Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
drivel I didn't bother reading
I just think it's funny for someone to be so clearly be freaked out by the lack of productive people reproducing yet so thinly veiling it.

I reiterate I don't care about racial politics; urging people to produce more people so you can have more tax dollars for dem programs is creepy as fuck. Stop being creepy.
 
urging people to produce more people so you can have more tax dollars.
I really dont care about race politics, thank God the race politik wankers are contained here and rarely venture outside A&N. I just like making spergs flip out about it.
What's your deal with taxes, this is about sex, and making fun of those too scared and bitter to have it.
I got it, what if taxpayer money was used to provide gov'mt issued fuckmommies to incels, which has been brought up before. You would be ok with this, right?
 
What's your deal with taxes, this is about sex, and making fun of those too scared and bitter to have it.
You sound like Freya. That's not a good thing fyi.
I got it, what if taxpayer money was used to provide gov'mt issued fuckmommies to incels, which has been brought up before. You would be ok with this, right?
Stop being creepy.
Addendum: stop being such a tryhard sperg. You're making the incels look better by comparison.
 
I love that an article about how both men and women are having less sex and dating less has triggered endless ranting about female promiscuity and a need to retvrn to the 1950s from guys who insist that they can fuck whomever they want, they're just bored by the foids.
If you tie sex to marriage, you make more people get married and married people have a sexual partner always close by so they have more sex. If men think women are all sluts and women think all men are unfuckable then neither has sex. Forcing a culture that pair bonds average people together leads to more sex, while making them enemies and offering unlimited access to every colour, size, age and style of woman naked at two clicks of a mouse leads to less.
 
people didn't get married because they wanted to. it was just something you did to survive. the whole reason divorce rates increased was because thanks to industrialization, women weren't forced to stay in shitty marriages just because. and im glad. no amount of crying will bring those days back.
 
people didn't get married because they wanted to. it was just something you did to survive. the whole reason divorce rates increased was because thanks to industrialization, women weren't forced to stay in shitty marriages just because. and im glad. no amount of crying will bring those days back.
Now birth rates are dropping, suicide, porn use and many other social ills have increased.

the women that were stuck in miserable marriages were unfortunate yes. They’re suffering was necessary for civilization as a whole.

A few black eyes, humiliated dignities, and verbal abuse is worth it. Maybe women are just too selfish to take the pain for the greater good?

The pain and abuse was necessary. A man coming home to a docile if miserable wife can focus on studying mathematics, science and philosophy. A man worried about whether or not his ungrateful bitch might leave can’t focus on advancing the human species.

You’re subjugation is necessary for the elevation of humanity.
 
I love that an article about how both men and women are having less sex and dating less has triggered endless ranting about female promiscuity and a need to retvrn to the 1950s from guys who insist that they can fuck whomever they want, they're just bored by the foids.
because male virginity has increased exponentially while women are still having sex?
 
people didn't get married because they wanted to. it was just something you did to survive. the whole reason divorce rates increased was because thanks to industrialization, women weren't forced to stay in shitty marriages just because. and im glad. no amount of crying will bring those days back.
Ironic considering how many spinsters and drunk cat ladies can't get married despite wanting to because women have no skills and no personality to offer. He gets porn while you get netflix and a pet shitting in your bed.
 
Ok I was wrong, the trannies are right. We need to have a serious conversation about abolishing women.

We need to re engineer the human brain so sexual drives and urges among men are oriented towards stuff like I dunno-writing poetry, building space craft and solving ecological problems.

#abolishwomenforhumanity

All that male angst and frustration could be redirected towards something useful and women could be gradually phased out. With cloning, and other technologies handling reproduction and robots doing domestic labor.
 
Now birth rates are dropping, suicide, porn use and many other social ills have increased.

the women that were stuck in miserable marriages were unfortunate yes. They’re suffering was necessary for civilization as a whole.

A few black eyes, humiliated dignities, and verbal abuse is worth it. Maybe women are just too selfish to take the pain for the greater good?

The pain and abuse was necessary. A man coming home to a docile if miserable wife can focus on studying mathematics, science and philosophy. A man worried about whether or not his ungrateful bitch might leave can’t focus on advancing the human species.

You’re subjugation is necessary for the elevation of humanity.
you really should have sex
 
I dunno, man. I've heard horror stories of supposed good quality women completely derailing a relationship because she decided to do a shit test. Maybe I just need to find more of these quality women but they seem rarer than a heterosexual in a democrat rally.
To be fair, I've never seen these "proud democrat" type "males" with attractive wives or girlfriends. It looks like he got her out of the bargain bin and she still more than likely screws other men when he's not around. Honestly what's the point when all you can get is a screechy political junkie who spreads her legs for random men and looks like she lives out of a McDonalds dumpster?
I mean there are plenty of nice guys and "good men" who have had keen interest in bad women. It's not always indicative of the person themselves, back when I was more naive one of my first crushes was a mean/bad girl. Yeah, I'm not exactly a "niceguy/good ma" anymore, but I don't think the world is so lacking nuance of good or bad.


