Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 77 18.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.7%

  • Total voters
    418
One of the really unsafe things is working on cars and reaching around car batteries with a ring on. Or doing any kind of electrical work. Also anyone doing welding really needs to take the ring off. Among other things, you can get really badly burnt by a ring.
None of that applies to Nick of course.
As my old (RIP) air conditioner teacher told us, “Whenever you’re working around electricity, anything metal, keys, necklaces, giant belt buckles, etc, need to come off. However, when it comes to your wedding ring, you have to decide if the electricity or your wife is more hazardous to your health.”
 
I don't know if the viballdo is a meme or real.
it's real
baldoo.png
 
That's not how that works. You don't have to verbally express disagreement to disagree with something and not verbally expressing disagreement does not mean you agree.
it was clearer than that I think, I posted the stream on an edit, also I just remember they also called to "let locals know" and a lot of cheeky stuff like "woow rules are being broken" and let's hope locals doesn't find out.
If you want to laugh it's ok, but if you go after a dude's income and then your own demise happens it's all on you.
I don't care about anyone here, but I really hate gay ops and Chudbere specially because of how annoying of a jimwalker she was and also trying to keep her 20 view show relevant here in the farms chat
 
Hasn't he talked about doing MDMA? I can't think of anywhere in the world that doing MDMA is legal -- outside of perhaps the occasional research study.

Even in the Netherlands. Law enforcement might not give much of a fuck but it certainly remains illegal there.
He definitely has talked about doing MDMA. At least in his locals, I'm not sure about live on stream.

As far as the drugs in other countries, I believe that was in reference to shrooms in Jamaica
 
it was either Claire or Rand, and both agree to the statements, but for god's sake I don't want to ever listen to that fat cunt, specially an almost 6 hours stream and now that she is dead on the internet.
Yeah, I don't think anything Rand says really counts against her. In my experience, nobody seems to GAF what Rand thinks 99% of the time. In fact, she basically committed to not having him on again after his constant drunken tangents that few seem to enjoy. Personally, I tend to tune Rand out.

Like I said, I think she was fine to Kaya because she mostly self-identifies with her as a mother with a brood of her own.

Either way, it's bizarre how mad he got over this. I think all he really accomplished is drawing more attention to the criticism against him. Were I in his position, I would have just ignored Claire.
 
Also, i think i know why Nick wife put that playlist in private.. she had a video with that "TED" talk author... and if you look for that author, Esther Perel, she is being called out for being a "cheating apologist".

And just digging in the first page of Google results with "Esther Perel cheating apologist", i just found this; https://archive.is/qw6vg (original; https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/18/in-defense-of-adulterers)

Just fast scrolling down, i found something, let's say... curious about this author;

Cuote; Perel claims, not only to save your relationship but to transform “the experience of infidelity into an enlarging emotional journey.” Roused from sexual complacency by the threat of a third party, you may find that the sexual spark in your marriage has been reignited. “There is nothing like the eroticized gaze of the third to challenge our domesticated perceptions of each other,” she writes. Now “the ongoing challenge” for you and your partner is to maintain the flame. Tips for doing so include arranging candlelit date nights at home and creating secret e-mail accounts for “private, X-rated conversations during meetings, playdates, and parent-teacher conferences.

(Wtf)

More; Perel is not unsympathetic to this thought, and, toward the end of her book, she devotes a brief chapter to various forms of consensual non-monogamy. She writes about couples who swing, couples who have chosen to be, in the term coined by the sex columnist Dan Savage, “monogamish,” and couples who have expanded into “triads,” “quads,” or “polyamorous pods.”... Perel praises the efforts of all these non-monogamists “to tackle the core existential paradoxes that every couple wrestles with—security and adventure, togetherness and autonomy, stability and novelty,” and she is careful to remind the squeamish that many of these “romantic pluralists” succeed in maintaining rather higher standards of loyalty and honesty than do their monogamous counterparts.

And the entire thing appears to be on line with all this "fun" shit talk that Nick let out of his mouth every day. (And is always this weird and ambiguous language used, that i was talking before).

It's looking bad for Nick... why your wife would be seeing this kind of content with this kind author?... and again, it's all this "sex, sex, sex" shit going on.
 
Either way, it's bizarre how mad he got over this. I think all he really accomplished is drawing more attention to the criticism against him. Were I in his position, I would have just ignored Claire.

Also, i think i know why Nick wife put that playlist in private.. she had a video with that "TED" talk author... and if you look for that author, Esther Perel, she is being called out for being a "cheating apologist".

