Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

yawning sneasel said:
We have a PM chain for Tommy content not in this thread. If you want to join just say so here and we will add you :)
Click to expand...

I'd like in on the chain, please.

Thomas Jay Wasserberg said:
lol. it's not possible to win an argument with somebody chemically conditioned to believe lies. go eat some adderall or xanax or whatever med you take that makes you so "normal" and qualified to destroy the reputation of innocent people with lies and false conjecture.
Click to expand...

And now we see a common recourse to a KF-addicted cow, taking things they've been accused of and turning them around on the accusers. They think that we think that we're throwing damning, cutting insults, and so they figure that they can use it to hurt our fee-fees more, since they're the good guys. It's more common with younger cows in general because it's something told to children in anti-bullying PSAs, that bullies are usually just projecting their inadequacies on their targets, but I guess old spergs do it too.

It's like when he was rating all our posts autistic, then negatively in general, because he was so offended that we gave him so many little red numbers and called him an autist. He figured we would be similarly offended because he lacks a working theory of mind. As such, he can't conceive of people that don't fit the parody of modern culture that he seems to subscribe to, IE, we're all supposed to be on mental health drugs because ADHD and stuff, and funnily enough, that's seen as both the fault of the evil BIG PHARMA and also us.

tl;dr tommy's retarded
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, PurpleSquirrel, Scribbler and 2 others
Bulk Bogan said:
I'd like in on the chain, please.

And now we see a common recourse to a KF-addicted cow, taking things they've been accused of and turning them around on the accusers. They think that we think that we're throwing damning, cutting insults, and so they figure that they can use it to hurt our fee-fees more, since they're the good guys. It's more common with younger cows in general because it's something told to children in anti-bullying PSAs, that bullies are usually just projecting their inadequacies on their targets, but I guess old spergs do it too.
Click to expand...

A lot of our cows have echo chambers where their views are validated, so it's quite a shock to them when they come here and none of their usual tactics for silencing dissent work. The funniest thing about Tommy is that he doesn't even have that. He's been doing this shit all over the internet for a very long time and it doesn't work anywhere. He's so ludicrous that the response to his bullshit is the same wherever he goes and the only way he can avoid it is by setting up group after group which he controls - groups which inevitably implode because he's such a twatwaffle.

The only thing somewhat unique about him is that he has no white knights. Even the worst cows usually have someone who charges in to defend them or at least to say they have some good points. Not Tommy, though.

ActualKiwi said:
He tried "Thomasa" but that's just retarded. He could have at least gone the whole "Thomasina"
Click to expand...

There's not really anything wrong with "Tommi", tbh.
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Like
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, Rokko, PurpleSquirrel and 5 others
repentance said:
A lot of our cows have echo chambers where their views are validated, so it's quite a shock to them when they come here and none of their usual tactics for silencing dissent work. The funniest thing about Tommy is that he doesn't even have that. He's been doing this shit all over the internet for a very long time and it doesn't work anywhere. He's so ludicrous that the response to his bullshit is the same wherever he goes and the only way he can avoid it is by setting up group after group which he controls - groups which inevitably implode because he's such a twatwaffle.

The only thing somewhat unique about him is that he has no white knights. Even the worst cows usually have someone who charges in to defend them or at least to say they have some good points. Not Tommy, though.



There's not really anything wrong with "Tommi", tbh.
Click to expand...
True enough, but he could put a lil more originality in it. On the previous point, I think he doesn't have white knights because he alienates fucking everybody (Rainbow Family debacle is a great example) with his whole being-a-raving-lunatic thing.
 
repentance said:
A lot of our cows have echo chambers where their views are validated, so it's quite a shock to them when they come here and none of their usual tactics for silencing dissent work. The funniest thing about Tommy is that he doesn't even have that. He's been doing this shit all over the internet for a very long time and it doesn't work anywhere. He's so ludicrous that the response to his bullshit is the same wherever he goes and the only way he can avoid it is by setting up group after group which he controls - groups which inevitably implode because he's such a twatwaffle.

The only thing somewhat unique about him is that he has no white knights. Even the worst cows usually have someone who charges in to defend them or at least to say they have some good points. Not Tommy, though.



There's not really anything wrong with "Tommi", tbh.
Click to expand...
Not to mention the only people that would even come close to white knighting this loser are the people that he somehow cons because of their lack of knowledge about how much of a shyster he is.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mr. Poker in the Front Liquor in the Rear, GREEDY FIREMAN, Dynamite Ninja and 4 others
ActualKiwi said:
On the previous point, I think he doesn't have white knights because he alienates fucking everybody (Rainbow Family debacle is a great example) with his whole being-a-raving-lunatic thing.
Click to expand...

Definitely. If there's a theme in his life which seems to go back for decades and repeats over and over, it's conflict with institutions, with groups, and with individuals.

