Controversial energy official charged with stealing woman’s luggage at MSP

Article link
Archive

Sam Brinton, one of the first “openly genderfluid individuals in federal government leadership,” was charged with felony theft last month after allegedly stealing a woman’s luggage at MSP Airport.

The MIT grad went viral earlier this year when he announced his new role as the deputy assistant secretary of the Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition in the U.S. Department of Energy.

“As one of if not the very first openly genderfluid individuals in federal government leadership, I was welcomed with open arms into the Department of Energy all the way up to the Secretary whom I shared the stage with in a Pride month celebration panel just today,” Brinton wrote on Twitter at the time.

He said he is not a Biden appointee but instead was hired as a career employee in the Senior Executive Service. Brinton accepted the job in February and began in June, according to media reports.

Prior to working in government, Brinton was an anti-conversion therapy activist who taught “Kink 101” workshops on college campuses, according to The National Pulse. A photo from one of these workshops shows Brinton in a dress as he stands over three males in leather dog masks.

tranny freak.png
Brinton teaches a “Kink 101” workshop at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. (Instagram via The National Pulse)
Brinton discussed his “pup play” fetish in a 2016 Metro Weekly article, The Pulse reports.

“One of the hardest things about being a handler is that I’ve honestly had people ask, ‘Wait, you have sex with animals?’” Brinton said. “They believe it’s abusive, that it’s taking advantage of someone who may not be acting up to a level of human responsibility … The other misperception is that I have some really messed up background, like, did I have some horrible childhood trauma that made me like to have sex with animals?”

Brinton is also a member of the sacrilegious drag queen society called “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence,” which mocks Catholic nuns with names like “Sister Porn Again,” “Sister Chastity Boner,” and “Sister Roz Erection,” according to American Greatness.

Brinton, who goes by the name “Sister Ray Dee O’Active,” attended the group’s 2021 “Lavender Mass” where he paid tribute to “Daddy Fauci,” The Pulse reports.

According to the Washington Examiner, Brinton once talked with college students about “how he enjoys tying up his significant other like a table, and eating his dinner on him while he watches Star Trek.”

The charges

Law enforcement at the Minneapolis-St. Paul (MSP) International Airport were alerted to a missing suitcase in the baggage claim area on Sept. 16. The adult female victim said she flew into MSP on a Delta flight from New Orleans and went to retrieve her checked bag at carousel seven.

Airport records confirmed the navy blue Vera Bradley roller bag arrived at 4:40 p.m. but was missing from the carousel. So law enforcement reviewed video surveillance footage from the baggage claim area and observed Brinton removing a navy blue roller bag from carousel seven, according to a criminal complaint.

The complaint says Brinton removed a luggage tag from the bag, placed it into a handbag he was carrying, and “then left the area at a quick pace.” Brinton arrived at MSP Airport around 4:27 p.m. on an American Airlines flight from Washington, D.C., but did not check a bag, meaning he had no reason to visit baggage claim, according to the complaint.

Police showed the surveillance video to the victim and she confirmed it was her bag.

Brinton left the airport in an Uber for a stay at the InterContinental St. Paul Riverfront hotel, where he checked in with the blue bag, the complaint says.

He returned to MSP on Sept. 18 with the bag in hand for a departing flight back to Washington, D.C., authorities allege.

Surveillance video from Dulles International Airport shows Brinton traveling with the bag on an Oct. 9 return trip from Europe, the complaint notes.

The victim said the estimated value of the bag and its contents was around $2,325.

Police questioned Brinton about the missing bag in an Oct. 9 phone call and asked him directly if he “took anything that did not belong” to him.

“Not that I know of,” Brinton allegedly responded. He later admitted to taking the bag but said the clothes inside were his, according to the complaint.

“If I had taken the wrong bag, I am happy to return it, but I don’t have any clothes for another individual. That was my clothes when I opened the bag,” he told police, according to the complaint.

Brinton allegedly called the investigating officer two hours later and apologized for not being “completely honest.” This time Brinton said he took the bag because he was tired and thought it was his, the complaint says.

He allegedly told police that he realized the bag didn’t belong to him when he opened it up at the hotel but “got nervous” and didn’t “know what to do.” Worried that people would think he “stole the bag,” Brinton told police he left the victim’s clothes in the drawers in the hotel room, according to the complaint.

Brinton said he brought the bag back to D.C. with him because it would have been “weirder” to leave a bag in the hotel room, according to police.

Police told Brinton how to return the bag to Delta, but as of Oct. 27 the victim still had not received her bag back.

Police also learned that no clothing was recovered from the hotel room.

Brinton’s first court hearing is scheduled for Dec. 19 in Hennepin County. Alpha News attempted to contact Brinton via email but received an automatic reply saying he is on leave and unable to access his email. The Department of Energy declined to comment. Brinton’s attorneys did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
 
I came to post this, hahahahahhaa.

