Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Swole McPole]

stop bringing up your retarded UK laws in here, the UK will arrest people for calling other pedos but let actual paki child fuckers run free. Fuck off.

Maybe read what I wrote which is actually discussing a Minnesota libel case in which somebody calls somebody a paedophile, you slow witted cunt.

If you're struggling, try holding up a finger and spelling it out one letter at a time.

 

[Procrastinhater]

stop bringing up your retarded UK laws in here, the UK will arrest people for calling other pedos but let actual paki child fuckers run free. Fuck off.

That was a Minnesota case bro. Surprised me too, I was under the impression the 1st Amendment made suing for this sort of thing pointless but apparently not in Minnesota.
That said in the case cited "Pat the Pedo" could prove actual damages (the loss of his job as a cop) whereas Monty is going to have a hard time proving damages from this, especially since Balldo Man isn't the first person to call Monty the Pedo a Pedophile, Monty's reputation is already dogshit and has been for years, I remember Jim shitting on him years ago, I'd like to see him try to prove his reputation is worse after Balldo started shitting on him than it was before.

 

[Father Balldo]

Maybe read what I wrote which is actually discussing a Minnesota libel case in which somebody calls somebody a paedophile, you slow witted cunt.

If you're struggling, try holding up a finger and spelling it out one letter at a time.

it's multiple posts about "HERE IN THE UK" "WELL IN THE UK..." "SEE, IF IT WERE ME, IN THE UK, I'D KOWTOW IMMEDIATELY" none of which has anything to do with United States law. What's next, bringing up how Rackets once brandished a butter knife on stream and "in the UK" that would be seen as a threat with a deadly weapon?

 

[Not Who You Think]

Right, and some of the ringleaders have tits, some compile albums of said tits for him, and some janny for free, so Rekieta allowed it.

This is his ideal government, the Nosetatorial Titocacy.

Pornocracy (aka Saeculum obscurum) was a thing during the 10th century Papacy, and Nick being "Pope of Lawtube" definitely invites the comparison in a funny way.

 

[Anticipointment]

This is from a few days ago in locals chats:



It is something I’ve heard many a troon say, pre-troonery. First they envy women, then they want to be one. With Nick’s recent aversion to anything that isn’t living life on easy mode, a Nick troon out would be surprising, but not entirely shocking.

I could at least see some drag show participation or similar. All in good “fun” though, to be sure!

Until it became a Bruce Jenner has become Caitlin type situation. If it can happen to an Olympic gold medalist, world record setter, & (formerly) married man of six children, it could certainly be the fate of Balldo man.

Btw, that yellow jacket Nick is wearing in Vegas is really gay. It would go perfectly with Vic’s gay pants.

 

[break these cuffs]

I could at least see some drag show participation or similar. All in good “fun” though, to be sure!

There is a 0% chance that Nick hasn't worn women's clothing at some point in his life. I wouldn't be surprised if its already a part of his degen sex life.

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

There is a 0% chance that Nick hasn't worn women's clothing at some point in his life. I wouldn't be surprised if its already a part of his degen sex life.

Like when he dressed up in women's clothing and did that camgirl stream?

 

[talk talk talk]

That was a Minnesota case bro. Surprised me too, I was under the impression the 1st Amendment made suing for this sort of thing pointless but apparently not in Minnesota.
That said in the case cited "Pat the Pedo" could prove actual damages (the loss of his job as a cop) whereas Monty is going to have a hard time proving damages from this, especially since Balldo Man isn't the first person to call Monty the Pedo a Pedophile, Monty's reputation is already dogshit and has been for years, I remember Jim shitting on him years ago, I'd like to see him try to prove his reputation is worse after Balldo started shitting on him than it was before.

I read through that case when Quest v. Rackets started. IIRC, there were at least two appeals and the whole thing was a mess.

In the end, Pat the Pedo couldn't prove he lost his job because of defendant's actions.

My recollection is that after years of litigation, he got $750.00.

ETA: The case is so old that the docs aren't available online. The docket report shows the amount of the final judgment, though.

 

[Procrastinhater]

This is from a few days ago in locals chats:

View attachment 4622658

It is something I’ve heard many a troon say, pre-troonery. First they envy women, then they want to be one. With Nick’s recent aversion to anything that isn’t living life on easy mode, a Nick troon out would be surprising, but not entirely shocking.

I could at least see some drag show participation or similar. All in good “fun” though, to be sure!

Until it became a Bruce Jenner has become Caitlin type situation. If it can happen to an Olympic gold medalist, world record setter, & (formerly) married man of six children, it could certainly be the fate of Balldo man.

Btw, that yellow jacket Nick is wearing in Vegas is really gay. It would go perfectly with Vic’s gay pants.

