Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

View attachment 4574128
Somebody needs a snickers
These gender/jew idiots don't understand that 99,999% people WANT them to go away. Threatening to block and end relationships only works with their brainwashed ass kissers who don't even buy the game in the first place. The rest is happy that the screeching lunatics are finally gone.
 
These gender/jew idiots don't understand that 99,999% people WANT them to go away. Threatening to block and end relationships only works with their brainwashed ass kissers who don't even buy the game in the first place. The rest is happy that the screeching lunatics are finally gone.
457.gif

Average reaction to screechy internet people threatening to block you.
 
View attachment 4573602
https://twitter.com/Annie_Dro/status/1626743729569648642

Twitter troon tries to claim the innocent twanz dindu nuffin and this was all a psyop by the right to make them look retarded. Everyone knows only trannies are retarded enough to even think of boycotting the wizard game in the first place.
1676784570032.png

Speaking of psyops and "media" literacy, how about claiming you know for a fact that the majority of one thing is something when nobody's even measured the one thing in the first place? And that from one look at your profile we knew you'd never claim anything else explaining why you didn't try to establish any kind of source for your claim at all:
1676784700234.png
 
These gender/jew idiots don't understand that 99,999% people WANT them to go away. Threatening to block and end relationships only works with their brainwashed ass kissers who don't even buy the game in the first place. The rest is happy that the screeching lunatics are finally gone.
Except it’s an empty threat, like “men going their own way.” They will never actually leave. I’ve seen these lunatics argue women who leave the workplace to piss because of them need to be disciplined by the boss. I have seen said boss send an email to every woman in the office as if tracking when the female workers are urinating isn’t something he could and absolutely should lose his job over. Let along gossiping with your male employee about it and taking his complaint about their bathroom habits to ask all the women about their bathroom habits.

Though let’s be real, we’ve all seen the circular arguments that boil down to “I should be able to drag screaming women into the bathroom to be my girly girl friend while I frighten everyone swinging my dick around.” People would just say “okay? yes they shouldn’t be discussing and tracking that but why aren’t those cunts urinating on demand for his fetish?” I would love to see how would respond to that story if it happened today rather than five years ago :story::story:
 
What do the 1890s have to do with it? You were originally responding to this comment:

I was simply pointing out that this law was not a law against homosexuality, and that buggery could have been interpreted by the courts to have included lesbian sex within its definition well into the 19th century. 'Buggery' only gradually came to have a fixed definition (anal penetration between men and anal or vaginal penetration between a man or woman and an animal) during the Victorian period.

This is still sort of a moot point though, because the laws which replaced the 1533 act contained provisions under which all sorts of sexual activities that lay outside this narrow scope could be prosecuted: as gross indecency, indecent assault or attempted buggery (which in practice could be almost any homosexual behavior, on the basis of the 'one thing leads to another' line of argument). In fact it was explicitly confirmed by the courts in 1885 that sexual acts between two women did count as an indecent assault, and was illegal.

Since (as far as I know) no women were ever prosecuted for this sort of offence, the limits of this illegality were never put to the test, but it is still untrue to say that women could not have been prosecuted for it. For one reason or another it just never happened. FtMs/lesbian crossdressers (depending on how you want to look at it) who pretended to be men and married were prosecuted, but only for fraud and not for any sexual offence.


TL;DR - there was no parliamentary legislation specifically outlawing sex between women, but it was very much not legal.
The post I was replying was made in context of Hogwarts Legacy which takes place in the 1890s.

The provision against attempted buggery specifies it is against a Male Person at least in the 1861 version of the act, and that section wasn't amended until 20th century, afaik.

I wasn't aware of the 1885 case, but from what I could find (R v Mourey, correct?) it was in context of testing a girl's virginity as part of selling her into prostitution. I'd need more details to have an informed opinion, but it seems like coercion and age of consent also played into it. Could you point me to any sources on that, since it's an actually interesting thing and it seems like it only recently got attention.

At any rate, we're arguing about details here and it's a derail, so if you want to, we can talk more in PMs.
 
