Manosphere Andrew Tate / Top G / Cobratate - Egotistical MRA "influencer", arrested for trafficking in Romania, lied about having lung cancer

> Assange was arrested for less. Snowden had to flee for Russia just for whistleblowing.
are you fucking retarded? those 2 guys you mention were leaking classified documents and shit, tate never did anything like that, he was just accusing the government of bullshit.

And why is it wrong to know what your own government is doing exactly?
 
I never said he was an ideologue at all. He's a scam artist and trafficker. That's been able to make enough money to experience the high class lifestyle. And on occasion, made commentary and observations of it. And I don't think the people from that world like Tate mentioning those things. Especially since he's been growing in popularity in the West. That's all.
Eh, fair enough. I guess we agree that him being arrested is the right and just thing to happen.

I'm sure there's other cunts walking free (not naming any) but that isn't really about him.
 
Now why do think they are getting that pressure? If Romania is at 46 corruption level, and he's become that rich from scams and trafficking, then certainly he had to have informants in place, to deliver bribes if there was a warning coming down. Yet there was no warning, there was no bribes.

All conveniently after the hitpieces, after the deplatforming.

So that leans me to the side that he was taken out because he was saying shit to a growing audience that they didn't want him talking about. It's immaterial if he's guilty or not. Assange was arrested for less. Snowden had to flee for Russia just for whistleblowing.
Now you're just talking shizo lol

I just gotta break this down.
So you're saying, how things work, is that if there are accusations in Romania, the FIRST thing the system does is it ACTUALLY TELLS the criminal about the looming law, hoping to get bribes.
Since Tate didn't even get a chance to bribe anyone, as you claim out of your ass, that means that there was a call from some really powerful entity able to sway a whole nation's law system to get Tate arrested. And you also claim that this had to happened because Tate was saying something so outrageous as the government is corrupt to his audience of literal morons. Again, Tate saying goberment bad to a bunch of teenagers is what caused him to be put down.
And you also think that Tate is in the same league of Assange and Snowden, who literally leaked top grade US secrets, which is absolutely against the law. Again, you think Tate talking shit on the internet is the same as near-to international espionage.
Damn.
 
Last edited:
Since Tate didn't even get a chance to bribe anyone, as you claim out of your ass, that means that there was a call from some really powerful entity able to sway a whole nation's law system to get Tate arrested. And you also claim that this had to happened because Tate was saying something so outrageous as the government is corrupt to his audience of literal morons. Again, Tate saying goberment bad to a bunch of teenagers is what caused him to be put down.
And you also think that Tate is in the same league of Assange and Snowden, who literally leaked top grade US secrets, which is absolutely against the law. Again, you think Tate talking shit on the internet is the same as near-to international espionage.

lol I can see you are exaggerating all the suggestions I made to the extreme to make me look like a lunatic. But if you tone down the assumptions you are making by like 50%. Then yeah that's exactly what I'm saying.

And I know leaking top secret stuff is against the law. But I don't recall anything wikileaks ever releasing causing death or even injury to anyone. And I'm sure the MSM would've reported so if that were case. So, why didn't the government just tell you in the first place? Maybe something to think about.
 
you are exaggerating all the suggestions I made to the extreme to make me look like a lunatic
that's exactly what I'm saying.
Breh.
And I know leaking top secret stuff is against the law. But I don't recall anything wikileaks ever releasing causing death or even injury to anyone. And I'm sure the MSM would've reported so if that were case. So, why didn't the government just tell you in the first place? Maybe something to think about.
Nigger, you want to make this bullshit about COVID, you go to the COVID thread.
What the fuck does Tate not agreeing to the COVID narrative have to do with anything?
Your stupid dumbass keeps pressing this retarded point that Tate and his faggot audience is some kind of threat to some chicken shit elite and that's what got him arrested. Definitely not him bragging about being a criminal for months.
How else am I supposed to look at this instead of shizo?
What you're saying is similar shit to what Tate's fanbois say, that he's jailbait because he's oh so powerful, oh so truthful, oh so inspiring, and not a word about him being a shady conman.
 