So Tommy, is your "good friend" Gregg Blanchard going to rely on weed instead of psych meds to ensure that his son Bamboo doesn't stab him again?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: The Somber (Desolate Winds), Dynamite Ninja and ActualKiwi
I had a poke around cancer.org this morning. No mention of any gender issues with DES-exposed sons. Which, since it was prescribed to millions of pregnant women between 1938 and 1971, you'd expect a correlation with gender dysphoria would've come out by now.

But watch those testicles, Tommy!


What health problems could DES-exposed sons have?

Epididymal cysts
DES-exposed sons have an increased risk for epididymal cysts, which are non-cancerous growths on the testicles. Some studies have found that as many as 1 out of 5 DES-exposed sons may develop these.

Other health problems
Whether DES-exposed sons are at higher risk for other genital changes is not known. Some studies have found that DES-exposed sons might have a higher risk of undescended testicles or hypospadias (a birth defect in which the urethra opens along the bottom of the penis rather than at its tip). But other studies have not found these risks.

The possible relationship of DES exposure to increased risk of testicular or prostate cancer is not clear at this time. Some studies have suggested a possible link, but others have not.

DES-exposed sons don’t seem to have more fertility problems than other men.

What should DES-exposed sons do?
There are no special screenings or tests recommended for DES-exposed sons, but they should tell their doctors about their exposure and get regular exams from their doctors.

Even though DES-exposed sons have not been found to have a higher risk of developing cancer, males with undescended testicles or unusually small testicles have a higher risk of testicular cancer, whether they were exposed to DES or not. DES-exposed sons may want to talk to their doctors about whether they should examine their testicles regularly.​
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista, GREEDY FIREMAN, PurpleSquirrel and 3 others
Have you finally stopped using your horseshit invasion of privacy argument, in the hopes that you can make us pay for it? Oh my buddy, dream on. Get a fuckin clue. You don't have a leg to stand on.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: The Somber (Desolate Winds) and ActualKiwi
Bulk Bogan said:
I'd like in on the chain, please.



And now we see a common recourse to a KF-addicted cow, taking things they've been accused of and turning them around on the accusers. They think that we think that we're throwing damning, cutting insults, and so they figure that they can use it to hurt our fee-fees more, since they're the good guys. It's more common with younger cows in general because it's something told to children in anti-bullying PSAs, that bullies are usually just projecting their inadequacies on their targets, but I guess old spergs do it too.

It's like when he was rating all our posts autistic, then negatively in general, because he was so offended that we gave him so many little red numbers and called him an autist. He figured we would be similarly offended because he lacks a working theory of mind. As such, he can't conceive of people that don't fit the parody of modern culture that he seems to subscribe to, IE, we're all supposed to be on mental health drugs because ADHD and stuff, and funnily enough, that's seen as both the fault of the evil BIG PHARMA and also us.

tl;dr tommy's retarded
Click to expand...
tl;dr people who use the word "retarded" as a synonym for stupid are most often young, dumb, full of cum, intellectually dishonest bags of dirty douche water, especially this group of apparently young, conservative psychology and business majors. your brand of pseudo-intellectualism is pretty lame and your own arguments largely overburdened by ad hominem fallacy dismissals of evidence based on prejudices against the author unrelated to validity or invalidity of the statement, like the one idiot who blew laing off for being a drunk. if you're not dumbed down from psyche drugs, what's your excuse for even being a part of a shit show like this? cui bono, man?

that1guy said:
And saying something like "Tommy is unisex or agender" is a bullshit cop out excuse.
Click to expand...
to do anything less than accept what a transgender person tells you they wish you relate to them as is simply barbaric binary behavior typical of the mentally manipulated media-consuming moronic masses (how's that for an alliterative BM, you quasi-literate queer bashing queefs?).

you cannot say that a name or attire validates or invalidates a person as transgender. nobody here is qualified to make any statements on whether or not i am intersexed due to in utero DES exposure, nor can anybody here give me any compelling reason to validate myself to any of you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
  • Autistic
Reactions: Bartolomeow Kittensberger, Begemot, ASU and 15 others
Thomas Jay Wasserberg said:
to do anything less than accept what a transgender person tells you they wish you relate to them as is simply barbaric binary behavior typical of the mentally manipulated media-consuming moronic masses (how's that for an alliterative BM, you quasi-literate queer bashing queefs?).

you cannot say that a name or attire validates or invalidates a person as transgender. nobody here is qualified to make any statements on whether or not i am intersexed due to in utero DES exposure, nor can anybody here give me any compelling reason to validate myself to any of you.
Click to expand...
Tl;dr.

Are you nonbinary or genderqueer, sir?
 
