Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

The definition has shifted in the past few years. Once upon a time it actually meant what the acronym said it should.

Now? Let's say you're in a room with six trannies. Find the most extreme one. If you don't agree 100% with what he says--99% isn't enough here, you have to agree fully--then you're a TERF.

There are a lot of TERFs.
No it doesn't mean anything. All these terms like Terf, Transphobic etc doesn't mean anything, it's just a made up word to throw away any meaningful discussions by way of insults. Do not adopt any of these terms.

There's no such thing as transphobic. If you say "Only women menstruate", the troons then, without needing to prove anything, can just call you transphobic...... which means shit. Every conversations you see is just keep on having the terms thrown around, science is transphobic (wtf does that even mean?!), disagreeing is transphobic bla bla.

That's why you see they never provide evidence or talk in good faith, they just throw around those terms like nazi, bigot, transphobe, terf, alt-right etc for every argument.

Anyone who calls other people Terf/phobic etc, i immediately assume that person is either an idiot, or insidious or both. If you engage them on those terms, you have already lost.

That's why they hate being called a pedo, because it's the same thing with them, you don't need to meticulously provide the evidence(which they don't give shit and call it transphobic anyway), just dismiss them with the term "pedo".

Make the term shemale, pedo, transverstite trending again for these degenerates.
 
Black Lipstick Buxom Boy', by the way, got out. She escaped the gender cult, grew her hair out and went back to identifying as a girl, and now says the whole 'Die Cis Scum' thing was just an embarrassing phase she was going through.

Would+you+hit+this+shes+actually+the+die+cis+scum_9f5be9_5494227.jpg


So, you know, people can come back.
She finally looks like a human , good for her.
 
That's why you see they never provide evidence or talk in good faith, they just throw around those terms like nazi, bigot, transphobe, terf, alt-right etc for every argument.
Their entire existence is based off of lying to themselves and forcing others to accept those lies. And if they can't easily convince people to accept their lies, trannies get society to ostracize said people. If the people that don't accept the tranny doctrine (heretics) aren't rich or politically powerful enough to be untouchable, trannies play dirty and rat on them to their employers in an attempt to get them fired.

It's a watered-down equivalent of modern yakuza tactics - publicly shame people and let society fall over themselves to be the first person to punish the heretic.

Trannies heavily rely on cognitive dissonance and tangentially picking off arguments against them. If you say that women are defined by having 2 X chromosomes as well as the requisite primary (ovaries and uterus) and secondary sex organs (breasts), trannies will argue back that there are some women that don't have sex organs or breasts so therefore are they not women anymore? This does not include the other argument they like to trot out for people who have chromosomal abnormalities (XO, XXX, XXY, XYY, XXYY).

The first argument is retarded, because we base definitions on the majority-present phenotypes, not their exceptions. Their argument is akin to saying that if you lose a finger, you're not human anymore since humans by definition have 10 fingers. The second argument is similarly uneducated, since chromosomal-abnormal people are still males or females. Sure, you can have people who are genetically male but phenotypically female, but they're still males - much like our MtF friends.

That's why they hate being called a pedo, because it's the same thing with them, you don't need to meticulously provide the evidence(which they don't give shit and call it transphobic anyway), just dismiss them with the term "pedo".
I love calling them groomers whenever they trot out that bigot/terf/transphobic line. It gets them so pissed off when you use their tactics against them.
 
are the uruk hai based on niggers?
Are you kidding? Uruk-hai are a loyal and well-organized fighting force.

Rowling at least once went anonymous on Harry Potter forums and possibly Tumblr. Hi Jo!
I wouldn't be surprised if she was lurking or at least aware of the forum but I doubt she would enjoy us saying "nigger" and "faggot" every second sentence.
 
Some fresh seething for you:

330321450_1135918833756053_7263444875171761655_n-min.jpg

Link, Archive

screencapture-twitter-kukkiia-status-1628009686908735489-2023-02-28-12_46_11__-min.png


screencapture-twitter-kukkiia-status-1628009686908735489-2023-02-28-12_46_11_-min.png

The dwarves were not Jewish coded.

The hobbits were, and quite sure Tolkien indirectly admitted that. Hobbits are very isolated, ethnocentric, selfish, and prefer to avoid the lives of men and love to board wealth without directly creating it. Dwarves were never Jewish; they've always been a separate race.
I mean, it makes so much more sense that the Shire and hobbits are inspired by the England of Tolkien's childhood. I know Wikipedia is pozzed and all, but even they get it right on this occasion.


On the subject of Tolkien, I found a rather interesting Twitter thread by a Christian LotR fan, disproving the narrative that Christians are suddenly cool with Rowling because she betrayed the transes:

screencapture-twitter-MiddleEarthElf4-status-1629972129415417856-2023-02-28-14_16_14_-min.png

Link, Archive

As if it ever needed disproving, but I've seen so many people claim the Onion's headline was 'straight up facts' that I felt it needed some debunking.
 
