Diseased Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

[AnOminous]

Don't get it twisted, they don't want to take the site down. They want to make hosting and/or posting on the site a felony.

Indeed. Don't ever believe the motives of censors. They lie. They have to lie.

They never have whatever benevolent motive they claim. Or barely ever. (The absolute worst are the ones who actually do have the benevolent motive they claim, cf. C.S. Lewis.)

Their usual motive is they want something censored because it says something about them that they can't stand. This is why I honestly detest the self-righteous parents of kids who committed suicide the most of all these fucking self-professed white knights. As the person closest to the victim of mental illness, they were in the best position to do something and did absolutely nothing of worth. Who do they blame? Themselves? No, of course not, it was some website that dun it all.

Fuck those people.

 

[CB_]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent. There is a common theme as well that it’s always the parents fault. Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

 

[afounder]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent. There is a common theme as well that it’s always the parents fault. Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

You can at least be transparent about who you are, Chip Bieber.

I don't think many here blaming the parents, but it is very dishonest to say that a forum caused someone to kill themselves. Suicide books have been sold on Amazon for decades and they're easy to get. You can also get ebooks of these books cheaply. All the community provides is a place where people can speak about suicide without society's judgement or at the very worst, involuntary commitment and being medicated against your will.

You may not like the site, but by supporting censorship of SS, you're also supporting continued censorship of other things, maybe things that you like. Censorship is always a slippery slope.

 

[suspended animation]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent. There is a common theme as well that it’s always the parents fault. Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

It's a parent's job to monitor what their child is watching/ reading/ involved in. You can't let your child navigate the world on their own without guidance (or they may end up a kiwifarmer for example.)

Or worse, they could end up lost in romanticizing suicide or be unwittingly persuaded that they're "living in the wrong body" because no parental figure was there to step in and tell them how to healthily explore and exorcise these thoughts and emotions that they are being inundated with. The child may not even be ready for certain convos, in which case the parent needs to divert their mind until they're mature enough to understand, even if it is involves taking away devices and feeling the wrath of the child's tantrums.

It's a total crapshoot as to what your child's nature and temperament will be, and parents have my sympathy- until they start misdirecting blame.

The Internet is not for children.

 

[Prince Vegeta]

Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

Yes.

where would they be, if not on a forum for suicide?

A woman's toilet, reading to kids in a library, calling the wives of T1 ISP owners at 6am, not playing the wizard game secretly in a dark room.

 

[Empty Juicebox]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent. There is a common theme as well that it’s always the parents fault. Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

I don't believe people go from enjoying life to becoming actively suicidal overnight, and if they don't feel comfortable with asking their parents about these feelings at some point in this transition from being happy to actively planning their death, then I personally believe that they have absolutely failed them. This goes for a lot of issues they might have though, I see so many parents wonder why their kid doesn't talk to them and then you find out it's just the home environment they've fostered.

 

[dick brain]

As the person closest to the victim of mental illness, they were in the best position to do something and did absolutely nothing of worth. Who do they blame? Themselves? No, of course not, it was some website that dun it all.

Fuck those people.

These niggas really out here acting like you can drive a perfectly stable adolescent to suicide just by saying "Hey kid, wanna SS?" like it's the anti-life equation.

In reality, it's a much more complicated process. First you have to convince them to learn JavaScript...

 

[LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent. There is a common theme as well that it’s always the parents fault. Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

Any retard can figure out how to die. It takes a mongoloid not to figure out you'd probably accomplish it if you put a gun to your head or jump from a high enough place. The two most common methods of suicide are via firearm and asfixiation, good luck banning rope and tall buildings. Suicide is always a matter of will not of method

The method that is getting Sanctioned Suicide railed on seems so rare that you'd have to be extremely deliberate every step of the way to die that way. Just to know about it you'd have to be looking for it.

 

[LurkTrawl]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent. There is a common theme as well that it’s always the parents fault. Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

If I had a kid and because I had failed so miserably at being a parent that they wanted to off themselves, I'd rather they do it cleanly. The alternatives are fucking horrific and to want someone to survive a suicide attempt, depending on the method, can be some of the most evil shit you can wish on a person.

