Furry Fandom and Drama General

omori said:
Ah this guy.

He used to go by MightyRedBird around 2017-2019 and was a mod on the fucking Angry Birds amino (yes the mobile game from 2009). I can’t recall what happened exactly but I think he was loud about his Trump nonsense in a community full of children and autists and was tossed out. Shortly after that he switched over to furry.

According to this post from a local meet of his that banned him his name is Daniel Dixon.
Click to expand...

Daniel Dixon
DOB: November 20, 1999
Telephone: +1 808 233 8712
Address: 87-118 Auyong Homestead Rd, Waianae, HI 96792

Parents: Thomas & Olga Dixon
MRW.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: TroonsDid911, Cat Phuckers, omori and 1 other person
1677742331270.png

Just caught wind of the purpleyeenba situation, which is managing to piss the hell out of furries.

Here's the quick version: Purple is some gender special 16-year-old furry who obsessed over some furry content creator going by Dander Woolf. Now it's important to note here that Dander certainly isn't a saint and apparently got into some drama himself, but that's another situation I'm not going to get into at the moment because it's otherwise irrelevant to this. What is important is that at some point, Purple tried to get into contact with Dander, and Dander thought Purple was enough of a nuisance to be blocked.
1677742958287.png
1677743668302.png

archive

1677743765952.png

archive

Purple decides that the best course of action from here is to abuse the DMCA feature on Youtube, taking down Dander's videos as well as videos that mentioned Dander's shitty behavior in any capacity. Purple essentially tried to blackmail creators and says "tell Dander to unblock me or I'll use the DMCA info to dox you". Purple is essentially told to fuck off.
1677744245334.png
1677744264495.png
1677744271482.png
1677744281280.png
1677744288066.png

archive

Not learning their lesson, Purple continues DMCA-ing videos and publicly bragging about doing so, all the while schizo-posting about Dander.
1677744431959.png
1677744455994.png
1677744678069.png
1677744815661.png
1677744824280.png
1677744834914.png
1677744843727.png

archive archive archive

Purple eventually gets a Twitter ban for their constant harassment, only to ban-evade on a new account.
1677745137778.png
1677745203214.png

archive archive

Purple then decided to up their DMCA abuse, spamming DMCA at seemingly random furry drama YouTubers with the demand of "tell Dander to unblock me or I'm going to abuse more DMCAs".
1677745372682.png

archive

So to summarize so far, this Purple yeen person gets blocked by another furry, then decides the best course of action is to send fraudulent DMCA takedowns on any YouTuber who discussed furry drama, seemingly at random. And by any, I really mean ANY. Any video that appeared in the search, they DMCA'd. Purple then claimed they would reverse the DMCAs if the YouTubers took their side.

Unsurprisingly, furry commentary YouTubers are not your personal army, and people began to criticize Purple for their behavior.
1677745535371.png
1677745573756.png


1677745605569.png
1677745614765.png
1677745624450.png
1677745635279.png
1677745645904.png
1677745658159.png
1677745668395.png
1677745703272.png
1677745709130.png

archive

reactions from NovelyJpg and LagoVirt:
1677747325480.png
1677747383226.png

archive archive

Purple also uploaded two videos on their youtube channel recording themself filing the fraudulent takedowns, inexplicably interspaced with Roblox machinima and shitty music blaring over the whole thing.


1677748028840.png

archive

And that's about where we are right now. The last time I've seen DMCA abuse at a level like this was during the Alex Mauer fiasco from 2017, where he tried extorting his employer for more money over a game's soundtrack he worked on, and was told no, so he responded by flagging any video that mentioned the game in any capacity. Alex was basically sued into oblivion for wasting the court's time. Purple seems to be abusing Youtube's lack of human moderation in a similar manner to Alex, and it's only a matter of time until they get into legal trouble for it.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Humbert Humbert, Da Capo and 44 others
Equal Rights for Androids said:
Furries in stories rarely have actual meaning to the plot. Even Zootopia could have replaced the animals with humans and few things in the plot would have changed, specifically because the plot didn't require furries to be integral in the story. If you can replace a furry character with a human and things in the story don't really change, the character didn't need to be a furry in the first place. It's the same thing with non-straight characters. There's no reason to bring up them being gay (outside of mentioning "she came with her wife to the party" if it's not integral to the plot. Furries should not have a place in study of animals in fiction. Furries are a result of degenerate humans.
Click to expand...
I’ve been saying this for years, except the “don’t need to be furries” part. If they can be swapped for humans with no changes to the plot, just admit it’s just because the creator wanted furries. There’s nothing wrong with admitting that or adding furries to a vanity project. The creator getting offended if people suggest it was not for anything other than that is silly. It’s fine to put what one likes into their creation.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Bungus Scrungus, Da Capo, Aspiring Artist and 10 others
Toolbox said:
@Pinball 2000 Isn't purple effectively doxing himself every time he sends a dmca? Like full address and contact information?
Click to expand...
The person who files a DMCA against a YouTube video usually doesn't have their info shared with the video creator unless YouTube's staff find the video as fair use and decide to tell the creator about the DMCA, but not delete the video. If the claim goes through, most you'll get is the name or alias of the claimant and the reason they gave for the claim.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Da Capo, Aspiring Artist, Fëanor Curufinwë and 10 others
I find it interesting with the PurpleYeenBa situation, they’re going after people that have gone after Dander Woolf.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: std::string
John Furrman said:
I’ve been saying this for years, except the “don’t need to be furries” part. If they can be swapped for humans with no changes to the plot, just admit it’s just because the creator wanted furries. There’s nothing wrong with admitting that or adding furries to a vanity project. The creator getting offended if people suggest it was not for anything other than that is silly. It’s fine to put what one likes into their creation.
Click to expand...
I mean, if you applied the same standard to a lot of things, they wouldn't pass. Star Wars could have as easily been set in a Tolkienesque universe with no change to the plot. It didn't have to be sci-fi. The Lion King could have had the same plot if, say, everyone was a human and it took place in medieval Denmark. Ahem, ahem.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Aspiring Artist, Fungible penis, Faceless Whore and 9 others
As a pretty swift update to the Purple situation, it looks like someone at Youtube finally decided to step in, telling Purple they need to provide actual proof of the DMCA or they will ban their account. Purple responded with another shitty Roblox video with loud music blaring over it.
1677814045670.png