SCRuler said:
Have you finally stopped using your horseshit invasion of privacy argument, in the hopes that you can make us pay for it? Oh my buddy, dream on. Get a fuckin clue. You don't have a leg to stand on.
Click to expand...
unauthorized copying of intellectual property and making defamatory memes from them constitutes invasion of privacy by misappropriation and defamation under false light. you are further libeling people and publicly inciting hatred. you are not protected by the first amendment. you're protected by weak laws at the state level and lack of manpower to waste on organized cyberbullying at the federal level. not only do i have a leg to stand on, i'll bet there will be thousands of co-plaintiffs appear and dozens of gangs taken out after i do file.

chimpburgers said:
Tl;dr.

Are you nonbinary or genderqueer, sir?
Click to expand...
i don't respond to people who disrespectfully address me. if you had access to the keylogger data from this machine you would know the answer to that because i posted a statement this morning in my status update.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Francis E. Dec Esc., The Somber (Desolate Winds), autism420 and 9 others
MysteriousStranger said:
I had a poke around cancer.org this morning. No mention of any gender issues with DES-exposed sons. Which, since it was prescribed to millions of pregnant women between 1938 and 1971, you'd expect a correlation with gender dysphoria would've come out by now.

But watch those testicles, Tommy!

What health problems could DES-exposed sons have?

Epididymal cysts
DES-exposed sons have an increased risk for epididymal cysts, which are non-cancerous growths on the testicles. Some studies have found that as many as 1 out of 5 DES-exposed sons may develop these.

Other health problems
Whether DES-exposed sons are at higher risk for other genital changes is not known. Some studies have found that DES-exposed sons might have a higher risk of undescended testicles or hypospadias (a birth defect in which the urethra opens along the bottom of the penis rather than at its tip). But other studies have not found these risks.

The possible relationship of DES exposure to increased risk of testicular or prostate cancer is not clear at this time. Some studies have suggested a possible link, but others have not.

DES-exposed sons don’t seem to have more fertility problems than other men.

What should DES-exposed sons do?
There are no special screenings or tests recommended for DES-exposed sons, but they should tell their doctors about their exposure and get regular exams from their doctors.

Even though DES-exposed sons have not been found to have a higher risk of developing cancer, males with undescended testicles or unusually small testicles have a higher risk of testicular cancer, whether they were exposed to DES or not. DES-exposed sons may want to talk to their doctors about whether they should examine their testicles regularly.​
Click to expand...
http://www.desaction.org/documents/SCOTTKERLINRpt2005.pdf

http://www.news-medical.net/health/Causes-of-Gender-Dysphoria.aspx

The FDA did not ban DES, but only urged doctors to stop prescribing it for their pregnant patients. Most, but not all, stopped, meaning sadly, DES was prescribed to pregnant women in America into the early 1980s, and later internationally.
Click to expand...
http://www.desaction.org/des-timeline/

transgender equality is shaping up as the leading civil rights issue of the decade and the DES coverup is going to blow the whole thing wide open, because there are a lot more chemicals besides DES in the environment causing cancers and sex/gender anomalies. DES is still given to livestock being raised for food.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/catholicauthenticity/2015/07/12-causes-of-gender-dysphoria/
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Deviant
Reactions: Francis E. Dec Esc., The Somber (Desolate Winds), autism420 and 11 others
Thomas Jay Wasserberg said:
unauthorized copying of intellectual property and making defamatory memes from them constitutes invasion of privacy by misappropriation and defamation under false light. you are further libeling people and publicly inciting hatred. you are not protected by the first amendment. you're protected by weak laws at the state level and lack of manpower to waste on organized cyberbullying at the federal level. not only do i have a leg to stand on, i'll bet there will be thousands of co-plaintiffs appear and dozens of gangs taken out after i do file.
Click to expand...

No, it's you who writes publicly available walls of text(and calls kiwi farm's legal department) and our trained autistic chimps screencaps those blurts. After that we call you drugged out hippie while we laugh at video of you calling the federal police, high as kite, about cyberstalkers and drainbows. Also, I thought that the first amendment was only about goverment restricting your ability to voice your opinion, not people ridiculing you on privately run and owned internet forums. (Then again, what do I know since I am not even citizen of the United States so I'm not covered by your first amendment anyway.)

I genuinely tought you also did file your claims on different authorities, but now it's again thing of the future. I'm confused Tommy, when does the axe fall? You're so far claimed that we brought here against your own will(which could be described as absurd claim at best), that you're collecting evidence(which is the job of the investigating parties in civilized nations) and that you don't care about us or our forum posts(but you do seem to get riled up by us). Now I might just be dumb, but to me it seems that you're not that credible. So let me ask once again, when do you file your claim at some law enforcement agency? What are you doing here, what you're trying to accomplish? And most importantly, why do you think your course of action would benefit you in any form or fashion?

EDIT: Please sempais add me to discussion too!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GREEDY FIREMAN, ActualKiwi and PurpleSquirrel
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back