Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[Lady Rackets Ass]

b) centaurs tend to be rapey in classical mythology

This is probably true except in HP the centaurs are consistently depicted as wanting nothing to do with humanity in the first book Firenze helps Harry and he gets beat to shit by his fellow centaurs afterwards and then when he later agrees to teach the divination class at hogwarts in the fifth book he is exiled from his people. They also hold a particular grudge against Umbridge because she has a fanatical hatred of half-breeds (read mixed race clearly meant to be a conservative) it’s honestly really surprising that they didn’t kill her honestly. Now that I think about it I think there’s a line in the book about dumbledore wading into the forest to save her because he’s the only human the centaurs respect (he’s the liberal) I could be wrong about that though it’s been a while since I’ve read the books.
Edit: I was right dumbledore did go save her probably the only reason she lived https://harry-potter-compendium.fandom.com/wiki/Skirmish_in_the_Forbidden_Forest

Tl;dr troons are stupid in everything they say

 

[DoubleD]

I haven't heard the ADL chime in about this, and I'm sure they have received literally LITERALLY THOUSANDS OF COMPLAINTS from the Alphabet Mafia.

Leaked ADL documentation regarding the symbols white supremacists are now using to identify one another. Stay vigilant, comrade.

I feel like The Onion no longer being funny isn't so much as the jokes suck (although they do suck admittedly), but more because it's hard to write satire on popular culture when our society has become satire in of itself.

Imagine going back in time 10 years to 2013 and saying that in the future "A video game about wizards will cause men dressed as women to screech about their safety, people stand in front of trains and eat cleaning agent for clout, and teenagers think Auschwitz is a type of gum".

See, that's where I disagree hard. Satire of our culture will always, always be relevant, even though our culture might seem like a work of satire already. Consider the image in this post for example. At the risk of explaining my own joke: while it is clear enough that ADL's definition of a hate symbo doesl feel like the stuff of parody, you can definitely still exaggerate it for comic effect. And there is definitely still mileage to be found in doing so (or at least I hope there is).

Remember the Onion's old Youtube channel? Of course you do. Now imagine if they did a comedy sketch in their golden era format (circa late 2000s) where Donald Trump comes out as a they/them nonbinary before running for the Democrat nomination, and every trans activist would give dejected interviews about how they have to pretend to like him--I mean, them. Tell me you would not watch the shit out of that and probably also find it hilarious if it were acted well. Heck, even if it were acted badly. It's just that the Onion would never do a thing like that. Sure, it would be a joke against Trump, but it would also be a joke against trans people, and the Onion cannot mock one of their sacred cows. To do so goes against their values.

Spoiler: Mild political sperg

You might not want to hear it, but the Onion has always leaned left, even during its golden era. Take this video, for instance, in which a judge declares that an attractive white girl will be tried as a black adult because of the severity of her crimes - the message behind the joke being that blacks are treated more harshly by the justice system. This was still funny and edgy at the time (2011) because back then, western culture was further to right on race. Culture has changed a lot in the meantime, but the Onion's political leanings remain the same.

Leftists are quick to assert that jokes are funnier when punching up at the powerful. They are actually correct about this - they just make the mistake of thinking conservatives/whites/Christians/men still hold the most power in western society. That's why the Onion isn't funny anymore. Because unless you're a lefty who genuinely believes these groups hold power over you, there is very little to be gained from mocking these safe, acceptable targets.

In another few decades, the shoe might be on the other foot again. But until then, there is never-ending list of things to make fun of through parody. But it would either need to come from the right, or from people who don't mind being lumped in with the right.

 

[The Jackal]

It not only wasn't illegal, but when there was a parliament discussion in early 20th century about making it illegal, one of the argument against making it illegal was that it would make women aware of the possibility of being lesbian. (That was after WW1 when an important social problem of the day was that since half of a generation of young men was dead or crippled, there wouldn't be enough young men for women to marry.)

And I commented on the wife thing before, but I remembered that there's some recorded instances of women referring to another woman as her wife in the Victorian period (even if they weren't legally married), but it was always in private correspondence or among friends. Nothing you'd tell a complete stranger, even if they are a video game protagonist.