Here's an archive:




Just so you don't have to sit through this garbage, I took screenshots of the video as well:
1677814409449.png
1677814425652.png
1677814457047.png
1677814493740.png
1677814537902.png
1677814567193.png
1677814593827.png
1677814622068.png
1677814667628.png
1677814683644.png


If this Purple person really is 16, I genuinely can't tell if they're completely ignorant of the fact they could get in legal trouble for DMCA abuse, or if they're just trying to be an edgelord.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Da Capo, NoReturn and 17 others
Pinball 2000 said:
As a pretty swift update to the Purple situation, it looks like someone at Youtube finally decided to step in, telling Purple they need to provide actual proof of the DMCA or they will ban their account. Purple responded with another shitty Roblox video with loud music blaring over it.
View attachment 4683612

Here's an archive:
View attachment 4683616



Just so you don't have to sit through this garbage, I took screenshots of the video as well:
View attachment 4683649View attachment 4683665View attachment 4683672View attachment 4683680View attachment 4683682View attachment 4683690View attachment 4683693View attachment 4683705View attachment 4683721View attachment 4683725

If this Purple person really is 16, I genuinely can't tell if they're completely ignorant of the fact they could get in legal trouble for DMCA abuse, or if they're just trying to be an edgelord.
Click to expand...
I'm convinced this is a troll
 
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: BohrokSwarms, Aspiring Artist, Klamimera and 6 others
1677889494478.png

It would appear that Purple's flagging spree is still in full force a couple of days later. I didn't even bother to watch this one, but I mirrored it in case this gets taken down:

The situation has managed to make at least 4 separate furry commentary channels make videos about Purple's abuse of the DMCA system. I've attached copies of the videos in case Purple DMCAs any of these too.
 

Attachments

  • purpleyeenbean - Literal Child Abusing Youtube Copyright (1080p_30fps_H264-128kbit_AAC).mp4
    10.4 MB
  • Minor uses Youtube to DOX me!_ (720p_30fps_H264-192kbit_AAC).mp4
    83.1 MB
  • PurpleYEEN_ Copyright struck +17 videos (and me!) (1080p_30fps_H264-128kbit_AAC).mp4
    16.1 MB
  • Yet Another Copyright Issue on YouTube (720p_24fps_H264-192kbit_AAC).mp4
    45.4 MB
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
Reactions: Humbert Humbert, Da Capo, TroonsDid911 and 6 others
Pinball 2000 said:
View attachment 4691734
It would appear that Purple's flagging spree is still in full force a couple of days later. I didn't even bother to watch this one, but I mirrored it in case this gets taken down:
View attachment 4691802

The situation has managed to make at least 4 separate furry commentary channels make videos about Purple's abuse of the DMCA system. I've attached copies of the videos in case Purple DMCAs any of these too.
Click to expand...
Someone I know had a theory about this person. It's most likely an underaged zoophile edgelord (maybe groomed by Sappho or Zrcalo) who is doing this.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cat Phuckers and Pinball 2000
Pinball 2000 said:
As a pretty swift update to the Purple situation, it looks like someone at Youtube finally decided to step in, telling Purple they need to provide actual proof of the DMCA or they will ban their account. Purple responded with another shitty Roblox video with loud music blaring over it.
View attachment 4683612

Here's an archive:
View attachment 4683616



Just so you don't have to sit through this garbage, I took screenshots of the video as well:
View attachment 4683649View attachment 4683665View attachment 4683672View attachment 4683680View attachment 4683682View attachment 4683690View attachment 4683693View attachment 4683705View attachment 4683721View attachment 4683725

If this Purple person really is 16, I genuinely can't tell if they're completely ignorant of the fact they could get in legal trouble for DMCA abuse, or if they're just trying to be an edgelord.
Click to expand...
I'm late but really interested in the dumpster fire Purple has created but I have to ask a genuine question. Is Purple genuinely an autistic teenage stan? I don't know why but everything seems too elaborate and too autistic, the mockery videos alone seem like some sort of joke or something with the gay nightcore music and roblox game chat being used to "talk" in the videos.

I haven't really seen all the videos and other shit just yet but Purple comes off as some sort of elaborate gay ops from what I'm seeing so far but that could be my hope in humanity not wanting to believe a fucking minor is abusing DMCAs because of a fucking twitter block.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rozzy, Crossed Animal and Pinball 2000
Opposite of a Winner said:
I'm late but really interested in the dumpster fire Purple has created but I have to ask a genuine question. Is Purple genuinely an autistic teenage stan? I don't know why but everything seems too elaborate and too autistic, the mockery videos alone seem like some sort of joke or something with the gay nightcore music and roblox game chat being used to "talk" in the videos.

I haven't really seen all the videos and other shit just yet but Purple comes off as some sort of elaborate gay ops from what I'm seeing so far but that could be my hope in humanity not wanting to believe a fucking minor is abusing DMCAs because of a fucking twitter block.
Click to expand...
It was my assumption that this was some form of gayop attached to the situation between furries and Ruben Sim. Although, this is solely based on the shitty Roblox videos and the timing between both.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Da Capo, Toolbox, Cat Phuckers and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back