Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[Blarmed&Dangerous]

Apparently @Xanon was a Chase sock who DFE'd everything. He also posted on my profile "don't slander my fellow libertarians" or something but it's gone too, LMAO.

See, having known her I largely think she's harmless. She's just an arrogant weirdo ethot, whatevs.

But goddamn do I hate simps.

 

[Dr. Butt]

She'd surely accuse us of strawmanning if we said she morally tolerates adult-minor sex and bestiality, but she's leaving a tiny gap of inferential distance.
View attachment 4639006

This is just her saying "it's better to be raped than murdered" again.

I'm not like those other simps! I'm a cool simp.

 

[Freya]

It disgusts me so much how hard she tries to push "non-violent rape". Rape is inherently violent. Rape is legally a VIOLENT CRIME. She says she's a libertarian, but I never see her post anything related to it. It's like she only adopted that view because she thought it was the most pro rape, pro pedo mainstream political ideology. That OR she's just too stupid to have actual analysis or insight on any serious political issue and defaults to "is it ok to rape a child if you buy them a candy bar afterwards?"

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Apparently @Xanon was a Chase sock who DFE'd everything. He also posted on my profile "don't slander my fellow libertarians" or something but it's gone too, LMAO.

Libertarians try to convince people you're the logical heirs of the radical liberal tradition instead of weirdos challenge. (Impossible.)

 

[Tilapia]

It disgusts me so much how hard she tries to push "non-violent rape". Rape is inherently violent. Rape is legally a VIOLENT CRIME. She says she's a libertarian, but I never see her post anything related to it. It's like she only adopted that view because she thought it was the most pro rape, pro pedo mainstream political ideology. That OR she's just too stupid to have actual analysis or insight on any serious political issue and defaults to "is it ok to rape a child if you buy them a candy bar afterwards?"

I don't know,. "Pedophilia is a supply/demand issue. Therefore if you supply the market with AI-generated child porn, the demand will decrease. This is better than simply regulating child pornography" is libertarianism at its most undistilled, extremist endpoint. I would think that it was a satire of libertarianism if it did not come from Aella.

 

[Freya]

I don't know,. "Pedophilia is a supply/demand issue. Therefore if you supply the market with AI-generated child porn, the demand will decrease. This is better than simply regulating child pornography" is libertarianism at its most undistilled, extremist endpoint. I would think that it was a satire of libertarianism if it did not come from Aella.

sure, but libertarians, as hard as it is to believe, talk about other things besides child porn. at least ones that arent aella

 

[Lord Quackers]

Great reminder why this thread is tagged "Gross" if the other shit like pedo defending and being a cuck wasn't gross already.
Speaking of gross Aella she overshares about her toenail that "popped off" last year and even posts several pictures:

Spoiler: NSFL absolutely gross toenail images

View attachment 4640551
source (a)
View attachment 4640548
source (a)
View attachment 4640545
source (a)

Aella's dating profiles use intellectual words to sound smart but backfires because people can't understand, her simps say this is a good thing:
View attachment 4640596
source (a)
Aella talks about her mom (Annick Slick):
View attachment 4640626
source (a)

her mother probably feels the same way about her children.

She might also be responsible if she was a lackadaisical parent without discipline.

 

[Alfred MacDonald]

I have internet again! We're still figuring out how we want it set up and I'm busy with a lot, but I have some mega-tea to spill soon. Until then, here are some imgur albums:

• Roko thinking that NASA denying his proposal was a behind-the-scenes slight against him: https://imgur.com/a/HEslClX
  
  
• Roko also being very stubborn about weight loss (note: I know what I am doing. I'm not world-class, but I know my shit. He knows this about me and is refusing to listen.) https://imgur.com/a/G6IvBmg
  
  
• An extremely cringe-inducing post in "Bountied Ratonality" about cuddling for money.
  
  
• A collection of Eliezer simping for Aella.
  