The latest Cormoran Strike season's final episode came out yesterday in burgerland. It's pretty good and I hope there's more episodes. I don't know how close the show hews to the books, but Robin really seems like an author self-insert with Cormoran her ideal fictitious male. I know there was some bitching about the latest book having a "transphobic" Dressed To Kill type twist, so I can't wait for that to get adapted.
 
Are you kidding? Uruk-hai are a loyal and well-organized fighting force.

Yes, they have much more in common with “noble savages” and huscarls of early medieval Denmark which Tolkien was 100% familiar with.

The various other orcs were based on Birmingham and London working class ruffians.

The Dwarves were based on dwarves of Norse and Germanic mythology and folklore. They completely were imagined as covetous little hairy fuckers long before Northern Europeans had encountered Greeks or Romans, let alone an Israelite, Hebrew or son of Abraham.

The “Black men of the east” are a bit iffy though. They probably were supposed to be some kind of Negro. Turkmen or Arabs at the whitest.
 
Last edited:
In addition to Malfoy and Voldemort's actors, Robbie Coltrane (Hagrid) supported Rowling before he died last year. Additionally, Helena Bonham Carter (Bellatrix Lestrange) and Jason Isaacs (Lucius Malfoy) refused to condemn Rowling. Helena decried the "witch hunt" (hah) against Rowling by the public, Robbie basically said that it's ridiculous that people were looking to get offended, and Jason said that Rowling had a right to her opinions.

Somebody correct me if I’m wrong, but Imelda Staunton (Professor Dolores Umbridge) and Fiona Shaw (Petunia Dursley) have no record of saying anything bad about Rowling either, probably because they’re professionals (and women of an older generation). Harry Melling (Dudley Dursley) supported the trans community but didn’t attack Rowling, saying “I don’t want to join the debate of pointing fingers and saying, ‘That’s right, that’s wrong,’ because I don’t think I’m the correct spokesperson for that. But I do believe that everybody has the right to choose.”

So the people who spent years playing a schoolyard bully who’s trying to live up to his family legacy, a spoilt brat who grows to defend his hated adopted brother, a gentle giant who’s the victim of government discrimination, a conservative, prudish house wife with a difficult family history, a damaged sociopath who’s emotionally enslaved by her master, a wealthy, arrogant supremacist but loving family man, a conniving, untalented bureaucrat desperate for power and an exceptional but insecure, narcissistic tyrant appear to be the people who understand that MAYBE condemning a person for their complicated personality and opinions isn’t a good idea.

I wonder why?!
Funny how All the actors who played evil wizard Nazis or just bad people are the ones not to denounce J.K.

Well alot of the actors who played the heroes stabbed her in the back. Ironic.
 
The latest Cormoran Strike season's final episode came out yesterday in burgerland. It's pretty good and I hope there's more episodes. I don't know how close the show hews to the books, but Robin really seems like an author self-insert with Cormoran her ideal fictitious male. I know there was some bitching about the latest book having a "transphobic" Dressed To Kill type twist, so I can't wait for that to get adapted.
Yes, if Jo Rowling has ever written a self-insert character, it‘s Robin. She even has red hair. I don’t know if Cormoran is her ideal man, though — he’s a bit of a transphobe, apparently, if Twitter is to be believed. :tomgirl:
 
I don’t know if Cormoran is her ideal man, though — he’s a bit of a transphobe, apparently, if Twitter is to be believed. :tomgirl:
I must deboonk it. He has a conversation with a troon and only realizes it's a troon after seeing his ID and is so surprised by it that he deadnames him. After that he's talking about the troon as if it was a woman.
 
Some fresh seething for you:

View attachment 4656580
Link, Archive

View attachment 4656583



I mean, it makes so much more sense that the Shire and hobbits are inspired by the England of Tolkien's childhood. I know Wikipedia is pozzed and all, but even they get it right on this occasion.


On the subject of Tolkien, I found a rather interesting Twitter thread by a Christian LotR fan, disproving the narrative that Christians are suddenly cool with Rowling because she betrayed the transes:

View attachment 4656628
Link, Archive

As if it ever needed disproving, but I've seen so many people claim the Onion's headline was 'straight up facts' that I felt it needed some debunking.
The most hillarious shit in this world is that autistic extremes of polar ideologies always find something they both can hate. Rowling deserves a medal for epic achievement of arousing the scizos from all sides.
 
Funny how All the actors who played evil wizard Nazis or just bad people are the ones not to denounce J.K.

Well alot of the actors who played the heroes stabbed her in the back. Ironic.
With the exception of Tom Felton (Draco), I personally chalked that up to the dissenting actors being much older and therefore less accepting of the current tranny dogma. Tom has more of a live-and-let-live approach and had stated publicly that Rowling's work should be celebrated.

You know what's fucked up? Trans activists actually celebrated Robbie Coltrane (Hagrid)'s death because he defended Rowling.

I feel that since Emma Watson (Hermione) does a lot of political activism causes, by default she's biased towards their views. In contrast, Helena Bonham Carter (Bellatrix) is an activist, but for non-political activist organizations (UNICEF, Smile Train, and Save the Children, to name a few). Harry and Ron's actors are less publicly political, but I think that because they're both in the spotlight as the main actors, they lean towards decrying Rowling. ...Actually, it's most likely less relevant for Harry's actor, since he already has a history of supporting tangentially related lgbt activist groups.

