- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
These niggers should be put up against a wall and shot.
This opinion is entirely protected by the First Amendment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These niggers should be put up against a wall and shot.
Just shoot _________ in the head and he stops being a problem. They have to find a new guy to be the problem...But shooting _________ in the head solves an immediate problem permanently. Just shoot _________ in the head and murder him.
If enough people do what the OP did then there will be too many people for Cuckwood to arrest, alls I'm saying.
This sheriff actually accused people of hiding behind freedom of speech. His response to minor criticism is having a man arrested and publicly humiliating him instead of doing his job. Gee guys, I'm beginning to think Jews may be an existential threat to the freedoms of the United States. Anyway, here are some posts:
View attachment 4782554
View attachment 4782562
View attachment 4782566
these stupid niggers, he said "in minecraft." how can you interpret that as a death threat
Incitement of lawless action is not covered by the 1st Amendment.These niggers should be put up against a wall and shot.
This opinion is entirely protected by the First Amendment.
I think Null once said that nowadays "in minecraft" holds as much weight as "in the irl". The law has caught up in that lingo.these stupid niggers, he said "in minecraft." how can you interpret that as a death threat
Confirmed janitors aren't just pedophile trannies but glowies as well
Again what the fuck do you label as "incitement" and what documents are you trusting on this? I'd like to see if people were getting arrested for saying "inciting" things about politicians states away from them a few decades back.Incitement of lawless action is not covered by the 1st Amendment
I guess it really depends on your tastes, social skills, and especially the altchans/altchan spheres that you go into. But the death of quality IBs usually occurs by either of these:I use many healthy alternative imageboards for specialized topics.
I've definitely noticed that. Another odd thing is that (at least from my personal experience) real CP is overwhelmingly posted on altchans, not 4chan. I'm not an avid 4channer anymore, I sometimes still go back for happenings to see in which direction(s) are they sperging out. But not once, did I see CP dumps being posted, the same way as on altchans. Sure the moderation is way better, but I can't believe it's that airtight. Look at how long it takes to remove normal rule-offending posts on 4bans. Usually between 10-50 minutes I'd say. It's just weird to suppose, that they detect that CP that they are supposed to receive and then wait several times that time on other posts. But maybe I'm just wrong, I don't sit there refreshing the catalog like some sort of jannie.Anyone who uses alternative imageboards for even a short amount of time will see child pornography spam which is completely automated, targets several imageboards at exactly the same time, and links to domains on the clearnet. Isn't that odd?
4chan's overall userbase is much larger than several of the biggest altchans combined meaning there will almost always be someone immediately willing to report or comment on it, plus it's common knowledge that 4chan's moderation is dick-deep in glowies. The few who still try to post CP do so either because they have the security or lack-of-jurisdiction necessary to avoid trouble, or are too stupid to realize they're incriminating themselves.Sure the moderation is way better, but I can't believe it's that airtight.
4chan has zero issues when it comes to blocking images/files with copyright claims on it. I've had it happen to me several times.t's just weird to suppose, that they detect that CP that they are supposed to receive and then wait several times that time on other posts. But maybe I'm just wrong, I don't sit there refreshing the catalog like some sort of jannie.
People were getting arrested for it a century ago under 18 USC Section 871, see United States v. Stickrath:Again what the fuck do you label as "incitement" and what documents are you trusting on this? I'd like to see if people were getting arrested for saying "inciting" things about politicians states away from them a few decades back.
The indictment was upheld in a district court. Whether this would happen in today's court is debatable but there is precedent for it. 18 USC Section 871 applies specifically to threats made against the president but doesn't lay any special definitions for what constitutes incitement.[Stickrath] did unlawfully, knowingly, and willfully make a threat against the President of the United States, to wit, a threat to take the life of or to inflict bodily harm upon the said the President of the United States, said threat being then and there uttered and spoken by the said Pemberton W. Stickrath in words and substance as follows, to wit: 'President Wilson ought to be killed. It is a wonder some one has not done it already. If I had an opportunity, I would do it myself'-- contrary to the form of the statute.
That was in 1917, when the US had entered World War I and was part of Woodrow Wilson's unprecedented suspension of civil liberties of those opposed to the war. For a more recent one, check United States v. Bagdasarian, who was cleared of both personally threatening to kill Obama AND inciting others to kill Obama, despite making statements like "Obama fk the niggar, he will have a 50 cal in the head soon” and “shoot the nig country fkd for another 4 years+" since he did not personally threaten to kill Obama nor directly incite others to violence. Court cites Watts v. United States (Vietnam draftee cleared for making jokes about shooting LBJ) as precedent.People were getting arrested for it a century ago under 18 USC Section 871, see United States v. Stickrath:
The indictment was upheld in a district court. Whether this would happen in today's court is debatable but there is precedent for it. 18 USC Section 871 applies specifically to threats made against the president but doesn't lay any special definitions for what constitutes incitement.
It's ludicrous that this dude is facing extradition to a notoriously corrupt county in the shithole known as Florida, where the sheriff who is personally interested in the case is the one who gets custody of him. Mike Shitwood, the homosexual faggot, should be [redacted] up against a [redacted] and then [redacted] in the [redacted] again and again until he is [redacted].Additionally, Sheriff Chitwood and the New Jersey cops violated Article IV, Section 2 (Extradition Clause) and the Sixth Amendment by extraditing him to Florida, since the proper venue for the alleged crime is either New Jersey or a federal court, not Volusia County.
4/pol/ has been shit a long time my friend.This honestly should be the nail in the coffin for /pol/, why anyone would post there after this is beyond me. I jumped ship and migrated here relatively recently, but even a few years back the board culture was turning into shit. I’d been browsing the board for around a decade and it seems like everything went to utter shit post ‘rona. I feel as if a number of things coincided with this, like the quarantining of many controversial subs like thedonald and those devoted to incels, the boomers filtering in due to the Q bullshit, zoomies home from school discovering the internet, and the overwhelming demoralization campaigns run on the daily. The Russia shilling was really it for me personally, it’s like a new breed of posters have cropped up that can not be reasoned with. Rarely is there any actual conversation going. Plus the place obviously glows brighter than the sun at this point. What popular boards aren’t astroturfed by nu-pol users are astroturfed by troons, like /b/.
Regretfully this BS had trickled into other less conspicuous boards, you can’t go to /tv/ without seeing threads with incels seething about random women, or to traditionally feminine boards like /cgl/ without seeing troons making a mockery of the fairer sex.
Off my soapbox, but it’s depressing seeing a site once known as a bastion of free speech fall so hard.
Newfags just pump and dump their lewd pics rather than actually talking about relevant shit or even engaging in waifufaggotry discourse.4/pol/ has been shit a long time my friend.
Hell I went to /vg/ for the first time in a long time. Lot more people just spamming ecchi of whatever attractive character they like in the threads. Like damn man I like some characters to but if I want pictures of them I'll look it up myself. Has it ways been that way?
Least the Dominions thread seems alright.
This is a problem on so many boards. So many threads on /biz/ have coom bait as the pic for their OP so even on the odd chance that the OP wrote something substance half of the replies are "That's a man" (a small percentage of that is probably troons saying it, or at least that's a popular theory) or "Built for BBC."Newfags just pump and dump their lewd pics rather than actually talking about relevant shit or even engaging in waifufaggotry discourse.
how do you see the id of these users? Or is it just specific to the board.
/Pol/ has IDs because it's infiltrated with samefags & fedsh
how do you see the id of these users? Or is it just specific to the board.