  
• When I was beefing with eigenrobot and his circle got me banned from an event, I eventually learned why. This is the moment I figured out eigenrobot's wife was a woman I used to sext with. To this day I have not experienced a feeling this satisfying. I wish I could turn this feeling into a powder and snort it.

And, finally, IMO the most damning of all:

• Eliezer Yudkowsky failing at weight loss for the better part of eight years by censoring and blocking the most basic-yet-effective advice under the reasoning of "I've heard that before / tried that before, therefore it must be wrong — it can't be that I've done it wrong."

(NOTE: if anyone is very overweight and having trouble losing weight, this is a foolproof method: sign up for the cheapest gym near you, go when it's late at night and dead, and use elliptical or treadmill while doing things you'd do to procrastinate like watch movies or TV shows or browse social media or KiwiFarms. Set the equipment to a pace you can fuck off with and before you know it you'll have burned 900 calories arguing with some moron on reddit. Do this every day and you'll get results. This won't work if you're kinda-in-shape and kinda-not, but if you need a guaranteed way here it is.)

For those who go on fitness boards and know what Eliezer's post means, this should put it in perspective: Eliezer went on a clen cycle, saw no results, and still deleted any comments about calorie restriction. How the fuck?

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

And, finally, IMO the most damning of all:

• Eliezer Yudkowsky failing at weight loss for the better part of eight years by censoring and blocking the most basic-yet-effective advice under the reasoning of "I've heard that before / tried that before, therefore it must be wrong — it can't be that I've done it wrong."

(NOTE: if anyone is very overweight and having trouble losing weight, this is a foolproof method: sign up for the cheapest gym near you, go when it's late at night and dead, and use elliptical or treadmill while doing things you'd do to procrastinate like watch movies or TV shows or browse social media or KiwiFarms. Set the equipment to a pace you can fuck off with and before you know it you'll have burned 900 calories arguing with some moron on reddit. Do this every day and you'll get results. This won't work if you're kinda-in-shape and kinda-not, but if you need a guaranteed way here it is.)

For those who go on fitness boards and know what Eliezer's post means, this should put it in perspective: Eliezer went on a clen cycle, saw no results, and still deleted any comments about calorie restriction. How the fuck?

This is gold. You'd think fatlogic like this is exactly what rationalism is supposed to overcome.

 

[Alfred MacDonald]

This is gold. You'd think fatlogic like this is exactly what rationalism is supposed to overcome.

Some people like this DO exist, they just don't make it their whole personality.

A public, practice-what-you-preach version of this is Menno Henselmans, a fitness trainer. He started with a degree in Behavioral Economics because his parents wanted him to get an MBA, so he knew stuff like Bayesian reasoning and mixed this with his training. He eventually pivoted to fitness and actually does research with people who know what they're talking about (e.g. Brad Schoenfeld, the top-cited guy in this field) and this research is published in real journals, not an obscure institute. He also does not give off cult vibes. In terms of being "rational" he's one of the more rational people I know of, he's just not famous for this because he's never written about AI / singularity / transhumanism / whatever and hasn't started a cult of personality. He's a very fit guy with a good career, that's it.

I know another guy like this, who is an extremely successful corporate lawyer who has done Brazilian Jiu Jitsu for 10+ years and took his fitness so seriously it looks like he aged in reverse. Since he's an extremely private person that's the most I can dish.

But both of these people don't have much to hide. The trainer has nothing to hide — he's not shy about interviews. The lawyer has attorney-client privilege to worry about.

People like Eliezer/Aella are fronting; they adopted this "I hate journalists" attitude after-the-fact. And they have a lot to hide, and they're inept at talking to normal people.

There were many, many reasons to distrust media before the Scott episode happened, which a website like newsdiffs would clue you in on.

A friend of mine made a post about how Scott Alexander wasn't really doxxed by the traditional definition (i.e. a dossier of your info, such as address/phone/etc) — this friend was blocked basically in unison, by the entire community, even though his point isn't really wrong. The LessWrong rationalists only started their anti-media attitude after one of their own (Scott) was in the spotlight and got personally affected by it; after that, it occurred to them how poorly they, themselves, could look. They don't have a distrust of media due to integrity or epistemic standards or whatever else. They are not Noam Chomsky reading the newspaper and grinding their teeth at the factual inaccuracies. They're worried about covering their ass, and what happens if they can't.