Completely untrue. Homosexuality itself was never an offense. The Buggery Act of 1533 didn't only apply to men and the offense which it prohibited was left undefined. The act could be used to prosecute anyone, man or woman, who engaged in deviant sexual practices. Anal sex (between two men or a man and a woman), sex with an animal, lesbian sex, incest could all in theory be classed as 'buggery'. In practice however only men were ever punished for it.

 

[Procopius]

Transgender genocide - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Look at the Nazi section. Notice how it's largely devoid of any actual evidence?

Even when they've got evidence staring them in the face, wiki is good at just ignoring it. Look at the article on Hirschfeld

his partner, Karl Giese ... and Hirschfeld were a well-known couple in the gay scene in Berlin where Hirschfeld was popularly known as Tante Magnesia. Tante ('aunt') was a German slang expression for a gay man but did not mean, as some claim, that Hirschfeld himself cross-dressed.

Magnus Hirschfeld - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

They called him Aunt Magnesia. But he wasn't a troon. No, Sirreee. Just a doctor. The manliest doctor that ever existed.

I couldn't make a Terficorn... At least it's a forbidden word.

View attachment 4572296
Oh well at least I have you, Tranchy

Please tell me you've got a Pepe in there somewhere.

 

[Executive Petrel]

Or how anime killed a kid through his friends' stupidity.

REEE ackfhually itfh an Eynimeyh its NAHWT (!!!!) a cahr-toon!

 

[A. G. Peak]

The GDQ / Games Done Quick speedrun marathon has blanket banned all wizardshit game submissions, not just Hogwarts Legacy. https://archive.md/m8k5w

The ban on the FNAF and Harry Potter series are both "subject to further review in the future." They must be waiting for the deranged people screeching online to turn their attention to the next Great Evil.

 

[Waff]

Women tend to be the biggest conformists and just reflect whatever the media tells them to like.


Who do you think is Jawsh's secret big benefactor?

Goblins?

 

[Jaimas]

The ban on the FNAF and Harry Potter series are both "subject to further review in the future." They must be waiting for the deranged people screeching online to turn their attention to the next Great Evil.

View attachment 4573218

Why the Cinnamon Toast fuck is Ion Fury banned?

Is..... Is it due to that one fucking gag about the hand cream?



It is, isn't it. They're trying to unironically argue that a stupid Olay parody is a fucking slur, aren't they.

 

[John Titor]

The ban on the FNAF and Harry Potter series are both "subject to further review in the future." They must be waiting for the deranged people screeching online to turn their attention to the next Great Evil.

View attachment 4573218

Sorry for off topic but what's the reason for the other bans? Why GoW?

 

[1440p Curved Monitor]

Terf Game Update 3: I'm being oppressed edition

View attachment 4572250
I couldn't make a Terficorn... At least it's a forbidden word.

View attachment 4572296
Oh well at least I have you, Tranchy

Why would the game have a restricted words list if it's single player?

 

[Lone Outsider]

Sorry dor off topic but what's the reason for the other bans? Why GoW?

Because the Greek Era games have nudity and a sex mini-game. There are censored versions that came out recently but I'd still say that Twatch would still ban people playing those versions.

 

[The Jackal]

you know, I legitimately feel seriously bad for old LGB people. they made so much progress in how they were looked at and treated to the point of basically nobody gave a shit, they could get married, etc. and in a decade the trans side of things through social media entirely took over and made it about them, and only them and have completely destroyed the credibility of the lgb people to the point that all other faggots and dykes are unfairly grouped with them and have been losing tolerance progress that took decades to the general public

It's kind of bizarre (at least to me) that the LGBs are still grouped together with the Ts, because it's really not the same thing at all. It probably seemed logical a few decades ago when trooning was basically just a branch of gay subculture. Now it doesn't make any sense. Being gay or lesbian means you want to have sex with people who have the same genitalia as you. Transsexuality on the other hand is a complex brew of mental instability, narcissism, self-loathing, political extremism, megalomania, infantilism and fetishism. In some ways it's more like a religion than anything else.

I can understand why gays/lesbians don't want to feel like they're excluding these people, but they need to cast that dead weight overboard.

