𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

For whatever is worth, troonytoons had pulled images and content that was also previously featured from the tranny sideshow thread.

Btw, twitter banned Laura Towker, patriotic alternative, Mark Collette and others. FpxvnjAaMAEvHY9.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halmaz and Vecr
CBC85B89-B083-43D9-B88E-6CD582875057.jpeg
source

I couldn’t care less whether Elon can get Twitter to turn a profit for once, or if he crashes it into the ground. Just being able to watch him fuck with these scum suckers is a type of delight that’s difficult to match.

Pre-Elon Twitter employees are the enemy of the people. If I had a dime for every instance in which I felt sympathy for any of them, I’d be broke.
 
Pre-Elon Twitter employees are the enemy of the people.
"I'll tell you my fellow kiwis, I sure enjoy watching this ultra-ultra wealthy man bully the lower income bracket.

Thankfully while the individuals who previously chose the direction of Twitter, the political powers that be, and the multi-billionaire currently running the company laugh and walk away unscathed or with pockets full of more money than any of us will see in our lifetimes as a reward for the festering social wound they've created, us the proletariat can rejoice in watching their underlings, many of whom were probably emotionally uninvested individuals trying to secure an income and who were just doing what they were told or going along with company culture, lose their income and their families face economic uncertainty.

That's what you get for being affiliated with something I dislike, but not enough to actually have any real control over it."

- Supporter Of The People
 
"I'll tell you my fellow kiwis, I sure enjoy watching this ultra-ultra wealthy man bully the lower income bracket.

Thankfully while the individuals who previously chose the direction of Twitter, the political powers that be, and the multi-billionaire currently running the company laugh and walk away unscathed or with pockets full of more money than any of us will see in our lifetimes as a reward for the festering social wound they've created, us the proletariat can rejoice in watching their underlings, many of whom were probably emotionally uninvested individuals trying to secure an income and who were just doing what they were told or going along with company culture, lose their income and their families face economic uncertainty.

That's what you get for being affiliated with something I dislike, but not enough to actually have any real control over it."

- Supporter Of The People
I don't support "The People". The People are retarded.
 
"I'll tell you my fellow kiwis, I sure enjoy watching this ultra-ultra wealthy man bully the lower income bracket.

Thankfully while the individuals who previously chose the direction of Twitter, the political powers that be, and the multi-billionaire currently running the company laugh and walk away unscathed or with pockets full of more money than any of us will see in our lifetimes as a reward for the festering social wound they've created, us the proletariat can rejoice in watching their underlings, many of whom were probably emotionally uninvested individuals trying to secure an income and who were just doing what they were told or going along with company culture, lose their income and their families face economic uncertainty.

That's what you get for being affiliated with something I dislike, but not enough to actually have any real control over it."

- Supporter Of The People
>twitter employees
>lower income bracket
lol
lmao
the only low income pople at a company like that are the janitors who keep the office clean, and i doubt that's who elon is sacking
 
Juice is here
1677631619910.png

1677631686984.png
1677631831658.png

1677631874863.png
Overview

February 2023

You may not threaten, incite, glorify, or express desire for violence or harm.

Twitter is a place where people can express themselves, learn about what’s happening, and debate global issues. However, healthy conversations can’t thrive when violent speech is used to deliver a message. As a result, we have a zero tolerance policy towards violent speech in order to ensure the safety of our users and prevent the normalization of violent actions.



What is in violation of this policy?

Violent Threats
You may not threaten to inflict physical harm on others, which includes (but is not limited to) threatening to kill, torture, sexually assault, or otherwise hurt someone. This also includes threatening to damage civilian homes and shelters, or infrastructure that is essential to daily, civic, or business activities.

Wishes of Harm

You may not wish, hope, or express desire for harm. This includes (but is not limited to) hoping for others to die, suffer illnesses, tragic incidents, or experience other physically harmful consequences.

Incitement of Violence

You may not incite, promote, or encourage others to commit acts of violence or harm, which includes (but is not limited to) encouraging others to hurt themselves or inciting others to commit atrocity crimes including crimes against humanity, war crimes or genocide. This also includes using coded language (often referred to as "dog whistles") to indirectly incite violence.

Glorification of Violence

You may not glorify, praise, or celebrate acts of violence where harm occurred, which includes (but is not limited to) expressing gratitude that someone experienced physical harm or praising Violent entities and Perpetrators of Violent Attacks. This also includes glorifying animal abuse or cruelty.



What is not a violation of this policy?

We allow expressions of violent speech when there is no clear abusive or violent context, such as (but not limited to) hyperbolic and consensual speech between friends, or during discussion of video games and sporting events.

