Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
This is absurd. In most states in the US, the mother will get primary custody by default and has to be a complete disaster before custody is given to the father. You can't look at statistics that were created by judicial fiat against many fathers' wishes and conclude that men aren't willing to take responsibility for their kids.

That's such bad reasoning.
Okay, even if courts always defer to women, that means that women are at least asking for custody, rather than demanding they be placed in foster care or be made the father's responsibility. Put yourself in the woman's shoes: does it make any sense that they'd leave a man and then volunteer to be a single mother? Being a single mother really hampers a woman's quality of life when she could depend on her partner.

If women are all snakes that initiate the majority of separations, they'd do that before or after that'd have to raise the children as a single mother. @Freya is right on this - the only thing that makes sense is men initiate the majority of child abandonment. Child support didn't always exist and strikes me as a direct attempt to remedy this problem. Every major "alpha" lolcow I can think of has sired and abandoned bastard children (e.g.Ethan Ralph, Andrew Tate, etc.)
"Single mothers are the fault of fathers who left. This is why you should care and be a good cuckold step-dad".

I can tell you haven't met many actual single mothers.
Brah, I'm not trying to force you to be a step-dad. I'm trying to force men who have abandoned their children to be a dad to the children they made. I have no beef with you if you don't have bastard children.
 
That's what it is. It was never about "family values". I find it interesting you ignore the article where it is revealed men are 6x more likely to abandon their wife after a cancer diagnosis. These scrotes aint loyal
I would add they literally defend and praise guys like Andrew tate . For real and then they have shocked pickachy face when women decided to go cat lady route. I mean shit on women for anything, demean them, pump and dump them and then they are suprised when women are like lol no thanks bro.
Scrotes gonna scrote
 
Put yourself in the woman's shoes: does it make any sense that they'd leave a man and then volunteer to be a single mother? Being a single mother really hampers a woman's quality of life when she could depend on her partner.

If women are all snakes that initiate the majority of separations, they'd do that before or after that'd have to raise the children as a single mother.
You're assuming some kind of perfect rational agent behavior among all women. That's absurd to do with anyone, least of all women.
 
I disagree. Having a kid changes many parents, including fathers. This is not the case in the black community where the men seem to love having lots of children but not raising them, but in many (white) male-dominated hobbyist circles it's common for men to drastically cut back their involvement or drop out altogether in their late 20s to mid 30s as they begin to have kids and don't have time to paint minis or practice the bass for three hours a day. When the kid is 8-9 and doesn't need intense parenting anymore, men pick up where they left off.
Playing Lego star wars with your son or nephew is part of the male bonding experience. It's a great way to teach them not to trust any one in a coop game because they will fuck you over and laugh when it happens.
 
Every single mother is the result of an absentee father who has absconded.
Those single mothers either knew they were the kind of person to flee, or we should be tracking those deadbeats down.

Not for child support, but to arrest them for raping a mentally handicapped person.

it's women who are taking responsibility for raising their children
They're not raising their children. Even when they're not making their grandparents take care of them, or they're not bringing in boyfriends that happen to molest them, they're hardly rearing them-- either because they're the kind of irresponsible person that would get knocked up by a certain future deadbeat, or because all the other responsibilities of being the sole parent are getting in the way of raising their children.
 
I would add they literally defend and praise guys like Andrew tate . For real and then they have shocked pickachy face when women decided to go cat lady route. I mean shit on women for anything, demean them, pump and dump them and then they are suprised when women are like lol no thanks bro.
Scrotes gonna scrote
Way to ignore 90% of the conversation in this thread and only focusing on the parts that makes you look like a victim.
 
This is absurd. In most states in the US, the mother will get primary custody by default and has to be a complete disaster before custody is given to the father. You can't look at statistics that were created by judicial fiat against many fathers' wishes and conclude that men aren't willing to take responsibility for their kids.

That's such bad reasoning.
Have you looked how custody get delegated lemme look up for you hmmm?

As of 2018, nearly 4 in 5 custodial parents were mothers (79.9%). But the statistics go deeper than that: Not only does the mother get custody of the children more often, the parents agree in more than half the cases (51%) that the mother should have custody

Btw this doesn't include fathers being literally mia only 10 per cent had to reach the courts in any way( this includes mediation and drafting custody arrangements) 4 % reach a judge

Scrotes will lie about anything just to avoid admitting the obvious which is they abandoned their kids and somehow you make womans fault.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mold
Have you looked how custody get delegated lemme look up for you hmmm?

As of 2018, nearly 4 in 5 custodial parents were mothers (79.9%). But the statistics go deeper than that: Not only does the mother get custody of the children more often, the parents agree in more than half the cases (51%) that the mother should have custody

Btw this doesn't include fathers being literally mia only 10 per cent had to reach the courts in any way( this includes mediation and drafting custody arrangements) 4 % reach a judge

Scrotes will lie about anything just to avoid admitting the obvious which is they abandoned their kids and somehow you make womans fault.
If these men are such horrible scumbags why are women letting themselves date and be impregnated by them?
 
