having is unsatisfactory. It's either starving or eating rotten food that doesn't even make you feel satisfied. That alone explains a lot about current progressive activists.
 
The reason people are having less sex (and less meaningful rekationships) is because people have less friends in general nowadays. You don’t have to get to know anyone in your community, or join any groups, or even go to a workplace to meet people now that you can get all your social stimuli and fulfill all your obligations over the internet. The internet is just easier for a lot of people. Who are you gonna have sex with when you’re isolated human interaction?

Just like watching porn is the path of least resistance for getting off, making Discord friends and keeping up with social media is the path of least resistance for establishing a relationship with another human being. Doesn’t help that the parasocial allure of camgirls, ethots, and vtubers are seemingly irresistible to the terminally online.
 
You really don't realize why that happened, do you?
Oh, I know exactly why wages have been stagnate in this country for a lifetime but I don't really want to clutter this thread up with political sperging.

They got dollar signs in their eyes when they saw women operating the factories as well as the men, who were away fighting the war.
 
The reason people are having less sex (and less meaningful rekationships) is because people have less friends in general nowadays. You don’t have to get to know anyone in your community, or join any groups, or even go to a workplace to meet people now that you can get all your social stimuli and fulfill all your obligations over the internet. The internet is just easier for a lot of people. Who are you gonna have sex with when you’re isolated human interaction?

Just like watching porn is the path of least resistance for getting off, making Discord friends and keeping up with social media is the path of least resistance for establishing a relationship with another human being. Doesn’t help that the parasocial allure of camgirls, ethots, and vtubers are seemingly irresistible to the terminally online.
i think this is not really true.
i don't think people neglect real relationships because they prefer internet shit, i think people are coping with internet shit after having been rejected and cast out by an increasingly toxic and dysfunctional society.
 
Oh, I know exactly why wages have been stagnate in this country for a lifetime but I don't really want to clutter this thread up with political sperging.

They got dollar signs in their eyes when they saw women operating the factories as well as the men, who were away fighting the war.
And there you go.
That's the root of this entire issue, and it's not going away until women choose not to work or are forced not to.
 
i think this is not really true.
i don't think people neglect real relationships because they prefer internet shit, i think people are coping with internet shit after having been rejected and cast out by an increasingly toxic and dysfunctional society.
Terminally online people also get blackpilled about society a lot easier. The Farms, 4chan, twatter and many other places on the internet tend to highlight the worst of the worst. In reality you have good odds of running into decent people out there if you don't do stupid shit and just live your life a bit.
Running to the web is a pretty bad form of cope.
 
And there you go.
That's the root of this entire issue, and it's not going away until women choose not to work or are forced not to.
Yeah, it's not women who tailored the economy to make it impossible for a single income to support a household. Watch the women interviewed, they say that they can't wait to give the job back to the men, when they return home from the war.

Hint: They invented feminism to trick women into working during their childbearing years, own the banks and wear small hats.
 
That sounds like an awful lot of work.

The price of pussy is unreasonably high and men have made do with less expensive alternatives. That's just basic economics.
I mean, if you're already showering and taking care of yourself and regularly talking to people it's literally just adding an extra "oh btw wanna smash?" once in a while. If getting laid seems onerously expensive from where you're standing, I think you need to worry less about getting laid and worry more about the state your life is in.
 
Yeah, it's not women who tailored the economy to make it impossible for a single income to support a household. Watch the women interviewed, they say that they can't wait to give the job back to the men, when they return home from the war.

Hint: They invented feminism to trick women into working during their childbearing years, own the banks and wear small hats.
Oh yes, women were just too stupid to see what would happen. I should've been more understanding. They are incapable of making decisions for themselves.
 
Back