 

[Dr. Butt]

This is gold. You'd think fatlogic like this is exactly what rationalism is supposed to overcome.

Our little NLOR is hilariously overcomplicating his weight loss too. That fucking essay from a young, able bodied man who looks to be about 6'2"? I had no idea eating less and going for more walks (in Texas, no less - always nice weather outside!) required Dambusters-tier strategizing. I highly recommend everybody click through and read those screenshots - solid entertainment.

ETA - who the fuck feels proud of "sexting" a woman without ever touching her

 

[Un uomo che ti ama]

A friend of mine made a post about how Scott Alexander wasn't really doxxed by the traditional definition (i.e. a dossier of your info, such as address/phone/etc) — this friend was blocked basically in unison, by the entire community, even though his point isn't really wrong.

Is there really a difference these days? If you know someone's full name there are lots of doxxing sites which will give you their addresses, phone numbers, emails etc.

 

[Alfred MacDonald]

who the fuck feels proud of "sexting" a woman without ever touching her

My bad, that was not the vibe I meant to give. It was more like "so THIS is why these people are so out to get me" since before that it wasn't so clear.

 

[Markass the Worst]

I have internet again! We're still figuring out how we want it set up and I'm busy with a lot, but I have some mega-tea to spill soon. Until then, here are some imgur albums:

• Roko thinking that NASA denying his proposal was a behind-the-scenes slight against him: https://imgur.com/a/HEslClX
  
  
• Roko also being very stubborn about weight loss (note: I know what I am doing. I'm not world-class, but I know my shit. He knows this about me and is refusing to listen.) https://imgur.com/a/G6IvBmg
  
  
• An extremely cringe-inducing post in "Bountied Ratonality" about cuddling for money.
  
  
• A collection of Eliezer simping for Aella.
  
  
• When I was beefing with eigenrobot and his circle got me banned from an event, I eventually learned why. This is the moment I figured out eigenrobot's wife was a woman I used to sext with. To this day I have not experienced a feeling this satisfying. I wish I could turn this feeling into a powder and snort it.

And, finally, IMO the most damning of all:

• Eliezer Yudkowsky failing at weight loss for the better part of eight years by censoring and blocking the most basic-yet-effective advice under the reasoning of "I've heard that before / tried that before, therefore it must be wrong — it can't be that I've done it wrong."

(NOTE: if anyone is very overweight and having trouble losing weight, this is a foolproof method: sign up for the cheapest gym near you, go when it's late at night and dead, and use elliptical or treadmill while doing things you'd do to procrastinate like watch movies or TV shows or browse social media or KiwiFarms. Set the equipment to a pace you can fuck off with and before you know it you'll have burned 900 calories arguing with some moron on reddit. Do this every day and you'll get results. This won't work if you're kinda-in-shape and kinda-not, but if you need a guaranteed way here it is.)

For those who go on fitness boards and know what Eliezer's post means, this should put it in perspective: Eliezer went on a clen cycle, saw no results, and still deleted any comments about calorie restriction. How the fuck?

If you could upload the images directly here to the site that would be great. Imgur is notorious for deleting shit and will definitely delete your albums if people complain loudly enough.

Spoiler: Roko and NASA

Spoiler: Roko and weight loss

Spoiler: Cuddling for money

Spoiler: Eliezer simping for Aella

Spoiler: eigenrobot / selentelechia

(can't embed the single screenshot of Eliezer and his weight loss, but it's still attached)

 

[Freya]

It's "dox"

 

[twisted cycle path]

this dumb bitch is like the molested white woman version of Jaden Smith. We should start a betting pool for how many different zip codes she ends up being found in when she succedes in fully supressing her "womanbrain".