As of 2018, nearly 4 in 5 custodial parents were mothers (79.9%). But the statistics go deeper than that: Not only does the mother get custody of the children more often, the parents agree in more than half the cases (51%) that the mother should have custody

Btw this doesn't include fathers being literally mia only 10 per cent had to reach the courts in any way( this includes mediation and drafting custody arrangements) 4 % reach a judge

Scrotes will lie about anything just to avoid admitting the obvious which is they abandoned their kids and somehow you make womans fault.
"Men don't want to bankrupt themselves feuding in court, therefore they don't care about their children."
 
Fair enough. At least you can say you did. Don't let it keep you down, you've done more than the average man
I should probably expand on it a little, but I don't want to go into a giant power level thing. Let me put it this way. I did the very best I could, keeping in mind my terminal autism. Maybe that's the issue and maybe it isn't. I just don't know.

At this point in my life, I try to find happiness in other things. Maybe that's the best some people can do.
 
If these men are such horrible scumbags why are women letting themselves date and be impregnated by them?
Because women are attracted to men that exude danger and anti social behavior. Why do you think women get wet and excited over serial killers, gangsters, and honest to god child murderers.

The female hind brain is attracted to men that are capable of violence, ignore social conventions and norms(which connote boring) and who at some level are dominant. Or at least her brain makes her think such men are dominant.

The caveman that swings the biggest club and cracks the most skulls is going to get pussy. It’s primitive and animalistic but women are still wired to be attracted to aggression, displays of aggressive posturing and emotional indifference.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
You're assuming some kind of perfect rational actor behavior among all women. That's absurd to do with anyone, least of all women.
Okay, while I concur that men statistically tend to be more rational and women statistically tend to be more emotional, you can't always use that to handwave away an entire statistic. For your position to be correct, women as a whole need to be pants-on-head fucking retarded.

If they were simply governed by their whims and wanting to take the easy path, we'd have an epidemic of children in foster care or orphanages, so they could continue to live their slay qween lifestyle. They aren't though. You know who is continuing to live a bachelor lifestyle of freedom? Absentee fathers. They seem to be quite benefited from having these paper abortions. Instead, single mothers are statistically signing themselves up for a responsibility they could shrug off if they wanted to.
Those single mothers either knew they were the kind of person to flee, or we should be tracking those deadbeats down.

Not for child support, but to arrest them for raping a mentally handicapped person.


They're not raising their children. Even when they're not making their grandparents take care of them, or they're not bringing in boyfriends that happen to molest them, they're hardly rearing them-- either because they're the kind of irresponsible person that would get knocked up by a certain future deadbeat, or because all the other responsibilities of being the sole parent are getting in the way of raising their children.
Here's the thing though: these men are idolized by incels. Would you personally fuck as many women as possible if you could get away with it? There are two sides to the coin of the single mother epidemic. I'm just trying to get you to see the other side. The "alphas" that I sincerely hope you do not idolize are the other half of the problem.
Women love to be “pumped and dumped” they complain later when Chad doesn’t commit but their ginies tingle before and when he fucks them, don’t let anyone tell you different.

Women absolutely enjoy being used by men who give less than a shit about them.
What I'm trying to get this thread to see is these "Chads" share in equal part of the blame. These dipshits get money thrown at them by incels. Women pick up on the fact that other men respect them and the cycle perpetuates.
 
woman: ugh, men have always just treated us as nothing more than disposable fuck-holes
man: well, i would like a wife and mother of our children
woman: ugh, that is so oppressive, you pig
man: so what do you want
woman: i want to be your disposable fuck-hole
woman: but only for tonight. I've got three swipes on Bumble to fit in tomorrow.
"Men don't want to bankrupt themselves feuding in court, therefore they don't care about their children."
Don't forget "Men don't want to be called a pedophile and a child molester because the mother knows it's an instawin and he has no way to disprove it". Better to see your kids on weekends without a fight than end up a social outcast.
 
Why do these threads devolve into the 3 Blue haired bitches on Kiwi farms arguing with some Larping Faggot who I have never seen post before this thread was created?
Because horseshoe theory is real.

The real hilarious thing is that dangerhairs and incels are the only demographics that could ever conceivably be desperate enough to put up with the other party's bullshit but are both too wrapped up in hating each other as well as blaming the opposite sex for every single problem under the sun to realize it.

It's an infinite cycle.
 
Okay, while I concur that men statistically tend to be more rational and women statistically tend to be more emotional, you can't always use that to handwave away an entire statistic. For your position to be correct, women as a whole need to be pants-on-head fucking retarded.

If they were simply governed by their whims and wanting to take the easy path, we'd have an epidemic of children in foster care or orphanages, so they could continue to live their slay qween lifestyle. They aren't though. You know who is continuing to live a bachelor lifestyle of freedom? Absentee fathers. They seem to be quite benefited from having these paper abortions. Instead, single mothers are statistically signing themselves up for a responsibility they could shrug off if they wanted to.

Here's the thing though: these men are idolized by incels. Would you personally fuck as many women as possible if you could get away with it? There are two sides to the coin of the single mother epidemic. I'm just trying to get you to see the other side. The "alphas" that I sincerely hope you do not idolize are the other half of the problem.

What I'm trying to get this thread to see is these "Chads" share in equal part of the blame. These dipshits get money thrown at them by incels. Women pick up on the fact that other men respect them and the cycle perpetuates.
women lack agency, we get it
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RurkerHivemind
Back