Culture A World Without Men - The women of South Korea’s 4B movement aren’t fighting the patriarchy — they’re leaving it behind entirely.

Source: https://www.thecut.com/2023/03/4b-movement-feminism-south-korea.html
Archive: https://archive.is/IRoTZ

A World Without Men​

Anna Louie Sussman

The women of South Korea’s 4B movement aren’t fighting the patriarchy — they’re leaving it behind entirely.​


Youngmi’s childhood was a difficult one. The 25-year-old nurse was born to a poor family in Daegu, South Korea, known for being one of the most conservative cities in the country. Youngmi’s mom left the home when Youngmi was young to escape her husband’s physical abuse, leaving her and her sister behind with him and their paternal grandmother. When she was 5, her 8-year-old sister started losing her hair from stress.

As she grew older, Youngmi found herself depressed, unsure of what her future held, and financially unstable. In Korea’s patriarchal society — in which women are generally expected to defer to their fathers and to adhere to rigid beauty standards — she felt like a perpetual victim, obsessed by the wrongs done to her by her father and pressured into maintaining her appearance in order to please men. Despite her meager budget as a nursing student, she purchased new clothes each season, spending a lot of money on cheap, poor-quality clothes from H&M. She wore makeup religiously. “I could not go outside without any makeup. I felt ashamed of my face,” she said. “I had this pressure of wanting to look beautiful and wanting to be desirable, physically or sexually.”

While scrolling through Twitter in 2018, Youngmi came across footage of protests taking place in the streets of Seoul. In South Korea, where cases of femicide, revenge porn, and dating violence are widespread, a surge in spy-cam sex crimes, overwhelmingly committed by men, had mostly resulted in fines and suspended jail sentences, if they were prosecuted at all. That was not the case, however, for one 25-year-old woman who had taken a nonconsensual photo of a nude male model at art school and posted it online; she was sentenced to ten months in prison and court-ordered sexual-violence counseling. The demonstrations were a reaction to the blatant hypocrisy.

Youngmi was moved by the solidarity she saw, but there was one thing she found perplexing: Many of the women at the protests shaved their heads on-camera. As she began to follow more feminist Twitter accounts, Youngmi understood this was a public act of rejection of those same aesthetic expectations imposed on Korean women that have made the country a leader in grooming products and plastic surgery. She began to realize that “you know, men do not do that — men do not feel the pressure to buy clothes every season or wear makeup.”

Soon, Youngmi shaved her head, too, and stopped wearing makeup, joining the so-called “escape the corset” movement happening among young women in South Korea. The movement, which first gained popularity in 2018, saw Korean women publicly turn away from societally imposed beauty standards by cutting their hair short and going barefaced. (Youngmi was not alone — in 2019, a survey found that 24 percent of women in their 20s reported cutting back their spending on beauty products in the previous year, with many saying they no longer felt they needed to put in the effort.) This eventually led Youngmi to “4B,” a smaller but growing movement among Korean women. 4B is shorthand for four Korean words that all start with bi-, or “no”: The first no, bihon, is the refusal of heterosexual marriage. Bichulsan is the refusal of childbirth, biyeonae is saying no to dating, and bisekseu is the rejection of heterosexual sexual relationships. It is both an ideological stance and a lifestyle, and many women I spoke to extend their boycott to nearly all the men in their lives, including distancing themselves from male friends.

Through open chat groups on KakaoTalk, Youngmi connected with other feminists in Daegu, where she lived with her mother while attending nursing school, soon meeting each other offline. (“It’s so easy to recognize each other with short hair,” she said.) She stopped seeing her friends from high school and middle school whose conversations still revolved around makeup, clothes, and boys. When we met last November at a café in Seoul, where she’s been living for the last two years, she was barefaced and dressed comfortably in loose jeans and a white fleece jacket. Her hair was long enough to be pulled back in a ponytail, as she’d grown tired of people asking about her short hair at her nursing job, but it was tucked into a white baseball cap. Feminism, she said, had helped her recognize that it was patriarchy that was the problem, not her — that “the bad things that happened in your life are not your fault,” she said.