Breh.

Nigger, you want to make this bullshit about COVID, you go to the COVID thread.
What the fuck does Tate not agreeing to the COVID narrative have to do with anything?
Your stupid dumbass keeps pressing this retarded point that Tate and his faggot audience is some kind of threat to some chicken shit elite and that's what got him arrested. Definitely not him bragging about being a criminal for months.
How else am I supposed to look at this instead of shizo?
What you're saying is similar shit to what Tate's fanbois say, that he's jailbait because he's oh so powerful, oh so truthful, oh so inspiring, and not a word about him being a shady conman.

Are you okay? I haven't brought up COVID for a while now.
 
I don't think he's innocent at all. I just think he wasn't controlled, he was getting too popular, and he was saying things the establishment would like best left unsaid.

He's not a threat to the establishment. His message amounts to little more than 'government bad', and a lot of his followers aren't even old enough to vote, much less powerful enough to affect any real change.

What's the most impactful thing Tate's followers have done either prior to or after his arrest? Some gay ops on Twitter? 'The man' has taken away their hero, and this mob that apparently has the world's governments running scared has done what exactly? Posted a few 'Free Top G!' comments in random places on the internet?
 
Nothings wrong with me, I've repeatedly said Tates a scam artist and trafficker. I'm not defending him at all. I'm just pointing out the observations I made that led to his arrest.
And yet you sure do insist that Tate's jailed not because he's a scamster, but because he's a Julian Assange type.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu
And yet you sure do insist that Tate's jailed not because he's a scamster, but because he's a Julian Assange type.

No I don't think he is an idealogue as I said. But simply due to his position as a rich criminal, who was living a high class lifestyle, he was saying things he observed about that lifestyle, that amounted to in the establishments perspective as exposes on them. It was purely incidental. He had no political objective. He was just like, "I'm rich now, look at this shit rich people get away with! It's all a scam! The whole way the world runs is a scam!" In between his scam advertisements and ego stroking. And he was getting too popular, too influential, so he had to be dealt with. First with the hitpieces, then the deplatforming, then the arrest.

That's my logical layout of whats going on.
 
I think you got it wrong, he insists that Tate is a scamster but that they don't normally arrest scamsters.
So why did they arrest Tate?
Because his interned cred is too big?
No I don't think he is an idealogue as I said. But simply due to his position as a rich criminal, who was living a high class lifestyle, he was saying things he observed about that lifestyle, that amounted to in the establishments perspective as exposes on them. It was purely incidental. He had no political objective. He was just like, I'm rich now, look at this shit rich people get away with! It's all a scam! In between his scam advertisements and ego stroking.
So his internet cred is too big.
 
So why did they arrest Tate?
Because his interned cred is too big?

So his internet cred is too big.

Your oversimplifying, but if you go back and read the posts I made, thats my theory. Now you might say that's ridiculous. Why would they do that? But remember that boy in the Trump hat just standing there at a that protest caught on film? The media that made him out to be some HyperNazi? And he was just standing there. He needed to go to court over that, just standing there.

So to me, nothings out of the realm of possibility now. We clownworld now.
 
Your oversimplifying, but if you go back and read the posts I made, thats my theory. Now you might say that's ridiculous. Why would they do that? But remember that boy in the Trump hat just standing there at a that protest caught on film? The media that made him out to be some HyperNazi? And he was just standing there. He needed to go to court over that, just standing there.
How the fuck am I oversimplifying your nonsense when you compare apples to moonrocks? Are you sure you're not overestimating how the world works?
Brother, how, HOW in the fuck can you compare some stupid shit that happened in America between some drug addict injun and a kid who got smeared by the media, then beat those faggots in court for millions, again, how do you correlate this to a fucktard nigger who bragged about being a criminal and getting jailed for criminal activity on the other side of the planet? Just saying that there was corruption on both sides is meaningless, especially in your case when you do seem to push some kind of apologetic for Tate.
I'm sorry if I keep pointing this out, but what you're saying is just so damn stupid that it must be pointed out.
So to me, nothings out of the realm of possibility now. We clownworld now.
Fine, whatever.
But consider this. Your theory is that Tate is being prosecuted for being too influential, all the while this influence of his is creating hedonists, abusers and criminals, who no doubt will get cut down by the law for things that Tate MAY HAVE NOT done today. Let's say it was corruption with false charges that put down Tate, let's say Tate wins this injustice, or maybe he'll lose, either way, his toxic influence remains. Who do you think then is more just in your case? Tate, whose just saying what he thinks and is repressed for it, or this phantom hand that decides Tate is too fucked up to be kept loose and needs to go by any means?
Or in other words, does not Tate contribute to the clownworld and if so, does he not deserve to be clowned himself?
 
