Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

I wonder which flavour of cope we'll get from Tony today: insistence that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones "are not banned!!!"; denunciation of Norway for transphobia; or complete silence?
It's silence, always silence. He's too dumb to ever construct anything or point out any "contradicting" or "disproving" takes to something this complex.
 
So how many troons have committed suicide? Tony claims that six trans kids committed suicide because Tennessee passed the bill to protect minors from gender affirming care. By now the news should be broadcasting tranny suicides 24/7 since bills have been signed in half a dozen states already.
No, they're very careful to claim as Tony did that people merely feel suicidal or "attempt" it because this is completely unfalsifiable. They don't just construct their narratives on irrelevant evidence they make sure you can't point out how that even that non-evidence can't be verified.
 
Tony now describes himself as an "independent reporter":
2023-03-11-tony-profile.png
Erin Reed (@ErinInTheMorn) / Twitter (archive)

He’s off to a good start, falling into a trap he could have easily avoided if he was able to read.
ErinInTheMorn-1634424992522747904.png
@ErinInTheMorn, tweet 1634424992522747904 (archive)
Erin Reed (@ErinInTheMorn) · Mar 11, 2023 · 5:24 AM UTC
Jesse Singal is an absolute moron with clearly 0 experience in understanding Gen Z trans humor.
Wow.
They're actually taking "attack helicopter" seriously.

And here's the tweet from Giles Ben Branstetter / Gillian Branstetter.
I literally got sucked into 40 minutes of research because I was annoyed that I didn't know Branstetter's real name, and was just referring to him as "Giles" because it's a funny name.

Anyway, Gillian Branstetter was previously known as Ben (Benjamin) Branstetter. Here's his old blog:
Branstetter (archive)
About Me | Branstetter (archive)

And here's the Muck Rack profile for Ben Branstetter, including lots of trash Daily Dot articles ("What Mark Zuckerberg can learn from the founder of Hershey's chocolate") which are now credited to Gillian Branstetter:
Articles by Ben Branstetter’s Profile | Business Insider, HuffPost, The Washington Post Journalist | Muck Rack (archive)
Gillian Branstetter (archive)

An archive of Ben Branstetter's Twitter account (@BenBranstetter) shows he joined in September 2011, which matches the date on Gillian Branstetter's Twitter account (@GBBranstetter):
benbranstetter-profile.pnggbbranstetter-profile.png
Ben Branstetter (@BenBranstetter) | Twitter (archive)

Radaris lists him as being born in October 1988, which seems about right, and is consistent with his age given on his old website, but I don't know if it's accurate. Benjamin B Branstetter - age 34, address: Washington, DC - Radaris (archive)
GBBranstetter-1634420494718976003.png
@GBBranstetter, tweet 1634420494718976003 (archive)
Gillian Branstetter (@GBBranstetter) · Mar 11, 2023 · 5:06 AM UTC
This is a joke. The kid was making a joke.

Gillian Branstetter (@GBBranstetter) · Mar 11, 2023 · 5:07 AM UTC
You have to have zero Gen Z literacy to not see this as a joke

Gillian Branstetter (@GBBranstetter) · Mar 11, 2023 · 5:08 AM UTC
Like

Gillian Branstetter (@GBBranstetter) · Mar 11, 2023 · 5:14 AM UTC
At the trial against Arkansas' ban the state asked an expert witness "how many genders are there" and he had to patiently explain people will use an infinite combination of words to explain their gender but there are only two relevant diagnoses, adult GD and adolescent GD

Gillian Branstetter (@GBBranstetter) · Mar 11, 2023 · 5:29 AM UTC
Jesse: Hmm yes very alarming

Ben is himself quote-tweeting Jesse Singal. Here's the specific tweet from Singal's thread, which includes a screenshot from his article:
jessesingal-1634326585212846080.pngmedia_Fq5LSiQWwAMuuR-.png
@jessesingal, tweet 1634326585212846080 (archive)
Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) · Mar 10, 2023 · 10:53 PM UTC
4/ Here, for the first time, is what Jamie Reed was referencing when she mentioned a kid identifying as a helicopter in her affidavit. It comes down to a shady letter of referral and an endocrinologist who Reed believed acted negligently, without reading that letter closely.
And the text in the screenshot:
Jesse Singal said:
Reed explained that on the day in question she was sitting in “the pod,” the room where the medical staff worked, with Karen Hamon, a nurse. Casey Lofquest, a nurse practitioner, came out of one of the exam rooms looking concerned. She walked over to Reed and Hamon and explained that the patient she was seeing was having a rough time. This patient, who was a natal male and who Reed believes used they/them pronouns, was attending their second appointment at the clinic. During their first, which had occurred three months prior, they had been prescribed hormones by one of the Center’s endocrinologists.