For Youngmi and many others who subscribe to its basic premises, 4B, or “practicing bihon,” is the only path by which a Korean woman today can live autonomously. In their view, Korean men are essentially beyond redemption, and Korean culture, on the whole, is hopelessly patriarchal — often downright misogynistic. A 2016 survey by the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family found the incidence of intimate-partner violence at 41.5 percent, significantly higher than the global average of 30 percent. While 4B’s adherents may hope to change society — through demonstrations and online activism, and by modeling an alternative lifestyle to other women — they are not trying to change the men whom they view as their oppressors. It is too soon to tell whether this movement can survive and thrive over the long haul. But its ideas and actions have already affected the country’s online discourse, its politics, and most of all, individual women’s lives.

“Practicing bihon means you’re eliminating the risks that come from heterosexual marriage or dating,” Yeowon, a 26-year-old office worker, told me on a café terrace in the seaside southern city of Busan. We talked over coffee and pastries, along with Yeowon’s girlfriend and another of their friends, all of them wearing wide black pants and black sweaters and sporting cropped short haircuts. Those risks Yeowon alluded to might seem familiar — trading career for child-rearing and housework, as well as the threat of physical violence — but in Korea, Yeowon said, marriage presents an existential threat.

There was a time when Minji, a 4B adherent in Daegu, had wanted to get married, “because, you know, everyone wants to get married.” Knowing what she knows now, however — like that domestic violence, as she puts it, is so common — “I don’t want to get married anymore.” Minji, 27, is probably heterosexual, she said, and has liked a few guys in the past, but they wanted her to “treat them like a king.” So she has no problem boycotting the men of her generation, who are little better than her selfish and abusive father.

Even young women who are not members of the movement echo that they could not imagine dating or marrying a Korean man. Sooyeon, a teacher in her early 30s, told me that talking to her male friends “made me always feel like, ‘Oh, maybe I can never find a Korean man’ … Even in my generation, some guys expect a really traditional role from their spouse.” As if to prove her point, a recent survey by a matchmaking company found that women were reluctant to marry because of the division of housework, while men hesitated because of “feminism.”

It is unclear how widespread or popular the 4B movement is given its fluid online and offline nature and its evolution over the years, beginning sometime around 2015 or 2016 when a simple “no-marriage” lifestyle grew to include a boycott of men and reproductive labor more broadly. One article estimated 50,000 adherents; others have put the movement’s numbers at under 5,000. Its origin story is similarly complex, though its contours can be traced.

Following years of financial crises in which young people faced growing housing costs and intense competition for university spots and jobs, the way women and men related to each other openly soured. Beginning in 2013, the rate of college enrollment among Korean women surpassed those of men; today, nearly three-fourths of women are enrolled in higher education, compared with less than two-thirds of men. Previously, women were expected to drop out of the labor force after marriage or parenthood. Now, young men see their female peers as competitors for increasingly scarce jobs. (Several academics I spoke with noted to me that Korea is largely ethnically and racially homogenous, making gender the default and central societal fault line.) In online forums and on social media, disgruntled men began labeling college-educated women kimchinyeo, or “kimchee women,” giving a name to “the stereotype of Korean women as selfish, vain, and obsessed with themselves while exploiting their partners,” wrote feminist scholar Euisol Jeong in her doctoral thesis on “troll feminism.”

Around 2014 and 2015, a virulently misogynistic and anti-feminist community called “Ilbe” grew in size and prominence. In its interpretation, women were demanding additional rights and privileges when they already benefited from avoiding the country’s compulsory military service. To the Ilbe community, the entire female populace is gold-digging and shallow. Female Korean internet users responded by latching onto misogynistic strategies like trolling, mockery, and abusive language. Members of Megalia, one of the more prominent feminist sites in this period, coined the term hannamchung, or “Korean male-bug,” which stereotyped Korean men as “ugly, sexist, and obsessed with buying sex,” wrote Jeong.

In 2016, a young man murdered a young woman in a Seoul public bathroom, telling police after that he killed her because women had always ignored him. Despite the perpetrator’s own statement, police refused to label the murder a hate crime. Furious, women flocked to online feminist message boards, communities, and chat forums. This wave of digital feminism attracted women from all backgrounds, including working-class women like Minji and Youngmi, making it different from traditional Korean feminism, which was largely confined to universities, NGOs that often received government support, and other elite spaces.

