Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
All the childfree people I know say that part of the reason they stayed childfree was to have more sex. But they're now in their 40s and sleeping in separate bedrooms like roommates, or fucking people other than their spouses on the sly.

Meanwhile when women get to dishing in the large family groups, they're having sex multiple times a week to multiple times a day.

I've seen a lot of men really balk at the idea of a woman who wants more than 1-2 kids, but it definitely seems like the husbands of the women in the groups are seeing some benefit from the strategy.
 
I've seen a lot of men really balk at the idea of a woman who wants more than 1-2 kids, but it definitely seems like the husbands of the women in the groups are seeing some benefit from the strategy.
I guess that's a good strategy if you don't mind taking care of an entire human being you're not super thrilled about existing for at least 20 years just to get laid.

Seems pretty steep to me though.
 
All the childfree people I know say that part of the reason they stayed childfree was to have more sex. But they're now in their 40s and sleeping in separate bedrooms like roommates, or fucking people other than their spouses on the sly.

Meanwhile when women get to dishing in the large family groups, they're having sex multiple times a week to multiple times a day.

I've seen a lot of men really balk at the idea of a woman who wants more than 1-2 kids, but it definitely seems like the husbands of the women in the groups are seeing some benefit from the strategy.
I wish large families weren't looked down on. My dream is have a whole bunch of kids.
 
Distance makes the heart grow fonder. In today's world, it is impossible to "miss" your significant other. Calls, texts, zoom, 9001 online social media apps/sites. Couples are up each others' asses 24/7.

Fonder? Impossible when the bitch starts on you for turning off your phone during a round of golf.

Who ordered this shit?
 
Distance makes the heart grow fonder. In today's world, it is impossible to "miss" your significant other. Calls, texts, zoom, 9001 online social media apps/sites. Couples are up each others' asses 24/7.

Fonder? Impossible when the bitch starts on you for turning off your phone during a round of golf.

Who ordered this shit?
ah yes
the bizarro world where you have to pretend like you're not interested to make her value you more

god, that's so retarded but it works
 
Did this harpy really just try to pin "lack of walkable communities" for a reason that people aren't getting laid?
It's called urbanism, we have a thread on it here. Don't ask them why Japan has high numbers of lonely men, is the reason why "hikikomori" was coined and Shinto Abe campaigned on "have sex" despite Japan being a dense island with tons of walkable communities.
 
No, they actually don't. Despite claiming they want men that are more aggressive they cry about getting raped all the time. I mean literal rape and not the feminist rape.
They do indeed like men who take charge and make demands, despite the other posters joke there is a difference between forcing a girl and being assertive. Most women will pretend not to be interested at first just to see if you'll pussy out or even later in relationships just to see how you react. There is a fine line of context though.
 
It's called urbanism, we have a thread on it here. Don't ask them why Japan has high numbers of lonely men, is the reason why "hikikomori" was coined and Shinto Abe campaigned on "have sex" despite Japan being a dense island with tons of walkable communities.
In their worldview, "renewable" energy, walkable communities, and vegetarianism is the panacea that will solve literally every one of the world's problems. It doesn't matter what the issue they're talking about is, those will always, always be proposed as the only solutions.
 
They do indeed like men who take charge and make demands, despite the other posters joke there is a difference between forcing a girl and being assertive. Most women will pretend not to be interested at first just to see if you'll pussy out or even later in relationships just to see how you react. There is a fine line of context though.
I wonder why men don't want to be with women anymore.
Persistence used to at least work, nowadays if you're persistent with a woman you're at serious risk of social pariahness, if not actual legal trouble.

Goddamn I wish women made sense.
 
I wonder why men don't want to be with women anymore.
Sometimes it's not that bad. For instance a girl I was recently talking to when I first talked to her, she said she'd "contact me later." I then said "You better." She then said something along the lines of "Boy I'll beat the fuck outta you." To which I responded "No, you'll bend over for me and enjoy it." She then said all CAPS "I WILL" but didn't finish the thought, the next day she sent me her nudes pretty fast and her "anger" turned into a complete 180. Another girl around 20 used to say I was too old, and having persisted she usually calls me when she's feeling in the mood.

There is some element of game that I find ok, women are controlled by their emotions and being resistant makes sense otherwise women would just submit to the worst of men who pressure them. They already do to some extent, but I digress, the good men gotta step up their game or lose to the bad men. Just how it is. I don't endorse going too overboard in such "games." from women but you can always test your luck to see if you can get some success. Haven't been arrested so far... Though to be fair, with how ladies are these days: yet.

Persistence used to at least work, nowadays if you're persistent with a woman you're at serious risk of social pariahness, if not actual legal trouble.

Goddamn I wish women made sense.
You're not wrong but it's heavily context based. If they don't show any interest I don't push and I just walk out forcing their hand or losing out. I am not willing to go to jail over pressuring a girl, but there are key signs when a girl is interested and just playing games, or becoming creeped out or avoidant. Don't get me wrong, I think a lot of things women do these days is completely idiotic at best, but this is one of the more tamer things to be honest. Unlike the other aforementioned issues.
 
Persistence used to at least work, nowadays if you're persistent with a woman you're at serious risk of social pariahness, if not actual legal trouble.

