Opinion Dear white Americans: You’re not racist about guns. You’re worse.

Link (Archive)

Dear white Americans: You’re not racist about guns. You’re worse.​

Dear white Americans,

I come before you with bowed head, heavy heart, and a long-overdue apology.

I’m sorry for doubting you, for wrongly assuming you were turning a blind eye to gun violence, outside of offering up thoughts and prayers after every high-profile shooting, because it was disproportionately hurting people who wear dark skin like I do.

I was wrong. I know now your indifference had nothing, or very little, to do with race. You just don’t care, or more charitably, you care more about a cartoonish version of the Second Amendment, one that has convinced the majority of the residents of the most-prosperous nation Earth has ever known that tens of thousands of bullet-riddled bodies every year – in the form of murder and homicide and suicide and preventable accidents – is a reasonable price for our freedom.

I’m writing this apology in the wake of yet another mass shooting at yet another school, this time at Michigan State University. But, let’s be honest. The details don’t much matter, neither does the location, something you made clear with your reaction to the slaughter of little white boys and little white girls at Sandy Hook a decade ago and white men and white women six years ago at a concert in Las Vegas. That this keeps happening in the U.S. on a level it doesn’t happen anywhere else in the industrialized world says loudly and profoundly that this is what you want.

And to think, I spent all those years harshly judging you for not caring about my high school friend who was blinded after being shot in the head; or my brother’s girlfriend being killed in a drive-by shooting; or the young man whom I tried to mentor who ended up shot dead anyway; or the other one who was shot to death during an incident that claimed the life of a Davidson police officer in North Carolina; or the one sitting on death row in South Carolina because of his involvement in the shooting deaths of two convenience store workers in the Myrtle Beach metro area.

Each of them was black. I thought you didn’t care because they were black. I thought you didn’t commit to doing something serious about our sick gun culture because the victims were so often black. I thought you kept making excuses about why we couldn’t unwind an untenable situation – a culture so saturated in guns we’ve convinced ourselves we need armed-agents of the state to enforce minor traffic violations because it isn’t unreasonable for cops to assume whoever is driving isn’t armed – because you didn’t experience the pain of gun violence the way people who look like I do have.

Historically, race has played a role, with laws saying white men and white boys were legally obligated to enforce slave laws, to Ronald Reagan embracing gun control measures, at least for a while. And it likely still does, just not in the simplistic way I had once imagined. I get why you weren’t moved by Trayvon Martin’s killing, or at least I thought I did until you were equally unmoved by coffins filled with the bullet-riddled bodies of white children.

Rep. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, after the latest mass shooting we’ll treat like wallpaper, said “you either care about protecting kids, or you don’t. But please don’t tell me you care about the safety of children if you’re not willing to have a conversation about keeping them safe in a place that should be a sanctuary.”

“If this is not a wake-up call to do something, I don’t know what is,” she said.

A 21-year-old Michigan State University student took to TikTok to express her grief about the shooting as well. She’s now a survivor of two mass shootings – the first at Sandy Hook 10 years and two months ago, a fact that she says is incomprehensible.

She’s white, not black.

Again, I apologize for believing you were blinded by race or racism. I didn’t realize you loved Glocks and AK-47s more than you love my kids or even your own.

I won’t make that mistake again.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry what?
2A every day.gif
 
It's amazing how people who have never owned a firearm seem to think that people wouldn't still kill each other if there were no firearms.
They also seem to think people who own guns are is inept as they are.

And then they have the nerve to say, "you need more training" to people know how to safely and legally handle guns better than they ever will.
 
I still remember during the Floyd riots, the endless Reddit threads where lefties/antifa supporters moaned about wanting guns, but how they couldn’t have them as they worried their “mental health issues” would make them self-harm. It went on for pages and pages, and had me chortling smugly.
 
tens of thousands of bullet-riddled bodies every year – in the form of murder and homicide and suicide and preventable accidents – is a reasonable price for our freedom.
About 2/3 of gun deaths are suicides. Why should someone's desire to die infringe on my right to protect myself?

How about this, if we do have gun control and those that used to have guns are injured or killed that same injury is visited on non conservative journalists?

So a former gun owner is killed, the result is the 10 hosts of CNN / MSNBC / TYT are executed on air.

You want me to risk my wellbeing time to put yours on the line too.

cartoonish version of the Second Amendment
Sure...cartoonish. Just like how the Deepak Chopra-esque penumbras and emanations supported abortion and continues to support gay marriage.

I hope you are killed, you disingenuous pig.
But, let’s be honest. The details don’t much matter
They don't seem to matter anymore since the shooter in Michigan purchased his guns legally but had a felony criminal interaction with the police.
, neither does the location,
You mean the gun free zone?
reaction to the slaughter of little white boys and little white girls
While tragic the events at Sandy Hook could have been done with a pistol.
I didn’t realize you loved Glocks and AK-47s more than you love my kids or even your own.
I like my right to self defense.
 
I'll outright say it,

Yes, I value my freedom more than I love your kids.