Last edited:
How the fuck am I oversimplifying your nonsense when you compare apples to moonrocks? Are you sure you're not overestimating how the world works?
Brother, how, HOW in the fuck can you compare some stupid shit that happened in America between some drug addict injun and a kid who got smeared by the media, then beat those faggots in court for millions, again, how do you correlate this to a fucktard nigger who bragged about being a criminal and getting jailed for criminal activity on the other side of the planet? Just saying that there was corruption on both sides is meaningless, especially in your case when you do seem to push some kind of apologetic for Tate.
I'm sorry if I keep pointing this out, but what you're saying is just so damn stupid that it must be pointed out.

Fine, whatever.
But consider this. Your theory is that Tate is being prosecuted for being too influential, all the while this influence of his is creating hedonists, abusers and criminals, who no doubt will get cut down by the law for things that Tate MAY HAVE NOT done today. Let's say it was corruption with false charges that put down Tate, let's say Tate wins this injustice, or maybe he'll lose, either way, his toxic influence remains. Who do you think then is more just in your case? Tate, whose just saying what he thinks and being repressed for it, or this phantom hand that decides Tate is too fucked up to be kept loose?
Or in other words, does not Tate contribute to the clownworld and if so, does he not deserve to be clowned himself?

I certainly have to say you do live up to your username. Your moral outrage is blinding you to the facts of the situation. Tate will be somewhat influential to some amount of Men, yes. But it won't have some massive impact you think it will. The larger media apparatus is more influential, and that's largely feminized.

Now if you think this will suddenly inspire Men to beat and traffick women? It won't. Men who already beat and traffick women might watch his stuff sure. But thats about as far as you're gonna go. Like a school shooter playing counterstrike. It's incidental.

So I really wouldn't worry about it too much. Theres far much worse things happening in the world than a criminal telling you Women ain't shit. Hell, rappers tell you that all the time.
 
I certainly have to say you do live up to your username. Your moral outrage is blinding you to the facts of the situation. Tate will be somewhat influential to some amount of Men, yes. But it won't have some massive impact you think it will. The larger media apparatus is more influential, and that's largely feminized.
Tate's influence is like a cycle. Every few years there's a new manbro dudefart leeching of young people who need a parent figure. Whatever happens to Tate, he'll come and go, another one will follow.
And media influence is rapidly decreasing. I'd wager most of the populace trusts the media less than more, especially after the last couple of years.
Now if you think this will suddenly inspire Men to beat and traffick women? It won't. Men who already beat and traffick women might watch his stuff sure. But thats about as far as you're gonna go. Like a school shooter playing counterstrike. It's incidental.
So now Tate's internet cred is too small.
So I really wouldn't worry about it too much. Theres far much worse things happening in the world than a criminal telling you Women ain't shit. Hell, rappers tell you that all the time.
So why aren't more rappers in jail for their music, as you claim they should be?
 
So why aren't more rappers in jail for their music, as you claim they should be?

Why would they be in jail? Popularizing the idea of being a gangsta and Women ain't nothing but bitches and hoes, is great for destroying the societal fabric, family structure and thereby making those people easier to manipulate. Tate simply made the mistake of revealing what the high class regularly gets up to, what they get away with, to his growing fanbase. And the elites don't want the plebs notified of that. It's as simple as that.

I'm not sure how much more clearly I can explain it to you. And I'm fairly confident in my position.
 
Back