Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
If you find one of these female friends in todays modern culture that is capably of holding herself together, and have an interesting convo,I owe you a drink.
Or without them already being married or suffering some other issue, like a certain girl I was close to whose health is in the shitter despite being good in both of those metrics before her health declined. RNG of life.
sweet jesus why doesn't anybody just get married
I said playing a successful strat or tactic with the metric given, this would be like having a shitty life and throwing yourself in a ditch or alternatively offing yourself as the "solution" to said predicament lol
 
The most funny thing about the article is how earnest the author comes off as. Loneliness and social dysfunction are real problems and sexual relationships can be a massively good thing for people’s mental and emotional well being.

The joke is that she doesn’t acknowledge the cultural or economic reasons why these problems have simply gotten worse and worse. From economic concerns to the fact that women do in fact “not settle” like they may have been expected too in the past. Look at any Tiktok or female dominated space-the message is always “you can do better” “or don’t settle girl!”

Men get the message that they aren’t owed a woman, that it’s social progress they die as bachelors(though the explicitness and glee of this message varies depending on the sender), not to mention the messages women send out. If you aren’t Brad Pitt then you are in a for a rough time, even more so if you don’t have FU money or some other signal of desirability to the female hind brain.

Marriage is a Russian roulette even for wealthier men-a woman gets the “ick”(a more degrading and revealing expression of the true nature of the female species if there ever was) and leave on a dime. Women cheat shamelessly. Women brag about dating a dozen men in a night for free drinks and dinner. Women gladly bask in simp attention while laughing at their pathetic pay pigs publicly.

What man has not seen this? What man has not gotten the notion that just maybe all that misogyny stuff from the past 5000 YEARS was right. That women are depraved wild beasts, demons in human skin, animals that can talk that every divine command and social taboo restrained and repressed and righteously!

Incels are just the men that realize this alongside coming to the realization that no women are not romantics-women do not judge a man on ethereal virtues or ideals. They are the most base and materialistic creatures in existence. Women are not ladies pure of the tales of old chivalry or gentle comforters and friends of Anime and countless other depictions besides-they are beasts. Many other men come to the same realization without the same bitterness at having a bad luck of the draw.

There are broader reasons for loneliness and social anomie and even if you mandated a woman spread her legs on pain of death, a lot of these problems would still exist. But no there is no solution to these problems-definitely not one this author would find congenial.
 
The most funny thing about the article is how earnest the author comes off as. Loneliness and social dysfunction are real problems and sexual relationships can be a massively good thing for people’s mental and emotional well being.

The joke is that she doesn’t acknowledge the cultural or economic reasons why these problems have simply gotten worse and worse. From economic concerns to the fact that women do in fact “not settle” like they may have been expected too in the past. Look at any Tiktok or female dominated space-the message is always “you can do better” “or don’t settle girl!”

Men get the message that they aren’t owed a woman, that it’s social progress they die as bachelors(though the explicitness and glee of this message varies depending on the sender), not to mention the messages women send out. If you aren’t Brad Pitt then you are in a for a rough time, even more so if you don’t have FU money or some other signal of desirability to the female hind brain.

Marriage is a Russian roulette even for wealthier men-a woman gets the “ick”(a more degrading and revealing expression of the true nature of the female species if there ever was) and leave on a dime. Women cheat shamelessly. Women brag about dating a dozen men in a night for free drinks and dinner. Women gladly bask in simp attention while laughing at their pathetic pay pigs publicly.

What man has not seen this? What man has not gotten the notion that just maybe all that misogyny stuff from the past 5000 YEARS was right. That women are depraved wild beasts, demons in human skin, animals that can talk that every divine command and social taboo restrained and repressed and righteously!

Incels are just the men that realize this alongside coming to the realization that no women are not romantics-women do not judge a man on ethereal virtues or ideals. They are the most base and materialistic creatures in existence. Women are not ladies pure of the tales of old chivalry or gentle comforters and friends of Anime and countless other depictions besides-they are beasts. Many other men come to the same realization without the same bitterness at having a bad luck of the draw.

There are broader reasons for loneliness and social anomie and even if you mandated a woman spread her legs on pain of death, a lot of these problems would still exist. But no there is no solution to these problems-definitely not one this author would find congenial.
My view on women isn't that grim, but I'd be lying if I said it was charitable. I think that women have inherent behaviours that they used to be taught how to manage and simply aren't anymore.

But I'm 30 and coming up on a decade of being single. Ask me again at 40 and you'll probably get a much more hateful response. Nothing like trying and failing to date for 15 years.
 
What from I've gleaned talking to other people, they don't really have to. It's so self-evidently worthwhile that it warrants no consideration.

I don't get it myself, but I think people like that are in the majority.
Well it depends, "the game" is different from "Having game" or participating in the "sexual game."