View attachment 4573602
https://twitter.com/Annie_Dro/status/1626743729569648642

Twitter troon tries to claim the innocent twanz dindu nuffin and this was all a psyop by the right to make them look retarded. Everyone knows only trannies are retarded enough to even think of boycotting the wizard game in the first place.
Not even two weeks since launch and they're already doing damage control and trying to gaslight. Amazing.
 
This idea has been popping up on Reddit as well - when I saw a thread about this earlier on /popular it was full of highly-rated comments suggesting that the people targeting streamers and raising a huge fuss about this game were secretly right-wingers trying to make trannies look like lunatics so people would stop paying attention to the eeeevil genocide being done to them.

What we're seeing here is damage control, basically. The trans movement is finally starting to realize that all they've done in their attempts to make everyone do only and exactly what they want them to do all the time is make themselves look like a bunch of insane cultists (because that's what they are), and they're trying to mitigate the reputational damage by pointing and going "Uhhh we didn't do that, no, uh, it was someone pretending to be us! Because they're evil!" Countdown to the trannies deleting their twitter posts telling people they're committing genocide if they buy Hogwarts Legacy so they can pretend they never said any of that starts... now.

It'll spread like wildfire until that becomes the official story - because no mainstream person or news source wants to cross the trans movement - and all of us "evil terfs" and "transphobes" will be the only ones who remember how it really happened. Every damn time.
It's not like /pol/ doesn't do things like this, social justice sabotage, etc. I get it; on the internet no one knows you are a dog. This shit is completely unfalsifiable, the main pillar of any good conspiracy theory. Maybe Yaniv is a secretly a Nazi willing to sacrifice it all for the cause too, nothing would surprise me at this point, but how would you even prove that; look at fucking Tarrant. This framing is clever because you can claim any doxing/harassing was the evil Nazis while owning the more civilized activism. Good cop / bad cop works even better when you claim the bad cop is impersonating an officer. Didn't they try this with the race riot violence too, claiming it was all proud boys pretending to be antifa or some schizo shit like that?

I agree it's damage control, and that it'll convince some people (basically the same ones who scream constantly about Russian trolls), but I think plenty of people will press X on that, even if they politely pretend to believe it so the troon can save face and not enrage and attack, just like they pretend to believe it is a woman for the same reason. There's no way this didn't peak trans a lot of people and even if some of them do fall for the damage control this time, if this keeps happening it's not going to keep working, especially once they've meet a troon or two IRL and seen that people like that actually exist. Genocide, seriously? You just can't wrangle this many tards that are this delusional with zero sense of optics, Null's right they even talk like evil supervillains.

Troons may be the Scientologists of gender, but lack the organized hierarchy to make careful use of fair game tactics; this ain't no Operation Snow White. They overplayed their hand very publicly and a lot of people saw., even normies. The comparisons to Gamergate aren't wrong, but the fact that this is Harry Potter is especially delicious given the culture war bullshit has made a full circle on the same fucking IP.

2023 is really shaping up to be the year of the Auspicious Incident at this rate:optimistic:; perhaps Globohomo has a new pet picked out:tomgirl:.
 
The ban on the FNAF and Harry Potter series are both "subject to further review in the future." They must be waiting for the deranged people screeching online to turn their attention to the next Great Evil.

View attachment 4573218
This sounds like a "games to play" list. This is the modern banned books list.
 
Why the Cinnamon Toast fuck is Ion Fury banned?

Is..... Is it due to that one fucking gag about the hand cream?

View attachment 4573396

It is, isn't it. They're trying to unironically argue that a stupid Olay parody is a fucking slur, aren't they.
I remember why Ion Fury got banned. There was a big controversy on Retardera about how the devs were transphobic alt-right whatevers on their Discord, and so they led a campaign to stop anyone from playing it and remove it from Steam.
 
Troons may be the Scientologists of gender, but lack the organized hierarchy to make careful use of fair game tactics; this ain't no Operation Snow White. They overplayed their hand very publicly and a lot of people saw., even normies. The comparisons to Gamergate aren't wrong, but the fact that this is Harry Potter is especially delicious given the culture war bullshit has made a full circle on the same fucking IP.