Goddamn I wish women made sense.
You know why "You can have it all" worked so well? Women want opposing things. And when they get them, it leaves them unsatisfied: freedom and security, responsibility and victimhood, power and vulnerability, and to be loved by everyone and to be loved by a special someone. Used to be father would tell them how stupid being undecided was, but their mothers got rid of that. We weren't meant to be dating, a useless ineffective mess for finding a lifetime mate. Men want opposing things too, but we know from actually having to get them having it both ways all the time is impossible.

The reality is you can only have things one way or you'll end up with nothing.
Sometimes it's not that bad. For instance a girl I was recently talking to when I first talked to her, she said she'd "contact me later." I then said "You better." She then said something along the lines of "Boy I'll beat the fuck outta you." To which I responded "No, you'll bend over for me and enjoy it." She then said all CAPS "I WILL" but didn't finish the thought, the next day she sent me her nudes pretty fast and her "anger" turned into a complete 180. Another girl around 20 used to say I was too old, and having persisted she usually calls me when she's feeling in the mood.

There is some element of game that I find ok, women are controlled by their emotions and being resistant makes sense otherwise women would just submit to the worst of men who pressure them. They already do to some extent, but I digress, the good men gotta step up their game or lose to the bad men. Just how it is. I don't endorse going too overboard in such "games." from women but you can always test your luck to see if you can get some success. Haven't been arrested so far... Though to be fair, with how ladies are these days: yet.


You're not wrong but it's heavily context based. If they don't show any interest I don't push and I just walk out forcing their hand or losing out. I am not willing to go to jail over pressuring a girl, but there are key signs when a girl is interested and just playing games, or becoming creeped out or avoidant. Don't get me wrong, I think a lot of things women do these days is completely idiotic at best, but this is one of the more tamer things to be honest. Unlike the other aforementioned issues.
you can keep them
if they could be seduced by 'bad men' they were bad women
 
Sometimes it's not that bad. For instance a girl I was recently talking to when I first talked to her, she said she'd "contact me later." I then said "You better." She then said something along the lines of "Boy I'll beat the fuck outta you." To which I responded "No, you'll bend over for me and enjoy it." She then said all CAPS "I WILL" but didn't finish the thought, the next day she sent me her nudes pretty fast and her "anger" turned into a complete 180. Another girl around 20 used to say I was too old, and having persisted she usually calls me when she's feeling in the mood.

There is some element of game that I find ok, women are controlled by their emotions and being resistant makes sense otherwise women would just submit to the worst of men who pressure them. They already do to some extent, but I digress, the good men gotta step up their game or lose to the bad men. Just how it is. I don't endorse going too overboard in such "games." from women but you can always test your luck to see if you can get some success. Haven't been arrested so far... Though to be fair, with how ladies are these days: yet.


You're not wrong but it's heavily context based. If they don't show any interest I don't push and I just walk out forcing their hand or losing out. I am not willing to go to jail over pressuring a girl, but there are key signs when a girl is interested and just playing games, or becoming creeped out or avoidant. Don't get me wrong, I think a lot of things women do these days is completely idiotic at best, but this is one of the more tamer things to be honest. Unlike the other aforementioned issues.
This 'game' sounds absolutely exhausting to participate in. You have to know when a girl is genuinely interested but you blew it or if she's still interested and is playing hard to get, you need to know how friendly is too friendly or how aloof is too aloof, etc.

I just want shit to make sense. Girl goes out of her way to show interest and I return it but then she goes cold; why do I then have to play the "in or out" game with risk of looking like a massive creep for guessing wrong? Fucking batshit, man.
 
They do indeed like men who take charge and make demands, despite the other posters joke there is a difference between forcing a girl and being assertive. Most women will pretend not to be interested at first just to see if you'll pussy out or even later in relationships just to see how you react. There is a fine line of context though.
You call it "a fine line", I call it "caprice".
 
This 'game' sounds absolutely exhausting to participate in. You have to know when a girl is genuinely interested but you blew it or if she's still interested and is playing hard to get, you need to know how friendly is too friendly or how aloof is too aloof, etc.

I just want shit to make sense. Girl goes out of her way to show interest and I return it but then she goes cold; why do I then have to play the "in or out" game with risk of looking like a massive creep for guessing wrong? Fucking batshit, man.
Women either are telepaths and they’re not telling us or men just don’t grasp all these supposed subtle body language cues.

But I agree, it just seems draining and a gamble.
 
This 'game' sounds absolutely exhausting to participate in. You have to know when a girl is genuinely interested but you blew it or if she's still interested and is playing hard to get, you need to know how friendly is too friendly or how aloof is too aloof, etc.

I just want shit to make sense. Girl goes out of her way to show interest and I return it but then she goes cold; why do I then have to play the "in or out" game with risk of looking like a massive creep for guessing wrong? Fucking batshit, man.
I've heard someone say it before, but I'll reiterate in my own words: game is a quality of low value (in terms of character) men and women. Any woman you can get into bed by playing mind games with is not someone you want to actually be with. At best, you'll fuck her and move on. If you could do it so easily, there's likely a dozen other men that already have. Why would you be the one who stays?

If you're just in it for sex, okay. You deal with that mess. I'd rather not bother.
 
Back