Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

How many people will show up to Aella's birthday gangbang?


  • Total voters
    168
  • Poll closed .
LCF sisters found Aella's reddit alt where she talks about having hyperhidrosis, ie sweating a lot from hands, feet and armpits. I've added the account to the OP.
View attachment 4738874
source (a)
She admits to being Abigail Glass (Aella's sex worker name).
View attachment 4738870
Why people would want to willingly fuck somebody like this (you know besides all the pedophilia, not showering and constipation) is beyond me.
Barf. I know she can't help this condition, but she is in control of how much she bathes. She chooses to sweat all day and never bathe. She's coping about not stinking. Aella, you have become nose blind to your own stench. Everyone else can smell you though. Take a damn shower.

Re: her hot take on AI child porn has always annoyed the fuck out of me. We already know that lots of people want to re-enact what they see in porn, and many do. It's not just kinky sex positive people either. We also know that what used to be considered kinky and unusual has changed with the explosion of porn over the years. Example, choking used to be considered really rare and something only freaks did, now it's so common that you would have an easier time finding people who haven't tried it. Another one, anal sex. That was also considered something only gays or really freaky straight couples did. Once again, thanks in large part because of porn, this has become so common that there are literal teen magazines telling teen girls how to have safe anal sex.

I bring this up to say if we flooded the market with AI child porn, then what is to stop this from pedos wanting to re-enact what they see online? If normie people try to re-enact what they see in porn after it's flooded the marker and become normalized, then why shouldn't we expect the same to happen if we normalize child porn? It being AI doesn't matter, if it looks like children and it becomes socially accepted, then at some point it will become normalized to abuse children.
 
@lyga nice find man! The sex abuse being more common in those groups is hardly surprising.
> people sexually attracted to children are more likely to molest them than the average person
WOA CRAZY

The mechanism is clear. If you're the kind of man susceptible to pedophilic desires, but you know CP is incredibly hard to find and you'll put a target on your back for even trying, you'll find it easy to suppress the desires, thinking, "This isn't something people like me do. It's never going to happen. No point in dwelling on it." If you're immersed in CP communities, though, you'll see it is in fact a thing that many people do and enjoy, so why can't it be you too? Ditto for incest erotica: one who would've immediately shut down lustful urges thinking, "What the fuck?! That's my own sister, haha!" starts longing for impossible scenarios and graduates to peeping and stealing her panties, thinking screw the taboo, it's an urge he deserves to have satisfied and this is the closest he can get. And "porn made me trans," many such cases!

Weirdly, the thot-hater crowd seems to think Aella's solution to porn will come true, but only for 18+ porn. "AI-generated porn will put all these OnlyFans creators out of a job!" Okay, and what will such AI do to the amount of real CP out there, increase it or decrease it? You'd have to either recognize that AI porn won't really kill the demand because the involvement of a real person is part of the appeal, or concede a point to her.

Edit: I wrote this before I refreshed to see @CoolFool had made a comment that largely overlaps with this one
 
> midwit
> entire appearance crafted by cosmetic surgery
> constantly fucking sweating
0.png
:story:
 
I updated the OP with Abigail Glass, her hyperhidrosis, and a special section on her deleting things including the reaction to this thread and defending her rape orgy parties. I made a thread in TTS asking to update the title and subtitle too.

I found this article of an interview with Aella on AskMen. It's subtitled "Let This Hilarious Camgirl Explain How Being Funny Can Get You Laid". The article sure is funny alright, it claims that her real first name is "Aelia". No, that's wrong, it's Rachael.

Aella Interview​

Let This Hilarious Camgirl Explain How Being Funny Can Get You Laid
If you ask a woman what she finds attractive in a man, one of the first traits that come up is inevitably sense of humor. That’s something guys can overlook, focusing instead on typical alpha characteristics like strength and good looks. But last year Glamour magazine polled its readers as to who the sexiest man on earth was, and at No. 1 was Ashton Kutcher. The year before, People crowned Bradley Cooper, and neither of those guys were typically “hunks” — they’re mostly funny dudes.

To help make a bit of sense of this, I got in touch with Aella Girl (her real first name is Aelia), one of the internet’s best known cam girls. She’s also a perfect example of a woman combining sex and humor, ever since she became a Reddit star in 2013 with her elaborately-staged photoshoot of her being kidnapped (while naked) that she posted to R/gonewild (post obviously NSFW). Since then, in addition to her regular gig of camming online (yep, NSFW again) , she was also one of the stars of the Cam Girlz (somewhat SFW) documentary, where she notably danced as a squirreltaco.

1. Biologically Speaking, You Need To Be Funny​

A recent study found that funny people have better orgasms, and a study a couple of years back, more exactly, found out that men could “laugh women into bed.” On the flip side, some commentators have gone so far as to say that biologically speaking, “women aren’t funny. ” So what gives?

“It’s more important more men to be funny. I know it’s stereotypical but I don’t give a sh*t because it’s true. I believe that women have to put in less effort because men come to them,” she says. It boils down to a biological imperative,” she says.