Lofquest explained that the patient was reporting that their mental health had worsened since starting hormones. The patient also couldn’t clearly define their gender identity. That prompted Reed to pull up their chart on her computer to try to figure out what was going on. The clinic uses Epic, a popular program for keeping track of patient records. Included in this patient’s Epic chart, in the “Media” tab where additional information can be added, was the letter of support from an outside therapist that had apparently been used to justify the decision to immediately start them on hormones upon their arrival at the clinic.

The patient was quoted in the letter as saying they identified as a “communist, attack helicopter, human, female, maybe non binary.” The therapist also wrote that the patient reported that they “hope for the transition to feel better in my body and no longer just in a flesh box.” Despite these major red flags — or at least what Reed saw as red flags, reading the letter months later — the referring provider nonetheless finished the letter by saying the young person was ready for hormones.

Reed was sufficiently concerned by the letter to get Hamon’s attention and ask her to read it. Hamon read it and agreed with Reed that something was off. The next time the endocrinologist came into the pod, Hamon asked him about the letter. According to Reed, the endocrinologist reported that he did not have any recollection of a patient identifying in the strange manner described in the letter, which suggested to Reed that he hadn’t read the letter, or hadn’t read it closely.
And here's Singal's article: Gender-Clinic Whistleblower Jamie Reed Has Provided A Detailed Account Of Her Most Controversial Claim, Including The Names Of Those Involved (archive)

So, anyway, all that out the way, the point is that Tony's gesturing at this excerpt of Singal's article and saying, in effect, "See! He's taking this helicopter claim completely credulously and he doesn't even know it's a meme!"

Literally: "Jesse Singal is an absolute moron".

Except, the tweeted portion of the article comes 16 paragraphs after this bit, the fourth paragraph:
Jesse Singal said:
In the eyes of a number of fairly high-profile liberal journalists, the detail about the helicopter turned Reed into an instant punchline — not just a liar, but a hackish one. “I sexually identify as an attack helicopter,” after all, is a well-worn internet meme, often used as an attack against transgender people. (It also inspired a very good science fiction short story that in turn sparked a brutal online controversy which led to its unpublishing.)

The point is:
  • A confused boy visits a therapist. He tells the therapist that he identifies as “communist, attack helicopter, human, female, maybe non binary”, and that his “hope for the transition to feel better in my body and no longer just in a flesh box”.
  • The therapist puts all this in a letter to the gender clinic and signs the boy off for cross-sex hormones.
  • On his first visit to the Washington University gender clinic, the boy is put on cross-sex hormones.
  • On his second visit, three months later, the boy is unable to articulate his gender identity and says his mental health has worsened since being prescribed hormones.
  • The staff look up his medical record, see the worrying quotes, and ask the endocrinologist who prescribed the boy cross-sex hormones.
  • The endocrinologist shrugs the whole thing off.
So a clearly mentally ill child is rushed onto hormones (on the first visit!) and his therapist and his endocrinologist do not give a shit about his mental health problems, which are left untreated and get worse.

And Tony's response? "LOL u just dont get it its a MEME u moron"
 
Last edited:
The best case scernario is this kid was referencing the meme to "own the chuds." If that's your concern during a consulation for extreme medical interventions, you are not competent to consent to such procedures. Now, obviously I don't really blame the boy. He's a teenager. They're stupid. As adults, it's our duty to ignore most of the shit they come out with until we can at least trust them with voting in a non swing-state.

The whole total affirmation now approach is like an R.L Stine story about a kid being followed around by one of those dickhead maliciously literal genies.
 