That doesn't mean I hate your kids, or that I want them harmed.

But I won't play to this false dichotomy that your kids are harmed in any way by me merely legally owning a legal firearm. Or that I HAVE to pick either firearm ownership or hating your kids, it's not either-or.

I am not hurting your kids

I don't know your kids

I've never met your kids

And yes, I don't' love them, that's not my job to LOVE the kids of TOTAL STRANGERS , that's creepy, actually.
 
Last edited:
What's with leftists writing essays on how all of their personal grievances are the fault of everyone who doesn't entirely align with them politically? Oddly enough, I've never met the "victims" they whine about, but every time I read one of these, I am encouraged to put the writer out of their misery. 🤷‍♀️
Because victims cannot have agency, and victimhood is assigned according to race/gender/sexuality/etc.

When you have power, you have responsibility, therefore if things are bad, it’s your fault. When you lack responsibility, you search for change through others. You shouldn’t have to live like this; other people need to recognize your pain and change accordingly. Since you must rely on others to change the world for you, you must therefore make your suffering as visible—or audible as possible.

SocJus blames the issues that arise from unequal power on the side with all the responsibility: the privileged. The Patriarchy, for example, is men’s fault. When women support it or try to help men understand it, we say they’ve simply internalized the misogynist messages of men, and then condescendingly absolve them of any responsibility or agency. It's not their job to educate you!

Since the oppressed have neither responsibility or agency, this means that all responsibility lies within the hands of the privileged. This responsibility means that if the privileged suffer, their suffering begins and ends with them, so they should get up and fix it themselves. Complaining about it is just an entitled demand for the non-privileged to manage their emotions, therefore they are not deserving of sympathy.

Privileged people could solve the world's ills—income inequality, climate change, structural racism, etc.—but they don't. Therefore, they are doing evil by benefitting from such ills, or at the very least they are willfully ignorant. To deny this is to absolve them of blame for how bad the world is and place blame on the victims, and we certainly can't have that.

In claiming the status of victim and by assigning all blame to others, a person can achieve moral superiority while simultaneously disowning any responsibility for one's behavior and its outcome. The victims 'merely' seek justice and fairness. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy.
 
For better or worse, gun control is the one issue on which American progressives have absolutely, unequivocally lost, and they've only now started to come around to that fact. You're going to see a lot of articles like this now that they're currently in the "depression" phase of the six stages of grief.
Its does give me hope that people are waking up on the right to defend themselves with the kids at Michigan State painting "Why can't we defend ourselves" all over the place.
AllowUsToDefend.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I legitimately think they might want us to be like Canada where we needs the state's permission to kill ourselves.
Ah...yes. Where ones right to life is determined solely by the government. They can either deny your right to self defense therefore life or they can deny you the right to end your life therefore controlling it.

Your ass is mine.
 
Because victims cannot have agency, and victimhood is assigned according to race/gender/sexuality/etc.

When you have power, you have responsibility, therefore if things are bad, it’s your fault. When you lack responsibility, you search for change through others. You shouldn’t have to live like this; other people need to recognize your pain and change accordingly. Since you must rely on others to change the world for you, you must therefore make your suffering as visible—or audible as possible.

SocJus blames the issues that arise from unequal power on the side with all the responsibility: the privileged. The Patriarchy, for example, is men’s fault. When women support it or try to help men understand it, we say they’ve simply internalized the misogynist messages of men, and then condescendingly absolve them of any responsibility or agency. It's not their job to educate you!

Since the oppressed have neither responsibility or agency, this means that all responsibility lies within the hands of the privileged. This responsibility means that if the privileged suffer, their suffering begins and ends with them, so they should get up and fix it themselves. Complaining about it is just an entitled demand for the non-privileged to manage their emotions, therefore they are not deserving of sympathy.

Privileged people could solve the world's ills—income inequality, climate change, structural racism, etc.—but they don't. Therefore, they are doing evil by benefitting from such ills, or at the very least they are willfully ignorant. To deny this is to absolve them of blame for how bad the world is and place blame on the victims, and we certainly can't have that.

In claiming the status of victim and by assigning all blame to others, a person can achieve moral superiority while simultaneously disowning any responsibility for one's behavior and its outcome. The victims 'merely' seek justice and fairness. The victim is always morally right, neither responsible nor accountable, and forever entitled to sympathy.
I'm well aware of the culture surrounding this whole phenomena. We know they don't ever want to become anything besides victims, because then they'd actually have to move on and do something with their lives. If you spend all your time whining about how people don't like you because of your sex/race/ect, you don't have anything else.
So yeah, base-level equality isn't a goal. The most sexual/racial tension these days comes from broads trying to harp it up.
 
Dear communist shithead. The only reason you want the guns to go away is so you can enact your homosexual red revolution where you will be summarily executed for being a useful idiot and enslave the rest of us in labor camps, detention centers and gulags because that is the only way your masters can ever feel secure by themselves. But even then, that is not enough.

Gulag Archipelago.jpg
 
Back