Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 25.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 64 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 149 39.7%

  • Total voters
    375
We aren't punished for killing Christ in any way shape or form nor is it a mistake, both because of omniscience and circumstance.
Not even Judas was punished for betraying Christ. After all, even Peter did it three times. If he was punished, it was for the sin of despair in committing suicide, because such an act arrogantly presumes a human is capable of committing a sin too great for God's mercy.
 
Claims about the universe and claims about the existence of a deity are two very different things.

I've never seen a fairy. I'm not 'agnostic' about the existance of fairies. Fairies don't exist. Show me compelling evidence to the contrary and I'll change my mind, but until then, I'm an atheist.
What I’m getting from this is that you’re an atheist in belief, but distance yourself from the dominant alternative hypotheses for creation, et vet because you don’t find them to be things you want to defend.

The problem is that aethetics-only atheism sans alternate hypotheses is just contrarian faith.
 
JFC he is such a mess here.
Your browser is not able to display this video.
This happened shortly after the already posted clip, I just found it funny because: 1) He doesn't mention his kids when talking about what's important to him on a given day. 2) He says the only person whose opinion you should care about is your spouse's while his wife is simultaneously begging strangers for attention.

His tone also always seems angry and belligerent, not in the being mad to entertain himself and the audience way, but more Ethan Ralphian. Between that and his apparent inability to maintain a train of thought and choices that suggest impaired executive functioning, I really think he's pickled his brain.
Between his description of how his sense of feel is enhanced “when drinking”, the anger and belligerence, as well as the impaired train of thought, I wonder if his Molly use has been significantly higher (and more frequent) than what he’s admitted to. Consequently, the significant use has permanently rewired his brain.

All the side effects described are typically more characteristic of rolling and not necessarily associated with alcohol consumption. To the contrary, alcohol being a depressant usually brings a numbing sensory effect, lack of motor skills, etc etc. Now when he drinks, his rewired synapses bring the added side effects of a Molly high.
 
The Assemblies of God approach meets the specific needs of a whole lot of people at this moment. I didn't understand it for a long time, but there are massive numbers of people out there who don't need deep or intellectual religion. They often need a structure that explains "right and wrong" and the most basic aspects of morality to them. They also usually need to both admit that they have done wrong and to find a forgiveness for it. It doesn't necessarily build faith or reach a point of intellectual salvation. But these people are living often in a morally bankrupt situation where even explaining to them that there is right and wrong can change lives. And it puts them on a road where a salvation is possible. Its not a perfect approach by any means, but it often demonstrates the raw power of the most simple version of the Christian message in people's lives.

People like Nick have a different set of needs typically. Someone like Nick usually needs to find some sort of meaning and purpose in life through religion. To realize the emptiness of hedonism and a life of total selfishness. Something to give his life structure when he is in a situation where he is wealthy enough to meet any material need he might have.

You can't ever really have just one sort of church (IMO) because the needs of people almost require different sorts of churches with different approaches.
Seems like a good time to mention the No Regrets Men's Conference Nick almost certainly attended on Feb. 4. (I didn't bother to post about it then bc I didn't think Kiwi would really care. (Who knew - there are some low-key theologians here.).

He mentions going to a men's conference at 4:58:30 here: https://rumble.com/v289vwc-friday-funday-camelot-law-and-lumber-drex-and-cecil.html

They're already advertising for next year's:

1678558709615.png


Here's the stuff from this past February 4's conference, including the workshops that they did.
https://www.noregretsconference.org/individual-streaming/ .

The title cracked me up... great... just what Nick needs to hear. Why should men ever have regrets? Here's the general link: https://www.noregretsconference.org/.

He likely attended one of the satellite locations in which it was being streamed at either Rock of Life CRC or Discovery Church per https://www.noregretsconference.org/host-site-directory/. Jesus (pun intended), this thing was huge! Hundreds of participating churches.
 
What I’m getting from this is that you’re an atheist in belief, but distance yourself from the dominant alternative hypotheses for creation, et vet because you don’t find them to be things you want to defend.

The problem is that aethetics-only atheism sans alternate hypotheses is just contrarian faith.
What I'm getting from this is you can't fathom someone not having a faith to the point where you're willing to derail a thread trying to corner someone into some kind of faith or ideology of your own invention.

I'm an atheist, married to a Catholic, and we plan to raise our children Catholic. I don't have faith in my lack of belief nor my lack of answers.

You provide an answer to existence that is not compelling to me. My lack of trust in your answer and admission that I don't have an answer of my own isn't faith.

I'd like you to consider that attitudes like yours are one of the biggest turn-offs many people have to religion as a whole. It shows a fundamental lack of respect for someone's non-belief even in the face of them showing significant respect for yours.

This will be my only addition to the derailment of this thread but I wanted to get it off my chest. Apologies given, puzzle pieces expected.
 
There's also been a real change even in the kind of facial expressions he makes, like this here:
View attachment 4754576
I'm not sure what even to call that. It's somehow smug and blank at the same time and his eyes look glassy.

His tone also always seems angry and belligerent, not in the being mad to entertain himself and the audience way, but more Ethan Ralphian. Between that and his apparent inability to maintain a train of thought and choices that suggest impaired executive functioning, I really think he's pickled his brain.

Also not sure how often he's doing molly and other substances. There are plenty of weekend warriors who do that with not much harm, but if he's mixing weird shit with alcohol on a regular basis, that has a multiplicatively bad effect.
It's a look instantly recognizable to anyone that's had to deal with an annoying smug alcoholic that thinks he knows far more than anyone he meets.
The alcohol is literally pickling him from the inside out and starting to kill his neurons.
In a few years if Nick keeps going he's gonna look like the Innsmouth town drunk
InnsmouthTownDrunk.jpg
Shit now I think about it, our wife already has the Innsmouth Look, it would explain those eyes.
 