In December of that year, as Korea’s fertility rate hovered at 1.2 births per woman (it has since slid to 0.78, the lowest in the world), the Korean government launched an online “National Birth Map” that showed the number of women of reproductive age in each municipality, illustrating just what it expected of its female citizens. (South Korean president Yoon Suk-yeol won the election in March 2022 with a message that blamed feminism for Korea’s low birth rate, and a promise to abolish the country’s Ministry of Gender Equality and Family. ) Women were outraged by the map, observing that the government appeared to consider them “livestock”; one Twitter user reportedly created a mock map illustrating the concentration of Korean men with sexual dysfunction. Several of these digital feminists responded with a boycott to the reproductive labor expected by the state and decided that the surest way to avoid pregnancy was to avoid men altogether. It was through these online communities that 4B emerged as a slogan, and ultimately a movement.

The blowback and fear that 4B practitioners experience underscores their conviction that Korea is still a frightening place for women. Yeowon’s photo was posted on an Ilbe site after participating in a feminist protest, and she was harassed and sexually threatened online for weeks. Youngmi said men have tried to physically attack her on the street three or four times. She recalled an episode when she and some friends, who all had cropped haircuts, were dining at a Japanese restaurant in Daegu. Throughout the night, the restaurant owner and his friends made gagging and puking noises and gestures at them. When Minji and I met at a coffee shop near the city’s central train station, she told me she was worried that someone in the café might post a photo of her online because she had short hair and was speaking openly about feminism. Others I spoke with insisted on using pseudonyms for safety reasons.

There are other consequences to forgoing long-term partnerships with men. Korea has the largest gender pay gap in the rich world, with women earning 31 percent less than men, and women still face widespread discrimination in the labor market, something the movement recognizes. A widely circulated 2018 tweet encouraged 4B women to save the money they would have otherwise spent on “self-fashioning labor” to sustain an independent life instead of winding up “a penniless granny with a wardrobe full of clothes.”

Women who commit to 4B “just work hard, because they know they will not have a breadwinner man or husband,” said Jeong, the scholar who wrote her doctoral thesis on troll feminism, adding that some take two or three jobs. Youngmi and her girlfriend live together about an hour by subway outside of downtown Seoul where rent is more affordable. Yeowon said her small studio apartment, the best option she can afford right now, is in an unsafe neighborhood near a market where drunken men often congregate after the local bars close. Her partner, who works in IT, recently moved apartments because her last one had cockroaches.

Several 4B women I met in Seoul still lived with their parents. Yeowon’s partner lives by herself but still eats at her parents’ house several times a week, even though they are no longer emotionally close. Her mother’s cooking is excellent, she said, and it saves her time and money. “I treat it like a restaurant,” she added. Youngmi and her friends created a map of women-owned businesses in Daegu so they could ensure their dollars went to supporting other women. “The economy is a very important issue for us,” she told me. Other 4B groups host events with personal-finance experts to help women learn how to save and invest. A subgroup of an online community called “WITH” (which stands for “Women in the Hell,” Hell being a nickname for Korea) is specifically focused on economics; members post job listings, advice on which banks are offering the best interest rates, and other financial tips. Han, a math tutor who runs her own tutoring company in Daegu, said she believes as women’s collective economic power grows, so will their political power, something she sees playing out over the next 20 years. Their interest in finance is both about the pressing matter of living an economically viable life today and the longer-term possibility that women practicing 4B at scale will eventually weaken the patriarchy. “When women are more economically influential, then it’s possible that the political parties will listen to women as important voters,” Han added. “But until then, I feel like women will still be utilized — their bodies will be utilized to reproduce.”

But it’s not just political backlash and straightened economic circumstances that pose a threat to the long-term sustainability of 4B and its influence. Like any social movement, 4B has its own internal rifts and divisions: Can 4B women be friends with men? With women who still want to date men? Does lesbianism privatize relationships, destroy feminist solidarity, and resexualize women, or is it a necessary foundation for a world without men? Some 4B practitioners also were turned off by the movement’s focus on cisgender women to the exclusion of trans women; many of the online communities require verification with a photo ID attesting to the applicant’s sex, and Minji said that one of the feminist communities she joined asked her to submit a video of her Adam’s apple, ostensibly to ensure she wasn’t assigned male at birth. But regardless of where they stand on these questions, for the more than a dozen 4B practitioners I met in Korea, these were academic disagreements that had little impact on their own personal commitment to living apart from men.