It being Harry Potter is part of what's steadily driving the message in deeper for the general populace. It's been socially acceptable for quite some time that the past is never as enlightened as the present, so to a degree people are on board with that idea when older works of media or literature are examined and deemed offensive

People might not want the works banned but by and large the majority accept they are not as sensitive. It's why there's grumbling but not outright revolt, especially from younger areas of society. Harry Potter though is only 26 years old. When something that recent is suddenly not sensitive enough for current sensibilities it tends to open a few more eyes than usual, especially when it is very clear that all the criticisms are rooted in issues with the author not the work.
 
Remember when the "transgender" craze wasn't a thing and RDS and TDS weren't things? That was as recent as a decade ago.

Twitter troon tries to claim the innocent twanz dindu nuffin and this was all a psyop by the right to make them look retarded.
"Damage the reputation of trans people"? The "transgender" people didn't exactly have the best reputation to start with.
 
This game brought a cold hard reality to trannies. That is that nobody likes them. The handmaidens who rally to their defense on Twitter laugh behind their backs and would gladly throw them down the river in order to relive their childhood fantasy. Normal people are tried of them and it looks like globohomo is too. The best part in all of this is that J.K Rowling had very little input with Hogwarts Legacy. I think the most she did was just give notes she had on the lore to the devs and that is it. Yet this woman and a video game based on her IP probably brought an end to major acceptance of both trannies and their movement. :story:
 
Last edited:
It's kind of bizarre (at least to me) that the LGBs are still grouped together with the Ts, because it's really not the same thing at all. It probably seemed logical a few decades ago when trooning was basically just a branch of gay subculture. Now it doesn't make any sense. Being gay or lesbian means you want to have sex with people who have the same genitalia as you. Transsexuality on the other hand is a complex brew of mental instability, narcissism, self-loathing, political extremism, megalomania, infantilism and fetishism. In some ways it's more like a religion than anything else.

I can understand why gays/lesbians don't want to feel like they're excluding these people, but they need to cast that dead weight overboard.

Oh, the T knows fine well that they're a parasite on the LGB. But they also know that the LGB has way, way, way more clout than them.

There are, of course, reasons for this. Chief among them, that the LGB don't tend to make the outlandish demands of others that the T do, and for the most part, seem to want to go along to get along.

I also like to think that it's because the LGB are naturally occurring, not something astroturfed by the corporate interests of Big Pharma and such.

You can just be gay, and you don't need to buy anything. You can participate in 'rainbow capitalism', sure - and, oh boy, do they have a lot of crap with the rainbow flag on for you, if that's your bag, baby - but it's not a requirement.

But if you're trans? Oh, you need to buy makeup, you need to buy new clothes, you need to buy wigs, you need to buy hormones, you need to buy facial feminisation surgeries, you need to buy hairline reduction surgeries, you need to buy top surgeries, you need to buy bottom surgeries...

In any case, hitching their wagon to the considerably more popular LGB shields the T from a lot of criticism, offers them the appearance of legitimacy and gives them a lot more power.

However, all this comes at a cost to the parasite's host. Studies show that people are increasingly less tolerant of the LGBT nowadays than they were say, ten, fifteen years ago. I wonder why. 🤔

But don't you EVER date suggest that maybe the LGB and the T should separate, and focus solely on issues that only affect their respective areas of interest, no matter how obvious or sensible that might sound. Why, that would make you a horrendous, hateful bigot, just like the evil bastards at that famous hate group, the LGB Alliance.

Don't you know there's no LGB without the T?

Tranny lies.jpg


Or, if we take away the cutesy graphics and frame this starkly in the language of the abuser:

"You're nothing without me. You won't survive without me."

View attachment 4573602
https://twitter.com/Annie_Dro/status/1626743729569648642

Twitter troon tries to claim the innocent twanz dindu nuffin and this was all a psyop by the right to make them look retarded. Everyone knows only trannies are retarded enough to even think of boycotting the wizard game in the first place.

They literally always do this. I remember back before this tranny shit went mainstream, back on places like Tumblr where you'd find trannoids in vast numbers.

Troons would do something retarded.
Normies would see the retarded thing the troons had done.
Troons would get made fun of for doing the retarded thing.
Troons would deny all knowledge of the retarded thing.
Troons would say, "Ackshually, we NEVER did the retarded thing, the TERFs did the retarded thing and then blamed us for it. Because they hate us and want us dead, you see."

