Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[Notorious AGP]

Tranny's gotta gun:

Pinko Scum (@kayla_denker) / Twitter

archived 7 Mar 2023 09:38:16 UTC

archive.ph

 

[monstrous bubo]

Tranny's gotta gun:

View attachment 4719692
View attachment 4719700
View attachment 4719704

Pinko Scum on Twitter: "While advocating just for trans people to "ar…

archived 5 Mar 2023 21:19:06 UTC

archive.ph

Not hysterical in the least

 

[sheepworldvizor]

Tranny's gotta gun:

View attachment 4719692
View attachment 4719700
View attachment 4719804
View attachment 4719704

Pinko Scum (@kayla_denker) / Twitter

archived 7 Mar 2023 09:38:16 UTC

archive.ph

Armchair psychology: I think they fantasize about killing people as a diversion from killing themselves. Trooning is a negation of self, a systematic attempt at the destruction of born reality and replacement with fantasy.
Of course they reach for guns, the ultimate phallic object, because in the core of their dingy, meagre souls, they know what they really are.

 

[LateNightMuffin]

Armchair psychology: I think they fantasize about killing people as a diversion from killing themselves

I think a lot of them fantasize about killing women because they hate women.

 

[Lucille Bluth]

I'm honestly shocked that Jamie Raines / JammiDodger doesn't have her own thread in this forum. They seem to have a wealth of things you could laugh at. Although her YouTube videos have seemed to devolve to just reading Reddit shitposts.

Her Twitter must be a goldmine if she's posting shit like this:


Just yesterday, they had a whole video poking fun at "men writing women". Odd coming from a woman pretending to be a man and spreading lies that "men" can get pregnant.

I've always had a theory that troons and their handmaidens are obsessed with calling women and men "cis" because deep down, they know the term "trans-man/woman" is "othering" to them. And their narcissistic minds don't want to be "alienated" like the freakshows they are.

A few days ago, they made a video about "Cis straights" trying not to be troonphobic. At around the 4 minute mark she goes into some word salad about a "she" using "he" pronouns being a "he" and no longer a "she".

Since her wife is from a Muslim family and of South Asian ancestry, I've always wondered if the family eventually "accepted" her relationship, because according to her, she is in a "straight" relationship. IIRC, the Persians or some West Asian shithole encourage their gays to become troons.
Link. Archive.

She has a recurring series on her channel called "Pointlessly Gendered", where she complains about things being "needlessly gendered". Yet again, ironic coming from a troon.

 

[sheepworldvizor]

I think a lot of them fantasize about killing women because they hate women.

Kinda everyone does.

 

[Oliver Onions]

When troons are trying to explain gender dysphoria, they always use this example "Imagine if one day you woke up as an opposite sex. What would you feel? What would you identify as?"
View attachment 4713790
The answer is that most people would probably go about with their life and they'd accept that they're opposite sex after they adjusted with it. Because normal people are not so obsessed with gender identity like those loonies. Why is it so hard for them to understand?

In the exact hypothetical scenario laid out I'd just get myself transformed back into what I originally was. Ctrl+Z, problem solved, home in time for tea.

Why are troons so bad at analogies/metaphors?

 

[Miriam Margoyles]

In the exact hypothetical scenario laid out I'd just get myself transformed back into what I originally was. Ctrl+Z, problem solved, home in time for tea.

Why are troons so bad at analogies/metaphors?

My question is why are so many troon arguments entirely based on bullshit hypotheticals that cannot and will not ever happen?

I watched that little Breadtube creep LonerBox debate King Critical the other day and he was acting like he totally fucking owned the TERF chud with facts and logic by presenting the argument, "Well, what if we both switched bodies, so your mind was in my body and my mind was in yours? Would you still be King Critical? Would I still be LonerBox?"

I like King Critical, but he was way too generous to that argument and it was embarrassing to try and watch him attempt to argue it in good faith, when what he should have done is turned around and said: "We don't live in 'Freaky Friday', LonerBox, you monumental bellend."

 

[Notorious AGP]

FtMs and masochism. Name a more iconic duo:

What’s your guys opinion when a trans guy has a feminisation/sissy fe…

archived 7 Mar 2023 12:15:49 UTC

archive.is

You think I would have learned by now to not expect better from TIFs. Being a woman isn't a performance, ffs:

 

[Oliver Onions]

My question is why are so many troon arguments entirely based on bullshit hypotheticals that cannot and will not ever happen?