For a movement born of rage, what happens when the rage mellows or when other concerns take priority? Yeowon said some of her friends are “selective feminists” who forgo makeup when they meet up with her, but are ultimately not ready to give up the advantages that come with being conventionally attractive. “They cannot let go of this power as women, of using femininity,” she said. “There are these feminists who say, ‘Oh, I’m a feminist, I hate men, but I also want to be, you know, consumable.’” She and her friends described videos on YouTube of ex-bihon women who told viewers that they’d seen the light and returned to heterosexuality, narratives that recall the profusion of #TradWife content online.

At least for now, it is clear that the message of 4B, regardless of how it is practiced, or however closely its followers identify with the label, has provided a refuge for Korean women. Taekyung, 24, is getting her master’s degree in German literature at Ewha University, an all-women’s university with a robust campus feminism movement and a respected gender-studies department. On a beautiful fall day, she proudly walked me around the campus, which dates from the 1880s, showing me the campus gift shop and the area where students socialize and sometimes take naps.

She has tried to avoid men since high school, after doing a research project on Ilbe that brought her to web pages where men had posted nude photos of their female family members and discussed how to get away with rape. She went to Sungshin Women’s University, another all-women’s university, for undergrad. She doesn’t believe in labels for her own sexual orientation and has little interest in dating other women, but she does believe in political lesbianism as a way for women to establish lives separate from men — with an emphasis on the “political” rather than the “lesbian.” “I don’t need to try being a lesbian, because in political lesbianism, I can just be a person, like a normal person — a human being. I can be in a safe place,” she told me as we drank sweet-potato lattes at a campus café. The most important thing, in her view, is the absence of men. “Always, when I use the word ‘safe place,’ it means the place for women.”
 
It wasn’t some nebulous patriarchy who hurt her, it was her father. That’s a lot harder to process that just making the baddy a nebulous evil organisation like a superhero movie.

But when so many fathers hurt their daughters, and so many husbands abuse their wives... wouldn't that indicate a problem on a greater scale? Individual male/female relationship dynamics don't exist inside a vacuum. They are influenced by the larger society.

Radical feminism was just a bunch of women coming together, sharing their stories amongst themselves, comparing notes, seeing patterns emerge, and getting angry at a society that influenced the men in their lives to be hurtful.
 
Putting other stuff aside for a second.. I think the most ironic part of all this is that these are the very type of people, type of women who fight and screech to keep things like the country's porn and hentai ban in place. And the very type who proactively try to ban things like sex dolls/bots.
 
Radical feminism was just a bunch of women coming together, sharing their stories amongst themselves, comparing notes, seeing patterns emerge, and getting angry at a society that influenced the men in their lives to be hurtful.
Nothing radical or feminist about not wanting people beat. Be they male or female.

Women got to together to fight such abuse and that was regular feminism. Than some of those women took it a step further and said nonsense like "all heterosexual sex is abuse, women are oppressed when their homemakers and women are only victims of abuse, never perpetrators." Thats radical feminism.
 
8 Goddesses. Basically the neglected daughter of the former dictator/national saviour got the presidency and took orders from the cult that groomed her.
View attachment 4791288View attachment 4791340
I remember all the way back in 2014 when gamergate was happening some korean guy showed up at 8chan (the only place where you could talk about gg without getting banned at the time) talking about all this over and over, and even the biggest tinfoil hat schizos there dismissed it as being too insane to be true.

Again, the guys who rambled about flouride and the deep state thought this was too crazy even for them.
 
Nothing radical or feminist about not wanting people beat. Be they male or female.

Women got to together to fight such abuse and that was regular feminism. Than some of those women took it a step further and said nonsense like "all heterosexual sex is abuse, women are oppressed when their homemakers and women are only victims of abuse, never perpetrators." Thats radical feminism.

This is one of the reasons I really don't like seriously using the term "TERF," it's an intentionally loaded term meant to put a certain image in people's heads. "If you don't believe LARPing men should be in female bathrooms then you aren't just 'trans exclusionary' but "radical" as well."
 
East Asians not respecting wahmen?

Next you'll tell me they have horrible human rights and stink like shit
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Shield Breaker
Nothing radical or feminist about not wanting people beat. Be they male or female.

Women got to together to fight such abuse and that was regular feminism. Than some of those women took it a step further and said nonsense like "all heterosexual sex is abuse, women are oppressed when their homemakers and women are only victims of abuse, never perpetrators." Thats radical feminism.

