Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
"We're not telling you to like vagina...but we're telling you to like vagina." A deaf faggot weighs in. Link / https://archive.is/rBFoZ
like vagina.PNGlike vagina 2.PNGlike vagina 3.PNG
Always with these Twitter fags...make a shitty take, get backlash, turn off replies.
How much you wonder Hayden here has fucked pussy?
like vagina 4.PNG
Imagine this being sent in the amicus brief during Obergefell. You'd never have DOMA repealed.
like vagina 5.PNGlike vagina 6.PNG
Caustic imp there is interesting. Another DudeKingBro selling her pussy videos on OnlyFans. She's got a tit chop coming up, and to no one's surprise, she's a diaper/DDLG fetishist.
FYt7iaRWIAAdHZ7.jpgFnuYi8UXwAEN8u5.jpg
When she wears makeup, she's worried about getting 'misgendered' at work. Nah, it's not as if the hair was a dead giveaway.
like vaginas 7.PNG
Here is Emily. Woman...or Indian? That one is a researcher, for health and medicine. Not in any official capacity, as it's a journo...but still.

I ended up getting this on a Twitter thread of gay men posting their hairy asses. This fat fuck goes around dressing in fishnets and calls himself a 'themboy'.
FpG8-V4XsAAQ6aZ.jpgFpG8-lQXoAAm7pB.jpgFpG8-KvXwAEeyxo.jpg

Is that good enough? Enjoy this Gunt cosplay.
Fo-aFPtXoAEFNu3.jpgFo-aFFcXsAEoNXb.jpg
Hope you remember to cook your pork roasts well, Kiwis.

I was going to end the post here, but our boy Colin popped up again. Discussing the JKR hammer of the Scots, Colin insists he has no free speech in the UK, and that he regularly self censors. Link / https://archive.is/jmoyg
KM regularly censors.PNG

Guaranteed he celebrated when Count Dankula got arrested. And looking through his timeline...all mentions of Daddy Dank were deleted by our boy Monty. Predictably, he DID celebrate his arrest and fining. The UK doesn't have a First Amendment, and this retard was at a Scottish university telling people 'adult human female' is a genocidal dogwhistle.

Everything you say is public, Colin. All of it. I still have the shit your friend Christa said about orangutan rape, as well as you being buds with rapist-in-line Mitchell Slater. Oh, and don't forget that when Magdalen Berns died, he was right there celebrating her death, and encouraged other trans journalists to go and piss on her grave.

There's nothing more authoritarian than a male insisting he's a woman and telling other women - and gays - their rights don't matter because your little trans feelings might get hurt. Keep caping for rapists, you shit.
 

Attachments

  • n0JXHNlk_400x400.jpg
    n0JXHNlk_400x400.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 117
rewatching austin powers for the millionth time and ---
View attachment 4555581
--are those boobs?

Troons have an interesting relationship with Austin Powers.

6b2179c568edcfb508819de70e68980e89444ab3c9a0aac1f6907c102ff0b582_1.jpg


Myself, I think that if anything, Austin Powers has always canonically been a violent, hateful TERF.

austin-powers-its-a-man-man.gif


Who could forget his iconic catchphrase, "It doesn't matter if you neck a load of hormones and whack the ol' todger off, you can't change your male socialisation, baby."
 
Eagle Heights elementary school in Canada had a "Rainbow Day" and apparently 1/3 of the students didn't attend school that day and are being investigated. This school also has a "equity superintendent" whatever the fuck that means.

 
Eagle Heights elementary school in Canada had a "Rainbow Day" and apparently 1/3 of the students didn't attend school that day and are being investigated. This school also has a "equity superintendent" whatever the fuck that means.

2/3 too many.
 
View attachment 4555354

Enthusiastic dick sucker "Ashley" posted a mile-long screed about NYT, likening it to pre-Nazi propaganda.

View attachment 4555570

Ashley squeals that NYT intentionally launders hard right ideologies in order to convert its “nice and polite” readers into Nazis.

View attachment 4555602

NYT is normalising transphobia to usher in the genocide against us!!!

View attachment 4555626

Ashley also calls for NYT contributors who signed the letter to resign in protest. Here’s hoping they do 🤞

Source

One of the best things about the bubbles these people keep themselves in: people like "Ashley" don't realize the damage they do to their cause just by showing up. Go on, Ashley, keep making threatening Twitter threads with your bearded profile picture right there. That will convince more middle Americans.

Another example:

2.png

Thanks for your input and representation, "Bennie the Bimbo."