Please let this happen

 

[Puppet clogged brain]

Like when he dressed up in women's clothing and did that camgirl stream?

Wait, when did that happen? I started following Nick just before Rittenhouse.
Edit: spelling

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

Wait, when did that happen? I started frowing Nick just before Rittenhouse.

December 2020

 

[Procrastinhater]

December 2020
View attachment 4623457

Lol what a faggot. I forgot about this.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

December 2020
View attachment 4623457

Ahh, when he still played it off as “ironic”

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Lol what a faggot. I forgot about this.

It was still a 'haha' joke that transmuted into a sick one once greater details of the Nose Man's proclivities became known

 

[Swole McPole]

I read through that case when Quest v. Rackets started. IIRC, there were at least two appeals and the whole thing was a mess.

In the end, Pat the Pedo couldn't prove he lost his job because of defendant's actions.

My recollection is that after years of litigation, he got $750.00.

ETA: The case is so old that the docs aren't available online. The docket report shows the amount of the final judgment, though.View attachment 4623090

Sure, the size of the damages wasn't the bit that I thought was interesting. At the time, people here seemed to be suggesting that it was open and shut -- Rackets would have it thrown out on first amendment grounds, as soon as the judge laid eyes on it. (Hence my reference to the UK here. That just seemed so contrary to how things happen here, it just seemed to me that the law in the US would have to be more nuanced than that. And of course, it is.)

The things I thought were interesting about it and were in direct contradiction to what Rekieta was claiming about the case were really the following things:

a.) A Minnesota appeals court had found that calling somebody a paedophile was defamatory per se. You didn't need to prove that your reputation had been damaged to get a finding against the person who defamed you, as long as you hadn't actually diddled any kids, you'd win your case.

b.) It didn't matter that everyone else in the area also called him Pat the Pedo. He wasn't suing everybody else. If somebody had publicly called you a pedo, they'd defamed you.

So even if you had a reputation as bad as Monty's, while you might not be able to make a fortune in damages, you'd definitely be able to drain his bank account by taking the case to trial, and you'd be able to drag him through the deposition process, humiliating him as you asked him about various aspects of his on-line pontificating.

If we could find this stuff with the most basic Google search, surely Rekieta, with his access to LexisNexis and the other great tools for looking up case law, surely he'd found it as well. Why wasn't he addressing it? How come he wasn't telling us that it didn't apply because X, Y and Z?

Perhaps it was because he didn't want to give away his cunning legal strategy to his opponents? But that didn't sound like Rekieta to me. Anyway, I just wanted to hear what any of the people who had some experience of the US legal system had to say about the case and it's applicability to Montagraph vs Rekieta.

 

[beautiful person]

Null has a suggestion for Lawtube:

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

I just remembered that when T. Greg Douchette (perpetually bankrupt lawyer from Weeb Wars) was using Randazza to sue some Confederate group, Nick made jokes about Randazza going "where's the money Greg?" like it was a mafia shakedown.

Since Nick is buying himself all sorts of unnecessary expenses like a flashy Mustang and a week in Vegas with a venue for his Noseguards and the lawsuit looks to be running up a lot of expenses, finances in Balldonia might not be doing too hot soon. Question might quickly become "where's the money, Nick?"

This is from a few days ago in locals chats:

View attachment 4622658

It is something I’ve heard many a troon say, pre-troonery. First they envy women, then they want to be one. With Nick’s recent aversion to anything that isn’t living life on easy mode, a Nick troon out would be surprising, but not entirely shocking.

Nick's said that many times before, usually in Drexel streams (Drexel says the same) so funny as it is, there's not much to take home from it.

I could at least see some drag show participation or similar. All in good “fun” though, to be sure!

Nick claims that a good night out for his birthday is watching gay bar drag shows in his underwear, possibly while covered in glitter, so him taking part isn't surprising. Maybe he'll even do a Drag Queen Story Hour for his homeschool!

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

Nick claims that a good night out for his birthday is watching gay bar drag shows in his underwear, possibly while covered in glitter, so him taking part isn't surprising. Maybe he'll even do a Drag Queen Story Hour for his homeschool!

Doubtful since that would involve spending time with his kids that he hates.

 

[ChromaQuack]

December 2020
View attachment 4623457

A screenshot does not show the true horror of it, it wasn't *just* dressing like that.

Allow me.

 

[Maude Snew]

Doubtful since that would involve spending time with his kids that he hates.

Can you blame him though? They're fucking nerds who play Roblox and Minecraft all the time and don't even party some of the night, much less all night. Nor can they drive drunk Nick to the liquor store or his dealer. Useless leeches the lot of 'em.