I don't doubt that there's feminists who push things to the extreme, the whole "all heterosexual sex is abuse" was definitely a reach, but even that was just people oversimplifying and misinterpreting the writings of Andrea Dworkin and others. There is a "sweet spot" of feminism where women can take personal responsibility/accountability, and not have a victim mentality, while also airing out grievances towards men...

Anyway, my point was that male abusive behavior is a pattern across societies, and women are comparing notes, and women are trying to protect themselves (whatever you might want to call that). Blaming individual men is missing the bigger picture.
 
Anyway, my point was that male abusive behavior is a pattern across societies, and women are comparing notes, and women are trying to protect themselves (whatever you might want to call that). Blaming individual men is missing the bigger picture.
Noticing the pattern of some men beating women and not noticing the pattern of most men NOT beating women (because that doesn't fit the narrative they wanted to claim is true) is peak galaxy brain (muh poison M&Ms analogy). Exactly what you would expect from people motivated not by a search for truth but a desire to build a grievance-based collective.

And that was many decades ago. Coming to the same feminist conclusions now is so beyond insane it shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone.
 
For a movement born of rage, what happens when the rage mellows or when other concerns take priority? Yeowon said some of her friends are “selective feminists” who forgo makeup when they meet up with her, but are ultimately not ready to give up the advantages that come with being conventionally attractive. “They cannot let go of this power as women, of using femininity,” she said. “There are these feminists who say, ‘Oh, I’m a feminist, I hate men, but I also want to be, you know, consumable.’”
I was perusing radfem twitter a few days ago-and you saw this sort of thing. "Men are all bad, the revolution will kill all men, heterosexual sex is entirely rape", Andrea Dworkin sort of stuff, and then I saw some incel comment elsewhere about how women were commenting on a hot rapist's mugshot(mulatto guy with blonde hair and chad jawline-saying they'd be fine with being raped).

The reason why the former will never gain traction (women should be entirely free from men, men are an oppressor class, men should be destroyed) is because heterosexual women still exist. Much to the rage of ugly lesbians who comprise the sort of attitudes depicted here.

The sort of women who become political lesbians and talk about being free of feminity, or even the concept of "Woman" itself as patriarchal imposition-are always the ugly, malformed and resentful. Never the hot women that get loads of dick.

I don't doubt Korea will probably decline as their sex wars seem particularly severe(we could genuinely see the North reunite the country in a century), but these sorts of feminist movements with all their seething rage and passionate misandry will fail. Why? Because women actually want sex with men. That's why.
 
Noticing the pattern of some men beating women and not noticing the pattern of most men NOT beating women (because that doesn't fit the narrative they wanted to claim is true) is peak galaxy brain (muh poison M&Ms analogy). Exactly what you would expect from people motivated not by a search for truth but a desire to build a grievance-based collective.

NOT beating women is literally the barest minimum standard for men to meet. The bar is truly in hell.

Women aren't comparing notes on pro-social male behavior, because they have no reason to, because they're off the internet and enjoying life with their families.

Women who are mistreated by men are comparing notes, because they're miserable and trying to make sense of their shitty lives and the shitty society they're forced to exist within. Can you blame them? The mistreatment has gotten so bad that they're now avoiding men en masse. This should tell you something about the men in that society.

Men will keep screeching though, anything to avoid improving and being better fathers and husbands
 
Meanwhile, Kim Jong-Il and Kim Il-Sung looks down from Heaven and laughs. As they know their Best Korea will eventually rule over the Worst one.

If I remember correctly, its this Matriarchal system is part of the reason why birth rates are abysmal right now in SK. The weird cult that is running it is definitely not helping. Made worse when the companies are definitely capitalizing on the women at work deal like the corpos here in the US do. Definitely the reason corpotocracy is so strong down there. No solid families to offset it.

And unless that changes, there is only going to be spinsters are incels left on SK in the coming decades.
 
Whenever I see people spout this 'fuck men men bad lesbians are the future' shit, whether it's this or the dating analysis article or something else, I feel like I should go on this long rant where I explain that being a dyke is a choice and that making it sets one up for a life of misery and how there's a reason why there seem to be no elderly lesbians. But this article also doesn't seem appropriate for it.

