Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
Unironically this. I've tried explaining this before but lots of users ITT are complaining about the epidemic of single mothers in this country and how no self-respecting man wants to date them and raise another man's kids.

Every single mother is the result of an absentee father who has absconded. The popular cope I've heard to rebut this fact is "mostly women are initiating the breakup" - even if that's true, it's women who are taking responsibility for raising their children because there are way more single mothers in this country than single fathers.

I am convinced this is because of the porn epidemic in this country. Men's brains have been reprogrammed en masse to believe that we're all Genghis Khan and that it's "alpha" to sire as many bastard children as possible (e.g. Andrew Tate and his followers). I won't bore you with my antisemitic theories regarding the ultimate root cause but it's nice to see eye-to-eye with a lefty kiwi on this issue.
They don't care. Most cases of single motherhood are from dad leaving because he didn't want to have to raise a kid. It's bad to avoid having kids, it's bad to have an abortion, it's ALSO bad to raise kids apparently too. Oh don't forget it's bad to be a gold digger but also bad to be a career woman. Most of these spergs in here wouldn't even want to raise a child because that would mean no 10 hour xbox/porn sessions.
 
Judges have openly admitted that they rule against fathers and men as a matter of course. That men have no real expectation of equal treatment in the legal system.

It’s sick but it’s something feminists defend very viciously and their allies in the media and academy go to extreme lengths to hide and obfuscate.
 
More like think about being 80, having lived a life without a companion, with no children or grand children and going "What is my legacy? Who did I enjoy my life with?" and the answers being nothing and no one. Your bodies going to fail, your interests will become stale, your porn collection more degenerate.. and you did it all because sluts exist and some try to trick you into dating them.
You helped big line go up so some Jew living off dividends could donate more money to some antiwhite shit. Your taxes went towards gibs for some Shaniqua who has six keeds by 25 because she lets any nigga hit it and quit it. Besides, ESG scores don’t get raised caring about your legacy so therefore it’s a non-issue. Just coom inside your hand or some thot and keep making us money, goy!
 
This is absurd. In most states in the US, the mother will get primary custody by default and has to be a complete disaster before custody is given to the father. You can't look at statistics that were created by judicial fiat against many fathers' wishes and conclude that men aren't willing to take responsibility for their kids.

That's such bad reasoning.
This is an absolute lie and might have barely been true in 1980. Courts do everything they can to give both parents custody. This is just some shit you read on an incel forum. You newfag retards come here from your holes and spew incel talking points verbatim and get mad when called out on it.
Besides, I thought according to you incels women only exist to make babies. Giving them custody should be a no brainer
 
Unironically this. I've tried explaining this before but lots of users ITT are complaining about the epidemic of single mothers in this country and how no self-respecting man wants to date them and raise another man's kids.

Every single mother is the result of an absentee father who has absconded. The popular cope I've heard to rebut this fact is "mostly women are initiating the breakup" - even if that's true, it's women who are taking responsibility for raising their children because there are way more single mothers in this country than single fathers.

I am convinced this is because of the porn epidemic in this country. Men's brains have been reprogrammed en masse to believe that we're all Genghis Khan and that it's "alpha" to sire as many bastard children as possible (e.g. Andrew Tate and his followers). I won't bore you with my antisemitic theories regarding the ultimate root cause but it's nice to see eye-to-eye with a lefty kiwi on this issue.
"Single mothers are the fault of fathers who left. This is why you should care and be a good cuckold step-dad".

I can tell you haven't met many actual single mothers.
 
They don't care. Most cases of single motherhood are from dad leaving because he didn't want to have to raise a kid. It's bad to avoid having kids, it's bad to have an abortion, it's ALSO bad to raise kids apparently too. Oh don't forget it's bad to be a gold digger but also bad to be a career woman. Most of these spergs in here wouldn't even want to raise a child because that would mean no 10 hour xbox/porn sessions.
So women are the majority filers of divorce yet men are the ones abandoning the kids when the woman no longer wants to be with them?
 
You helped big line go up so some Jew living off dividends could donate more money to some antiwhite shit. Your taxes went towards gibs for some Shaniqua who has six keeds by 25 because she lets any nigga hit it and quit it. Besides, ESG scores don’t get raised caring about your legacy so therefore it’s a non-issue. Just coom inside your hand or some thot and keep making us money, goy!
That’s what you get for granddad fighting against the eebil Nahzees
 
So women are the majority filers of divorce yet men are the ones abandoning the kids when the woman no longer wants to be with them?
You don't understand, incel. Women are girlbosses who don't need no man, which is why nothing they do can ever be their fault. Everything wrong with any woman's life is the fault of the men within.

It's not her fault she chose a poor man to be her baby daddy. It's his fault for leaving! Even if she left him!
 
Most of these spergs in here wouldn't even want to raise a child because that would mean no 10 hour xbox/porn sessions.

I disagree. Having a kid changes many parents, including fathers. This is not the case in the black community where the men seem to love having lots of children but not raising them, but in many (white) male-dominated hobbyist circles it's common for men to drastically cut back their involvement or drop out altogether in their late 20s to mid 30s as they begin to have kids and don't have time to paint minis or practice the bass for three hours a day. When the kid is 8-9 and doesn't need intense parenting anymore, men pick up where they left off.
 
You don't understand, incel. Women are girlbosses who don't need no man, which is why nothing they do can ever be their fault. Everything wrong with any woman's life is the fault of the men within.

It's not her fault she chose a poor man to be her baby daddy. It's his fault for leaving! Even if she left him!
That is the gist of the entire argument. Agency is always placed on the man.
Don't try to make sense of woman logic.
They are simultaneously victims and fuck masters of galactic destruction, I know.
 
Back