 

[Ja'amUnbago]

I'll powerlevel and talk about my personal experience with weight loss. I'm still reddit brained so I overshare and use anecdotal evidence.

So I started doing the bare minimum and began operating at a calorie deficit and getting more protein and vegetables in my diet instead of fast food. While my job does have me lifting and walking about 5-6 miles per 8 hour shift I haven't increased my activity or gym days more than 1 extra day (so 3 days in total) a week. I've lost the same amount of weight as Roko (in half the amount of time). It's that simple unless you're metabolism and body chemistry is super fucked up. I also asked multiple people for advice and test it out; trial and error basically.

Now Roko has a degree in Physics, he's more than likely familiar with the scientific method. Why doesn't he use his big brain and apply the scientific method to weight loss? After all science is based on finding out whether or not something is right/wrong, works/doesn't work et al. He could be verbose and grand in his language and brag about losing weight to feed his ego. Blocking people who give good advice is retarded and pointless, it's almost as if he just wants to complain about being overweight without doing anything about it. It takes willpower and effort, something the hedonist lolcows that we've seen in this thread don't possess. Also at first glance his space runway looks and sounds retarded; I refuse to give it a second glance.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Scott Siskind's latest blog post talks about Rachael's poll. He says he's boggled by the results but then in literally the same sentence dismisses his confusion by saying "and Aella is a national treasure." No I am not making this up, you bet he wouldn't do this for any other random twitter poll.

source (a)

Big Yud boasts about having sex with women with "sufficiently high standards" in Rachael's replies:

source (a)
Rachael retweeted it of course:

(archive)

Rachael seems to misunderstand what commitment in a relationship actually means:

source (a)
All relationships have the understanding that if your partner fears you, they will leave, no need to spell it out. As one reply put it:

That's not breaking commitment that's being a decent human being.

A bit old but gold: Rachael also misunderstands what people she calls "anti-degeneracy" actually believe.

source (a)
Yes she's literally saying "not being degenerate is bad for my mental health." If she criticizes "anti-degeneracy ppl" for this I wonder how she would respond to the numerous instances of degenerate people having miserable mental health and actively suffering, often as a direct result of their degeneracy.

 

[Alfred MacDonald]

If she criticizes "anti-degeneracy ppl" for this I wonder how she would respond to the numerous instances of degenerate people having miserable mental health and actively suffering, often as a direct result of their degeneracy.

I think she'd do one or both of these things:

1. Apologize in the contrived way she usually does over podcasts when she's put on the spot.

2. Secretly judge their use but act like she's completely accepting of it. Other than the year where she supposedly did LSD every day she seems mild in her drug use; she just makes a point to let you know. At one party she opened with "I"m on drugs! — Phenibut!" (And I mean, yes, phenibut is a drug, but it's not like MDMA or mushrooms or something where you should warn someone in case you act radically different. She might as well have said "I took a Benadryl!")

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Scott Siskind's latest blog post talks about Rachael's poll. He says he's boggled by the results but then in literally the same sentence dismisses his confusion by saying "and Aella is a national treasure." No I am not making this up, you bet he wouldn't do this for any other random twitter poll.
View attachment 4652608
source (a)

Believe it or not just saying "cis ladies" at the start of your poll question on Twitter does not in fact lead you to get a representative sample.

A bit old but gold: Rachael also misunderstands what people she calls "anti-degeneracy" actually believe.
View attachment 4652671
source (a)
Yes she's literally saying "not being degenerate is bad for my mental health." If she criticizes "anti-degeneracy ppl" for this I wonder how she would respond to the numerous instances of degenerate people having miserable mental health and actively suffering, often as a direct result of their degeneracy.

Aella, you're asking them to throw out their entire framework to accommodate you even though their theory already does. As you start to allude to in your second tweet the problem is that you don't like the conclusions about you it leads them to. It's not a rational ask in the slightest the way you're formulating it. All you're saying is you disagree, which, duh. Believe it or not, Brianna Aella, not everything is about you.