Now, as an aspiring comedian herself, she’s not arguing that women aren’t funny, or can’t be funny. Just that society dictates men have to be better at it.

“Men are the pursuers and this isn’t just our society this is the way it’s been across all cultures for all of known history. Men have to put in the effort to win a woman and humor is the sort of humor they have to put out, just like peacocking. It’s displaying social skills. It’s displaying to a woman that I will have more fun with you than another person. It’s less important for women, because it’s easier for a woman to get laid.”

2. Humor Helps You Appear More Confident​

Despite the (sometimes) stereotype of funny guys being neurotic or anxious, being funny can actually deliver the opposite impression. Guys using funny openerson dating sites is just one example, she says, that works.

“I’m on OKCupid a lot. And if someone opens up with a joke, that doubles my chances of being interested.”

The reason? It all boils down to confidence, and that extends way beyond the world of just online dating.

“It lets me know if you’re easygoing. Because it’s difficult to let me joke around if you’re really stressed. Joking is a way of signalling to me that you’re confident and that you’re not anxious about me or the date that we’re on. And that makes me feel like you’re confident, and that maybe you could be having other women if you want, and that you don’t really care, and that makes me more interested.”

3. Humor Itself Isn’t Sexy — But It Can Make You More Sexy​

“The sensation of humor isn’t directly arousing. People don’t typically go to comedy shows and get boners,” says Aella. “But humor leads to a better contextual appreciation of a person. If you find someone funny, you’re more likely to find their nudity more sexy, which is why you can turned on by your girlfriend and not anybody else.

4. What Women Are Looking For​

Just because women enjoy humor, it doesn’t mean you should show up with canned jokes or memorize a Chris Rock routine before showing up on a date.

“The art of being funny is a bit difficult. It’s hard to put your finger on it. Surprising is usually good. You don’t have to be someone who is going to be consistently hilarious all the time. But I usually like to have a witty back and forth with [guys] if I can. I’m not looking for someone who’s a comedian who’s going to slay the house. But I like someone who can keep up with the jokes I make and make them back. And to keep up with my level of silliness, and I’m a very silly person.”

5. What To Do If You’re Not Funny​

There’s no “secret” to being funny, and no real way to teach it. Being able to be funny often comes from acceptance of who you are.

“You have to first not reject yourself. Your humor is good if you find it funny. And that it when I find myself funny genuinely, then I stop caring about others finding funny. If you find something so funny that you’re confident enough to put it out there because you think it’s good, then other people can sense that and are drawn to it,” she said.

“And that might come from just exposing yourself to better comedy, or trying to become more appreciative of humor.You just gotta loosen up. Realize that the world is one big joke, and that nothing is really serious.”

6. Humor Isn’t Everything​

“Just because you’re not funny doesn’t mean you’re not going to get laid. It would definitely help. But it’s not going to kill you either. You have to look at other aspects to attract a woman, namely confidence, or skills, typically confidence that you can make a woman happier. It’s not just going to be humor that gets you laid. If you’re lacking in [those] other areas, you’re kind of f*cked. Or actually, you’re not f*cked at all,” she says.

“The journey to successfully attract a woman is not learning how to attract a woman. The trick to being funnier and more confident, is finding outcome independence, to come to the realization that you’re going to be happy no matter what happens. And finding your own self-worth is a complicated thing. and if you can do that, it helps your awkwardness go away, and naturally help you be better at being funny.”
source (a)

I also found her posting on ChristianForums.com asking Christians to take her relationships survey for whatever reason. Looks like she didn't get much response.
christianforums.png
source (a)
 
How can she not feel validated when simps back her stuff up. It's almost like reverse shaming.
View attachment 4729929

View attachment 4730114

View attachment 4730120
Following this she made yet another twitter poll to figure out if she should really consider herself a "Data Scientist" because why wouldn't she.
It was actually closer than what I thought it would be though.
ds.png

twt,archive

ofc.png

I think in this tweet she realized how dumb this poll and this bootcamp idea was, so she diverted it with a sexual "joke"
ppp.png
 
ok, here is what I've been meaning to post.

I've been spending a lot of time of time getting my life together and helping my mother, so I haven't had as much time to type much. I put everything I could in an otter transcript:

lots of people here think Aella is part of some pedophile or groomer shtick. I assure you that I'd love to see her in jail, but she's not that kind of person. She just isn't; she's too much of a wimp.

However, WHAT SHE IS INSTEAD is a node for extremely cultish beliefs, and the people she ends up influencing the most tend to be 18-26. She can't be involved with cults because that involves the supernatural and she can't be involved with grooming because that involves minors but she's willing to mold a caste of 18-26 year old tech whizzes to her ethos who have no idea that this is her goal.

SKIP TO THE 5 MINUTE MARK IF YOU WANT THE MOST IMPORTANT INSIGHT

https://otter.ai/u/mSGtaF_u_HY1JmPRVFRQb3twsU4 (this is an insane story; I can't write up a proper text version right now because it is just too much.)