What I'm getting from this is you can't fathom someone not having a faith to the point where you're willing to derail a thread trying to corner someone into some kind of faith or ideology of your own invention.

I'm an atheist, married to a Catholic, and we plan to raise our children Catholic. I don't have faith in my lack of belief nor my lack of answers.

You provide an answer to existence that is not compelling to me. My lack of trust in your answer and admission that I don't have an answer of my own isn't faith.

I'd like you to consider that attitudes like yours are one of the biggest turn-offs many people have to religion as a whole. It shows a fundamental lack of respect for someone's non-belief even in the face of them showing significant respect for yours.

This will be my only addition to the derailment of this thread but I wanted to get it off my chest. Apologies given, puzzle pieces expected.
It is derail-y, but I think in an appendix kind of way, since religion is an area where Rekieta comes off as having bait-and-switched his core audience.

I’m not going to keep going with it after this either, but you’re mistaking me.

I’m agnostic. Agnostic meaning, “I am without knowledge” of what is behind existence. In the sense of Aquinas’ Third Proof, paraphrased as “whatever is behind creation, I call God,” I believe in god, so I guess I’m a theistic agnostic.

Calling yourself an atheist is saying that you definitively assert there is no god and nothing that could plausibly fill the role of a creator or architect. It’s a statement that requires either proof or faith.

Maybe I’m an asshole, but I like to point out to self described atheists that their position is not in any way shape or form scientifically superior. It is not better evidenced than any other religion. If you admit to not knowing, then the word is “agnostic.”
 
Calling yourself an atheist is saying that you definitively assert there is no god and nothing that could plausibly fill the role of a creator or architect. It’s a statement that requires either proof or faith.
That's not actually true. There are many strains of atheism, from so-called "strong" atheism which positively asserts the lack of existence of a deity, to "weak" atheism which is simply a lack of belief, and anything in between, such as simply believing that it is highly unlikely that there is a deity, without positively asserting nonexistence. Many famous atheists (including Dawkins) are in the latter category.

Agnosticism is a set of beliefs that are not entirely coterminous with, but often overlap atheism, although agnosticism addresses epistemic rather than existential concerns. Similarly, there is a range of beliefs the term describes, including simply denying that one personally knows whether there's a deity, to positively asserting that such existence is epistemologically impossible and that nobody knows.
 
It is derail-y, but I think in an appendix kind of way, since religion is an area where Rekieta comes off as having bait-and-switched his core audience.

I’m not going to keep going with it after this either, but you’re mistaking me.

I’m agnostic. Agnostic meaning, “I am without knowledge” of what is behind existence. In the sense of Aquinas’ Third Proof, paraphrased as “whatever is behind creation, I call God,” I believe in god, so I guess I’m a theistic agnostic.

Calling yourself an atheist is saying that you definitively assert there is no god and nothing that could plausibly fill the role of a creator or architect. It’s a statement that requires either proof or faith.

Maybe I’m an asshole, but I like to point out to self described atheists that their position is not in any way shape or form scientifically superior. It is not better evidenced than any other religion. If you admit to not knowing, then the word is “agnostic.”
I have yet to see any proof for the existence of a god or gods, which is why I am an atheist. Its not that hard.
On another note. I wonder if Nick introduced the balldo to the other gents at that conference.
 
I have yet to see any proof for the existence of a god or gods, which is why I am an atheist. Its not that hard.
On another note. I wonder if Nick introduced the balldo to the other gents at that conference.
"God" is a giant space crystal thing. When we die we go back to it to be reincorporated into it. We are all part of the giant space crystal sent out to experience every facet of creation.
 
Highlights from last LOCALS livestream (From the Rekieta-certified 'dumbest motherfucker')

-Nick doesn't even know anything about the SVB bank failure.

He isn't interested in it, and he doesn't like covering stories he doesn't find interesting. He whinged that people will be probably be spamming him about it.

-RealDragonLady is STILL bugging Nick to read DMs?

How parasocially dependant is this BPD bitch?

-He will probably not appear back on DnD.

-He has new ideas and things to think about given some recent happenings to restrategise his content
 
-Nick doesn't even know anything about the SVB bank failure.

He isn't interested in it, and he doesn't like covering stories he doesn't find interesting. He whinged that people will be probably be spamming him about it.
I know that he did work at a bank in the past, but I assume that was more of a "bank teller" or "branch manager" sort of thing (ie clerical/customer service) rather than an actual job as a banker. I doubt he has much insight to offer from his perspective as a bank employee. The people who make the actual decisions for banks sit in glass offices inside nondescript towers in New York, lording over armies of number-crunching Asians who actually know what a "derivative" is. The people you see in the branch don't even need to know arithmetic.

Also, I caught 2 or 3 separate people begging for donations to their gofundme in this past stream. Don't they realize it reeks of desperation (and a grift) to pay to have a drunkard announce your gofundme to the world?
 
-He has new ideas and things to think about given some recent happenings
Pray tell Nick what are these happenings? Your viewership numbers dropping lower than Our Wife’s tits after birthing your 5 humans? The absolute spectacle you make out of yourself in public because you’re a Molly addled alcoholic? The utter disgrace you’ve made out of your family name by publicly advertising your unapologetic fascination with a silicone ball cage?
 
Back