We also allow certain cases of figures of speech, satire, or artistic expression when the context is expressing a viewpoint rather than instigating actionable violence or harm.

We make sure to evaluate and understand the context behind the conversation before taking action.



What happens if you violate this policy?

In most cases, we will immediately and permanently suspend any account that violates this policy.

For less severe violations, we may instead temporarily lock you out of your account before you can Tweet again. However, if you continue to violate this policy after receiving a warning, your account will be permanently suspended.

We also recognize that conversations regarding certain individuals credibly accused of severe violence may prompt outrage and associated violent speech. In these limited cases, we may take less punitive measures.

If you believe that your account was suspended in error, you can submit an appeal.



Additional resources


Jannying powers
When we take enforcement actions, we may do so either on a specific piece of content (e.g., an individual Tweet or Direct Message) or on an account. We may employ a combination of these options. In some instances, this is because the behavior violates the Twitter Rules. Other times, it may be in response to a valid and properly scoped request from an authorized entity in a given country. Below are some of the enforcement actions that we may take.


Tweet-level enforcement

We take action at the Tweet level to ensure that we are not being overly harsh with an otherwise healthy account that made a mistake and violated our rules. A few of the ways in which we might take action at the Tweet level include:

Labeling a Tweet that may contain disputed or misleading information: Our current misleading information policies cover: synthetic and manipulated media and civic integrity. If we determine a Tweet contains misleading or disputed information per our policies that could lead to harm, we may add a label to the content to provide context and additional information.

Limiting Tweet visibility: This makes content less visible on Twitter, either by making Tweets ineligible for amplification in Top search results and on timelines for users who don’t follow the Tweet author, by downranking Tweets in replies (except when the user follows the Tweet author), and/or excluding Tweets and/or accounts in email or in-product recommendations. Limiting Tweet visibility depends on a number of signals about the nature of the interaction and the type of the content.

Requiring Tweet removal: When we determine that a Tweet violated the Twitter Rules, we require the violator to remove it before they can Tweet again. We send an email notification to the violator identifying the Tweet(s) in violation and which policies have been violated. They will then need to go through the process of removing the violating Tweet or appealing our review if they believe we made an error.

Hiding a violating Tweet while awaiting its removal: In the interim period between when Twitter takes enforcement action and the person removes the Tweet, we hide that Tweet from public view and will replace the original content with a notice stating that the Tweet is no longer available because it violated our Rules. Additionally, this notice will be available for 14 days after the Tweet is removed.


Where this notice is available:

The details page of the Tweet in violation on Twitter for iOS and Android, and twitter.com.
The profile page of the account in violation on Twitter for iOS and Android, and twitter.com.

Where this notice is not available:

Areas outside of profiles and Tweet details pages, such as Home timeline, notifications, and search of any Twitter client.

Notice of public interest exception: In rare cases, we may determine that it is in the public interest for a Tweet that would otherwise be in violation of our rules to remain accessible on our service. Learn more about the public interest exception.

When we make such an exception, we’ll place the Tweet behind a notice explaining the exception and giving you the option to view the Tweet if you wish.


When applying the notice, we’ll also take the following actions to reduce the Tweet’s visibility on our service:

We’ll turn off engagements like replies, Retweets, and likes. If you want to talk about it, you can still Quote Tweet.
We won’t show any engagement counts on the Tweet (e.g. number of likes, replies), but any prior engagements can be undone (e.g. unliked, Retweets undone).
Any previous replies will not be viewable within the Tweet details.

Additionally, in order to minimize potential harm, Tweets that are placed behind the notice will not be available in the following areas of Twitter:
Tweets in the “Top Tweets” Home timeline
Safe search
Recommendations via push and Notifications tab
Email and text recommendations
Live event timeline
Explore tab

Direct Message-level enforcement

Stopping conversations between a reported violator and the reporter’s account: In a private Direct Message conversation, when a participant reports the other person, we will stop the violator from sending messages to the person who reported them. The conversation will also be removed from the reporter's inbox. However, if the reporter decides to continue to send Direct Messages to the violator, the conversation will resume.

Placing a Direct Message behind a notice: In a group Direct Message conversation, the violating Direct Message may be placed behind a notice to ensure no one else in the group can see it again.

Account-level enforcement

We take action at the account level if we determine that a person has violated the Twitter Rules in a particularly egregious way, or has repeatedly violated them even after receiving notifications from us.

Requiring media or profile edits: If an account’s profile or media content is not compliant with our policies, we may make it temporarily unavailable and require that the violator edit the media or information in their profile to come into compliance. We also explain which policy their profile or media content has violated.
Placing an account in read-only mode: If it seems like an otherwise healthy account is in the middle of an abusive episode, we might temporarily make their account read-only, limiting their ability to Tweet, Retweet, or Like content until calmer heads prevail. The person can read their timelines and will only be able to send Direct Messages to their followers.