 

[Dyn]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent. There is a common theme as well that it’s always the parents fault. Do you think it’s a good idea having a website who’s goal is to discuss suicide and it’s methods in high detail for the sole purpose of exiting this world without zero regard to the age or vulnerability of the individuals consuming it?

If you somehow have less influence over your child's life than an obscure messageboard, then yes, whatever happens to him is probably your fault.

Go raise your damn kids.

 

[Beacon]

If you somehow have less influence over your child's life than an obscure messageboard, then yes, whatever happens to him is probably your fault.

Go raise your damn kids.

Well... we have kids being groomed in school to be victims. Or... if they're in a cult of wokeism, they're more likely to view parents as an enemy and withhold everything from them, even run away from them.

 

[Dyn]

Well... we have kids being groomed in school to be victims. Or... if they're in a cult of wokeism, they're more likely to view parents as an enemy and withhold everything from them, even run away from them.

Not agreeing with your child's rebellious teenage politics is not a valid excuse for having less impact on their life than a xenforo board full of miserable retards.

 

[Markass the Worst]

SS recently got a Wikipedia article from all the attention they've been getting. And wouldn't you know it, look at what's in the infobox:

That's right, direct links to the site. In contrast to the Kiwifarms article where apparently linking to us is deemed too great a threat to life to do. Despite the NYT claiming the site has killed more than 45 people (which is even reprinted in the article) while even the worst allegation against the farms is like 5 people or so. Also, lolcow Taylor Lorenz is cited in the article:


The talk page is worth a laugh:

Apparently someone debated about the value of using Lamarcus and Diego's real names in the article, citing "muh harassment". But apparently it's okay to include them if the full name is printed in media outlets. So basically, doxing is okay on Wikipedia as long as journoscum do it.

Also they have a weird wikipedo policy against using master's theses if they don't have a "significant scholarly influence" so the one by Elisa Sartori (that @GenociderSyo found) simply can't be cited.

SS'ers are not happy about this:


source (a)

I would agree with them, Wikipedia holds very strictly to the rule of "only reliable sources" (most of the time being journo outlets) and they literally have a rule against original research, so nobody is allowed to go to the site, see that they have a Recovery section, and report that they have a Recovery section, even when proving it with archives, links, screenshots, and everything. As far as I know, no coverage of the site, whether it be journos or other places on the Internet even mentions that they have a Recovery section except for the OP of this thread.

Speaking of which let's look at some of that coverage.

Reddit (r/videos):

source (a)
reveddit (a)
unddit (a)

r/Gamerghazi (bonus mention of Byuu/Near):


source (a)
reveddit (a)
unddit (a)

ResetERA:


source (a)

TV Tropes:

source (a)

Needless to say Tantacrul's video has spread far and wide, whatever its faults.

 

[frap]

SS'ers are not happy about this:
View attachment 4539778

lol "everyone should report it for misinformation". This poor soul has much to learn about Wikipedia.

 

[dick brain]

SS recently got a Wikipedia article from all the attention they've been getting. And wouldn't you know it, look at what's in the infobox:
View attachment 4539493
That's right, direct links to the site. In contrast to the Kiwifarms article where apparently linking to us is deemed too great a threat to life to do. Despite the NYT claiming the site has killed more than 45 people (which is even reprinted in the article) while even the worst allegation against the farms is like 5 people or so. Also, lolcow Taylor Lorenz is cited in the article:
View attachment 4539866

The talk page is worth a laugh:
View attachment 4539629
Apparently someone debated about the value of using Lamarcus and Diego's real names in the article, citing "muh harassment". But apparently it's okay to include them if the full name is printed in media outlets. So basically, doxing is okay on Wikipedia as long as journoscum do it.

Also they have a weird wikipedo policy against using master's theses if they don't have a "significant scholarly influence" so the one by Elisa Sartori (that @GenociderSyo found) simply can't be cited.

