- Joined
- May 30, 2014
Who cares? He's an idiot. Why clog your brain trying to understand the ramblings of a schizophrenic exceptional individual?
Dude, it's ADK. You just described everyone who takes his baitposts in Deep Thoughts to a T.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who cares? He's an idiot. Why clog your brain trying to understand the ramblings of a schizophrenic exceptional individual?
Genghis Khan and all of China clearly shows that Mongoloids are more r-selected than you suggest otherwise they wouldn't need a one child policy. It would probably go as followsI am not an ethnic Jew. Learn to read banners. That would be, from K to r, Mongoloids, Whites, Jews, Austro-Dravidian subcontinentals, Blacks, and then presumably Capoids and Aboriginjes (reproduction artificially capped due to a lack of resources).
This is like watching two skitzos decide who is Jesus.
There are two Mongoloid populations which distinctly split, say, the likes of Japan and Korea with those of the part Austral Chinese and part Caucasoid Mongols.Genghis Khan and all of China clearly shows that Mongoloids are more r-selected than you suggest otherwise they wouldn't need a one child policy. It would probably go as follows
Jews, Whites, Austro-Dravidian subcontinentals, Mongoloids, Aborigines, Capoids, Blacks
Aborigines have much less reproduction than one may think and their resource constraint is less with modern medicine and federal aid
KangarooBecause there are so many exceptional individuals here I just want to know what you collectively think about what I should have for dinner.
That would predict that the mongols and manchu be more K-selected and the Japanese and Han be more r-selected but we see the reverseThere are two Mongoloid populations which distinctly split, say, the likes of Japan and Korea with those of the part Austral Chinese and part Caucasoid Mongols.
No, because those admixture I mentioned would be intermingled with r strands, so that I predicted the "reverse" is actually correct, disingenuously misrepresentative and incredulous fuckwit.That would predict that the mongols and manchu be more K-selected and the Japanese and Han be more r-selected but we see the reverse
I realize that you are actually correct and I was wrong on this. I still stand by the notion that Jews as a whole are the most K-selected race and that Mongoloids are more r-selected than whitesNo, because those admixture I mentioned would be intermingled with r strands, so that I predicted the "reverse" is actually correct, disingenuously misrepresentative and incredulous fuckwit.
K selection is principle of quality over quantity, the intellectual profile of the Jews however is not a proprietary quality of anything other than strategic consanginuity rather than careful reproductive patterning. Imagine intellectual schizophrenia and social psychopathy, basically gentrified Charles Mansons, and you have the Jew.I realize that you are actually correct and I was wrong on this. I still stand by the notion that Jews as a whole are the most K-selected race and that Mongoloids are more r-selected than whites
Jews clearly prioritize their strategic consanguinity over large numbers. Intellectual schizophrenia and social psychopathy are forms of quality that do improve individual fitness just in the same way that autism does. Strategic consanguinity is a form of careful reproductive patterning that enables them to engineer their environments towards their favour and remove its constraints as seen in current popular cultureK selection is principle of quality over quantity, the intellectual profile of the Jews however is not a proprietary quality of anything other than strategic consanginuity rather than careful reproductive patterning. Imagine intellectual schizophrenia and social psychopathy, basically gentrified Charles Mansons, and you have the Jew.
However, K selection should not only have regard for a race unto itself but its environmental constraints, which peculiar situation of Jews clearly contravenes.
K selection is principle of quality over quantity, the intellectual profile of the Jews however is not a proprietary quality of anything other than strategic consanginuity rather than careful reproductive patterning. Imagine intellectual schizophrenia and social psychopathy, basically gentrified Charles Mansons, and you have the Jew.
However, K selection should not only have regard for a race unto itself but its environmental constraints, which peculiar situation of Jews clearly contravenes.
