If homosexuality is okay, then what's the argument against incest?

RybenZ999

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 24, 2022
Alot of the arguments regarding homosexuality can be applied to incest as well
>There's nothing wrong with what 2 consenting adults do
So there's nothing wrong with a father fucking his adult daughter or 2 adult siblings fucking each other?
>Homosexuality is natural, animals engage in it too
As far as I know, animals engage in incest too, perhaps even more than being gay
>Gays are born with it
I'm pretty sure most people with sexual deviations are born with them too. Perhaps some studies suggest otherwise, but that could be because there isn't enough extensive research on it (The same thing applied to homosexuality too back in the 50s).

Arguments against incest:
>It creates deformed babies
So incest with protection on or between 2 men is alright?
>It's just icky in a way gay isn't
1 in 3 westerners found gays just as icky as incest until the 70s. In fact, even the concept of homophobia was only coined in the 60s.

So if gay is okay, then by that logic incest without the intention of procreation should be okay too.
 
morality is build often built upon a need. Even deep in the north, eskimos villages noticed that inbreeding happen and would start marrying with other tribes instead of just making more downies babies.

I assume there is some genetic reason why animals can inbreed more often but even they eventually need some genetic diversity.

Morality of gay sex is something else entirely and more predicated on sex without reproduction being sinful since its just engaging in dopamin release of cooming. Even straight sex without the purpose of reproduction is often frowned upon in many religion. Gay sex is inherently all about the coom and not reproduction and thus is degenerate behaviour.
 
I assume there is some genetic reason why animals can inbreed more often but even they eventually need some genetic diversity.
Humans as a species are genetically more inbred than others. There’s a genetic bottleneck of something like less than 10,000 women ~70,000 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No. 7 cat
If there are are no children that get sired, literally none.
When you abolish sexual and societal taboos and make consent the only metric, society will get there after a while.
i think as time passes the hand of the market will gradually optimize everything till the world is centered around consent
its going to be nightmarish but theres no way of stopping the process without undoing the catalyst (industrialization) that kicked up the biosocial dysfunction and economic potential of supertribes like ancient babylonia from passable to dangerous
 
  • Like
Reactions: No. 7 cat
What's more fucked up?
Some guy having sex with some other guy.
Or a father having sex with his adult son?
From my perspective, the latter. But that's because of how much the world has tried to normalise homosexuality over the last 2 decades. "They're literally family" could only be one step above "They're literally men" logically speaking.

Personally, I don't care if men want to fuck men. It's just the constant push to demonize anyone who doesn't accept it that weirds me out. Like in the end, it's still a sexual deviation.
 
Back