When an account is in read-only mode, others will still be able to see and engage with the account. The duration of this enforcement action can range from 12 hours to 7 days, depending on the nature of the violation.

Verifying account ownership: To ensure that violators do not abuse the anonymity we offer and harass others on the platform, we may require the account owner to verify ownership with a phone number or email address. This also helps us identify violators who are operating multiple accounts for abusive purposes and take action on such accounts. Note that when an account has been locked pending completion of a challenge (such as being required to provide a phone number), it is removed from follower counts, Retweets, and likes until it provides a phone number.
Permanent suspension: This is our most severe enforcement action. Permanently suspending an account will remove it from global view, and the violator will not be allowed to create new accounts. When we permanently suspend an account, we notify people that they have been suspended for abuse violations, and explain which policy or policies they have violated and which content was in violation.
Violators can appeal permanent suspensions if they believe we made an error. They can do this through the platform interface or by filing a report. Upon appeal, if we find that a suspension is valid, we respond to the appeal with information on the policy that the account has violated.

Actions we may take against non-violating content

Placing a Tweet behind a notice: We may place some forms of sensitive media like adult content or graphic violence behind an interstitial advising viewers to be aware that they will see sensitive media if they click through. This allows us to identify potentially sensitive content that some people may not wish to see. Learn more about how to control whether you see sensitive media.

Withholding a Tweet based on age: We restrict views of specific forms of sensitive media such as adult content for viewers who are under 18 or viewers who do not include a birth date on their profile. Adult content is any consensually produced and distributed media that is pornographic or intended to cause sexual arousal. Age-restricted content will be placed behind interstitials, which you can learn about here.

Withholding a Tweet or account in a country: We may withhold access to certain content in a particular country if we receive a valid and properly scoped request from an authorized entity in that country. We also clearly indicate within the product when content has been withheld. Read more about country withheld content.

What is Perpetrators of Violent Attacks / NO manifesto on twitter?
1677632282137.png

kekeke
Overview

February 2023

We will remove any accounts maintained by individual perpetrators of terrorist, violent extremist, or mass violent attacks, as well as any accounts glorifying the perpetrator(s), or dedicated to sharing manifestos and/or third party links where related content is hosted. We may also remove Tweets disseminating manifestos or other content produced by perpetrators.

We want Twitter to be a place where people can find reliable information and express themselves freely and safely without feeling burdened by unhealthy content. In the aftermath of terrorist, violent extremist and mass violent attacks, we know many want to express compassion for victims, condemn the attacks and/or the perpetrators, and discuss how these incidents impact people and their communities. Some might also wish to share manifestos or other similar content produced by the attack’s apparent perpetrator or an accomplice, either to express outrage or condemnation of the perpetrator’s possible motives.

The violence that these perpetrators engage in, and the rationale they outline in manifestos or other means that normalizes hatred and discrimination, may further jeopardize the physical safety and well-being of those who are targeted, and has the potential to inspire future attacks. Exposure to these materials may also cause harm to those that view them.

We believe the hateful and discriminatory views promoted in content produced by perpetrators are harmful for society and their dissemination should be limited in order to prevent perpetrators from publicizing their message. As a result we may remove Tweets that include manifestos or other similar material produced by perpetrators, even if the context is not abusive. However, we may allow newsworthy content if it does not:

Convey suggestions about how to arm oneself and choose targets;
Share hateful slogans, symbols, memes, and/or hateful conspiracy theories;
Outline the perpetrator’s ideology, tactical choices, and/or plan of attack.
What is a manifesto?

We define a manifesto as a statement by a perpetrator outlining their motivation, views, or intent to engage in a violent attack. A manifesto can be in the form of a written document, social media post, audio recording, video, external link, or letter or other forms of content. It may be shared in the aftermath, or at any period before a violent attack. A manifesto can be linked to the event through a statement of warning or intent.

Who are the individual perpetrators of terrorist, violent extremist, and mass violent attacks?

Violent attacks claimed by a violent organization or by a member of such organizations are covered under our Violent and Hateful Entitites policy. We do not require that a person have been confirmed as members of terrorist organizations or other violent and hateful entities, nor that they have any official affiliation with any group, organization, or ideology, for us to enforce on content under this aspect of our policies.
What is in violation of this policy?

Under this policy, we will permanently suspend accounts belonging to apparent individual perpetrators of terrorist, violent extremist, and mass violent attacks, as well as accounts dedicated to the sharing of harmful and violent content associated with the perpetrators or the violent attack.