Leftists are quick to assert that jokes are funnier when punching up at the powerful. They are actually correct about this

That's not really what they're saying - they don't care whether it's funny or not (they have no sense of humor, remember?), they just think it's morally acceptable to mock a certain group of people and unacceptable to mock another group. And even if they did think that, I disagree that this is 'correct'. A joke about a king or a dictator isn't inherently more or less funny than a joke about a prisoner or a slave - the humor of jokes derives from our inherent understanding of the absurdity of existence. The specifics are largely irrelevant.

Anyway, the whole concept of comparing jokes to punching is retarded.

Why would the game have a restricted words list if it's single player?

Because it's not enough to prevent you from offending trannies, you're not allowed to even think about offending trannies.

 

[Roland TB-303]

This game sucks anyway, I’m going back to playing Leisure Suit Larry.

 

[Henri Barbusse]

Completely untrue. Homosexuality itself was never an offense. The Buggery Act of 1533 didn't only apply to men and the offense which it prohibited was left undefined. The act could be used to prosecute anyone, man or woman, who engaged in deviant sexual practices. Anal sex (between two men or a man and a woman), sex with an animal, lesbian sex, incest could all in theory be classed as 'buggery'. In practice however only men were ever punished for it.

The Buggery Act of 1533 was long repealed and replaced by 1890s and the replacement specified that just penetration and not emission of seed is sufficient reason to prove someone guilty of sodomy and rape. (Offences Against the Person Act of 1861, section 63 is the relevant part, though the section stayed the same since 1820s.) As lesbian sex was assumed to be always inherently non-penetrative, it was legal. If use of prosthetics was discussed, it was in the few recorded cases of marital deception, where a woman pretended to be a man and married another woman.

For the parliamentary debate, it's available in the Hansard for the August 15, 1921 sitting of the House of Lords: Link

Relevant quotes:
Earl of Malmesbury

We all know that vice has been increasing partly owing to the nervous conditions following on the war, but I believe that these cases are best left to their own determination. I believe that all these unfortunate specimens of humanity exterminate themselves by the usual process, which we know has taken place in every nation through all the ages. The more you advertise vice by prohibiting it the more you will increase it. May I also add this—and I think I have now touched on all the arguments which seem to me to be important—that you will find it extremely difficult to get any evidence against persons accused of this offence. It is going to be practically impossible to obtain evidence, and the evidence, when obtained, will be so imperfect that no jury will convict; and, as I have already said, the opportunity for blackmail will be vastly and enormously increased.

Earl of Desart

I much regret that such a question has even been discussed. I may perhaps draw cold comfort from the realisation that there arc not many people who read the debates of either House. I am strongly of opinion that the mere discussion of subjects of this sort tends, in the minds of unbalanced people, of whom there are many, to create the idea of an offence of which the enormous majority of them have never even heard.

Lord Chancellor (Viscount Birkenhead)

Lord Desart has pointed out with unanswerable force and with great truth, as I think, that the overwhelming majority of the women of this country have never heard of this thing at all. If you except a sophisticated society in a. sophisticated city, I would be bold enough to say that of every thousand women, taken as a whole, 999 have never even heard a whisper of these practices. Amongst all these, in the homes of this country, where, in all innocence, and very often as a necessary consequence of the shortage of small houses, they have to have the same bedroom, and even sleep together in the same beds, the taint of this noxious and horrible suspicion is to be imparted, and to be imparted by the Legislature itself, without one scintilla of evidence that there is any widespread practice of this kind of vice.

 

[byuu]

This game sucks anyway, I’m going back to playing Leisure Suit Larry.

Did they cancel Larry for accurately portraying a typical pre-transition tranny?

 

[Lurk Jurk]

https://twitter.com/Annie_Dro/status/1626743729569648642

Annie Dro on Twitter: "Not sure if people realize this, but the major…

archived 19 Feb 2023 02:18:43 UTC

archive.ph

Twitter troon tries to claim the innocent twanz dindu nuffin and this was all a psyop by the right to make them look retarded. Everyone knows only trannies are retarded enough to even think of boycotting the wizard game in the first place.

