Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

[batteredpancakes]

Also wtf are those clit bumps and what is that on the side???

I'm pretty sure they're fordyce spots. Just a harmless genetic thing that appears for some people when they hit puberty.

 

[Geranium]

I made something to celebrate the first birthday of Ashton Williams's neopenis, and to make clear how much phalloplasty was worth it and she has no regrets.

 

[Risky Horse Business]

I don't know what he asked for in the email but to the troons defense, the surgeon seems inept as to what can be done. Maybe its just a communication issue but the comments are actually useful in this case. The cleft chin can be fixed with either a small implant, botox and or fillers. An experienced injector can tailor the results so it looks proportional to the face and not just 'bigger.' A t-osteotomy is a possible option too but its invasive and expensive. Poor value IMO.

If he's concerned about the facial wideness, he could always do Kybella or other fat dissolvers in the jowl area to get that v-line look. Botox can also be used in the masseter muscle to get more jawline reduction. Fillers to plump up the lips could also help make the face look more proportional. Not much can be done about the wide nasal bridge unfortunately.

As for the red scar, thats normal, they typically face over the course of several months. Silicone sheets or gel can help mitigate its appearance. If that does not work, chemical peels, laser therapy or dermabrasion can be used to further reduce its appearance.

I can't see the adams apple but neck fat grafting or fillers around the area could soften its appearance. The other option is revision surgery but that gets expensive fast.

I wondered if the surgeon simply didn't want to deal with the troon again?

 

[Thomas Eugene Paris]

I'm late to comment on the St. Louis whistleblower affidavit, but it was a sobering read. I am becoming more confident by the day that the supervised medical transition of minor children will prove to be the downfall of the entire movement. Make no mistake, this is beyond making ethically questionable decisions or breaking a vow to "do no harm": it's a systematic atrocity being perpetuated against the most defenseless members of a society, and there is no justification or excuse. The truth will out, and when it does, my fervent hope is that not only the direct perpetrators but also their collaborators will be held to account. Undoubtedly, there will be a vociferous group of wretched, smarmy quislings who will proclaim to anyone within earshot that they knew all along but were compelled to silence by fear of professional and personal censure. There will be people who grovel and maintain that they were coerced, "just following orders", that they had acquiesced to evil only because they were made to believe that children would be irreparably harmed should anyone dare to bring the movement into disrepute. When it happens, I hope people remember that actions speak louder than words.

That said...

There are several technical and structural peculiarities of Jamie Reed's affidavit itself that are making me uneasy. I'm not going to get specific because I don't wish to provide ammunition to those trying to discredit her. However, I'm concerned that someone with even a passing knowledge of medicine or the relevant science could raise questions regarding whether Reed has a sufficient grasp of the theoretical underpinnings of her statements and whether she is even qualified to make some of the assertions she does.

I want to be clear that I believe that the premise is solid and her statements factual. The devil is in the details, though, and I have reservations about the manner of expression. I'm curious about how this affidavit came about. It's troubling to me that anyone who might have something important to say would not bother to write well enough to be taken seriously or verify the technical details of their claims.

Tl,dr: Jesus Christ, hire a technical writer.

 

[Lady Farishta]

I made something to celebrate the first birthday of Ashton Williams's neopenis, and to make clear how much phalloplasty was worth it and she has no regrets.
View attachment 4567472

got herself a permanent speech impediment. sounds like she has cotton in her mouth.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

I made something to celebrate the first birthday of Ashton Williams's neopenis, and to make clear how much phalloplasty was worth it and she has no regrets.
View attachment 4567472

At 1:35 this deluded woman says she wants to achieve the ultimate happiness.

Sweet summer troon, there is no such thing as ultimate happiness. Hell, you destroyed lots of happy moments you could have had in the future by ruining and mutilating your body beyond repair. If you want to be happier in your life then don't fucking mutilate yourself and if you already did then STOP.

 

[PBR Streetgang]

I made something to celebrate the first birthday of Ashton Williams's neopenis, and to make clear how much phalloplasty was worth it and she has no regrets.
View attachment 4567472

Her face looks permanently pained and like she's about to cry. She looks like she's constantly suffering. Whether she is in physical discomfort or not, she's obviously tormented mentally.
If she read this ^ she'd think of it as a personal transphobic attack, or someone trying to tear her down or whatever. It isn't. It's just a clear description of what anyone can see written all over her face.

 

[Slur Generator]

The quest for happiness is stupid. The more work you put into finding it the more elusive it becomes. She will never be happy.