The game as far as I define it is just drama and ego-feeding, which some people avoid all together. Kind of like people who post vacation trips all over social media trying to impress others to get validation. Many relationships do fall under this despite it being shit in this very specific concept it never last long without having to feed it continuously. I avoid this dog shit, what they see is what they get, don't like it move on. You can see this with celebrities, they are in a relationship game to see who can get the youngest girl, how many girls they can bag, etc. Pointless in my opinion, and their families they have from it suffer in the mean time the women celebrities aren't much better in that regard or PUA, and more. It's all about the humble bragging and less about what they gain because of that dopamine rush.

Having game, is just the ability to seduce, end up at sex, or knowing how to "work" (and not always manipulatively) women or the opposite sex into getting into the sex position.

Participation in the sexual game has many reasons, in regards to men, it's often for children (married or not), pure pleasure seeking, status or even ties and social exposure. Women do it generally because most women if honest can't function to level headed without a man to help guide them, or because women are far more socially constructed evolution wise, they need dependence quite often. Sex is more a tool to try to control, or obtain said relationship.

--

If you don't care about having a legacy, desensitized to pleasure or have your urges curbed, or are just jaded, it makes sense to not get involved or caring about having game, or seducing ladies, etc. Nothing wrong with that each man choses his own option, but that's primarily why some of us are into improving our game or experiencing what we can or improving it.

Government involvement has fucked it up though, and social engineers so it's far more awful than need be at this point in society though. That's without what feminist have led the way for.
 
What man has not seen this? What man has not gotten the notion that just maybe all that misogyny stuff from the past 5000 YEARS was right. That women are depraved wild beasts, demons in human skin, animals that can talk that every divine command and social taboo restrained and repressed and righteously!

I wouldn't go that far. I'd call them children in adult bodies. You have to talk them down from emotional outbursts. You have to keep them in check. You have to take them out regularly, give them gifts. Virtually discipline them.

I'm not interested in managing a child.
 
Hilarious romcom tier opinion that "sex solves all your problems". Nah, in my experience it makes things get worse. As a dude, the only way to ensure 100% safe sex is abstinence. Condom reduces chances, but they're not guaranteed and I've had a girl get on top of me and slip it in raw without my consent in the past.

I've never been really scared about being accused of rape or harassment, but I've had sex with women that have made me question my sanity for having sex with women who would have made my life complete hell, and would have been a hellish presence in my life for decades to come, not to mention bringing someone into the world to be raised in a fucked up environment with an unstable mother.

Maybe I'm jaded because of my parents, but I don't want to have a kid born into a fucked up situation. And at the current stage in my life, casual sex is more of a risk than anything, and I don't have the time to balance a proper relationship along with school, working full time, and everything else I'm doing. Even when pussy is achievable, it's never really "free", no matter what the chad incel meme bullshit says. If nothing else, it still costs time, it costs energy, and both of those are in incredibly short supply for me right now.

TL;DR: pussy doesn't fix your problems and getting it while you feel miserable just makes you feel more disillusioned in my experience.
 
If you didn't learn the skills when you were young, even before the apps fucked everything up good luck trying to get anywhere now with no XP.

Nah, 30 is when the single mothers start chasing you. You get a few good years of that. I might have married one when I was around that age if she wasn't geographically tied down because of custody. That, and for all her many delightful qualities, she was a leftist. BAMN, abortion marches, maybe NLG--she was planning to go to DC and do something if Trump's electoral victory wasn't stolen. I can't be close to someone like that, someone who actively opposes my core beliefs. And that's a lot of single women in America, maybe most. And it's getting worse. For those who see sex as part of a relationship, even a casual relationship, the other party has to be relatable, and that's becoming more and more difficult.
 
Yes, for many of you. The apps work if you're chad or you know the game and they just took the game online.
The Apps work if you have no taste in women and just want any pile of meat, they are absolutely wretched at looking for someone you actually want to spend time with unless you just swipe right on everything and pray you find one person who isn't...boring.
 
The most funny thing about the article is how earnest the author comes off as. Loneliness and social dysfunction are real problems and sexual relationships can be a massively good thing for people’s mental and emotional well being.

The joke is that she doesn’t acknowledge the cultural or economic reasons why these problems have simply gotten worse and worse. From economic concerns to the fact that women do in fact “not settle” like they may have been expected too in the past. Look at any Tiktok or female dominated space-the message is always “you can do better” “or don’t settle girl!”

Men get the message that they aren’t owed a woman, that it’s social progress they die as bachelors(though the explicitness and glee of this message varies depending on the sender), not to mention the messages women send out. If you aren’t Brad Pitt then you are in a for a rough time, even more so if you don’t have FU money or some other signal of desirability to the female hind brain.

Marriage is a Russian roulette even for wealthier men-a woman gets the “ick”(a more degrading and revealing expression of the true nature of the female species if there ever was) and leave on a dime. Women cheat shamelessly. Women brag about dating a dozen men in a night for free drinks and dinner. Women gladly bask in simp attention while laughing at their pathetic pay pigs publicly.