Instead, I'm just going to do the flipping game and say: Imagine if all this 4B shit was an AF manifesto about how women suck, how women need to be ostracised from society and how everyone needs to be gay, just to spite women. "Incels" "Fucking virgins!" "live in your mother's basement", you'd never hear the end of it, all the belitteling and demeaning in the world, endorsed and supported on every platform, yet here we find bloggers and self-professed journalists unable to say a single openly negative thing about it or point towards where this shit leads to long-term.
 
NOT beating women is literally the barest minimum standard for men to meet. The bar is truly in hell.

Women aren't comparing notes on pro-social male behavior, because they have no reason to, because they're off the internet and enjoying life with their families.

Women who are mistreated by men are comparing notes, because they're miserable and trying to make sense of their shitty lives and the shitty society they're forced to exist within. Can you blame them? The mistreatment has gotten so bad that they're now avoiding men en masse. This should tell you something about the men in that society.

Men will keep screeching though, anything to avoid improving and being better fathers and husbands
Lol found the weirdo feminist.

Sorry someone hurt you, love, but collective guilt is among the dumbest of concepts people latch on to. Maybe people motivated (clearly) by feelings instead of rational thought shouldn't be representing anyone else but themselves.
 
Radical feminism was just a bunch of women coming together, sharing their stories amongst themselves, comparing notes, seeing patterns emerge, and getting angry at a society that influenced the men in their lives to be hurtful.
If feminists were capable of pattern recotnition they wouldn't be feminists.
 
I was perusing radfem twitter a few days ago-and you saw this sort of thing. "Men are all bad, the revolution will kill all men, heterosexual sex is entirely rape", Andrea Dworkin sort of stuff, and then I saw some incel comment elsewhere about how women were commenting on a hot rapist's mugshot(mulatto guy with blonde hair and chad jawline-saying they'd be fine with being raped).

The reason why the former will never gain traction (women should be entirely free from men, men are an oppressor class, men should be destroyed) is because heterosexual women still exist. Much to the rage of ugly lesbians who comprise the sort of attitudes depicted here.

The sort of women who become political lesbians and talk about being free of feminity, or even the concept of "Woman" itself as patriarchal imposition-are always the ugly, malformed and resentful. Never the hot women that get loads of dick.

I don't doubt Korea will probably decline as their sex wars seem particularly severe(we could genuinely see the North reunite the country in a century), but these sorts of feminist movements with all their seething rage and passionate misandry will fail. Why? Because women actually want sex with men. That's why.
North Korea will never get the South. Any shortfalls in the military of South Korea will be immediatly filled by the US or Japan.

The only thing that will happen is the moonies will take over. All the radfem women are isolating themselves and not starting families while some pseudo Christian sect is having mass marriage ceremonies.
wedding.jpg
What we're seeing is the Korean left wing performing ritualistic suicidd
 
NOT beating women is literally the barest minimum standard for men to meet. The bar is truly in hell.
Weird because I've never laid a hand on a woman and it never bought me any slack with the feminists I grew up subjected to.
Women aren't comparing notes on pro-social male behavior, because they have no reason to, because they're off the internet and enjoying life with their families.
Maybe they're with all the men who can clear your abysmally low bar?
Women who are mistreated by men are comparing notes, because they're miserable and trying to make sense of their shitty lives and the shitty society they're forced to exist within. Can you blame them? The mistreatment has gotten so bad that they're now avoiding men en masse. This should tell you something about the men in that society.

Men will keep screeching though, anything to avoid improving and being better fathers and husbands
I've seen what radical feminists are wont to do with male babies. The want for avoidance is mutual. Maybe all the dangerhairs who can't find a man that won't beat them are BPD/histrionic basket cases themselves?
 
I'm unsure why SK is being held as some 'Woman beating paradise!', when it's DV rate is 16%, which is literally miles below: USA, Canada, Europe (as in all of it), UK, New Zealand, Australia and pretty much every single North African or ME nation. Most nations report ~10% higher DV rates than SK. In fact, in terms of 'violence suffered by women', stranger assaults are a higher percentage than intimate partner violence in that country, (IPV is 46% of all violence against women in the country.) which puts it slightly higher as a percentage of violence than Western Europe. But the totality of violence against SK women seems to be largely stranger attacks; and the rate of actual domestic violence is lower than the rest of the rest entirely.