And just digging in the first page of Google results with "Esther Perel cheating apologist", i just found this; https://archive.is/qw6vg (original; https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/18/in-defense-of-adulterers)

Just fast scrolling down, i found something, let's say... curious about this author;

Cuote; Perel claims, not only to save your relationship but to transform “the experience of infidelity into an enlarging emotional journey.” Roused from sexual complacency by the threat of a third party, you may find that the sexual spark in your marriage has been reignited. “There is nothing like the eroticized gaze of the third to challenge our domesticated perceptions of each other,” she writes. Now “the ongoing challenge” for you and your partner is to maintain the flame. Tips for doing so include arranging candlelit date nights at home and creating secret e-mail accounts for “private, X-rated conversations during meetings, playdates, and parent-teacher conferences.

(Wtf)

More; Perel is not unsympathetic to this thought, and, toward the end of her book, she devotes a brief chapter to various forms of consensual non-monogamy. She writes about couples who swing, couples who have chosen to be, in the term coined by the sex columnist Dan Savage, “monogamish,” and couples who have expanded into “triads,” “quads,” or “polyamorous pods.”... Perel praises the efforts of all these non-monogamists “to tackle the core existential paradoxes that every couple wrestles with—security and adventure, togetherness and autonomy, stability and novelty,” and she is careful to remind the squeamish that many of these “romantic pluralists” succeed in maintaining rather higher standards of loyalty and honesty than do their monogamous counterparts.

And the entire thing appears to be on line with all this "fun" shit talk that Nick let out of his mouth every day. (And is always this weird and ambiguous language used, that i was talking before).

It's looking bad for Nick... why your wife would be seeing this kind of content with this kind author?... and again, it's all this "sex, sex, sex" shit going on.
if your theory is true I think i'd incline for an even sadder aproach, of Nick's wife looking for excuses for Nick to cheat, she seems like a really low energy person, Rekieta has said on stream how she is often tired, taking anti depressants or other meds, having a bunch of kids, while Nick gets more degenerate the more money he earns. maybe in a sad way she is trying to justify her "succesful" husband looking at better ladies.
but this is 100% schizo speculation just for fun.
 
Cuote; Perel claims, not only to save your relationship but to transform “the experience of infidelity into an enlarging emotional journey.” Roused from sexual complacency by the threat of a third party, you may find that the sexual spark in your marriage has been reignited. “There is nothing like the eroticized gaze of the third to challenge our domesticated perceptions of each other,” she writes. Now “the ongoing challenge” for you and your partner is to maintain the flame. Tips for doing so include arranging candlelit date nights at home and creating secret e-mail accounts for “private, X-rated conversations during meetings, playdates, and parent-teacher conferences.
This sounds awful close to the "While my wife is out sucking and fucking her way to a good time with Matt from Tinder, I'm at home writing like a peak alpha. Because at the end of the day, she's doing it all because I allow it and she comes home to me" bullshit that Cuck Murphy was pushing
 
if your theory is true I think i'd incline for an even sadder aproach, of Nick's wife looking for excuses for Nick to cheat, she seems like a really low energy person, Rekieta has said on stream how she is often tired, taking anti depressants or other meds, having a bunch of kids, while Nick gets more degenerate the more money he earns. maybe in a sad way she is trying to justify her "succesful" husband looking at better ladies.
but this is 100% schizo speculation just for fun.
You speculation is gibberish. Keep it simple, like the mentality of his bug-eyed wife who is a moron. Looks up cheating because she cheats. We already know she cheats. As described by her while she pulled a hundred faces a minute. She got her tits rubbed more than once by a nigger from a sports bar. And Rekieta didn't beat her for doing it, making him a jizz-hungry cuck.
 

for someone not big mad nick is big mad at us.

edit: I am late but not as gay as nick on this.
I guess I am wondering why he's talking about autism, having another guy's fingers up his ass and the drag show.

Also he really needs to clean his beard (his real one not Kayla) because there was a distracting fleck of food or spit or cum or something on it.
 
Nick is TOTALLY not reading his thread. Kayla is NOT interested in the DRAMA at all... There are gay ops that are 'le epic' in the chat on LOCALS to PWN the Farms...
Heh, a work right Nicky?
What's next, are you going to tweet out misogynistic remarks about your wife abandoning you at some hellscape airport with no air conditioning?

Wonder if the in-laws will auction off your balldo and field kit.

Wow, I've never felt so pwned.

You say that we are dumb to believe it and that 'If [you] were going to a drag show [you] would say it'... Hmmmm... What was the resort you were going to in Jamaica called again?
"If I shat myself I would say it, in fact I will shit all over myself right now!"
Way to become everything you've ever made fun of.
 
This faggot made his Vegas show a locals exclusive upload for some reason. Why not post it to rumble if anyone can watch it anyway?

Oops I’m retarded it only plays a 30 second preview for free. I’m a beggar for content today apparently, but if anyone has it hook your fellow niggers up
 
What gets me is he's massively punching down when it comes to Elisa and Claire. I don't think Nick has ever experienced criticism like what he's been getting, and doesn't know quite how to handle it. I think most Youtubers probably would have ignored either of them, given their relatively small size.
Who else only picks on women he can't control...?
 
Back