So... what is this? It's not a groomer, and it's not a cult influencer, but it's *something*. I could see her being the Alex Mack to LessWrong's NXIVM ,

I cannot stress this enough: if a lesswrong invites you to a grouphouse, run away. It's not pedophilia, it's not grooming and it's not initiation into a cult but it's something that's a combination of 1/3 of all those things and you DO NOT want to be part of it.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Very enlightening, @Alfred MacDonald. That doesn't surprise me she's been involved in other weird stuff. I looked up the Sengstock circling thing and it certainly seemed similar to what I would regard as other pseudoreligious, cultish movements, e.g., Bikram Yoga as it was under Bikram Chowdhury. As for the pedo stuff, I think it's not so much that she genuinely has groomer tendencies, but more that she's overcorrecting from her sheltered childhood. That's what I get from her "I wish I'd been exposed to more porn at a younger age!" takes on Twitter.
 
I've never seen Aella as a groomer. What I see her as is a useful idiot that is helping usher the normalization of child abuse with her dumb ""research"". She assures actual creeps/pedos that their fetishes are totally normal and fine, and that they don't need help, it's society that needs to stop being so prudish! She downplays abuse ("I was sexually abused and I turned out fine!" "Native tribes are naked in front of kids and they are fine!"etc) not because she's a groomer that wants to abuse kids, but because she's incredibly dumb and too far up her own ass to realize that she has a bunch of creepy simps gassing her up and telling her how uber smart her disgusting opinions are.
 
I hate to steal from LCF but this meteorologist sharing his story about Aella being a moron was too good not to share:
View attachment 4740325
source (a)
Not surprising to hear Aella talks out her ass about other things besides data science she has no fucking clue about.

Autism. Hyper fixation on topics. Mind-blindness. Lack of awareness of social queues. Oversharing.


Re: her hot take on AI child porn has always annoyed the fuck out of me. We already know that lots of people want to re-enact what they see in porn, and many do. It's not just kinky sex positive people either.

Pedophilia isn't a kink or a sexual orientation. Despite what some parts of the LGBTQ+ lobby would like to imply when they get an opening. It's a psychotic/sociopathic urge to sexually corrupt children. Her suggestion of AI created CP wouldn't work, because as the Pedos on 4chan told me 15 years ago when I was arguing with them. Unless is a real child it doesn't count. Not drawings. Not 4 foot 7 super petite flat chested body shaven women with baby faces in school girl outfits. It has to be children.

Besides. Where is this AI going to draw all it's training images from? The entire FBI CP database? Using petabytes of child abuse material to create more hyper realistic simulated child abuse material? Oh yeah what a great idea. That's all we need.
 
Last edited:
I am fucking stunned that she gets 100k considering how she showers like 37 times a year and probbably stinks to high heaven and is pretty average looking as a thot. Are Onlyfans standards really that bad? Or is it just the normalisation of sluttery that has lowered the standards of people's degeneracy.
 
I am fucking stunned that she gets 100k considering how she showers like 37 times a year and probbably stinks to high heaven and is pretty average looking as a thot. Are Onlyfans standards really that bad? Or is it just the normalisation of sluttery that has lowered the standards of people's degeneracy.

From the stories I've read from sex workers online. The only thing worse than them, is the Johns that show up to pay them.
 
Autism. Hyper fixation on topics. Mind-blindness. Lack of awareness of social queues. Oversharing.




Pedophilia isn't a kink or a sexual orientation. Despite what some parts of the LGBTQ+ lobby would like to imply when they get an opening. It's a psychotic/sociopathic urge to sexually corrupt children. Her suggestion of AI created CP wouldn't work, because as the Pedos on 4chan told me 15 years ago when I was arguing with them. Unless is a real child it doesn't count. Not drawings. Not 4 foot 7 super petite flat chested body shaven women with baby faces in school girl outfits. It has to be children.

Besides. Where is this AI going to draw all it's training images from? The entire FBI CP database? Using petabytes of child abuse material to create more hyper realistic simulated child abuse material? Oh yeah what a great idea. That's all we need.
By this argument, anyone who *is* into 4'7" flat chested super petite women, and who would genuinely prefer that to a child, isnt a pedo - right?

Likewise, anyone who just gets off on weeaboo loli hentai, but isnt into real children, also isnt a pedo?

I want to make sure I understand your argument.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Dr. Butt
By this argument, anyone who *is* into 4'7" flat chested super petite women, and who would genuinely prefer that to a child, isnt a pedo - right?

Likewise, anyone who just gets off on weeaboo loli hentai, but isnt into real children, also isnt a pedo?

I want to make sure I understand your argument.

The truth is, we don't have enough data or research to make disambiguation. Almost everything we have is anecdotal. But since we know of people like Jeffery Epstein and his clients. Who has the money to make that research happen? Why don't they fund research like that?


Well what was funded, that was related to pedos?

The Kentler Experiment

kentler.jpg


And the Kinsey Experiments

kinsey.jpg
 
Back