Additionally, you may not Tweet any of the following:

Manifestos and other content created by perpetrators

We may remove content containing manifestos and other content created by individual perpetrators or their accomplices. Violations can occur via Tweets, Spaces, images, and videos, including live video. Examples of content that we may action under this policy include, but are not limited to:

Sharing or linking full-length manifestos, regardless of context
Any Tweets containing excerpt(s) of a reproduced manifesto (edited or sliced) or of the original manifesto, except when shared in a newsworthy context.
Regardless of context, it is always prohibited to share any of the following:


Excerpt(s) that convey suggestions about how to arm oneself and choose targets.
Excerpt(s) that share hateful slogans, symbols, memes, and/or hateful conspiracy theories such as the Great Replacement Theory.
Excerpt(s) outlining the perpetrator’s ideology, tactical choices, and/or plan of attack.
Sharing perpetrator-generated media related to the attack in all instances. This includes, but is not limited to:


Media filmed by the perpetrator of the attack
Memes, stickers, or graffiti shared and/or produced by the perpetrator
Media of the weapons utilized in the attack
Other perpetrator-generated content that is not associated with the violent attack but that is specific to the promotion or support of violence.
Bystander-generated content of the attack as the attack is taking place, such as content that displays a moment of the assault or death, dead bodies, content that identifies victims, or content that depicts the perpetrator(s) conducting the attack.
Multimedia content, URLs, and hashtags

We may put a sensitive media interstitial over some media. The interstitial places images and videos behind a warning message that needs to be acknowledged before the media can be viewed. Using this feature means that people who don’t want to see sensitive media can avoid it, or make an informed decision before they choose to view it. The types of media we may interstitial include, but are not limited to:

Media depicting a perpetrator
Excerpts of the attacker’s manifesto that are shared as part of a news report
We may label URLs linking directly to documents believed to be a manifesto to prevent these URLs from being shared on Twitter.

We may denylist hashtags identifying perpetrators on trends to reduce the visibility of perpetrators’ identities, as well as all hashtags that are used uniquely to surface manifestos.

What is not a violation of this policy?


Accounts that belong to
Bystanders who happened to be close to the violent attack and/or managed to stop the attack, for example someone who shot the perpetrator(s)
Perpetrators whose convictions were overturned after a not guilty verdict
Content depicting any of the following:
The use of force by law enforcement and military personnel, as part of the scope of their official functions, that resulted in casualties;
Violence against military personnel and law enforcement;
Human rights abuses
Violent attacks that are part of an armed conflict
Violence used as a means of self defense
Violent attacks, where there is probable doubt about the intent behind the attack
Cases of vandalism and attacks resulting in damage to essential infrastructure
Sharing a few sentences from the manifesto(s), either in a newsworthy context or to bring more awareness to the rise of hate or violence towards a specific group. For example: “the shooter said he wants to eradicate x group” is not actionable under this policy.
Who can report violations of this policy?


Anyone can report potential violations of this policy, whether they have a Twitter account or not.
What happens if I violate this policy?


The consequences for violating our violent events policy depends on the severity of the violation. Accounts maintained by perpetrators of terrorist, violent extremist, or mass violent attacks will be permanently suspended. As described above, we may also remove content containing manifestos and other content created by perpetrators or their accomplices.

In addition, we will also remove content that violates our policies regarding Violent Speech or other parts of the Twitter Rules.
 
Last edited:
>in response to @Terrifik (site isn't letting me quote you for some reason)
on one hand, if this is enforced properly, the retards on twitter who threaten to kill people over typos might have a chance to chill out and the platform will be genuinely better off for it
on the other hand, this probably won't be enforced properly because those who attempt to control speech always do so exclusively with their biases in mind
will lurk for results regardless
 
"I'll tell you my fellow kiwis, I sure enjoy watching this ultra-ultra wealthy man bully the lower income bracket.

Thankfully while the individuals who previously chose the direction of Twitter, the political powers that be, and the multi-billionaire currently running the company laugh and walk away unscathed or with pockets full of more money than any of us will see in our lifetimes as a reward for the festering social wound they've created, us the proletariat can rejoice in watching their underlings, many of whom were probably emotionally uninvested individuals trying to secure an income and who were just doing what they were told or going along with company culture, lose their income and their families face economic uncertainty.

That's what you get for being affiliated with something I dislike, but not enough to actually have any real control over it."

- Supporter Of The People
>blah blah blah blah
I'm sure Musk really cares you're this butthurt. The fact you can't laugh at this crap pile burning shows how autistic you are.
 
Back