They are staking everything on the attack helicopter joke and missing the point entirely. Affirmative models do not make room for irony, humor, or self-deception, first off. These sorts of tongue-in-cheek statements describing a nebulous, fluid, sometimes inhuman gender are par for the course among teens, especially teens on the internet. An example brought up by the trans psychologist Erica Anderson in Jesse's article was "raccoon gender," which Anderson immediately pegged as a playful fantasy, and the kid admitted to Anderson it was sort of a joke and just a creative way of describing something true, that they felt particularly grungy and unknowable, perhaps. They could then use that as a start to a real discussion. So the point is that kids develop different ways of conveying almost pedestrian teen angst, and we have to be careful that new descriptions are not mistaken for new diagnoses. Just as it's probably true that someone stating they feel like a raccoon or a helicopter is not being literal, it's probably true that a sudden horror at one's developing body and sexuality has an extra layer under it that has nothing to do with gender. And it's impossible to pause and explore those feelings and the language kids use to describe them if hormones are the go-to.

It was fun to have read the article before seeing the Twitter reactions because it is very obvious they didn't read it. It's not even presented as a vindication of Jamie Reed, just additional possibilities to chew on and some discussion from clinicians who see this type of thing and make sure to delve into it with patients in their practice.
 
He’s off to a good start, falling into a trap he could have easily avoided if he was able to read.
It's not a trap bro, it's a serious own! Singel will not fucking recover in the eyes of twitter court (because twitteratti can't read more than 4 tweets) so Erin Reed is #winner.

I'm imagining this is all that matters to Aaron as he needs that asspats for his emotional health.

4blz3h.jpg

hope for the transition to feel better in my body and no longer just in a flesh box”.
Autism is one hell of a drug. :(
 
Ah yes, the old "it's just a joke bro, no one would seriously believe that!" method of moving the goalposts...
Them going "It was just a joke bro, lol you're stupid for taking it seriously!" honestly makes their side look even worse to anyone paying attention, because the whole story was that kids showing up with absurd joke identities were in fact, put right on the blockers-hormones-surgery pipeline same as everyone else who shows up at these shoddy clinics. So no, it's not a good thing for kids to be medicalized over stupid fucking internet gender jokes, even if you are one of those people who believes there are "true trans" kids that would benefit from any of this. Someone showing up to an oncologist and making off color jokes about themselves having cancer wouldn't just be given chemo with no questions asked. If they were, that's a massive red flag!
 
This is accurate, I doxed him a while ago, likely in the Keffals thread. Here’s a fun article relating to Ben.
Thanks, found your post:
This one took slightly longer to dox, but it should’ve been quicker.
For future search autism: Gillian Branstetter dox.

Edit: Reading the "That One Time I Was In A Psych Ward" article by Ben, and he said he was prescribed Wellbutrin -- as was Tony, which gives me an excuse to re-post the other thing in that post, a Reddit thread asking "What's on the top of your bucket list?" (For newcomers, Tony is _supernovasky_.)
tony-creep.png
And because Old Geranium needs search to augment his Tony autism, here's the text:
mrgelastic at 00:10 UTC, March 1 2015
Sleeping with a super hot chick. Not that I prefer them over "Normal" looking woman, but just for the experience.

_supernovasky_ at 00:15 UTC, March 1 2015
It lived up to my expectations. I never thought I would considering how I was picked on in high school and all of the problems I had growing up, and my extremely negative self image, but the joy of sleeping with someone who you can actually move their body in various ways that you simply can't with bigger girls, combined with how pleasing they are on the eyes, I loved it.

But, one thing I definitely did learn is that while the one hot chick experience I had was fun, relationships take a whole lot more.

I like that this is six months before his son was born (August 2015), and the way he describes the "one hot chick experience" he had suggests he did not consider his then wife, the future mother of his child, a "hot chick".
 
Last edited:
It never fails to make me laugh when ugly troons claim they were scoring hot women before they trooned out.

I would like to remind the class that this is what Erin REEEd looked like:
258f7778-6357-4395-991a-de7f5f2cbb66-jpeg.3713976

Remember, Erin Reed claims he banged 9.5 chicks while looking like this :story::lit:

edit: I'm an idiot and don't know how to get images to show in quotes :oops:
 