 

[Cracklaw]

I made something to celebrate the first birthday of Ashton Williams's neopenis, and to make clear how much phalloplasty was worth it and she has no regrets.
View attachment 4567472

See, this is why I’m running short of sympathy for these women. She is suffering from severe complications, but she’ll still squeak and squeal until her throat is raw that the surgery was 120% worth it and peddle it to more girls.

 

[Hepativore]

Whoa gunna tell her...?

I know it's been stressed excessively in this thread and im just spinning a broken record at this point, but these people have absolutely no idea how the human body works.
Muscle doesn't just grow back.
do they actually take muscle from the arm/leg to make the cock roll up? I thought it was just skin and veins and fat

Skeletal muscle can regenerate, as it contains myosatellite cells that are basically stem cells that are found in skeletal muscle tissue that can give rise to new muscle fibers. However, it is a slow, and lengthy process, and if the skeletal muscle injury is too great, the affected muscle will often just fill the damaged area with scar tissue.

What happens with these phalloplasty donor sites, is that the underlying innervation and blood supply of the muscle often gets damaged in the aftermath of tissue harvesting to create the neophallus in addition to the risk of damaging the integrity of the surface musculature itself due to how deep the surgeon often goes when they "peel" off the surface layers of skin and other connective tissues.

Since skeletal muscle needs functional innervation and circulation to maintain tone and regulation, if the nerves or vascularity in the area are damaged, the muscle tissue that is associated with it will shrink and permanently atrophy as a result.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Skeletal muscle can regenerate, as it contains myosatellite cells that are basically stem cells that are found in skeletal muscle tissue that can give rise to new muscle fibers. However, it is a slow, and lengthy process, and if the skeletal muscle injury is too great, the affected muscle will often just fill the damaged area with scar tissue.

What happens with these phalloplasty donor sites, is that the underlying innervation and blood supply of the muscle often gets damaged in the aftermath of tissue harvesting to create the neophallus in addition to the risk of damaging the integrity of the surface musculature itself due to how deep the surgeon often goes when they "peel" off the surface layers of skin and other connective tissues.

Since skeletal muscle needs functional innervation and circulation to maintain tone and regulation, if the nerves or vascularity in the area are damaged, the muscle tissue that is associated with it will shrink and permanently atrophy as a result.

Call me a simpleton, but if that’s the case, then why is the forearm considered a good option for the donor tissue? Or, if they’re going to take it from there, why not go less deep? And is surgeon skill an element, either in precision of depth, or just overall minimization of potential permanent harm? I mean, I suppose surgeon skill is always an element of that for anything, but I mean - does this kind of outcome mean that the surgeon was sub-par, or is it an inherent risk and probable outcome no matter who performs it?

 

[Hepativore]

Call me a simpleton, but if that’s the case, then why is the forearm considered a good option for the donor tissue? Or, if they’re going to take it from there, why not go less deep? And is surgeon skill an element, either in precision of depth, or just overall minimization of potential permanent harm? I mean, I suppose surgeon skill is always an element of that for anything, but I mean - does this kind of outcome mean that the surgeon was sub-par, or is it an inherent risk and probable outcome no matter who performs it?

Because of the sheer amount of tissue needed to create a neophallus, there is always going to be some scarring and risk of complications involved. I mean, if you look at a neophallus, that is quite a bit of skin and other soft tissue that they use.

The thigh and forearm are preferred, as those are areas where there is less of a risk of damaging something life-threatening, such as a major artery or organ and the forearm or thigh tend to have less hair on them than other areas to minimize the chance of having dick-stubble. However, even with the best skill or precautions involved, there is always the risk of complications when peeling off a huge chunk of your skin from somewhere and the extent at which people scar depends on the individual.

It is one of these situations of trying to make the best of a surgical procedure that is already fucked-up to begin with.

 

[Otterly]

Call me a simpleton, but if that’s the case, then why is the forearm considered a good option for the donor tissue? Or, if they’re going to take it from there, why not go less deep? And is surgeon skill an element, either in precision of depth, or just overall minimization of potential permanent harm? I mean, I suppose surgeon skill is always an element of that for anything, but I mean - does this kind of outcome mean that the surgeon was sub-par, or is it an inherent risk and probable outcome no matter who performs it?

It’s got an artery that you can kind of sort of not really but won’t kill you do without so they take that and use it. It allows the rog dog to be given an easy blood supply.
The effects on the hand and arm are both hideous visually and mechanically. The tissue fluid circulation is badly hurt, which is why they tend to have the weird puffy hands, and it’s a serious injury to a very complex and delicate area. You will lose fine motor control, and leave the hand extremely vulnerable. I think we will see longer term some of these girls losing hands and using hand function completely.
I think out of all of it, the flayed arms are the worst for me. They remind me of pictures I’ve seen of people who have been tortured and I can’t get that out my head.

