- Joined
- Dec 24, 2022
Civil wars have been fought over less than this. It’s like they want to foment civil unrest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Civil wars have been fought over less than this. It’s like they want to foment civil unrest.
This post is kinda glowing.Hope Trump's arrest is true, that "the people" rise up for him and it becomes a gigantic clusterfuck. The world is sick of your shit and needs a bit of breathing room.
It didn't happen with the 2008 banking fart or Covid it will never happen. People are lazy pussies.Civil wars have been fought over less than this. It’s like they want to foment civil unrest.
Maybe not, but can you prove what you're saying? I'm very open to being wrong on this.
As for woke, I gave HHH this definition, which I thought was better than his at least:
As the new ABA Legal Fact Check notes, the extent of a president’s legal authority to unilaterally declassify materials — without following formal procedures — has yet to be challenged in court.
There was chatter about this from outside of Trump due to government activity, so if he is wrong about it this it's on the back of that most likely as Tim Pool and others were bringing it up that it looked like they were about to arrest Trump the last couple of days.I usually don't like to feature political shit but I feel like this is really big news. If he's lying about an imminent arrest I'll be more cautious in featuring Trump-related posts in the future.
I'm not going to wholeheartedly to agree with what you posted but I do think that a lot of people are missing the point about pardons, because while he could've done more, it wouldn't amount to shit because because a lot of those protesters got dragged back into court within the last year or so and then slapped with a bunch of new federal felonies that got cooked up, meaning that any pardons would've been basically worthless.As mentioned before, McConnell, Pompeo, and other figures were threatening to have Trump removed from office and prosecuted if he pardoned Assange&Snowden. On top of that, in those last fourteen days many of those J6 Patriots weren't even charged yet, and given that The Powers That Be managed to prosecute Steve Bannon after Trump's pardon of him, they would've figured out away around a vague pardon of a crowd of people not yet prosecuted.
Trump actually has been financially supportive of J6 Patriots. In fact, the $ from the song "Justice For All" is going to their legal defenses.
Not to mention that all Trump did was tell people to visit Washington DC and *never told anyone to take a guided tour into the Capitol.*
Not to mention that every other Republican politician (aside from maybe Marge Greene, Paul Gosar, Matt Gaetz) has been far more cucky and genuinely siding with the heinous Feds: DeSantis for instance mentioned he was glad they were all being prosecuted and hasn't done a thing in support of them, various GOP Senators and Congressmen said it was a good thing Ashli Babbit got shot.
Kiwifarms faggots attacking Trump for supposedly turning on J6 Patriots is essentially a successful ploy by the Establishment to exploit the fact that Feds are persecuting innocents, to claim that the one decent political figure trying to make actual positive change is someone you should attack (as opposed to the Uniparty traitors actually worthy of scorn). Null is also a faggot for falling for this ploy.
Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon for "any crimes he may or may not have committed." Would that've held up in court? IDK. Did it stop Nixon's criminal prosecution in its tracks? Yeah.I'm not going to wholeheartedly to agree with what you posted but I do think that a lot of people are missing the point about pardons, because while he could've done more, it wouldn't amount to shit because because a lot of those protesters got dragged back into court within the last year or so and then slapped with a bunch of new federal felonies that got cooked up, meaning that any pardons would've been basically worthless.
You are correct that it is not like Monica Lewinsky but not because of different parties or different standards of the day. From the news coverage I read at the time, I was given the impression the issue was infidelity, the scandal of an affair, etc. and that religious and partisan Republicans were using it to remove a popular and successful president over something that didn't matter. That is genuinely what a lot of the media of the day presented it as. It was only relatively recently that I learned the background to it. It was a sexual assault case brought against Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky was a witness to the case. Clinton lied under oath about the nature of the relationship between himself and a sworn witness. That is what it was about.Current-day society is so degenerate that even if Trump came out and say, “Okay, I had an affair with a whore” nothing would happen. It's not like with Monica Lewinsky. In fact, he'd probably would've been cheered for being polyamorous or some shit like that.