What man has not seen this? What man has not gotten the notion that just maybe all that misogyny stuff from the past 5000 YEARS was right. That women are depraved wild beasts, demons in human skin, animals that can talk that every divine command and social taboo restrained and repressed and righteously!

Incels are just the men that realize this alongside coming to the realization that no women are not romantics-women do not judge a man on ethereal virtues or ideals. They are the most base and materialistic creatures in existence. Women are not ladies pure of the tales of old chivalry or gentle comforters and friends of Anime and countless other depictions besides-they are beasts. Many other men come to the same realization without the same bitterness at having a bad luck of the draw.

There are broader reasons for loneliness and social anomie and even if you mandated a woman spread her legs on pain of death, a lot of these problems would still exist. But no there is no solution to these problems-definitely not one this author would find congenial.
It's fucking sad that even someone like my dad, who I think has a level head when it comes to shit like this, thinks exactly this. Women are overly materialistic and base when it comes to their ego. Of course, a woman shouldn't just trust any man for no reason, but women on the whole care too much about status and other material benefits of a relationship rather than being with someone that truly cares for you and wants the best for you. I don't think all women are like this nor do I resent women for it, but that's a running theme throughout all of society nowadayd. Even in churches, synagouges and mosques around the world, this mindset has been planted in every woman that she needs someone that signals her social and material wealth rather than someone that can take care of her, her children and even her family in addition to bring a constant source of love, affection and goodwill. Frankly, shit's fucked. The best thing you can do nowadays is not even bother with women for the most part unless you see one that is not only a good friend but a good peraon, a rarity nowadays.
 
Idealism is a male virtue.
Curiosity is a male virtue.
Imagination is a male virtue.
Striving for "higher things" is a male virtue.
Even things coded as feminine such as compassion are you guessed it male virtues.

Women have no morals, no ideas or thoughts-you think men are hedonistic, you have not seen the lengths women will go to experience nothing but pleasure, only pleasure with nothing else even imagined.

Humanity as defined by ideals and dreams is the reserve of men, forever and always.

Men grow up loving an ideal construct of women-whether that's Arthurian ladies, or Anime GFs that will take on the world with you and stand by you even if you walk into Hell itself. This ideal is beautiful, but every single woman does not meet it.

Genuine religiosity and a firm social conservative upbringing do not change female behavior either-they regulate and repress it making the woman amenable if less desirable in a strictly carnal sense. I recall hearing a study that female libido is reduced if they go to church often, especially bible study. This is a good thing, but you won't find many women with "women should be silent" shawls over their heads and fathers open to dowry discussions today.

The end of such repression has allowed the true primal beast that dwells in every woman to express itself, free of the laws and norms men imposed on pain of beatings, ostracism and indeed a grisly death to keep them controlled and pleasing to men.
 
Nah, 30 is when the single mothers start chasing you. You get a few good years of that. I might have married one when I was around that age if she wasn't geographically tied down because of custody. That, and for all her many delightful qualities, she was a leftist. BAMN, abortion marches, maybe NLG--she was planning to go to DC and do something if Trump's electoral victory wasn't stolen. I can't be close to someone like that, someone who actively opposes my core beliefs. And that's a lot of single women in America, maybe most. And it's getting worse. For those who see sex as part of a relationship, even a casual relationship, the other party has to be relatable, and that's becoming more and more difficult.
I could never date a single mother. It's losing at every option. Either she's a good mother; in which case you're always, rightfully, second to the kid. Or you're first in her life and she's a bad mother, and why would you want to marry a bad mother?
 
Anyone expecting anything different? Apart from the guys that think in current year they can find a relationship using them because someone did when the apps were new.
I mean No, but isn't that a condemnation of the Sites/Apps all on their own?

OK Cupid - "HEY HONKA HERE ARE YOUR TOP PICKS"
All of the women : "I AM OUTDORSY"
Me : "YOU STUPID FUCKING WEBSITE I AM A NERD I LIKE TO BE INSIDE WHY IS EVERY SINGLE WOMAN YOU SUGGEST TO ME THE POLAR OPPOSITE OF MY INTERESTS"
 
The Marie Antoinette of sex, everyone.

Women either are telepaths and they’re not telling us or men just don’t grasp all these supposed subtle body language cues.
OR.

Women aren't telepaths, and-- though it's true that they're generally less blunt-- they've taken to calling their inaction "really subtle actions".

Women have no morals, no ideas or thoughts-you think men are hedonistic, you have not seen the lengths women will go to experience nothing but pleasure, only pleasure with nothing else even imagined.
There's a number of refutations to that idea. One closest to mind: if that were true, we'd have no canonized female saints whatsoever.

Men grow up loving an ideal construct of women-whether that's Arthurian ladies, or Anime GFs that will take on the world with you and stand by you even if you walk into Hell itself. This ideal is beautiful, but every single woman does not meet it.
This much is true, though. Men at large have duped themselves into believing that women are somehow less vulgar than them, though women at large have done more than help that false notion.
 
Last edited:
Back