Last edited:
Though I have to admit to being frustrated when, after finding out that another member of Tony's polycule reads his thread, I posted some relevant amhole results from witchbitchaddi's future surgeon (Gabriel del Corral) and his response was:
witchbitchaddi-1627775458325549085.png
@witchbitchaddi, tweet 1627775458325549085 (archive)
But, I guess, whatever, go get your flesh sock my nigger and have a great life. I'm sure it won't be one of those college-age decisions you live to regret. (Do autists even feel regret?)
Lol of course they are completely oblivious that probably at least half of us in the thread are pussy owners ourselves, unlike these mutilated (male) freaks.
It's very appropriate for Tony to appear on this podcast. It's funded by the Population Institute, one of those "abort more babies to save the planet" charities, eugenics but for the 21st century. Meanwhile Tony's part of a movement to sterilise gay, gender-non-conforming, and mentally ill people.
Tony is palling around with an organization whose explicit goal couched in progressive language is to prevent population growth in Africa and Asia (the same Malthusian depopulation motivations underlying forced sterilization and infanticide in several countries, sponsored by Western govts/orgs) and we're the genociders
quoting from this (no I’m not some huge Cato fan but this has good info):
In 1983, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)—then the United Nations Fund for Population Activities—the world’s largest multilateral source of funding for government population programs, began issuing a prize called the Population Award, to be presented annually to “an individual, to individuals, or to an institution for the most outstanding contribution to the awareness of population questions or to their solutions.” The first prizewinners were Indira Gandhi, India’s prime minister who declared a national “Emergency” that suspended civil liberties and mandated sterilizations on a massive scale between 1975 and 1977, and Qian Xinzhong, head of China’s State Family Planning Commission and the man in charge of the country’s one‐child policy, which lasted from 1979 to 2015.
[…]
Why did the United Nations (UN) applaud Gandhi and Xinzhong, who had overseen coercive policies that victimized millions of people? Part of the answer can be found in UN Secretary‐General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar’s statement as he presented the Population Award: “If rapid population growth in the developing nations is left unchecked, it will evidently undermine all efforts for economic and social development and could easily lead to widespread depletion of each nation’s resources.” He praised the “vision and foresight” of Gandhi and Xinzhong for their efforts toward “controlling population growth.”
[…]
Others have offered in‐depth critiques of neo‐Malthusian theory. It turns out that birth rates tend to fall without coercion as countries grow richer and that population growth may make resources more plentiful thanks to humanity’s capacity for innovation. Economist Julian Simon, for example, argued that the human mind is the “ultimate resource,” allowing humanity to increase the supply of other resources, discover alternatives to overused resources, and improve efficiency of resource use. Recent research has found evidence supporting Simon’s view, showing that every 1 percent increase in population is associated with commodity prices falling by around 1 percent. In other words, each additional person helps to decrease resource scarcity on average, suggesting that humans, when free to innovate and engage in market exchange, tend to be net creators rather than net destroyers.
[…]
In both countries, neo‐Malthusian policies have contributed to higher rates of sex‐selective abortion and infanticide. China has the world’s most imbalanced sex ratio at birth, resulting in 30 million more men than women, and India has the world’s fourth most imbalanced ratio despite government and private efforts to combat sex‐selective abortion. China and India have contributed to a worldwide lopsided sex ratio at birth of 107 boys per 100 girls and to over 160 million “missing” women globally. (The natural sex ratio at birth, when unaltered by sex‐selective abortion or infanticide, is on average 105 boys born for every for every 100 girls.)
[…]
As population increases in any given territory, it encroaches upon all natural resources… . Parenthood should be considered a privilege, not a right… . Those who do not have the individual initiative and intelligence to plan and control the size of their families should be assisted, guided, and directed in every way to eliminate the undesirable offspring, who usually contribute nothing to our civilization but use up the energy and resources of the world.
The year she gave that address, Sanger founded the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), a global nongovernmental family planning organization that went on to provide technical assistance to China’s coercive one‐child program.
[…]
As early as 1959, the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations recommended that aid be given to “developing countries who establish programs to check population growth.” In 1966, President Lyndon Johnson made U.S. foreign aid dependent on countries adopting population control policies. In 1967, Congress allocated $35 million via the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for “population programs.” In 1969, President Richard Nixon established the Office of Population within USAID that was dedicated to population control and had a $50 million annual budget. In 1977, the head of that office, Reimert Ravenholt, said he hoped to sterilize a quarter of the world’s women.The World Bank also made aid contingent on population control, embracing “explicit demographic goals.”
[…]
The increasingly popular goal of lowering the population justified coercive policies in the minds of some scholars. In 1970, ecologist Garrett Hardin opined at a meeting convened by the Population Council, “It would be much easier if we have a persuasive campaign first to prepare the way for coercion later.” By 1978, in a survey of Population Association of America members, 34 percent of respondents agreed that “coercive birth control programs should be initiated in at least some countries immediately.”