I watched that little Breadtube creep LonerBox debate King Critical the other day and he was acting like he totally fucking owned the TERF chud with facts and logic by presenting the argument, "Well, what if we both switched bodies, so your mind was in my body and my mind was in yours? Would you still be King Critical? Would I still be LonerBox?"

I like King Critical, but he was way too generous to that argument and it was embarrassing to try and watch him attempt to argue it in good faith, when what he should have done is turned around and said: "We don't live in 'Freaky Friday', LonerBox, you monumental bellend."

I'm sure there's some pretentious Latin term for this fallacy, (reducto ad absurdum, maybe, or is that a Harry Potter spell?) where you keep proposing more and more ludicrous scenarios until your opponent is too bewildered to go on, but the more I see it it just comes across like a really weird parody of Monty Python's 'what have the Roman's ever done for us' sketch.

"Okay, so if we could 3D print a female skeleton and replace each bone in my body, rebuild the flesh and organs like Terminator so I had all the physical components, functions and proportions of a woman, if we could recode my DNA to be female, retune my vocal chords to have a woman's voice, wipe my memory and replace it with X years lived experience as a woman...then would you call me a woman?"

 

[Miriam Margoyles]

OK, for real, how is this shit right here...

Tranny's gotta gun:


View attachment 4719700

...Any different to when, back in the day, nerdy beta male geeks on the Internet would do this shit right here?



This is the same behaviour.

 

[PyrrhicRustle]

I'm sure there's some pretentious Latin term for this fallacy, (reducto ad absurdum, maybe, or is that a Harry Potter spell?) where you keep proposing more and more ludicrous scenarios until your opponent is too bewildered to go on, but the more I see it it just comes across like a really weird parody of Monty Python's 'what have the Roman's ever done for us' sketch.

"Okay, so if we could 3D print a female skeleton and replace each bone in my body, rebuild the flesh and organs like Terminator so I had all the physical components, functions and proportions of a woman, if we could recode my DNA to be female, retune my vocal chords to have a woman's voice, wipe my memory and replace it with X years lived experience as a woman...then would you call me a woman?"

The Tranny of Theseus?

 

[Oliver Onions]

The Tranny of Theseus?

I was thinking the Ship of She-seus.

 

[Mayor Cody Travers]

OK, for real, how is this shit right here...



...Any different to when, back in the day, nerdy beta male geeks on the Internet would do this shit right here?

View attachment 4720785

This is the same behaviour.

Never thought I would miss these kinds of losers but here we are. We need them to come back into consciousness to defend m’ladies honor and cut up the trannies with their thousand-folded katana or something.

 

[Shakespeare]

My question is why are so many troon arguments entirely based on bullshit hypotheticals that cannot and will not ever happen?

What else do they have?

 

[AMHOLIO]

Easily solved with... survey says; Anarcho-Communism! Shocker! :Wow:

But who decides how vital it is to produce? And how much we can spare/need? And how said other people get it first? And so on, and so on, and tard on...

, so first, we assume a can opener an endless cost-free supply of HRT. Now, onto the simple cost-free global distribution network

My guess? Cis white slaves. They had their time in the sun, now it's time to become the backbone slaves of the troon empire.



@Larry Trainor

She'd look really good if she stopped LARPing as a man.

That's it. You accidentally pointed out why she doesn't want to be a woman or teen girl: even small complements like this that allude to womanhood or looks or being valued visually that isn't in her control likely set her off. She doesn't want to be anyone visually appealing except to those who she likes or trust, and even then it's likely hard for her.

It's so innocuous but I remember TiFs breaking down at this because they are terrified their value will always be with their looks and their looks are what attracted the abuse in the first place (in their head) so it's a cascade of negative thinking and horrible feelings. It's hard to climb out of and I hope she becomes more at peace with herself one day.

What if I woke up tomorrow 50 feet tall? What if I woke up tomorrow as a turnip? What if I woke up tomorrow and I was on the Starship Enterprise? FFS.

They watch and read too much isekai media and are so used to fantastical scenarios that they don't think of real ones is my guess. Go outside reason #3048.

What they mean is half of cis women aren’t fuckable because fuckable is how they define a woman.

Sometimes anti trans and TERFs give narrow definitions of visually passing as a woman ("no woman has a shoe size over 10, no gorl is over 5'8", no woman has a harsh jawline") and instead of thinking with the broad brainset of "this is a rule of thumb", they take that shit literally and run with it as far as they can to make those types look stupid.

