How Biden's New Washing Machine Regulations Could Ruin Laundry Day - They're waging a war on all appliances, not just gas stoves

Manufacturers say government climate change initiative would make your washing cycles longer, clothes dirtier​

1678841185803.png
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 25: U.S. President Joe Biden makes an announcement on additional military support for Ukraine in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on January 25, 2023 in Washington, DC. President Biden said the U.S. will send 31 M-1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine to aid in their fight against Russia after Germany approved the delivery of Leopard 2 tanks to Kyiv. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Collin Anderson
March 13, 2023

When Cincinnati firefighter Ed Wallace bought a high efficiency Whirlpool washing machine, he came to regret the decision almost immediately. The machine used less water—not enough to clean Wallace's work clothes—and his colleagues at the firehouse quickly took notice. "I walked past my guys and they say, 'Dude, you stink!'" Wallace said. "I smelled myself, and yeah, that's me stinking."

Now, President Joe Biden is pushing regulations that could force Wallace's stinky situation upon millions of Americans.

Biden's Energy Department last month proposed new efficiency standards for washing machines that would require new appliances to use considerably less water, all in an effort to "confront the global climate crisis." Those mandates would force manufacturers to reduce cleaning performance to ensure their machines comply, leading industry giants such as Whirlpool said in public comments on the rule. They'll also make the appliances more expensive and laundry day a headache—each cycle will take longer, the detergent will cost more, and in the end, the clothes will be less clean, the manufacturers say.

The proposed washing machine rule marks the latest example of the administration turning to consumer regulations to advance its climate change goals. Last month, the Energy Department published an analysis of its proposed cooking appliance efficiency regulations, which it found would effectively ban half of all gas stoves on the U.S. market from being sold. The department has also proposed new efficiency standards for refrigerators, which could come into effect in 2027. "Collectively these energy efficiency actions … support President Biden's ambitious clean energy agenda to combat the climate crisis," the Energy Department said in February.

While the Energy Department—which did not return a request for comment—acknowledged in its proposal that "maintaining acceptable cleaning performance can be more difficult as energy and water levels are reduced," it expressed confidence that Whirlpool and other appliance manufacturers can comply with its regulations without sacrificing stain removal and other performance standards. For the Heritage Foundation's Travis Fisher, however, manufacturer concerns over the proposal are justified.

"When you're squeezing all you can out of the efficiency in terms of electricity use and water … you by definition either make the appliance worse or slower," said Fisher, who serves as a senior research fellow at the foundation's Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment. "Why are we so focused on the energy output, as opposed to if it's helping me wash my clothes? That standard has kind of gone off the rails."

Beyond the performance standard debate, the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers argued that the Energy Department's washing machine regulations "would have a disproportionate, negative impact on low-income households" by eliminating cheaper appliances from the market. The Energy Department estimates that manufacturers will incur nearly $700 million in conversion costs to transition to the new machines.

The department countered concerns over higher appliance prices by arguing in its proposal that consumers will ultimately save money under the regulations through lower energy and water bills. Still, those estimated savings won't apply to all consumers, roughly a quarter of whom "would experience a net cost" thanks to the efficiency rule, according to the Energy Department's proposal.

The Energy Department is required to conduct efficiency standard reviews every six years under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, which Congress enacted in 1975, two years after an Arab oil embargo inflated gas prices in the United States. The Clinton administration subsequently established the country's first washing machine energy and water efficiency standards in 2001, just before former president George W. Bush took office. Those standards led to "ruined laundry, ongoing maintenance, and service calls," prompting Whirlpool to release a cleaning product "specifically designed to address moldy washing machines," according to George Washington University's Sofie Miller.

The debacle has not stopped the Biden administration from moving forward with more stringent appliance energy efficiency standards, which have not been updated for washing machines since 2012. The tightening of those standards "could put performance at risk" but is unlikely to provide "meaningful energy savings," the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers says, because most appliances covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act "now operate at peak efficiency."

"They keep tightening the standards, and I'm not sure their reasoning makes sense anymore," Fisher told the Washington Free Beacon.

Source (Archive)
 
Oh boy. The climate agenda entails not only severely reduced travel, summers without AC, and winters without heat and fire, but now we gotta get used to ourselves and others smelling like shit as well? What next?


Coming from the same people who think we should get rid of the combustible engine and have only electric vehicles...which like the combustible also runs on a form of fossil fuel (coal.) With nuclear power that wouldn't be so pointless...but muh Chernobyl...

Consider this video. It lampoons the green agenda and how the elites really see it. Made decades ago. This whole shit stinks of low flow toilet.

Are we trying to recreate the great depression? Take away all the jobs, put the banks out of business, take away cars, blow up the food factories, get rid of electricity and water.

But at least it will stop global warming which is scientifically proven to be a natural occurrence and humans have little to no impact on it.
They very much are but they completely forgot the conditions that recreated the great age of Piracy and the mobsters from the Prohibition. This type of shit will hurt them as well. Not immediately, but it will.
 
Oh boy. The climate agenda entails not only severely reduced travel, summers without AC, and winters without heat and fire, but now we gotta get used to ourselves and others smelling like shit as well? What next?


Coming from the same people who think we should get rid of the combustible engine and have only electric vehicles...which like the combustible also runs on a form of fossil fuel (coal.) With nuclear power that wouldn't be so pointless...but muh Chernobyl...
Make Americans Serfs Again.

It seems to be their end game. Environmental laws are basically modern sumptuary laws.
 
Biden's Energy Department last month proposed new efficiency standards for washing machines that would require new appliances to use considerably less water,
Water saving is important as it will be required to extinguish the growing number of electric car fires, which require 10x more water than a regular ICE vehicle.
 
And God forbid you live a little too far north, and it's winter, and the electricity goes out.
In a lot of new construction I've seen, they have large gas powered generators built into their homes to power their homes in case of power outage. In some cases they have a gas line run to their home or, if they can't, use large propane tanks, just to run their generator and nothing else.
 
reject appliance based washing machines
embrace handwashing your clothes with a portable washing device
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hubelublub
I think the over all goal here is just to get the proles used to a lower standard of living.

For the Environment of course...

You know, sacrifice your QOL so the world doesn't burn. Don't look at the elites! They're allowed to live high because they're doing all the real work to save the world! All those big houses, fancy cars and plane trips are soley for your own good! Don't question it citizen or your bug protein ration for the week will be reduced for non-compliance! Remember be happy...or else.

Some animals are plain just more equal then others I guess.
 
Already sperged about it another thread; but was in Home Depot just looking around, a washer/dryer combo, one of the talking points on the card was something like "Firmware updates through Wi-Fi." Just in case big brother thinks you're washing your clothes a bit too much or whatever.
I swear to god IoT is easily the top 5 worst things of the 21st century.
 
I swear to god IoT is easily the top 5 worst things of the 21st century.
Every once in a while when out shopping, I'll see one of those mobile kiosk's selling smart home solutions or whatever. I do what I can to avoid and not make eye contact, but everyone once in a while they do their damndest to get my attention.

"Excuse me sir, have you ever thought about having a smart home?"

"No thanks, I'm straight."
 
Every once in a while when out shopping, I'll see one of those mobile kiosk's selling smart home solutions or whatever. I do what I can to avoid and not make eye contact, but everyone once in a while they do their damndest to get my attention.

"Excuse me sir, have you ever thought about having a smart home?"

"No thanks, I'm straight."
The only things I like are cameras but overall they are probably used to collect info in you to sell you shit or some other BS. I wonder if there’s a based jail broken version of smart homes. Highly doubt it though.
 


You might consider manual way of doing things. Looks like about same amount of time.
 
Back