More pics:
View attachment 4607261View attachment 4607260

Look at the fucking agp smile

View attachment 4607269
He knows he's done wrong, he knows he stole this from a woman and he is ENJOYING it very much.
You mean he stole this from a

PROUD
BLACK
AFRICAN
TANZANIAN
WOMAN
OF

COLOR

If ever there was a time when pulling cards was appropriate, PLEASE for the love of GOD, I hope this woman does. This is a "Shut me up!" moment that should NOT go to waste. Show these leftists for the real racist/pervert/degenerate/thieves they are.
 
Maybe I’m missing something but the pattern around the neckline is different. The flowers on hers go all the way around the neckline while his are only on the left shoulder. I think they’re different dresses, just very similar.
I think it's just a very loose, flowing gown/tunic and he's wearing it askew like an ugly faggot. You can see the part facing towards the front on him on the very left on her, the print is definitely the same at the very least.
View attachment 4608344 View attachment 4608393
Askew and backwards.

The neckline can be explained by a 180 degree rotation.

Her front left has a snake boy that kind of matches his right arm. I'm not sure not much work flow vs flat is doing to make the two look different.
 

Attachments

  • 2_1.jpg
    2_1.jpg
    331.9 KB · Views: 12
  • 3_1.jpg
    3_1.jpg
    128.2 KB · Views: 12
Maybe I’m missing something but the pattern around the neckline is different. The flowers on hers go all the way around the neckline while his are only on the left shoulder. I think they’re different dresses, just very similar.
I was gonna say the retard just put it on backwards but I was ninja'ed by @Dergint 's superior autism above.

Like I said in the sideshows thread when this came up today, either this pervert has stolen so many bags he has picked up some choice finds through dumb luck and large sample size, OR he has actively stalked and targeted specific women- maybe starting at their hotel or some event or who knows.

Either possibility is pretty dire.
 
Like I said in the sideshows thread when this came up today, either this pervert has stolen so many bags he has picked up some choice finds through dumb luck and large sample size, OR he has actively stalked and targeted specific women- maybe starting at their hotel or some event or who knows.
The first time I remember him showing up in A&N, people were questioning how the luggage was worth enough to be a reportable crime. He was picking up luggage where the shell alone was valuable name brand goods, and people who can afford expensive cases sure aren't going to fill them with goodwill finds.

Some luck is required, but also he's got a method of selecting for the good stuff.
 
It's the same print, but it doesn't seem to be exclusive to the designer in any sort of conventional seasonal collection sort of way. That pattern shows up in her Instagram around 2018, but also three years later. He's an easy target so it might be a grift.
Her Twitter has a huge gap from 2016 - 2022 which is weird too, but I have a bunch of questions that are objectively answerable that can direct my conclusion. I can't answer them, but the answers are more objective than muh feels.

So far we've seen 3 outfits where the woman's picture is dated 2018, and a claim that the clothes were lost on a certain year/location. The fox article narrows it down to March 9, 2018, at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

Here's the before picture for the 3rd outfit:
FpnfEHEakAACyq1.jpeg

Note that although I say evidence of prior ownership exists, this is normie tier proof, not Autistic Archive.today level proof. I don't use Instagram, I just pulled the screenshot from Twitter.

The last picture is interesting because the hood thing on top makes it more ethnic, so it was probably altered to look more neutral.
  • Can a sewing autist detect an altercation by looking at the thread / stitch used?
  • Does she still know the original sizes of her works?
  • Can it be verified that his clothes are of equal or lesser size?
I'm sure flight records exist and I doubt the government allows them to be casually deleted.
  • Did he pass through Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on March 9, 2018?
  • Can her flight on that day be verified?
  • Did he post an exact flight date in public, or would she have to be extremely lucky to guess they were in the same place at the same time?
  • Is there any evidence of him wearing these clothes in public before March 9, 2018? Or if on that date, before they were both allegedly at the airport?
And some more subjective questions:
  • How many coincidences until there is no more plausible deniability?
  • What did the outside of her luggage look like? Did it look expensive or have a fashionable girly charm on it?
  • How custom is custom?
  • Do verified "duplicates" - within the range of lookalikes due to fit and rotation - exist?
Instagram - Not archived because I think that was a site that gives archive.fo issues. And bibliogram is dead so I can't check the alleged 2018 posts exist without registering.
 
here are much better pics of him and her with the dress:

1677131041166.png
imagen_2023-02-23_004544028.png

the original Instagram pic description says it's a "cap kimono", fancy words for just a circle that you tie on the middle with a belt. Because she knows her dress, she knows the flowery part goes on front, this fucker does not.

imagen_2023-02-23_005314496.png


The details on his left shoulder align perfectly with her right shoulder, though:
imagen_2023-02-23_004749196.png

It is 100% the same dress:

imagen_2023-02-23_005610472.png
 
Her Twitter has a huge gap from 2016 - 2022 which is weird too, but I have a bunch of questions that are objectively answerable that can direct my conclusion. I can't answer them, but the answers are more objective than muh feels.
The most obvious answer would be that she doesn't just own one single version of those dresses. She might have lost one bag, and have other sets at home. I doubt designers make one single dress, specially if they wear their own designs as they don't necessarily have the same measures of the models. And of course, if they sell those dress, they have so many of them.