By the 1980s, the background document to the International Conference on Family Planning, cowritten by the UNFPA, IPPF, and Population Council, decreed, “When provision of contraceptive information and services does not bring down the fertility level quickly enough to help speed up development, governments may decide to limit the freedomof choice of the present generation.” Many people saw coercion as acceptable because the overpopulation problem was deemed so urgent.
So a clearly mentally ill child is rushed onto hormones (on the first visit!) and his therapist and his endocrinologist do not give a shit about his mental health problems, which are left untreated and get worse.

And Tony's response? "LOL u just dont get it its a MEME u moron"
child: “here’s a joke about how my identity is unstable, HELP ME!!!!!”
therapist/endocrinologist/Tony: “the problem is clearly that you have a penis. take these drugs until your old enough that we can cut it off.”
 
child: “here’s a joke about how my identity is unstable, HELP ME!!!!!”
therapist/endocrinologist/Tony: “the problem is clearly that you have a penis. take these drugs until your old enough that we can cut it off.”
Tony's posted a couple of retweets on this subject.

From Kyle / Katelyn Burns:
kyle-singal.pngmedia_Fq-nWBfWcAExw0a.jpg
@transscribe, tweet 1634709190215081985 (archive)
Kyle Burns said:
You walk into your dentist office and the receptionist greets you and asks how you're doing.

"Tooth pain has my head spinning like a helicopter," you say to her.

She finishes checking you in as you anticipate your filling.

As you head to the waiting room she brings up her secret spreadsheet marked "Not really cavities"

From Guardian journalist Julia Carrie Wong:
wong-singal.png

Full thread:
juliacarriew-1634596621584412674.png
@juliacarriew, tweet 1634596621584412674 (archive)
Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) · Mar 11, 2023 · 4:46 PM UTC
Under the absolute best case scenario for Singal (that is, that Reed’s allegations are accurate and not made up), he has published direct quotations from a child’s therapy sessions without that child’s consent, after their privacy was egregiously violated by a third party.

Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) · Mar 11, 2023 · 4:50 PM UTC
Anyone who has ever sought mental health care can understand how utterly violative this is. The patient in question has had their privacy grievously violated, first by the clinic staffer who reviewed records, copied info, and shared it, and again by Singal for publishing it.

Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) · Mar 11, 2023 · 4:55 PM UTC
I honestly feel sick thinking about it. Journalists have broad latitude to make private information public, but we have an ethical responsibility to balance the public interest with potential harms, must take particular care when dealing with minors and vulnerable populations.

Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) · Mar 11, 2023 · 4:59 PM UTC
Even if there is no way that this patient could be identifiable to others, they are now being discussed in a way that is likely recognizable to the patient themself. Can you imagine how horrific that would be? To read about your private sessions with your therapist in the press?

Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) · Mar 11, 2023 · 5:01 PM UTC
The patient did not consent to their private communications with their therapist being made public, nor did their therapist. An uninvolved third party released info to a fourth party for publication, not in order to promote the wellbeing of the patient, but to win an argument.

Trans activists: Children are thoroughly assessed before being given gender-affirming care.

Whistleblower & reporter: Here's at least one case where that wasn't true.

Trans activists: What do you know, you’re just a receptionist.

Whistleblower & reporter: He told his therapist he identified as a helicopter.

Trans activists: lol u don't understand that it's a meme u absolute moron

Whistleblower & reporter: Just look at these direct quotes from this child’s therapist letter referring him for hormones, which he got on his first appointment.

Trans activists: HOw COulD YOu violAte tHIS PatIENt’s pRIvacY YOU sHOULD go to jaIl!

Edit: Here's a bunch of people saying Jesse Singal and Jamie Reed are going to jail, which I'm sure will age just as well as Louise Mensch’s claim that Steve Bannon was headed for the death penalty for espionage.

I've included archive links for each; these are just the tweets that contain "singal" and "jail", some of the other ones shown in the archives are just as retarded.
I very much enjoy that these are the same people who want to "abolish the police".

Edit, again: The outbreak of stupidity is just… amazing. Some people very confidentally weighing in about Singal and Jamie Reed violating "HIPPA". Best tweet:
PsychEnjoyer-1634628068391133192.png
@PsychEnjoyer, tweet 1634628068391133192 (archive)
 
Last edited:
Back