VW7VBJ0W_400x400.jpg

Elsewhere on Twitter! Filter-happy pervert owned the TERFs with this tweet:

3.png

The comments didn't go the way he had hoped:

4.png
5.png6.png

Fucking brutal:

7.png
 
Elsewhere on Twitter! Filter-happy pervert owned the TERFs with this tweet:

View attachment 4558110

The comments didn't go the way he had hoped:

View attachment 4558113
View attachment 4558116View attachment 4558117

Fucking brutal:

View attachment 4558145

Ha, this is that tranny that Lea Michele BTFO'd the last time he was in the women's bathroom!

"She was standing there with her friends, talking s***, being a mean girl, making fun of people's outfits. I was just trying to get out of there.

I said, 'Excuse me,' and she's standing there blocking my reach.

She goes, 'Excuse me?' and she looks at her friends, looks at me again, and says, 'Excuse you, you're in the woman's bathroom.'"

The model said she immediately felt like a 'circus freak'.

She continued: "She brushes me off and continues laughing with her friends. It was a bathroom packed full of women, so it made everyone else feel uncomfortable. People were staring at me and talking and pointing. I was like, 'Okay, I'm out of here.'

I was dressed, I felt glamorous, and to hear that from somebody who I thought was so beautiful. I went from feeling like I was on cloud nine to feeling like a circus freak."

Plastic, who scored a ticket to the prestigious ceremony through her well-connected mother, said the night was a 'dream come true' and she looked a 'million bucks'.

But her confidence was ripped away by Lea, 33, whom Plastic insisted knew she was mid-transition.

She said: "I was passable, but not as passable. I hadn't had any surgery yet and was still undergoing laser treatment. She knew."

Based Stacey, living her best life, IRL shitposting with her besties in the ladies' room. Botched troon, knowing he's somewhere he's not supposed to be, tries to virginwalk away, and she just utterly annihilates him, giving no fucks.

What a bad bitch.
 
Last edited:
Somebody staged a Mission: Impossible-like break-in at a tranny thrift store. I don't know how a clothes shop can have a "hetero-normative" appearance besides the lack of rainbows plastered everywhere. I do know just seeing the video of the shop made me feel gross and I could almost smell it. Trannys also got shot at a couple blocks away but I doubt it's related.


Archive
 
Last edited:
I hate these new "rest in whatever" slogans. It really does feel as if we're anointing them to Sainthood just by virtue of Dying While Political. Lame and gay.
Same. What's wrong with wishing an innocent person peace in death? Isn't that the central conceit of most faiths and religions; that no matter how much suffering you might endure in this life you will find comfort in the next? "Rest in power" conveys the exact opposite.

I don't even understand the point of its use. Anyone who uses it can fuck right off.
 
Last edited:
Somebody staged a Mission: Impossible-like break-in at a tranny thrift store. I don't know how a clothes shop can have a "hetero-normative" appearance besides the lack of rainbows plastered everywhere. I do know just seeing the video of the shop made me feel gross and I could almost smell it. Trannys also got shot at a couple blocks away but I doubt it's related.


Pah, more like BLACKED CREEP REEEEE-sale, amirite, guys?

This HAS to be an insurance scam or something, right? Because the hon in the rainbow sweater's right, it does 'feel weird'.

Someone broke in through the ceiling, smashed through the crawlspace, hotwired the safe open, all to steal a grand in cash, a camera and a couple of unique hand-painted jackets (which will be easily recognised as stolen, and, let's be honest, are probably shit, right? It'll be some LGBT 'You Are Loved, You Are Valid' tier crap in glitter or something).

Weeks before, they claim someone shot at them? Multiple bullets apparently hit the car, but all they have to show for it is what looks like a broken headlight?

Then the day prior to the burglary, their friend's car is broken into, but nothing is taken?

Now, I'm no Sherlock Holmes, but none of this is adding up for me.



Also, unrelated but amusing - how uncomfortable does that poor woman look when he goes in for the hug? That smile looks very tight and forced. That rubbing of his back at the end is a definite, unspoken 'Please let me go', right? It isn't just me?
 
Last edited:
"This chair from my doll's house isn't manufactured for humans to sit on, tee hee."
The problem is that they don't argue in any attempt to get to the truth, just to "win" by always having a retort. The only good way to argue with these people is to show onlookers how vacuous, self-serving and self-contradictory trannyism is. That's why "superstraight" was so good, it showed the contradiction between "all fetishes are valid, don't kinkshame" and "genital fetishes are literal Nazism", as well as the fact that people were using trannyism as a way of demanding sex. Similarly, Matt Walsh's argument with the faggot professor of women's studies - the professor looked like an idiot when he rigidly adhered to his "self-identifying" beliefs by asking if Matt was a black man.
If someone really did try to use the argument that "A doll's chair isn't made for humans to sit on" then we all know that that's because it's not a chair, but a toy chair, and a toy X is not an X, just like a trans woman is not a woman.
I mean technically they are straight. Studies have shown that men who are attracted to trannies have little to no demonstrable attraction to masculine stimuli. It's best understood as a heterosexual paraphilia. The scientific term for it is gynandromorphophilia (GAMP). A significant portion of GAMP men are autogynephilic themselves.

gamp (11).png
This is the study, the full text was uploaded to researchgate. (For opsec reasons don't log in to either one, just download the pdf.)

