Opinion The Pandemic of Lonely Men Not Women’s Problem - Don't need no man #4,683,592

Journalists nationwide are covering the hottest new pandemic that gets them clicks: the pandemic of lonely men.

Major publications like Psychology Today, and BBC’s Science Focus have covered the problem, saying COVID destroyed men’s social lives in particular, and the endemic of loneliness in men causes them undo hardship and suffering.

With the rise of loneliness came the rise of misogyny, with once-hidden corners of the internet becoming outlets for men to share their struggles in finding a mate. These communities become echo chambers, blaming women for men’s inability to connect or find a mate. If only women had lower standards, accepted men for what they were, and weren’t only interested in the top 10% of men, there wouldn’t be a problem.

Men’s Loneliness Not Women’s Problem

Women are speaking out on the issue. That men are lonely and can’t attract a mate is a men’s problem, not a women’s problem.

Women came out in droves to support this idea in the popular Reddit community dedicated to women’s issues, R/twochromosomes.

A user turned to Reddit to rant about the expectation that women should solve men’s loneliness.

“Recently read yet another post about the “epidemic of lonely men,” the original poster (OP) began before going into a rant about how the comments of that post focused on women as the problem.

“That’s just men projecting their top desire for a romantic partner being attractive onto women. Men are never going to learn until they realize they aren’t competing with 6’5 chads who’ll just cheat because let’s face it, men are only as honest as their options,” she continued.

Men Aren’t Competing With Other Men

Men fail to understand that they aren’t competing with other men. They are competing with the happiness and fulfillment a woman can provide herself. And they’re failing spectacularly.

The OP continued to share exactly what men are up against, and it’s not some other dude.

“Men are competing with a full and enjoyable life without the hassle of raising a man and his get. They are competing with never having to pick up after them and be expected to manage every holiday/birthday for a man and HIS side of the family. They’re competing with a free lifestyle, not catering to the whims of everyone else. They’re competing with freedom to buy everything they need/own a home/have financial security without being expected to regularly put out as a condition of continuing some relationship.”

Women No Longer Need Men

With advances in women’s rights, women gained the ability to take care of themselves. They no longer need to rely on men for financial security or a place to live. We can give that to ourselves.

Unfortunately, it’s only been true for the past two generations. Even many of our mothers couldn’t get a line of credit without a man’s signature. Women were fired for getting pregnant, passed up for promotions because “a man needs the job,” and thought of as lesser in the workforce.

Even now, women still face discrimination at work, but things are slowly improving, and women finally have the opportunity to take care of themselves.

Some Men Want to Push Women Back

Rather than rise to the challenge and become equal partners that would enhance a woman’s life, men are attempting to push women back.

One severe backlash we’re already seeing is the rise in pro-life legislation across the country. Women who can’t control their own reproduction are more likely to need male assistance, become trapped in unhealthy relationships, or face poverty. It’s far harder to leave a terrible relationship when kids are involved, and men know this. They want women to be trapped with them.

Other communities take it even further, advocating for stripping women of the right to vote, own property or exist without men.

To Alleviate Male Loneliness, Men Need to Improve

The one thing these male communities refuse to consider is self-improvement.

“They put the blame on “chads” because then it’s a genetic lottery, and they are absolved of the responsibility of becoming someone women would want to be with,” shared one commenter on the thread.

Another said, “It’s so weird to me to have that little motivation to improve oneself in any way.”

Men think they can continue to be lazy, incompetent users while attracting a desirable partner. They believe women should flock to them solely based on the fact that they’re a man.

The entitled attitude turns women off even more. Women want an equal partner. They want someone who will contribute to the household, parent their own children, share expenses, and handle their own health and wellness.

Women no longer want to manage the household, juggle childcare, and complete all the domestic duties while also bringing in the paycheck.

Women have looked at the options and realized being single is far better than being attached to a man they must also take care of.

Men must step up and contribute if they want to attract a mate. They must enhance a woman’s life rather than make it more difficult.

Men, are you up to that challenge?

This post was inspired by the rant about men’s loneliness on the TwoXChromosomes Subreddit.

 
Not to be black pilled but there isn't time for change any more. The demographics are already crossing the point of no return. Gen Z are more brown than white in most major areas.
So I’m guessing that your ideal society would be like Craster from GoT as a totalitarian dictator, and the demographics would be like The Hills Have Eyes, but predicated on a genetic disaster instead of a nuclear one?

522F14C4-41B9-49F9-8085-E5F20F57F6B4.jpeg
 
One severe backlash we’re already seeing is the rise in pro-life legislation across the country. Women who can’t control their own reproduction--
These women soar from dick to dick like Super Mario.

They have no choice, after all-- it's our fault as men, as we failed to preserve and transmit the ancient traditions of closing your legs.

Even this cobbled together "contraception" that the wisest of us made to compensate for our egregious blunder literally cannot overtake the pace at which women will backwards long jump from member to member.