In any case, if she lost even one only set, she could have later made another one.

The proof would be a report made by her when she lost the bags.
 
Nah, I can assure you most women would know what design goes on front in dresses like this one. Patterns on your butt make it look fatter.
I think the ass enhancement people want their asses to look fatter, but admittedly that's not critical to this story.

If most women would be able to identify the front of this dress, the woman wearing it right doesn't prove much, but the kleptroon wearing it wrong is telling. It reveals that he doesn't have a woman's instinct, and he didn't see the dress on a mannequin or see where the back tag was. (not that those apply here, but pretending he could have bought it off a shelf, I would expect those to be present).

As for her making multiple copies, I have to think hard on that. With her presenting herself as an award winning fashion designer who makes custom works, I expect one of a kind pieces. If there's duplicates, I would call that made to order instead.

But also her Twitter features a top she sold for $25, so it's not like she's an industry leader. For those prices I wouldn't expect exclusivity, maybe she's just talking herself up.
 
The last picture is interesting because the hood thing on top makes it more ethnic, so it was probably altered to look more neutral
My guy they're seperates, the scarf and top Arnt attached to the chiffon blouse.


I don't know why there's doubt about whether she's truthfull, one piece could be a coincidence but the combination of three .. come on.
I know if my luggage got stolen I'd be sore about it till I dropped dead. if I'd see something relating to a similar situation in the news I'd definitely check it out.
 
I’d be fairly confident that’s the same set of pieces. One item could be explained as him buying from her but three? From luggage she lost? The placement of the flowers wrt the black binding on the neckline is consistent and as dergint pointed out, it’s worn sideways because he has no sense of style.
What a lucky ‘hit’ for him! I would be very interested in whether he was actually following these women before they were separated from their luggage - he seems to be picking high value luggage with flamboyant female clothing in. Either he hit the jackpot first time, or he does it so much that he’s got multiple to choose from or he was actively picking out a woman and then going for their luggage.
I said before in one of these threads that the sheer nerve to wear these publically and to steal repeatedly is dangerous behaviour. This man has no brakes.
 
As for her making multiple copies, I have to think hard on that. With her presenting herself as an award winning fashion designer who makes custom works, I expect one of a kind pieces. If there's duplicates, I would call that made to order instead.
This is a very weird field with a lot of nuance. Truly one of a kind is difficult to do and incredibly hard to find a market niche for. You can always accommodate customers like this but they are whales you cannot count on for your bread and butter. Buying the materials to make multiple similar pieces to have an example to wear and account for customer desires is more practical. You're far more likely to come across a customer saying "I want that! But..." and you tailor it to their size/specifications. There's still probably going to be less than a dozen of any one "design" incorporating the same material and unless they miraculously fit within the alteration envelope of the original it would be made to order.

If they had worked with notable fashion houses or had meaningful awards, they would have directly cited them. They'd do that because they know everyone in the market is holding out their best representation. It takes a very small amount of effort to get a token award that would make her statements still true.
 
I was gonna say the retard just put it on backwards but I was ninja'ed by @Dergint 's superior autism above.

Like I said in the sideshows thread when this came up today, either this pervert has stolen so many bags he has picked up some choice finds through dumb luck and large sample size, OR he has actively stalked and targeted specific women- maybe starting at their hotel or some event or who knows.

Either possibility is pretty dire.

Personal opinion: I bet he chooses unique-looking bags. Flowery ones that stand out. We heard the one he got done for was a Vera Bradley. I think he chooses the most "statement" bags he can find, knowing that most people's luggage isn't seen as a personality statement but that if your luggage is, you probably also care a lot about how your fashion taste is perceived.
 
I don't travel by plane, so my knowledge on how airports work is pretty much nothing. I'm confused on how you can even steal a bag especially after the whole 9/11 thing. Like I understand how easy it is to do, in that you just walk up and grab a bag and then leave, but where I'm confused is how a person could get away with it, like this fucker did for years?

I'm just imagining if I lost my bag. I would let the airport know that my bag is missing, and what it looks like. Wouldn't the airport just need to check their cameras, find my bag, and see that the person taking it isn't me? Then go back and figure out who the thief is by matching it to his ticket when he boarded?

Sure it would take some work to do all this but I just assumed airports would have a dedicated security team that does just that, but maybe it's just cheaper and easier to mark it "lost"?
 
especially after the whole 9/11 thing.
I think post 9/11 checks are more about limiting what enters the controlled zone than controlling what exits it. Everything that exits it was probably checked back when it entered the equivalent zone before the flight.

I'm just imagining if I lost my bag. I would let the airport know that my bag is missing, and what it looks like. Wouldn't the airport just need to check their cameras, find my bag, and see that the person taking it isn't me? Then go back and figure out who the thief is by matching it to his ticket when he boarded?
Have you seen the horror stories about airlines destroying musical instruments and killing pets? Even without ever flying, that should warn people: flyer beware, airlines are careless.
 
Back