SS'ers are not happy about this:
View attachment 4539778
View attachment 4539774
source (a)

I would agree with them, Wikipedia holds very strictly to the rule of "only reliable sources" (most of the time being journo outlets) and they literally have a rule against original research, so nobody is allowed to go to the site, see that they have a Recovery section, and report that they have a Recovery section, even when proving it with archives, links, screenshots, and everything. As far as I know, no coverage of the site, whether it be journos or other places on the Internet even mentions that they have a Recovery section except for the OP of this thread.

Speaking of which let's look at some of that coverage.

Reddit (r/videos):
View attachment 4540141
source (a)
reveddit (a)
unddit (a)

r/Gamerghazi (bonus mention of Byuu/Near):
View attachment 4540250
View attachment 4540293
source (a)
reveddit (a)
unddit (a)

ResetERA:
View attachment 4540445
View attachment 4540446
source (a)

TV Tropes:
View attachment 4540450
source (a)

Needless to say Tantacrul's video has spread far and wide, whatever its faults.

I wish somebody with a surplus of free time would take this a step further and produce a virtue signaling, sensationalizing hit piece about a site that doesn't even exist, and watch the karma farmers saddle up like Paul Revere about it without a second thought.

I'm sure nobody would learn, but it'd be funny.

 

[Beacon]

Not agreeing with your child's rebellious teenage politics is not a valid excuse for having less impact on their life than a xenforo board full of miserable retards.

Partially true, but as parents, there isn't much they can do, even if they were accepting of the child. Yes, they have things to learn from the suicidal, however... it all comes down to the said individual.

And what about the parent's who tried their best to cater to the child's wishes, and gave them nothing but support; is it their fault too the child is dead?

There just has to be a mutual understanding, not war.

While it's a bit much to condemn an entire suicide forum for suicides, the same can also be said in condemning all the parent's.

It's like R&S in the screenshots antagonizing the bereaved family members for grieving, which is a human thing to do, knowing only one side of the story, or is missing the entire context.

Plus, it's an echo chamber.

Things are Grey.

 

[Dyn]

Partially true, but as parents, there isn't much they can do, even if they were accepting of the child. Yes, they have things to learn from the suicidal, however... it all comes down to the said individual.

And what about the parent's who tried their best to cater to the child's wishes, and gave them nothing but support; is it their fault too the child is dead?

There just has to be a mutual understanding, not war.

While it's a bit much to condemn an entire suicide forum for suicides, the same can also be said in condemning all the parent's.

It's like R&S in the screenshots antagonizing the bereaved family members for grieving, which is a human thing to do, knowing only one side of the story, or is missing the entire context.

Plus, it's an echo chamber.

Things are Grey.

No, if the only thing stopping your kid from killing himself is an internet forum not existing you're a straight-up black and white shit parent.

 

[Shakey Bones]

I'm on the site because I was diagnosed with Parkinson's in my early 30's. I've lost everything I worked for. People always want to say that "suicide is a permanent solution to temporary problems" but sometimes there are problems that aren't temporary, they're very real and only getting worse. I find it cathartic to talk about my suicide ideation without getting spammed with a useless suicide hotline number or thrown in a psych ward only to end up with a large medical bill at the end. If that makes me a "miserable retard' then so be it.

If you don't want your kids to stumble upon potentially harmful shit, keep them off the internet. Good luck with that.

 

[dick brain]

If you don't want your kids to stumble upon potentially harmful shit, keep them off the internet. Good luck with that.

There are smart phones designed for children that are able to facilitate telecommunication and run apps but unable to connect to the internet, they're so foolproof that the feds provide them to child predators and cybercriminals on federal probation/pretrial.

Just saying. It's not hard if you invest a modicum of effort. And if you're not in a position to invest a modicum of effort in your child's development, you're not in a position to breed.

 

[AnOminous]

Spoken like a true individual that is likely not a parent.

Spoken like a faggot who is likely completely stupid, maybe spooged into a bitch who gave birth, then did nothing of value afterwards. Do a flip yourself.