Obviously, your partner attacking you is never okay, and the ideal figure would be 0% intimate partner violence; but there's no indication SK is some haven for wife beating. The epidemology of who gets assaulted should also be looked at as well, since by and large in the west, violent men are repeat offenders, and predatory. If that holds true, it's not that 16% of men are violent to their wives. It's probably closer to like 5% of men are violent to their multiple different partners. These men are manipulative, and know how to game the system. It's not the 'bar is low.', it's that these women are victims of men who are practised at victimising women. If anything, not having a good example of male/female relationships opens you up (as a woman) to being more easily victimised as you have no real standard to judge your man against. The normalisation of domestic violence in modernity is not a product of a systemic effort, it's from predatory men isolating vulnerable women and escalating their behaviour without these women being able to ground what is happening to them against a good example.
 
But the totality of violence against SK women seems to be largely stranger attacks; and the rate of actual domestic violence is lower than the rest of the rest entirely.

Obviously, your partner attacking you is never okay, and the ideal figure would be 0% intimate partner violence; but there's no indication SK is some haven for wife beating. The epidemology of who gets assaulted should also be looked at as well, since by and large in the west, violent men are repeat offenders, and predatory. If that holds true, it's not that 16% of men are violent to their wives. It's probably closer to like 5% of men are violent to their multiple different partners.
It's a common phenomenon that I don't know how to name. The 'feminist influence reported oppression paradox'? Basically the stronger a presence feminist movements have within a country, the louder they scream about women being beaten or otherwise mistreated in that country, even when the reality is the exact reverse (it always is).
That's why if you go by how loud people scream, feminist high fortresses like Sweden or SK would seem to be where women are the most oppressed, and places like Saudi Arabia, Jordania, Qatar or Kuwait would be the safest havens where women have the most rights. After all, they're not complaining as much and as loudly in those countries, therefore they must be treated better, right?
Of course, if we drop the bullshit, the reality is simply that feminists, especially the ones operating out of organizations where feminist politics are their actual bread and butter that they live off of for an income, will always leverage any coverage and influence they get to paint a spectre of supposed oppression and abuse that isn't necessarily there. Every feminist (who does this for a living) will always claim that women are oppressed and abused, no matter whether they really are because if everyone collectively admitted that they're not, she'd be out of a job. So of course the more power they have, the more oppressed women seemingly are if you go by what you hear.

This is actually a really funny take on the same idea. Men collectively decide to beat women into submission and suddenly the official figure on male-on-female violence is 0%.
 
Noticing the pattern of some men beating women and not noticing the pattern of most men NOT beating women (because that doesn't fit the narrative they wanted to claim is true) is peak galaxy brain (muh poison M&Ms analogy). Exactly what you would expect from people motivated not by a search for truth but a desire to build a grievance-based collective.
You've noticed the wrong pattern. The pattern is men more likely to be violent to women than women are to men: e.g.
Most likely to beat the shit of their significant other badly enough to put them in a hospital - men
Most likely to commit rape - men
Most likely to murder their significant other - men
Most likely to be serial killers - men

It's the 21st century. Women have guns, viagra and ruffies. No reason for them not to be out raping, serial killing and murdering their spouses as well. And yet, men are 90% of the people who commit these acts. If 90% of serial killers were redheads, the conversation would be "Wtf is going on with redheads? We need to get down to the bottom of this."

But when it comes to men doing most of the violence it's just "*shrug* not all men." And then there are feminists over there providing an actual explanation, rightly or wrongly, saying it's sexism/misogyny/patriarchy and that's why you can never trust a man. If you want to get women away from the idea of patriarchy, feel free to explain why there is more violence against them, and how they can protect themselves from the wife beaters.
 
But when it comes to men doing most of the violence it's just "*shrug* not all men."
Not that anybody says this (anymore), but it's literally true. It's not most men, and we punish and stigmatize those actions especially when committed against women.

You have an issue if you're worried about the sex of the person committing violence against you before you're worried about the likelihood of violence being committed against you in the first place.

It's the 21st century. Women have guns, viagra and ruffies. No reason for them not to be out raping, serial killing and murdering their spouses as well.
Women suck at physical violence (this has always been the explanation, by the way). It's also why they kill themselves less but make their ideations more known than men do, whereas the reverse is the case for men.
 
Back