This is a serious intellectual discussion. Low effort noncontributing posts like this do not make for productive discussion. The obvious answer is that just like me @Autphag is a deep thinker who thinks deep intellectual thoughts for funWhat do you do for fun
Literally all I did was write my (highly philosophical) autobiography in the ward. That should tell you everything.This is a serious intellectual discussion. Low effort noncontributing posts like this do not make for productive discussion. The obvious answer is that just like me @Autphag is a deep thinker who thinks deep intellectual thoughts for fun
There is still a distinction to forge between strategic consanginuity and careful reproductive patterning in that the environment, irrespective of how racially constituent pathologies contribute to its artificial reformation, must answer to both. Strategic consanginuity is a scarcity strategy that sacrifices genetic diversity for the selection of specific traits (the verbosity and circumlocution of the Jew), whilst careful reproductive patterning, as I still maintain we see in those K selected strand of Mongoloid mentioned, takes a more careful and less environmentally impactful approach to a holistic consideration of all possible human traits (generalized intelligence which doesn't parasitically encumber on a social elicitation of other's resources is probably the biggest one coming to mind). We thus see in this contrast two different styles of environmental reformation, one is sacrificing of scare resources and interdependently parasitic, and the latter, sparing of scarce resources and intradependently self-reliant (Juchesasang probably standing as the greatest reflection of such a racial mindset).Jews clearly prioritize their strategic consanguinity over large numbers. Intellectual schizophrenia and social psychopathy are forms of quality that do improve individual fitness just in the same way that autism does. Strategic consanguinity is a form of careful reproductive patterning that enables them to engineer their environments towards their favour and remove its constraints as seen in current popular culture
I would say though that the Jewish strategic consanguinity although sacrificing genetic diversity actually places all investment into the most important traits (that is communication) which due to the presence of network externalities leads to an exponential return on investment. The careful reproductive patterning of North Korea does not have such returns. An individual North Korean may be more generalized than an individual Jew and thus able to survive more but Israel beats North Korea because the presence of well developed communications channels more than compensates for the increased likelihood of certain genetic disorders such as Tay Sachs disease and Cystic FibrosisThere is still a distinction to forge between strategic consanginuity and careful reproductive patterning in that the environment, irrespective of how racially constituent pathologies contribute to its artificial reformation, must answer to both. Strategic consanginuity is a scarcity strategy that sacrifices genetic diversity for the selection of specific traits (the verbosity and circumlocution of the Jew), whilst careful reproductive patterning, as I still maintain we see in those K selected strand of Mongoloid mentioned, takes a more careful and less environmentally impactful approach to a holistic consideration of all possible human traits (generalized intelligence which doesn't parasitically encumber on a social elicitation of other's resources is probably the biggest one coming to mind). We thus see in this contrast two different styles of environmental reformation, one is sacrificing of scare resources and interdependently parasitic, and the latter, sparing of scarce resources and intradependently self-reliant (Juchesasang probably standing as the greatest reflection of such a racial mindset).
The return is not financial, fine, but more tangibly, there are the inarguable racial returns to viability that will probably see the Jewish multigenerational cycle burn out quicker than an optimistic prediction would expect (say, on the feted Day of the Rope) since other races cohabiting alongside Jews quickly tire of their self-serving diplomatic games and domestic infiltration. Returning to DPRK's example, apart from the threat to Western degeneracy they represent in carrying a mantle of the remnants of old White civilization which has international Jewish diplomacy working overtime, their peaceful nature will probably mitigate the co-operation of any attack waged against them which cannot be said for the Jews, and their survivability will contribute to a rampart defensive buoyed by the racial vitality and dependability which will probably work against large scale macrowarfare prolonged over the long term (especially compensatory of technological setbacks which have, despite isolation, compensated themselves beyond estimation), with Jewish vulnerabilities and weaknesses quickly finding themselves compromised in a similar situation.I would say though that the Jewish strategic consanguinity although sacrificing genetic diversity actually places all investment into the most important traits (that is communication) which due to the presence of network externalities leads to an exponential return on investment. The careful reproductive patterning of North Korea does not have such returns. An individual North Korean may be more generalized than an individual Jew and thus able to survive more but Israel beats North Korea because the presence of well developed communications channels more than compensates for the increased likelihood of certain genetic disorders such as Tay Sachs disease and Cystic Fibrosis
I think you are underestimating the Jewish ability to suppress rebellions. For over 70 years they have been able to for the most part completely avoid western rebellions and riot control technology is likely so good now that it will be able to prevent any day of the rope from happening. When the "Day of the Rope" happens if ever they will just go into their underground bunkers and blast most of the world into oblivion. North Korea has made many enemies because of its honorable refusal to enter international trade but in the end honor doesn't win wars and they will fall.The return is not financial, fine, but more tangibly, there are the inarguable racial returns to viability that will probably see the Jewish multigenerational cycle burn out quicker than an optimistic prediction would expect (say, on the feted Day of the Rope) since other races cohabiting alongside Jews quickly tire of their self-serving diplomatic games and domestic infiltration. Returning to DPRK's example, apart from the threat to Western degeneracy they represent in carrying a mantle of the remnants of old White civilization which has international Jewish diplomacy working overtime, their peaceful nature will probably mitigate the co-operation of any attack waged against them which cannot be said for the Jews, and their survivability will contribute to a rampart defensive buoyed by the racial vitality and dependability which will probably work against large scale macrowarfare prolonged over the long term (especially compensatory of technological setbacks which have, despite isolation, compensated themselves beyond estimation), with Jewish vulnerabilities and weaknesses quickly finding themselves compromised in a similar situation.