We have no other choice but to rip gestating children apart, limb from limb, for the sake of these poor women who have suffered from our cosmic levels of incompetence.

hey wait a second why are women having sex with men who would entrap them with a baby

Yeah, I do. When I suggested that both sexes change their behavior and return to tradition during the previous 30+ page cringefest, the incels proceeded to sneed.
What actually happened in that thread:

I had to reorient you from talking about incels you weren't talking to twice. After the second time, you tried to figure out if I was an incel. After I indicated nothing more than not wanting to have sex before marriage, you assumed I was saying that I was religious and then tried to appeal to the sinfulness of adultery... even though that had nothing to do what I was talking about.

You need me to identify with some kind of "cel" subculture. At the least, you need me to cut deadbeats slack while going after single mothers-- but I already pointed out that deadbeats are already universally condemned (and that I certainly believe them to be wrong) and that I'm addressing your trying to paint single mothers as the victims of anything that isn't their own stupidity in choosing said deadbeats.
 
So I’m guessing that your ideal society would be like Craster from GoT as a totalitarian dictator, and the demographics would be like The Hills Have Eyes, but predicated on a genetic disaster instead of a nuclear one?

View attachment 4571376
Yes I said incest is less harmful to a society than homosexuality is. Way to go through my post history to try and win an internet argument with it. Incest has been around and in the open for most of human history and a lot of Europe's original elites did in breed to keep power in their own hands. For the most part it did little to no harm as opposed to open homosexuality which damages children and creates the clown world we live in.
That doesn't make any sense. A cult is a collective you fucking dimwit,
Peterson's fanbase is very cultist. They are very much a collective of lost and confused people being lead astray. There's plenty of free love cults telling you to be free and listen to your spirit animal while the guru leads you by the nose.
 
Peterson is pretty infamous for rallying against white identity groups while supporting Jewish identity groups. He wants his audience to not collect together and form a defense against hostile groups competing for territory.

Oh so you think he's not doing enough to take out the Jews, the guys that run the entire financial system and could bankrupt you in a millisecond? Okay well you go work on that plan and get back to me on that.
 
Last edited:
Peterson is a cult. He teaches young men not to form collectives to defend themselves against other hostile collectives.
I don't trust any retard who works for the Daily Wire thanks to Crowder. Crowder might be a sperg who's show is only funny because of Dave, but he was absolutely correct about them being hacks.
 
I just refuse to accept the premise of "men versus women". Any time someone brings it up I just say "that's a terrible thing to say about your father/ grandfather /whatever". As soon as you put it in those terms, most women will backpedal and say "not all men".
I know that it's a current year idea of this war between the sexes, but history is far more about cooperation than competition.
 
So if men are not women's problem, why are men's societies and institutions being demanded they care and prioritize women and fags?
The unsaid part of "Don't owe you anything" is "I deserve what's yours"
But the pandemic of lonely women WILL be somehow men's fault, am I right?
Like seemingly every problem in a woman's life, yes.
 
Literally all problems of sex and relationships in modern-day America are the result of managerialism. That is, governments, corporations, and academia doing what is best for them but a detriment to the social fabric as a whole. It started off with giving women the vote. Sounds fine, right? Except women disproportionately vote for politicians with slates of thug-hugging, bleeding-heart policies, increasing the size, power, and influence of the welfare state and shifting the burden of tending for society off of corporations and onto governments, who simply print money and deface the value of a man’s paycheck via inflation to pay for all these new entitlements. Meanwhile, the corporations get to lower their wages or offshore the work, since welfare picks up the slack. Score one for the oligarchs.

Then, they introduce women to the workforce. This, again, depresses wages while creating a bunch of fresh taxpayers to help pay into the Fed’s societal Ponzi schemes and finance the entitlements that women voted for. The purchasing power of the citizenry is reduced to nil, allowing huge asset management firms to buy up all the property at fire sale prices and enjoy windfalls from speculation. Score one for the oligarchs.

Lastly, the oligarchs can’t have people getting wise to the scheme, so they need to replace the host population with hostile aliens who have never known even a fraction of the wealth seen in the West and are easy to keep in line with a few basic handouts. So, they start spreading a sex panic through colleges to make women think every man is Schrödinger’s rapist, sending paranoia and depression through the roof and cratering fertility, while also loosening immigration restrictions. They push alternative outlets for sexuality, like LGBT, porn, and streaming one’s tits, so people can have parasocial and transactional relationships without any of the substance. Score one for the oligarchs.

That’s how, in a couple generations, you go from a guy being able to afford a house, a car, and a family right out of high school, to becoming a nation of harried and haggard dual-income households who can just barely pay their bills and look after their kids without having a nervous breakdown, and who can’t even afford babysitters, and whose kids will spend most of their lives staring at a screen and paying for relationship substitutes, or cybering with fucking chatbots.

When are people going to realize that the incel problem is really the oligarch problem?
 
Back