 

[Executive Petrel]

Jessie Gender is ackchually autistic, be easy on him.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/autistic-culture-movement-neurodiversity.10779/page-45#post-14978205

r/AutisticPride Dont stream the wizard game archive

 

[The Jackal]

The Buggery Act of 1533 was long repealed and replaced by 1890s and the replacement specified that just penetration and not emission of seed is sufficient reason to prove someone guilty of sodomy and rape. (Offences Against the Person Act of 1861, section 63 is the relevant part, though the section stayed the same since 1820s.) As lesbian sex was assumed to be always inherently non-penetrative, it was legal. If use of prosthetics was discussed, it was in the few recorded cases of marital deception, where a woman pretended to be a man and married another woman.

What do the 1890s have to do with it? You were originally responding to this comment:

IIRC Lesbianism technically wasn’t illegal in Victorian times. Like, they couldn’t officially get married or anything like that, and people were still really homophobic and discriminatory towards them, but there was never a law specifically banning it. The law against homosexuality originated in 1533 and only applied to men.

I was simply pointing out that this law was not a law against homosexuality, and that buggery could have been interpreted by the courts to have included lesbian sex within its definition well into the 19th century. 'Buggery' only gradually came to have a fixed definition (anal penetration between men and anal or vaginal penetration between a man or woman and an animal) during the Victorian period.

This is still sort of a moot point though, because the laws which replaced the 1533 act contained provisions under which all sorts of sexual activities that lay outside this narrow scope could be prosecuted: as gross indecency, indecent assault or attempted buggery (which in practice could be almost any homosexual behavior, on the basis of the 'one thing leads to another' line of argument). In fact it was explicitly confirmed by the courts in 1885 that sexual acts between two women did count as an indecent assault, and was illegal.

Since (as far as I know) no women were ever prosecuted for this sort of offence, the limits of this illegality were never put to the test, but it is still untrue to say that women could not have been prosecuted for it. For one reason or another it just never happened. FtMs/lesbian crossdressers (depending on how you want to look at it) who pretended to be men and married were prosecuted, but only for fraud and not for any sexual offence.


TL;DR - there was no parliamentary legislation specifically outlawing sex between women, but it was very much not legal.

 

[Sourceress]

It's kind of bizarre (at least to me) that the LGBs are still grouped together with the Ts, because it's really not the same thing at all. It probably seemed logical a few decades ago when trooning was basically just a branch of gay subculture. Now it doesn't make any sense. Being gay or lesbian means you want to have sex with people who have the same genitalia as you. Transsexuality on the other hand is a complex brew of mental instability, narcissism, self-loathing, political extremism, megalomania, infantilism and fetishism. In some ways it's more like a religion than anything else.

I can understand why gays/lesbians don't want to feel like they're excluding these people, but they need to cast that dead weight overboard.

The LGB Alliance, Get The L Out, and a few other organizations have been trying to split off from the "TQ+", but mostly all it's gotten them is labeled "hate groups" unfortunately.

View attachment 4573602
https://twitter.com/Annie_Dro/status/1626743729569648642

Annie Dro on Twitter: "Not sure if people realize this, but the major…

archived 19 Feb 2023 02:18:43 UTC

archive.ph

Twitter troon tries to claim the innocent twanz dindu nuffin and this was all a psyop by the right to make them look retarded. Everyone knows only trannies are retarded enough to even think of boycotting the wizard game in the first place.

This idea has been popping up on Reddit as well - when I saw a thread about this earlier on /popular it was full of highly-rated comments suggesting that the people targeting streamers and raising a huge fuss about this game were secretly right-wingers trying to make trannies look like lunatics so people would stop paying attention to the eeeevil genocide being done to them.

What we're seeing here is damage control, basically. The trans movement is finally starting to realize that all they've done in their attempts to make everyone do only and exactly what they want them to do all the time is make themselves look like a bunch of insane cultists (because that's what they are), and they're trying to mitigate the reputational damage by pointing and going "Uhhh we didn't do that, no, uh, it was someone pretending to be us! Because they're evil!" Countdown to the trannies deleting their twitter posts telling people they're committing genocide if they buy Hogwarts Legacy so they can pretend they never said any of that starts... now.

It'll spread like wildfire until that becomes the official story - because no mainstream person or news source wants to cross the trans movement - and all of us "evil terfs" and "transphobes" will be the only ones who remember how it really happened. Every damn time.

 

[Dave.]

Somebody needs a snickers