Oh no, that's completely fair and I've lost some girls who play some of those games. If they go cold I cut off contact, they have to come to me, if they don't, well I move on fast. It is really shitty and one of those issues in modern dating for certain and it often jades men pretty quickly. A wise man once said treat them like replaceable accessories. If they want to maintain permanent residency in your life, they'll let you know.

I can understand why many give up these days make no mistake, I just think the first step isn't often that big an issue. Don't change for a girl, ever even if you want to keep her. Too friendly, that girl was always planning on friending you. Only advice in that is just tell them up front, if they start drawing distance they're out, they treat you like a friend, you are gone. It worked for my brother and the few successful men (at the moment at least) I know. Sometimes being upfront is a good thing.


Girls always shit test, that isn't to be confused with game. Sometimes they do to see if you're honest and straightforward and who you say you are. It's not always a test of the woman's characters but the man's as well. If you start to simp and fail the shit test they realize you were never who you claimed to be. It sucks but shit testing has existed as far as I've known girls in general.
There's a reason you see guys going for strippers and not church girls. Attraction is key.
 
Church girls might actually be sincere. A girl raised Pentecostal is not going to choke on your dick, take it up the ass and give you head in a car. They might insist you believe the religion they do, and that you go to church and behave yourself. Worse, they might insist you meet…their…parents. Horrifying.

A lot of men derive pleasure from seducing or otherwise overcoming a religious or conservative woman’s objections, but men as a rule are not attracted to women that might refuse to indulge their desires or insist on some set of beliefs or standards of conduct if you want to be their bf/husband.
 
If you tie sex to marriage, you make more people get married and married people have a sexual partner always close by so they have more sex. If men think women are all sluts and women think all men are unfuckable then neither has sex. Forcing a culture that pair bonds average people together leads to more sex, while making them enemies and offering unlimited access to every colour, size, age and style of woman naked at two clicks of a mouse leads to less.
pretty spot on post
without societal structures like marriage to guide people through life, they revert to caveman behavior instead
in women that means extreme hypergamy across the board, in men it means chad goes pump+dump mode while betas fight for scraps

but caveman behavior like that is not compatible with civilisation, it is anathema to the stability and social trust that are necessary to maintain civilised society. the longer it is allowed to continue, the more society erodes and fractures.
 
Church girls might actually be sincere. A girl raised Pentecostal is not going to choke on your dick, take it up the ass and give you head in a car. They might insist you believe the religion they do, and that you go to church and behave yourself. Worse, they might insist you meet…their…parents. Horrifying.

A lot of men derive pleasure from seducing or otherwise overcoming a religious or conservative woman’s objections, but men as a rule are not attracted to women that might refuse to indulge their desires or insist on some set of beliefs or standards of conduct if you want to be their bf/husband.
Is it really a wild statement to say men want women who will fulfill their sexual desires? There's nothing wrong with a woman taking it up the ass or giving you head in a car as long as you're in a long term relationship with thr goal of having a family.
 
I just think it's funny for someone to be so clearly be freaked out by the lack of productive people reproducing yet so thinly veiling it.

I reiterate I don't care about racial politics; urging people to produce more people so you can have more tax dollars for dem programs is creepy as fuck. Stop being creepy.
The earth has too many people as it is. Stop having sex, people.
you really should have sex
If women aren't up to the task, you can always go for men instead.
 
pretty spot on post
without societal structures like marriage to guide people through life, they revert to caveman behavior instead
in women that means extreme hypergamy across the board, in men it means chad goes pump+dump mode while betas fight for scraps

but caveman behavior like that is not compatible with civilisation, it is anathema to the stability and social trust that are necessary to maintain civilised society. the longer it is allowed to continue, the more society erodes and fractures.
West African village culture is a good example. Chads don’t actually hold much social power they pretty much go from village to village constantly trying to impress women-nigger peacock behavior is a male mating display. You have to show you’re wealthier, more wild, etc… than other men when women can banish you at any time.

Less attractive men do menial labor or leave and form roaming gangs or bands. Maximizing the chances of reproductive success due to gang rape. Women pretty much hold all the power in a community-as the climate is comfortable and there is no winter season. A bunch of women can simply gather herbs year round.

This isn’t an environment that incentivizes technological, artistic or really any sort of progress. For women it’s a life of constant feting interspersed with relatively light work, for men life is a constant struggle for survival and a struggle to attract a woman’s attention.

Same patterns are replicated amongst American blacks.

If you want civilization to devolve to tribal huts in the muck then you give women rights. It is the inevitable outcome.
 
This isn’t an environment that incentivizes technological, artistic or really any sort of progress. For women it’s a life of constant feting interspersed with relatively light work, for men life is a constant struggle for survival and a struggle to attract a woman’s attention.
for the women there it's also a life of poverty, instability and insecurity. violent rape is so ubiquitous there, it makes AIDS a real pandemic that kills people left and right.
 
Back