But truthfully, if a troon says that he passes better than a woman, it means he's saying he's prettier than her which even if on the 1 in a million chance her face is FUBAR, notes nothing more than they have a more aesthetically pleasing visage. Of course, this doesn't indicate moral purity, intelligence, reason, or anything else, they just want an easy win ( ) because what they say goes, not you stupid fucking roastie.

Armchair psychology: I think they fantasize about killing people as a diversion from killing themselves.

While Latenightmuffin pointed to the obvious answer, I think they also fantasize about killing people because they want power and are too stupid/emotionally stunted to acquire it through a skill or something. It boost their ego to think about it since it shows they're physically superior. Or they just like hurting people because of the power high and they think it's funny.

My question is why are so many troon arguments entirely based on bullshit hypotheticals that cannot and will not ever happen?

Because they can't think of things that actually will happen and can't talk the science without seeing how limited it is, if they can even find good ones to support their arguments. If they can even understand the science of transgenderism (what little there is) too.

wipe my memory and replace it with X years lived experience as a woman...then would you call me a woman?"

They want to know which scientific discoveries they need to invest in to FINALLY become the woman/man/enby of their dreams. WHEN WILL YOU ACCEPT ME??? They're trying to break down sex so that it's mutable and play-dough like, and want you to see that. They also want all the hoops they go through and all the things that they do to validate themselves to be justified, so that if you spend all your exp & skill points into SRS, hormone therapy, and mimicking a gender, you become it like you would a profession. This is obviously not how it works but damn, don't say that.


Honestly for some of the most complex scenarios I'd still call them their birth gender out of spite because it would be hilarious.

 

[AssignedEva]

I'm sure there's some pretentious Latin term for this fallacy, (reducto ad absurdum, maybe, or is that a Harry Potter spell?) where you keep proposing more and more ludicrous scenarios until your opponent is too bewildered to go on, but the more I see it it just comes across like a really weird parody of Monty Python's 'what have the Roman's ever done for us' sketch.

"Okay, so if we could 3D print a female skeleton and replace each bone in my body, rebuild the flesh and organs like Terminator so I had all the physical components, functions and proportions of a woman, if we could recode my DNA to be female, retune my vocal chords to have a woman's voice, wipe my memory and replace it with X years lived experience as a woman...then would you call me a woman?"

They're trying to come up with so extravagant a scenario that they obtain any form of concession - "ok in that impossible scenario I guess" so they can pull the classic tactic of "Aha you concede sex isn't immutable, and therefore if it isn't immutable you've just got a subjectively high threshold for its mutability. Argument defeated.".

It's kinda like the old joke -

"Would you sleep with me for £50 million?"
"I'd consider it."
"Would you sleep with me for £5?"
"Of course not, what sort of woman do you take me for?"
"My dear, we've already established what sort of woman you are, we're just negotiating your price".

Thankfully this sort of tactic rarely convinces pragmatic normies - epistemological philosophy tends to be met with people going "yeah but that's not real, is it?". It's just showboating so the seals in the audience can clap along.

 

[monstrous bubo]

While Latenightmuffin pointed to the obvious answer, I think they also fantasize about killing people because they want power and are too stupid/emotionally stunted to acquire it through a skill or something. It boost their ego to think about it since it shows they're physically superior. Or they just like hurting people because of the power high and they think it's funny.

just to chuck another reason in here: some are drama queens. If every slight is LITERAL GENOCIDE, then killing evil cis terven scum is just self-defence. They are the heroes of their own story, and some write a script in which they larp as embattled brave trans heroes fighting for their lives. Think that makes farmers the walking dead.

 

[Oliver Onions]

They're trying to come up with so extravagant a scenario that they obtain any form of concession - "ok in that impossible scenario I guess" so they can pull the classic tactic of "Aha you concede sex isn't immutable, and therefore if it isn't immutable you've just got a subjectively high threshold for its mutability. Argument defeated.".

This is exactly why I say the only winning move is not to play. No matter how accurately you define the model, they'll just keep adding more and more caveats and pulling one-in-a-million medical marvels out their ass to say your model doesn't match every instance so therefore it's useless.

Luckily, as you say, most people are able to recognise this disingenuous garbage for what it is, I just wish more people would start ignoring them instead of engaging their bad faith bullshit, but I appreciate that can be difficult when faced with such glaringly stupid arguments.

 

[AMHOLIO]

I just wish more people would start ignoring them instead of engaging their bad faith bullshit, but I appreciate that can be difficult when faced with such glaringly stupid arguments.

To be fair, what do normies say when someone starts talking about the gender equivalent of the time cube?