How the fuck am I oversimplifying your nonsense when you compare apples to moonrocks? Are you sure you're not overestimating how the world works?
Brother, how, HOW in the fuck can you compare some stupid shit that happened in America between some drug addict injun and a kid who got smeared by the media, then beat those faggots in court for millions, again, how do you correlate this to a fucktard nigger who bragged about being a criminal and getting jailed for criminal activity on the other side of the planet? Just saying that there was corruption on both sides is meaningless, especially in your case when you do seem to push some kind of apologetic for Tate.
I'm sorry if I keep pointing this out, but what you're saying is just so damn stupid that it must be pointed out.
Fine, whatever.
But consider this. Your theory is that Tate is being prosecuted for being too influential, all the while this influence of his is creating hedonists, abusers and criminals, who no doubt will get cut down by the law for things that Tate MAY HAVE NOT done today. Let's say it was corruption with false charges that put down Tate, let's say Tate wins this injustice, or maybe he'll lose, either way, his toxic influence remains. Who do you think then is more just in your case? Tate, whose just saying what he thinks and being repressed for it, or this phantom hand that decides Tate is too fucked up to be kept loose?
Or in other words, does not Tate contribute to the clownworld and if so, does he not deserve to be clowned himself?