I mean, shit, it goes even further back than that. You know that old reliable, the 'I sexually identify as an attack helicopter' copypasta? The one they claim is the invention of right-wing chuds online to make fun of them? 'The one joke'?

A tranny wrote it.
 
Last edited:
It's kind of bizarre (at least to me) that the LGBs are still grouped together with the Ts, because it's really not the same thing at all. It probably seemed logical a few decades ago when trooning was basically just a branch of gay subculture. Now it doesn't make any sense. Being gay or lesbian means you want to have sex with people who have the same genitalia as you. Transsexuality on the other hand is a complex brew of mental instability, narcissism, self-loathing, political extremism, megalomania, infantilism and fetishism. In some ways it's more like a religion than anything else.

I can understand why gays/lesbians don't want to feel like they're excluding these people, but they need to cast that dead weight overboard.
it's insane. a few years ago I was talking to a friend of mine's uncle at a family reunion/independence day thing, and he's an old gay dude in his late 60's and he was talking about how young people in the lgbt community his husband and him knew were constantly talking about pronouns and shit and how stupid that it all was to them, this was 2014/15 probably. I haven't seen that dude since around that time (I watched their dog sometimes, they travelled hella but the dog died at like 16 years old) but I wonder all the time how frustrated and irritated and angry old faggot bitching about his lawn he must be today with the state of things. I agree back in the day the grouping made sense when people just equated all of it as weird faggot sexual deviants being unnatural, but at this point it's just sad because the gay community is basically forced to deal with them out of fear of ostracization now that the trannies have co-opted the entire culture. I blame social media, and the pick me mentality. It used to be if someone was seriously deep enough in gender dysmorphia to get a sex change, they knew what they were getting into and dead serious about it. Now, it's mainly degenerate incels groomed by their peers and taking advantage of gaining a free social victim card. how many of these faggots that are MtF claim to be "trans lesbian"? bro you just can't get pussy so you're out here claiming to be the woman so you have a better chance to commit a rape, guilt a woman into touching you, and/or get brownie points with other fags online when you call someone turning down your advances a transphobic bigot and can rally your internet troops of brainwashed teenagers to harass them and attempt to ruin their life.
 
Normal people are tried of them and it looks like globohomo is too.
I wouldn't be so sure about the 'globohomo' part. Even the game itself has a token tranny (although realistically looking like a man). They just treat them like golems, aka they take for granted that if they wave the rainbow++ flag a bit then trannies will always buy their product. Trannies existence in itself is basically just to serve as a fat check for the big pharma.
trannies are just a free cash for pharma.jpg
 
Leaked ADL documentation regarding the symbols white supremacists are now using to identify one another. Stay vigilant, comrade.

View attachment 4572472
This shit looks/reads like something written by a burgeoning paranoid schizophrenic. Especially the magic math(heh) with the numbers of the 9 3/4 platform. It's also worth mentioning just how insane the fifth point is: the last book was released on 21 July 2007, whereas the Charlottesville rally took place on 11-12 August 2017, a little over a full decade later.

edit: is satire, am idiot
 
Last edited:
This shit looks/reads like something written by a burgeoning paranoid schizophrenic. Especially the magic math(heh) with the numbers of the 9 3/4 platform. It's also worth mentioning just how insane the fifth point is: the last book was released on 21 July 2007, whereas the Charlottesville rally took place on 11-12 August 2017, a little over a full decade later.

I don't think it's real.

...Oh my God, is it real?
 
Meiwaku's pet unicorn has reminded me of this classic piece of tranny Harry Potter copefic from Tumblr's hallowed halls.

Unicorn sperging.jpg


I'm picturing what happens next, where the unicorn impales the troon through the chest with its horn, before trampling up and down, crushing his bleeding, twitching corpse beneath its hooves, throwing back its head, bellowing "MOOOOOOOIIIIIIID!!"
 
This shit looks/reads like something written by a burgeoning paranoid schizophrenic. Especially the magic math(heh) with the numbers of the 9 3/4 platform. It's also worth mentioning just how insane the fifth point is: the last book was released on 21 July 2007, whereas the Charlottesville rally took place on 11-12 August 2017, a little over a full decade later.
I don't think it's real.

...Oh my God, is it real?
Did you people not even finish reading the comment?
 
Back