First, nobody should believe "A peer-reviewed study says it, I believe it, that settles it". You'd have to believe thousands of contradictory things, for a start.

The graph shows that GAMPs and AGPs were both more attracted to tranny porn than porn of women, it's just the amount wasn't statistically significant. It's important to understand that real effects will fail to register as statistically significant if the sample size is too small, statistical significance is really a measure of "is the sample size big enough to distinguish the result from a difference by random chance". For the "genital arousal" part of the study, as depicted in the graph, there were 16 autogynephiles, 23 GAMPs, 14 heterosexuals and 16 gays.

Regarding the similarity of GAMPs and AGPs, it shows that the attraction of AGPs was similar to GAMPs and the discussion section of the paper says: "Among our present sample of 27 autogynephilic men, all but three reported GAMP". So they couldn't find enough non-GAMP AGPs to show a difference. Maybe there aren't any, maybe they weren't looking in this right place. (Why is the 27 higher than 16? Well, 11 of the group had broke dicks and showed no detectable arousal. The AGP group was older than the other three and recruited by a different method.)

The discussion section of the paper has the statement: "With respect to arousal patterns, the similarity of autogynephilic men to heterosexual men is consistent with the idea that autogynephilia is a type of misdirected heterosexual attraction, albeit one that complicates and competes with typical heterosexual attraction to women on the outside".
Well, all sexual attraction is misdirected heterosexual attraction, because the biological purpose of sexual attraction is to ensure reproduction (just like the biological purpose of hunger is to obtain energy from food etc.). Attraction to someone of the same sex is by definition homosexual. This study doesn't in any way rule out the idea* that there is some process that causes GAMPs to be attracted to other men, but not so much that it annihilates their attraction to women, but if it proceeds further produces the men from the gay group, who are attracted to anatomically normal men and repelled from women (but still with some residual attraction to GAMs, i.e. men with tits). Back when buggery was illegal, GAMPs and gays moved in the same circles. What ended this was that (the successful part of) the gay rights movement rested their argument for legalisation on the existence of men who were obligatory homosexuals (and only interested in other adult obligatory homosexuals). Hence the idea of "normal" homosexuality and the requirement to deny the existence of both bisexuals and GAMPs (never mind other things like pederasty).

*This is not an idea I'd say must be true, there could be other reasons why we have GAMPs and gays, but it doesn't rule it out so we cannot say the study shows that "GAMPs are straight".

The authors of these studies are well aware of the possibility of ruining the potential for future studies by pissing off the people you're studying. Remember that studies on how AIDS spreads among men who bum each other in public toilets have to call the participants "men who have sex with men" (or MSM) because these men are adamant that they are in no way whatsoever "gay". Gays don't want to be associated with GAMPs and GAMPs want to be considered straight (after all, they aren't attracted to macho men), so neither would participate in a study that calls them both homosexual, no matter how correct that might be in its literal meaning.

However, reading the study provoked a thunk for me: Perhaps the reason we have activists pushing the "it doesn't matter what's in your pants" point of view is that they are like the GAMPs and AGPs in the study, they are attracted both to women and to men with tits, but mistakenly believe they are straight, and therefore don't understand that normal heterosexual attraction exists and think heterosexuals are just rigid adherents of orthodoxy and tradition.
 
So on Wednesday there was a vigil for Brianna Ghey in London (one of several planned, there's another one tomorrow in Soho)
Fo2yN82akAAzFUj.jpg
As per the flyer, they decided to protest the Department for Education
FpCZ-VRXgBcvlc_.jpegFpFLJjMWcAAiHVz.jpeg
I'm not entirely sure why the Department for Education. Brianna's school is an academy, which means they don't have to follow the national curriculum. I guess something around safeguarding? According to the Ofsted reports they'd improved all their student pastoral care stuff, there's not much else the DfE can do.

There was a big crowd.
FpFFPXbWAAIo0lx.jpeg
That did really normal, not cult like behaviour:





That last chant is "fuck Keir Starmer". Keir Starmer is the left wing leader of the opposition, who said Trans Women Are Women but biological sex differences exist and also under 18s are a bit young to make permanent life altering decisions like surgery or changing legal sex. This is contrasted against the current right wing Prime Minister who has gone on TV to say woman means adult human female, personally intervened to block Scotland's gender reforms and is overseeing the closure of trans youth clinics. I guess apostates are more hated than heathens.