Part of me thinks that half of the reason why the main trio publicly denounce Rowling is because it's a form of self-preservation. Rowling made their careers with the film releases, and continued association with Rowling would sink it permanently. Nobody remembers Emma for the 2017 CGI Beauty the Beast remake, Rupert for Moonwalkers, or Daniel for Guns Akimbo - the public remembers the trio for the Harry Potter series and only the Harry Potter series. Therefore, they have to figurehead the separation of the Harry Potter franchise from the author; they get to keep riding the coattails of their previous acting work while at the same time receiving none of the backlash from fans.

Edit: grammar
 
Last edited:
With the exception of Tom Felton (Draco), I personally chalked that up to the dissenting actors being much older and therefore less accepting of the current tranny dogma. Tom has more of a live-and-let-live approach and had stated publicly that Rowling's work should be celebrated.

You know what's fucked up? Trans activists actually celebrated Robbie Coltrane (Hagrid)'s death because he defended Rowling.

I feel that since Emma Watson (Hermione) does a lot of political activism causes, by default she's biased towards their views. In contrast, Helena Bonham Carter (Bellatrix) is an activist, but for non-political activist organizations (UNICEF, Smile Train, and Save the Children, to name a few). Harry and Ron's actors are less publicly political, but I think that because they're both in the spotlight as the main actors, they lean towards decrying Rowling. ...Actually, it's most likely less relevant for Harry's actor, since he already has a history of supporting tangentially related lgbt activist groups.

Part of me thinks that half of the reason why the main trio publicly denounce Rowling is because it's a form of self-preservation. Rowling made their careers with the film releases, and continued association with Rowling would sink it permanently. Nobody remembers Emma for the 2017 CGI Beauty the Beast remake, Rupert for Moonwalkers, or Daniel for Guns Akimbo - the public only remembers the trio for the Harry Potter series and only the Harry Potter series. Therefore, they have to figurehead the separation of the Harry Potter franchise from the author; they get to keep riding the coattails of their previous acting work while at the same time receiving none of the backlash from fans.
Your being too generous. People have to barely remember who Rupert is. You have to say Ron or the red hair one. Not many people seen the other shit he's been in unlike the other two.
 
The dwarves were not Jewish coded.

The hobbits were, and quite sure Tolkien indirectly admitted that. Hobbits are very isolated, ethnocentric, selfish, and prefer to avoid the lives of men and love to board wealth without directly creating it. Dwarves were never Jewish; they've always been a separate race.

"I'm Jewish so let me tell you how I'm not upset goyim"

Nah she was crying. She courted that audience and they ate her, and she continues to get on her knees and fellate troons in the hope they'll stop.
Have no hate for her, but she is just fucking stupid.

I hate it when people say that they are just playing the game, but they don't share the same opinion with JK, what a faggot answer.

What are JK's opinion anyway, that only women can menstruate, and you don't believe it this??
Then you totally deserve it because you are courting those lunatics. Anyone who can say women aren't the only one menstruating are lunatics and do not deserve your attention.

It's better that you make your stand once and forever cut off those woke audience, and you will get quality ones henceforth.

But let her go on, the more she apologizes, the more brazen they will get, this will not be the last time she gets eaten.
 
I love calling them groomers whenever they trot out that bigot/terf/transphobic line. It gets them so pissed off when you use their tactics against them.
Unless you are on tv or some public spaces to make your case, arguing with them is retarded anyway. I don't want to sperg & power level, but I've seen enough of their presented evidences that are egregious lies, all the fucking time. They are not there to change their mind or yours, they are there to harass and threaten you to comply.

Calling them pedo/groomers is the right way, saves your effort, and they are also terrified of getting those labels, because in their minds you would be scared of being labelled by them too,, hence all the name calling they throw.

TLDR: Do not adopt their made up terms like Transphobic, Terfs etc. Just call them pedo groomers.
 
The latest Cormoran Strike season's final episode came out yesterday in burgerland. It's pretty good and I hope there's more episodes. I don't know how close the show hews to the books, but Robin really seems like an author self-insert with Cormoran her ideal fictitious male. I know there was some bitching about the latest book having a "transphobic" Dressed To Kill type twist, so I can't wait for that to get adapted.
The book that was adapted that season had the “dressed to kill” bit, yet it was minor enough that it was likely removed from the adaptation itself.

However, it would be impossible to “sanitize” the next book in line from the controversial aspects, since its entire thing is about how both political sides have motive for going after an online creator.
 
I will have to track it down, but I actually recall sometime recently Rupert Grint (rons actor) mentioned he would love returning as Ron Weasley for something related to that Cursed Child book and even said Daniel said the same to him, personally. As in, as his friend he mentioned wanting to go back into the role of Harry. Which sort of contradicts most of what I have read of him publicly decrying Rowling but perhaps it was what he thought was a smart idea at the time to not get any of his other work boycotted or some shit, since he's not usually political.
 
Back