 

[Procrastinhater]

Take this as hearsay because I'm simply pulling up memories from more than a decade ago, but I got into the David Reimer story years ago and this was a common belief. I remember there was found to be some connection between Dr. Money and the place David got his circumcision.

I heard something along those lines myself. Supposedly Money had been searching for twins for sometime, like a pedophillic Dr Mengele, the perfect test subjects to try out his thesis, and Reimers parents were young, naive, and the Demonic Money had some very shady connections to the hospital, the way I heard it he had approached surgical staff at a couple of other hospitals quietly and been rebuked before the Reimers fell into his clutches.
The shit he put those kids through was fucking sick, making young children simulate sexual activities, and reportedly filming them naked... the guy was a fucking chomo who used his position to access victims to abuse.
I hate to think of what happened to copies of those videos.
Its a case of truly horrendous ethical nihilism and medical malpractise, and I'm amazed how he avoided being prosecuted for child abuse.
The fact the fucking Gender Movement worships him says a lot about whats wrong with them.
Its a sick ideology based on the work of a pure monster who if there was any justice would have been fed alive to feral hogs feet first.

 

[Autistic Faggot]

He's real. It's this guy

Man I hate faggots.

I made something to celebrate the first birthday of Ashton Williams's neopenis, and to make clear how much phalloplasty was worth it and she has no regrets.
View attachment 4567472

Anyone with even a basic grasp on body language can tell she's lying her ass off.

Spoiler: Body language analysis sperg

Almost every single time she says she doesn't regret it, she licks her lips and/or looks away - the first being a self-soothing gesture, the second being an indication of lying. It's even more damning because she's talking to a camera, not a person - it's just instinctual to break eye contact when you're lying.

Whenever she says doesn't regret it, she shakes her head 'no' very aggressively. It could be argued that this is just going along with her negative statement, but she never makes any consistent positive gestures. When she says that it was worth it and she's so happy, there's no emphatic nodding or other congruent gestures. Even when she tries to smile it's a grimace that doesn't lift up at the corners. So I believe that the aggressive 'no' head-shake is actually because her statement itself is false and a lie. You see the same thing in interviews where the perp says shit like "I didn't kill him", "I don't know what you're talking about" etc - they shake their heads really hard, just like Ashton.

When she talks about how she's achieved the 'ultimate happiness', the corners of her mouth turn downwards & her eyebrows furrow upwards, both classic signs of being upset. Then she breaks eye contact again, repeats that it was worth it, and grimaces again. I noticed that she often seems to frown after saying it's worth it - at the very least, she certainly never smiles.

All that to say, she's not fooling anybody, least of all herself. Looking forward to this particular crash and burn.

 

[popnloch ness monster]

like a pedophilic Dr Mengele

plz don't slander the good name of Mengele, thank you

 

[Peaches Demure]

I found a troon with hilarious square-shaped bolt-ons:

Spoiler: The bushy eyebrows and the dead look in the unmistakably male eyes below them is a nice touch

r/Transgender_Surgeries - [NSFW] 12 day post Op 550 cc

90 votes and 17 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

Dude also has acquired an amhole which honestly isn't the most hideous one I've seen.... but he clearly can't even be bothered to shave his tree-trunk man legs, so... F for eFfort.

Spoiler: 1 year and 4 months post-op

Reddit - Dive into anything

www.reddit.com

 

[DarkWhorse]

Hate that I saw this and thought of this thread.

At least it matches the surrounding skin tone.

 

[Aunt Carol]

It’s got an artery that you can kind of sort of not really but won’t kill you do without so they take that and use it. It allows the rog dog to be given an easy blood supply.
The effects on the hand and arm are both hideous visually and mechanically. The tissue fluid circulation is badly hurt, which is why they tend to have the weird puffy hands, and it’s a serious injury to a very complex and delicate area. You will lose fine motor control, and leave the hand extremely vulnerable. I think we will see longer term some of these girls losing hands and using hand function completely.
I think out of all of it, the flayed arms are the worst for me. They remind me of pictures I’ve seen of people who have been tortured and I can’t get that out my head.

The hands remind me of people who've had multiple dialysis fistulae on the same limb/multiple recanalizations of failed fistulae, or a vascular steal hand.

...jeez, these ladies are all about a life of recurrent UTIs and urinary outlet problems, starting in their 20s. Some of them are going to need a dialysis fistula, and they'll already be one arm down for vascular access options.

 

[Gar For Archer]

@Tard Whisperer cant quote your post but I noticed an uncanny resemblance:

Spoiler: Life

Spoiler: Imitates Art