Anyway, then they had a die-in.
FpCDy-ZXEAk76lV.jpeg
As per the flyer there were a lot of masks
Screenshot_20230217-083011_Instagram-01.jpeg
Screenshot_20230217-082917_Instagram-01.jpeg
Which is weird because you never really see many people in London still wearing masks, usually just the odd one on the commute, but we know why.
Also this isn't really relevant but just an amusing schizotake that made me laugh:
Screenshot_20230217-081559_Chrome-01.jpeg
 
So on Wednesday there was a vigil for Brianna Ghey in London (one of several planned, there's another one tomorrow in Soho)
View attachment 4557845
As per the flyer, they decided to protest the Department for Education
View attachment 4557849View attachment 4558466
I'm not entirely sure why the Department for Education. Brianna's school is an academy, which means they don't have to follow the national curriculum. I guess something around safeguarding? According to the Ofsted reports they'd improved all their student pastoral care stuff, there's not much else the DfE can do.

There was a big crowd.
View attachment 4558414
That did really normal, not cult like behaviour:
View attachment 4558421

View attachment 4558433

View attachment 4558438
That last chant is "fuck Keir Starmer". Keir Starmer is the left wing leader of the opposition, who said Trans Women Are Women but biological sex differences exist and also under 18s are a bit young to make permanent life altering decisions like surgery or changing legal sex. This is contrasted against the current right wing Prime Minister who has gone on TV to say woman means adult human female, personally intervened to block Scotland's gender reforms and is overseeing the closure of trans youth clinics. I guess apostates are more hated than heathens.

Anyway, then they had a die-in.
View attachment 4558453
As per the flyer there were a lot of masks
View attachment 4558637
View attachment 4558694
Which is weird because you never really see many people in London still wearing masks, usually just the odd one on the commute, but we know why.
Also this isn't really relevant but just an amusing schizotake that made me laugh:
View attachment 4558701
Faggots hate Kier Starmer for the wrong reasons. London has been gentrifying for the past 20 years at least, so I'm not surprised that there's a large crowd of affluent americanised liberals whose main concern is idpol and not material conditions.
 
Faggots hate Kier Starmer for the wrong reasons. London has been gentrifying for the past 20 years at least, so I'm not surprised that there's a large crowd of affluent americanised liberals whose main concern is idpol and not material conditions.
And working class women certainly have more to lose than wealthy libfems. It's absolutely an out of touch feminism vs a real/based one.
Ensuring single sex provision in public spaces when you don't have the luxury of a private hospital room, statistically a higher risk of prison, and may not have more options than a crisis shelter in domestic violence shelter- poor women certainly know who the men are.
Trans is a luxury belief.
 
London's a very diverse, multicultural city.

Strange that this crowd is mostly white. 🤔
It was already mentioned earlier in the thread by another eagle-eye farmer, but why shitposters eager for chaos haven’t begin to play up trans as an entirely almost white people thing against blacks and browns shocks me. We already see it a bit with the Keffals stuff, so it is tinder merely waiting for a light.
 
The NYT just indirectly told the trannies to get fucked even more with this perfectly timed op-ed.

View attachment 4549577

https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1626208308096024576 (Archive)

Meltdown incoming

Article | Archive

2022: Drop Kiwi Farms
2023: Drop the New York Times! Let's fucking goooo

DROP the New York Times-min.png

Link, archive
screencapture-twitter-ErinInTheMorn-status-1626412673289056257-2023-02-17-12_28_34__-min.png

Pic belowis a memo from executive editor Joe Kahn to NYT staff in response to letters from:
1) GLAAD
2) a group of their own journalists who put up NYTLetter.com

FpHcvMjWAAE-EvS-min.png


Both groups seem keen to clarify that there were two different letters - seemingly to downplay the accusation that there was coordination between the two groups, which would be in violation of the NYT's ethics policy.

screencapture-twitter-glaad-status-1626338393461227524-2023-02-17-12_59_55_-min.png

Link, Archive

Meanwhile, the people journalists at NYTLetter.com are making public efforts to distance themselves from GLAAD:

We are disappointed that the New York Times chose to use their public response-min.png

Link, archive

But it's clear enough that the NYT editor already addressed this, and that the activists/journos are clutching at straws.

screencapture-twitter-glaad-status-1626338393461227524-2023-02-17-12_59_55__-min.png

Link

So where do we go from here? It'd be nice to see the latter group receive disciplinary action, but I worry that releasing this many pro-trans journalists into the wild at once would likely devastate the ecosystem.
 
Back